Intracranial Hemorrhage and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage



Intracranial Hemorrhage and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage


Timolaos Rizos

Thorsten Steiner



INTRACEREBRAL HEMORRHAGE


Epidemiology, Risk Factors and Prognosis

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is an extravasation of blood into the brain parenchyma. Hemorrhagic stroke accounts for approximately 15% of all strokes.1,2 Advances in treatment (in the context of specialized neurologic and neurosurgic intensive care units) have resulted in improved survival over the last decade.3 However, the mortality rate in patients with ICHs remains high; approximately 50% of patients die in the first 3 months,4,5,6 with half of these patients dying within the first 2 days after symptom onset.4 Moreover, ICH is associated with significant morbidity. For example, after 6 months only 20% of patients are functionally independent.4

ICH is most common in elderly persons.7 The crude risk ratio for age (every 10-year increase) was calculated to be 1.97.7 The incidence of ICH is higher in African American and Asian populations compared with whites. The Northern Manhattan Study revealed that Hispanic adults from the Caribbean and Black adults have a higher risk for ICH than whites.8 Especially in elderly patients, cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) is an important risk factor for primary ICH.31,32 Many modifiable risk factors for ICH have been identified and prevention of these factors may reduce the incidence of ICH. Arterial hypertension is one of the most important risk factors for ICH. In elderly patients and in patients with untreated or uncontrolled hypertension, the risk of ICH is doubled.7,17,18 The frequency of arterial hypertension in ICH has been estimated at 70% to 80%4 and the crude odds ratio (OR) for hypertension is 3.68.7 Although hypertension is the most important modifiable risk factor for prevention of ICH recurrence, data on optimal blood pressure control are lacking.19,20

The use of oral anticoagulation with warfarin is associated with an 8- to 19-fold increase in the risk of ICH.21,11 The risk of ICH in patients taking oral anticoagulants is estimated to be 0.3% to 3.7% per year (when the international normalized ratio [INR] is between 2.0 and 4.5).15 Each increase in INR of 0.5 elevates the bleeding risk by a factor of 1.4. The risk is particularly high in patients whose INR exceeds 3.9.22 Because of the rising prevalence of atrial fibrillation—which is the most frequent indication for long-term therapy with vitamin K antagonists— the burden of oral anticoagulant-associated ICH is expected to rise considerably over the next several years.14,15,16 Although more studies are needed, newer oral anticoagulants, including factor Xa inhibitors may reduce the risk for ICH when used for prevention of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation.23,24 Highdose aspirin has also been implicated as a risk factor for ICH risk, particularly in elderly patients with untreated hypertension.25 Aspirin use (at doses that reduce the risk of myocardial infarction and ischemic stroke) is associated with an absolute risk increase in ICH of 12 events per 10,000 persons.25 In a pooled analysis from 21 cohorts, aspirin use at the time of ICH onset was independently associated with increased mortality, but not with poor functional outcome.25 The combined use of aspirin and clopidogrel further increases the risk of ICH.25 Other risk factors for ICH have been reported, including alcohol consumption,26,7 cigarette smoking, cocaine use,7 high cholesterol level,27 Vitamin E intake, and racial variations.28,29

Age over 80 years represents a risk factor for unfavorable outcome. In addition, hematoma volume and hematoma location contribute to prognosis and outcome.9,8 Specifically, large infratentorial and deeply located hematomas have unfavorable prognoses.4 ICH associated with the use of oral anticoagulants accounts for 10% to 18% of all ICH and results in particularly high rates of secondary hematoma enlargement (up to 54% of patients) and mortality (up to 67%).10,11,12,13



Clinical Presentation

A frequent characteristic feature of ICH is the sudden onset of focal neurologic deficits during physical activity.1 Presentations of neurologic deficits depend on the bleeding location and hematoma volume. For example, a small hematoma in
the brainstem (FIGURE 73.3) may produce profound neurologic deficits, whereas a similarly sized hematoma within supratentorial structures may cause only mild deficits. Bleeding in the basal ganglia may result in sensorimotor hemiparesis on the contralateral side. Bleeding in thalamic structures typically presents with paraesthesia or sensory loss. Symptoms of patients with lobar hematomas (˜20% of ICH) include aphasia, neglect, hemiparesis, and hemianopia. Hematomas in frontal regions may lead to neuropsychological disorders. Brainstem symptoms, including diplopia, dysarthria, dysphagia, facial weakness, and cerebellar signs such as vertigo and ataxia can be observed in infratentorially located hematomas (see FIGURE 73.3). ICH in the brainstem or supratentorial ICH with impending or apparent herniation may lead to decreased consciousness and coma. In supratentorial ICH, unequal pupils with a dilated pupil on the side of the supratentorial hematoma (resulting from pinching the third cranial nerve to the clivus bone) indicates herniation of the temporal lobe (FIGURE 73.4). Clinical deterioration is frequent in ICH, often within the first 24 hours after onset of symptoms. Underlying mechanisms include hematoma enlargement, development of perihematomal edema, hydrocephalus, and seizures. As a result, continuous monitoring of vital parameters is indicated.






FIGURE 73.1 “Typically” located primary ICH in the left basal ganglia.






FIGURE 73.2 Cerebral amyloid angiopathy. In this patient, a left occipital ICH was seen on CT, subsequent MRI identified multiple CAA-related microhemorrhages (Susceptibility weighted images). In the CAA, depositions of b-amyloid in the media and adventitia of small- and mid-sized arteries can be found.






FIGURE 73.3 In this comatose patient, a brainstem hemorrhage was present. Though small in size, the bleeding caused severe symptoms including a high-grade right-sided arm paresis, ataxia, a complex oculomotoric dysfunction and dysphagia.




Conservative Treatment


General Measures

ICH is an emergency and has to be treated as such. Although treatment options are limited, advances in supportive care have reduced mortality of these patients during the last several years. Indeed, previous studies have shown that treatment at specialized neurologic units can reduce mortality and improve functional outcome.1 In these settings, patients may be continuously monitored for vital parameters and neurologic status using
standardized scores (e.g., National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, Scandinavian Stroke Scale, Hemphill-ICH-Score). Airway management including tracheal intubation and ventilation is frequently necessary in unconscious patients.52 Elevated body temperature (>37.5°C) and hyperglycemia should be avoided and rapidly treated. Further aspects of general treatment are the prevention of decubital ulcerations and infections. Early mobilization and rehabilitation are recommended for clinically stable patients.1






FIGURE 73.5 Left basal ganglia hematoma in a patient presenting with a mild hemiparesis on the right side (A). Three hours after admission, the patient was found comatose with slight unequal pupils (right < left). The follow-up CT scan revealed massive expansion of the formerly relatively small hemorrhage (B). The clinical condition further deteriorated and the patient died 26 hours after admission.


Blood Pressure Management

Arterial hypertension is one of the most important risk factors for ICH and blood pressure monitoring and management is the most important aspect of ICH treatment. In ischemic stroke, aggressive lowering of the blood pressure is associated with increased neurologic deterioration.53 However, small-volume ICH is not associated with detectable ischemic penumbra,47 and thus the risk-benefits of treating high blood pressure in this patient population may favor such intervention. Indeed, The INTEnsive blood Pressure Reduction Trial54 revealed that early intensive blood pressure-lowering treatment is clinically feasible, well tolerated, and seems to reduce hematoma growth in ICH. However, patients with severe injury (GCS 3-5) were excluded from this study, and it is still not known whether aggressive blood pressure reduction confers an improved clinical outcome. It is generally recommended that cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) be monitored particularly in patients with elevated intracranial pressures, and CPP (mean arterial pressure minus intracranial pressure) should be kept above 60 to 80 mm Hg.


Hemostatic Therapy

Previous efforts have focused on the role of hemostatic agents in controlling bleeding and preventing hematoma expansion in ICH. Most of these strategies, including tranexamic acid, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and aprotinin, have failed to demonstrate efficacy. However, the use of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) may hold more promise. A prospective randomized controlled phase IIB trial demonstrated the potential of rFVIIa to reduce hematoma expansion and to improve clinical outcome.55 A subsequent phase III trial (FAST-Trial) confirmed that 80 µg/kg of rFVIIa IV reduced hematoma expansion significantly when given within 4 hours. However, in contrast to the Phase IIB study, rFVIIa did not improve clinical outcome,56 and was associated with a dose-dependent increase of thromboembolic events.57 Additional studies are needed to determine the risk-benefit profile of rFVIIa treatment according to patient age, time to treatment, volume of ICH, and presence of IVH.58






Management of Increased Intracranial Pressure

Increased intracranial pressure caused by cerebral edema and mass effects is frequently seen in patients with high-volume ICH and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Because elevated intracranial pressure compromises CPP, it must be monitored for and treated in order to maintain a target CPP >60 to 70 mm Hg. Preventative measures include avoidance of situations that might increase the intracranial pressure (e.g., pain, fever, constipation, hyponatremia, and psychological/physical stress), treatment with sedation and analgesia, and maintenance of sufficient venous flow in the jugular veins (i.e., by positioning the head 30 degrees upright). Osmotic diuretics such as glycerol and mannitol (20%) can be used to lower elevated intracranial pressure. A risk of this approach, especially with mannitol, is excessive depletion of the intravascular volume, secondary renal failure, and rebound elevations in ICP. Therefore, serum levels of electrolytes, renal function, and osmolality must be carefully monitored (target osmolality: 300 to 320 mOsmol/L). Another approach is to administer hypertonic saline (Hyper-HAES: NaCl 7,5%; hydroxyethyl starch [HES] 6%). However, this treatment carries the risk of hypernatremia. In some patients, hyperventilation can rapidly reduce elevated ICP but the effect is transient and therefore this strategy is not useful for long-time therapy.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 21, 2016 | Posted by in HEMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Intracranial Hemorrhage and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access