Current Staging and Prognostic Factors in Melanoma




The current American Joint Commission for Cancer staging system for melanoma includes thickness, ulceration, and mitotic index as primary tumor factors for patients with stage I and II disease. Number and size of nodal metastases, presence of satellitosis and in-transit disease, and tumor ulceration status categorize patients with stage III disease. Presence and location of distant metastatic disease and increased lactate dehydrogenase level stratify prognosis in patients with stage IV disease. Factors predictive of sentinel lymph node positivity are also studied, particularly in patients with T1 melanomas, but are not always congruent with those predictive of survival.


Key points








  • In the current (seventh) edition of the American Joint Commission for Cancer staging system, tumor thickness, ulceration status, and mitotic index categorize patients with stage I and II melanoma.



  • Size (micro vs macro), number of nodal metastases, presence of satellitosis or in-transit disease, and primary tumor ulceration status categorize patients with stage III disease.



  • For stage IV disease, location of distant metastases (skin/subcutaneous/nodal vs lung vs nonlung visceral) and increased lactate dehydrogenase levels categorize patients with M1 status.



  • Other pathologic and clinical factors of the primary tumor have been reported with variable prognostic significance: presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, absence of regression, younger age, female gender, and extremity location have generally been associated with more favorable outcomes.



  • Prognostic factors for sentinel lymph node positivity overlap but are not uniformly congruent with those for survival.






Introduction


The current (seventh) edition of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for melanoma is now approaching its sixth year since publication and is based on 30,946 patients with stage I, II, and III melanoma and 7972 patients with stage IV melanoma from 17 major medical centers or independent cancer centers. This article reviews the notable changes in the current staging system compared with the last and discusses this in the context of clinical management of patients. Tumor and patient factors are discussed that do not feature in the staging system but that nonetheless carry important prognostic significance.




Introduction


The current (seventh) edition of the American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for melanoma is now approaching its sixth year since publication and is based on 30,946 patients with stage I, II, and III melanoma and 7972 patients with stage IV melanoma from 17 major medical centers or independent cancer centers. This article reviews the notable changes in the current staging system compared with the last and discusses this in the context of clinical management of patients. Tumor and patient factors are discussed that do not feature in the staging system but that nonetheless carry important prognostic significance.




Melanoma staging system


The current AJCC staging system for melanoma is shown in Tables 1 and 2 .



Table 1

Seventh edition of the AJCC TNM (tumor, node, metastasis) staging categories for melanoma




















































































T Classification Thickness (mm) Additional Stratification
Tis NA NA
T1 ≤1.00 a: Without ulceration and mitoses <1/mm2
b: With ulceration or mitoses ≥1/mm2
T2 1.01–2.00 a: Without ulceration
b: With ulceration
T3 2.01–4.00 a: Without ulceration
b: With ulceration
T4 >4.00 a: Without ulceration
b: With ulceration
N Classification Number of Metastatic Nodes Metastatic Burden
N0 0 NA
N1 1 a: Micrometastasis (identified on SLN biopsy)
b: Macrometastasis (identified on clinical examination)
N2 2–3 a: Micrometastasis (identified on SLN biopsy)
b: Macrometastasis (identified on clinical examination)
c: In-transit metastases/satellites without nodal metastases
N3 4+ metastatic nodes, matted nodes, or in-transit metastases/satellites with nodal metastases
M Classification Site Serum LDH Level
M0 No distant metastases NA
M1a Distant skin, subcutaneous, or nodal metastasis Normal
M1b Lung metastases Normal
M1c All other visceral metastases Normal
Any distant metastasis Increased

Abbreviations: LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; NA, not available; SLN, sentinel lymph node.

From Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, editors. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. 7th edition. New York (NY): Springer, 2010; with permission.


Table 2

Seventh edition of the AJCC stage groupings for melanoma




























































































































































Clinical Staging T N M
0 Tis N0 M0
IA T1a N0 M0
IB T1b N0 M0
T2a N0 M0
IIA T2b N0 M0
T3a N0 M0
IIB T3b N0 M0
T4a N0 M0
IIC T4b N0 M0
III Any T N > N0 M0
IV Any T Any N M1
Pathologic Staging
0 Tis N0 M0
IA T1a N0 M0
IB T1b N0 M0
T2a N0 M0
IIA T2b N0 M0
T3a N0 M0
IIB T3b N0 M0
T4a N0 M0
IIC T4b N0 M0
IIIA T1–4a N1a M0
T1–4a N2a M0
IIIB T1–4b N1a M0
T1–4b N2a M0
T1–4a N1b M0
T1–4a N2b M0
T1–4a N2c M0
IIIC T1–4b N1b M0
T1–4b N2b M0
T1–4b N2c M0
Any T N3 M0
IV Any T Any N M1

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 27, 2017 | Posted by in ONCOLOGY | Comments Off on Current Staging and Prognostic Factors in Melanoma

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access