The Immune System and Host Defense Against Infections



The Immune System and Host Defense Against Infections


Joseph B. Margolick

Richard B. Markham

Alan L. Scott



INTRODUCTION

The human immune system comprises a diverse array of cells found throughout the human body (Box 10-1) that protect it against the pathogenic effects of infectious organisms that may enter and threaten the body. The goal of this chapter is to describe (at a level appropriate for a non-immunologist) how this protection is provided. Astonishing insights into immunity have been realized in the last few decades, more than can be covered in an introductory overview chapter. Additional information is provided in feature boxes scattered throughout this chapter, along with referrals to other sources for those who may want to learn more detail. The last 30 years have been an exciting and challenging time for both immunology and infectious disease epidemiology. In this chapter, you will encounter the best of both worlds.


Research on immune functions uses many experimental methods, both in vivo and in vitro. In many cases, immunogenic cells perform the same functions in tissue culture, where they are relatively easy to measure, as they do in the body. Because these functions are generally similar across the immune systems of humans and of other animals, inferences from animal models of disease often have direct applicability to human host defense and immune function. Moreover, the advent of modern molecular microbiology and recombinant DNA methods has made it possible to isolate and characterize many of the molecules produced by immune cells that regulate and/or mediate the functions of the immune system, and also to gain insight into the functions of these molecules in animal models by inserting or deleting (“knocking out”) the genes that code for these molecules. These studies have revealed a complex and dynamic interaction between cells of the immune system and pathogens.

The immune system is traditionally considered to have three defining characteristics. First, it can discriminate between self and non-self—that is, what is normally present in the host and what is not. Second, it remembers what it has encountered (memory). Memory allows the immune system to react more quickly and effectively to a stimulus it has encountered previously. Third, it responds only to the pathogen that is at hand (specificity). In this chapter, we also explain how the immune system attains these characteristics.

Two distinct but interrelated arms of the immune system—one general and one highly specific—have evolved for the recognition of pathogens and foreign molecules. Both arms involve a complex of cell surface receptors and soluble molecules that work in concert to identify a pathogen through unique aspects of its molecular makeup, and tag it for elimination.


The first arm is designed to work within minutes after a pathogen establishes residency in the vertebrate host. It utilizes receptors that are constitutively expressed on mononuclear and polymorphonuclear phagocytic cells and on “killer” cells that recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). These receptors provide a general signal that certain types of microorganisms are present, and they initiate cellular mechanisms that can clear the foreign pathogen from the body. This ready-to-use capacity to rapidly recognize pathogens is referred to as the innate immune response. The term “innate” refers to the fact that these responses do not require time to develop but rather are ready to go at any time. The main cell types involved in innate immunity are macrophages, dendritic cells, and natural killer (NK) cells (Box 10-2 and Box 10-3). Epithelial cells also play a role in the innate immune response.

Most encounters with microorganisms and toxins are not obvious to the person who experiences them because the innate immune response is able to eliminate the threat of infection. However, in those situations where cells and molecules of the innate immune response fail to control and eliminate a pathogenic organism, the role of the innate response shifts to one of initiating, modulating, and mediating the second, highly specific arm of the vertebrate defense system—the adaptive immune response. The term “adaptive” refers to the fact that these responses take time to develop and are modified over this time to best respond to the specific infection. The cells that regulate and carry out most of the major effector functions of the adaptive immune response are lymphocytes called T cells and B cells. These lymphocytes express cell surface antigen-specific receptors that confer the inducibility and specificity that are the hallmarks of the adaptive immune response. In addition, after clearing the pathogen, the cells of the adaptive immune response develop a long-lived “memory” of the exposure that can be quickly mobilized upon re-exposure to the same antigens.



In the following review, we explore the cells and molecules that play key roles in the functions of both the innate and adaptive immune responses. The main cells involved in adaptive immunity are lymphocytes and macrophages (see Box 10-3).

Pathogens that reside inside cells pose a special challenge to the immune system, because they are not directly accessible to detection. However, cells containing pathogens are themselves altered at the cell surface, and these changes can be recognized by both the innate and the adaptive immune systems. As mentioned earlier, the innate immune system can recognize molecular patterns present on the pathogen itself. It can also recognize patterns on the surface of infected cells, which may be genetically altered as a result of being infected. For example, infection of a cell may cause a normal surface molecule to be expressed at abnormally high or low levels. This is yet another example of how innate immunity does not depend on the identity of the infecting pathogen. (Innate immunity is also triggered by non-infectious processes that affect the integrity of cells, such as heat injury, radiation, toxic exposures, or, in some cases, neoplastic transformation.)


The first step in the immune response to a pathogen is the recognition of the pathogen. It has long been known that the immune system can distinguish self from non-self or foreign antigens. How this was accomplished remained a fascinating mystery for many years, but the essential mechanisms have now been clarified, in work that resulted in at least seven Nobel Prizes.


RECOGNITION OF PATHOGENS

What does the immune system actually recognize, or react to? Substances that can trigger an immune response are called antigens. More specifically, the receptors on cells of the immune response recognize small sub-regions on each antigen, termed epitopes or antigenic determinants. A single antigen molecule can have many epitopes that can be recognized by different receptors. Epitopes can be made up of amino acids, sugars, lipids, or nucleotides. In adaptive immunity, lymphocyte receptors recognize highly unique epitopes on pathogen-derived antigens. Those antigens that are recognized during this response are not normally present in the body, because they are derived from particular molecules present in bacteria, viruses, parasites, or other organisms. In contrast, the receptors used in the innate immune response recognize pathogen-derived antigens that are not species-specific, but rather are representative of a class of microorganism, such as virus, bacteria, fungi, or parasite.

In recent years, much work has been directed at defining the precise chemical nature of antigens, including which characteristics an antigen must have to elicit an effective immune response. This work has been motivated by very practical concerns, such as the need to develop vaccines and understand immune responses to dangerous organisms.


Antigen Recognition in Adaptive Immunity: T and B Cells

The cells that are responsible for specific recognition of foreign antigens (i.e., adaptive immunity) are B and T lymphocytes (see Box 10-3). These cells have surface proteins that bind to (recognize) antigens with high specificity and affinity: each particular surface protein can bind effectively to one and only one antigen. These surface recognition proteins are called antigen receptors, and it is the precision of these receptors (they will bind to only one epitope out of all possible epitopes) that is responsible for the amazing specificity of the immune system. (Box 10-4). For T cells, the epitope is usually a small peptide; for B cells, it is frequently more than a small peptide that is recognized. When the antigen receptor binds its antigen, the B or T cell becomes activated and the immune response is initiated.







Figure 10-1 Schematic drawing of an antibody. The antibody molecule is composed of light (short) and long (heavy) chains. The N-terminus region contains the complimentarity defining regions which are highly variable giving the antibody the potential to bind to a nearly infinite number of foreign antigens. Near the C-terminus the constant region contains the FC receptor which is recognized by host immune cells and initiates further host responses against the antigen.

Both B and T cells can recognize any antigen that might possibly be encountered, including synthetic antigens that do not exist in nature. How such a vast array of receptors could exist was a puzzle to immunologists during the many years when it was believed that each unique antibody molecule was encoded by its own gene, because there is not enough DNA in the entire body to code for one gene for each possible antibody. The key to this diversity was determined first for B cells (Figure 10-1), and subsequently shown to apply to T cells (Figure 10-2) as well. One section of the receptor protein consists of relatively constant amino acid sequences that are shared by many receptors and coded for by a small number of genes. The second section is a highly variable part of the receptor
that recognizes the vast diversity of antigens which is created by allowing rearrangement of gene segments to generate a huge number of permutations (Box 10-5). The genes coding for the constant and variable segments are assembled within a given B or T cell into a single DNA sequence that codes for the final receptor molecule that will be expressed by that cell (see Box 10-7 for a more detailed description of this process).






Figure 10-2 Schematic drawing of a T-cell receptor (TCR). The complimentarity defining region (CDR) is highly variable and is joined to the constant regions which are held to the cell surface by a long cytoplasmic tail. The variable region recognizes antigens in conjunction with host MHC.

Although generated by similar mechanisms, Band T-cell antigen receptors work in different ways. The B-cell receptor recognizes antigens in their native form—that is, as they exist in nature. As a consequence, the antigen does not need to be manipulated in any way, and the B cell can recognize the antigen by itself. This is true whether the B-cell receptor, which is an antibody molecule, is attached to the surface membrane of the B cell, or has been secreted from the cell and is free of the B cell entirely.

The T-cell antigen receptor differs from the B cell antigen receptor in two ways. First, it cannot recognize native antigens. Instead, it recognizes only antigens that have been broken down into short, epitope-sized peptide fragments. This process, which is referred to as antigen processing, can occur within the cytoplasm of many types of cells, called antigen-presenting cells. The processed antigen is then carried to the surface of the antigen-presenting cell by major histocompatibility(MHC) proteins. (Box 10-6) This leads to the second major difference between B- and T-cell recognition of antigens: the T-cell receptor binds not only to the processed peptide, but also to the carrier (MHC) protein on the surface of the antigen-presenting cell. This process of re-expressing the processed antigen on the surface of the antigen-presenting cell is called antigen presentation. In other words, the T-cell antigen receptor, even though it is specific for one peptide, is also specific for one MHC protein, and T-cells recognize an antigen only if it is bound to the correct MHC protein. (Figure 10-3). For this reason, antigen recognition by T cells is said to be MHC-restricted, and antigen-presenting cells and T cells must be histocompatible for T-cell activation to occur. Because of MHCrestriction, one person’s T cells will not recognize any antigens unless they are presented by that person’s own antigen-presenting cells (or antigen-presenting cells from another person who happens to have some of the same particular MHC proteins). In summary, T-cell responses require the processing and presentation of antigens by an antigen-presenting cell to a histocompatible T cell.




MHC proteins are highly variable from person to person, and, in fact, are among the most variable proteins known (Box 10-7). It is this enormous variability from person to person that allows the immune system to distinguish self from non-self—that is, to differentiate between one’s own cells and antigens and someone else’s. Two broad classes of MHC molecules exist: Class I molecules, which are expressed on all nucleated cells in the body, and Class II molecules, which are primarily expressed by cells of the immune system (monocytes/macrophages, dendritic cells, B cells, and activated T cells). In humans, MHC proteins are also called human leukocyte antigens (HLA), and we refer to a person’s “HLA type.” MHC Class I proteins are the primary antigens responsible for graft rejection and must be expressed by a target cell for this cell to be killed by an antigen-specific CD8 T cell.1 MHC Class II must be the same on the antigen-presenting cell and the CD4 T cells for the latter to be triggered.2 In fact, all of the cells listed previously as expressing Class II MHC molecules are important antigen-presenting cells, even B cells. Of note, activated B cells can use their antigen-specific surface receptor to facilitate antigen uptake as the first step in antigen processing. For this reason, B cells can process antigens that are present in very low concentrations, and they are important cells for presentation of antigens to T cells during mature immune responses.3 However, B cells specific for a given antigen are much less numerous than other antigenpresenting cells, which explains why the non-specific antigen-presenting cells are essential.






Figure 10-3 Diagrammatic representation of the strucutral similarity between the B-cell receptor (antibody molecule) and the T-cell receptor. Both have large constant regions and smaller variable regions, with the antibody-binding sites in the variable regions. Both are composed of disulfidelinked protein chains, called heavy and light for the B-cell receptor and chains for the T-cell receptor, which also have variable and constant regions.

Because they vary so widely among individuals, the MHC proteins from different people will interact differently with the foreign proteins or peptides encountered by those individuals. Most of the antigens
associated with pathogens are complex molecules that can be degraded by antigen-processing cells into many different peptides. Among individuals with different MHC proteins (i.e., different HLA types), therefore, different peptides may bind most efficiently to a given individual’s repertoire of MHC proteins. For example, if a protein contains epitopes A and B, and individuals X and Y have different HLA types, then only epitope A may be presented by antigen-presenting cells in individual X and only epitope B may be presented by the corresponding cells in individual Y. Some individuals may have an MHC type that will not bind either of these epitopes; these individuals will not recognize this protein at all. This point means that immunizing a human population against a T-cell epitope (i.e., eliciting a cellular immune response at a population level) is much more difficult than eliciting a B-cell response, because B cells recognize native antigens, which are the same for everybody. Given the huge diversity of MHC proteins in the human population, development of vaccines that will induce general T-cell immunity represents an extremely formidable challenge. It is not a coincidence that almost all successful vaccines generated to date have depended largely on B-cell responses (i.e., antibodies) rather than T-cell responses.



Antigen Recognition in Innate Immunity

A third type of lymphocyte, termed natural killer (NK) cells, plays a key role in triggering innate immunity (Box 10-8).

The mechanism by which NK cells are triggered to kill has only recently been elucidated. Although they do not have antigen receptors, NK cells have surface receptors that inhibit their killing function. These inhibitory receptors, termed killer inhibitory receptors (KIRs), recognize abnormal levels of MHC Class I molecules on all other nucleated cells in the body. Thus, if the target cell expresses MHC Class I to a normal degree, the NK cell is not triggered and the target cell is not killed. Conversely, down-regulation of MHC Class I molecule expression (which is common in some virally-infected cells and some tumor cells) removes the inhibition of the NK cell, so that the target cell is killed.


This mechanism appears to be an important component of host defense against certain viral infections.4, 5 Many viruses interfere with expression of MHC molecules by the host cell (possibly as a means of evading cytotoxic CD8+ T-cells, which require MHC Class I molecules to be expressed on the target cell, as discussed previously). Thus, NK cells help prevent the virus from getting away with this trick. This mechanism elegantly explains the function of NK cells.

After this understanding was reached, in somewhat of a surprise, stimulatory NK receptors were discovered by researchers. The function of NK cells is regulated by the balance of signals coming from the KIR and the stimulatory receptors. It has been hypothesized that stimulatory receptors on NK cells may be important in situations in which MHC proteins are over-expressed, which is uncommon in infectious diseases but may occur in neoplastic or pre-neoplastic conditions.

Macrophages and dendritic cells have been described in Box 10-2. How do they recognize antigens? In contrast to the specific recognition of particular antigens by T-cells, as described previously, macrophages and dendritic cells recognize molecules common to multiple pathogens, or structures derived from such antigens. For this reason, antigen receptors on these cells are referred to as pattern recognition receptors (Box 10-9).6


Jul 8, 2016 | Posted by in INFECTIOUS DISEASE | Comments Off on The Immune System and Host Defense Against Infections

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access