Introduction



Introduction





INTRODUCTION

Esophageal cancer remains one of the more challenging solid tumors to treat, because it responds only modestly to chemotherapy and radiation and requires extremely complex surgery for resection and restoration of gastrointestinal continuity. Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common malignancy and the sixth most common cause of cancerrelated death in the world. The incidence of esophageal cancer has increased dramatically over the past three decades and affects more than 450,000 people worldwide.1

In the United States, approximately 17,000 patients will be diagnosed with esophageal cancer in 2017, and an estimated 15,690 will die; overall, the disease is associated with an expected 5-year survival rate of 18%.2 Multimodality strategies, prompted by poor results with surgery alone, have aimed at improving the survival of patients with localized disease. However, significant areas of discussion and controversy exist.

This chapter will help to elucidate and provide pointed recommendations to optimize the intraoperative treatment of resectable esophageal cancer so as to enhance positive outcomes as part of a comprehensive multimodality approach.


DIAGNOSIS AND CLINICAL STAGING

The diagnosis of esophageal cancer is typically made with esophagogastroscopy. A tissue biopsy is critical to rational decision-making, as is an assessment of the tumor’s size, its location within the esophagus (upper 18 to 24 cm, middle 24 to 32 cm, or lower 32 to 40 cm), and its distance relative to the gastroesophageal junction and the upper esophageal sphincter. Whether there is extension into the stomach must also be determined prior to initiating therapy.

A detailed computed tomography scan of the chest and abdomen with oral and intravenous contrast is essential to evaluate for the proximity/invasion of adjacent structures and vessels. Concern for aortic invasion may call for the addition of a magnetic resonance imaging. Employment of a positron emission tomography scan or positron emission tomography/computed tomography can help to elucidate the presence or absence of metastatic disease. An endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) study should be performed to provide the most accurate tumor depth information (T stage), for localized assessment of lymph nodes (N stage), and to assess the need for potential biopsy of clinically suspicious lymph nodes. Despite its current role, EUS has been shown to be inaccurate for T-staging, resulting in up- and down-staging of tumors.3 As such, endomucosal resection (EMR) is frequently used as a staging modality for superficial tumors that appear to be ≤T1 in depth by EUS—if the tumor is T1a, EMR may also provide definitive treatment given the low associated incidence of nodal metastasis.

Staging for esophageal cancer changed with the seventh edition of the staging manual by the American Joint Committee on Cancer and the Union for International Cancer Control, which separated algorithms for adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma and included histologic grade. With the new eighth edition, the staging of esophageal cancers was further affected by the Worldwide Esophageal Cancer Collaboration, which provided data on more than 22,000 patients, of whom 13,300 had received no preoperative therapy.4 An updated staging system table from the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition is provided in Tables I-1 and I-2.


TABLE I-1 American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Criteria for Esophageal Cancer, 8th Edition








TABLE I-1A Definition of Primary Tumor (T)









































All Carcinomas


Category


Criteria


TX


Tumor cannot be assessed


T0


No evidence of primary tumor


Tis


High-grade dysplasia, defined as malignant cells confined to the epithelium by the basement membrane


T1


Tumor invades the lamina propria, muscularis mucosae, or submucosa


T1a


Tumor invades the lamina propria or muscularis mucosae


T1b


Tumor invades the submucosa


T2


Tumor invades the muscularis propria


T3


Tumor invades adventitia


T4


Tumor invades adjacent structures


T4a


Tumor invades the pleura, pericardium, azygos vein, diaphragm, or peritoneum


T4b


Tumor invades other adjacent structures, such as the aorta, vertebral body, or airway









TABLE I-1B Definition of Regional Lymph Node (N)























All Carcinomas


Category


Criteria


NX


Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed


N0


No regional lymph node metastasis


N1


Metastasis in one or two regional lymph nodes


N2


Metastasis in three to six regional lymph nodes


N3


Metastasis in seven or more regional lymph nodes










TABLE I-1C Definition of Distant Metastasis (M)














All Carcinomas


Category


Criteria


M0


No distant metastasis


M1


Distant metastasis









TABLE I-1D Definition of Histologic Grade (G)




















Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma


G


G Definition


GX


Grade cannot be assessed


G1


Well differentiated


G2


Moderately differentiated


G3


Poorly differentiated, undifferentiated









TABLE I-1E Definition of Location (L)
























Squamous Cell Carcinoma


Location plays a role in the stage grouping of esophageal squamous cancers.


Category


Criteria


X


Location Unknown


Upper


Cervical esophagus to lower border of azygos vein


Middle


Lower border of azygos vein to lower border of inferior pulmonary vein


Lower


Lower border of inferior pulmonary vein to stomach, including gastroesophageal junction


Note: Location is defined by the position of the epicenter of the tumor in the esophagus.










TABLE I-1F AJCC Prognostic Stage Groups-Esophageal Cancer







Squamous Cell Carcinoma


In addition to anatomic tumor depth, nodal status, and metastasis (see Definitions of AJCC TNM), other prognostic factors – grade (G) and location (L) – affect outcome, and therefore staging, of squamous cell carcinoma.









TABLE I-1F-1 Clinical (cTNM)






















































When cT is…


And cN is…


And M is…


Then the stage group is…


Tis


N0


M0


0


T1


N0-1


M0


I


T2


N0-1


M0


II


T3


N0


M0


II


T3


N1


M0


III


T1-3


N2


M0


III


T4


N0-2


M0


IVA


Any


T


N3


M0


IVA


Any T


Any N


M1


IVB










TABLE I-1F-2 Pathological (pTNM)


















































































































































































When pT is…


And pN is…


And M is


And G is…


And location is…


Then the stage group is…


Tis


N0


M0


N/A


Any


0


T1a


N0


M0


G1


Any


IA


T1a


N0


M0


G2-3


Any


IB


T1a


N0


M0


GX


Any


IA


T1b


N0


M0


G1-3


Any


IB


T1b


N0


M0


GX


Any


IB


T2


N0


M0


G1


Any


IB


T2


N0


M0


G2-3


Any


IIA


T2


N0


M0


GX


Any


IIA


T3


N0


M0


G1-3


Lower


IIA


T3


N0


M0


G1


Upper/middle


IIA


T3


N0


M0


G2-3


Upper/middle


IIB


T3


N0


M0


GX


Lower/upper/middle


IIB


T3


N0


M0


Any


Location X


IIB


T1


N1


M0


Any


Any


IIB


T1


N2


M0


Any


Any


IIIA


T2


N1


M0


Any


Any


IIIA


T2


N2


M0


Any


Any


IIIB


T3


N1-2


M0


Any


Any


IIIB


T4a


N0-1


M0


Any


Any


IIIB


T4a


N2


M0


Any


Any


IVA


T4b


N0-2


M0


Any


Any


IVA


Any T


N3


M0


Any


Any


IVA


Any T


Any N


M1


Any


Any


IVB

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 7, 2019 | Posted by in ONCOLOGY | Comments Off on Introduction

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access