Coagulopathic complications of cancer patients
Maria T. De Sancho, MD, MSc Jacob H. Rand, MD
Overview
Bleeding and thrombotic complications are common in cancer patients. The bleeding complications usually result from abnormalities in platelets or deficiency of coagulation factors and require specific blood or coagulation factor replacement. Thromboembolic events including deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism are common and associated with serious complications. New biomarkers, diagnostic imaging approached and anticoagulant therapies have significantly improved the care of these patients. Ongoing research in the understanding of the various disturbances in hemostasis, application of innovative treatment modalities, and use of appropriate thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients should lead to further decreased morbidity and improved survival.
Bleeding and thrombotic complications are major causes of morbidity and mortality in cancer patients. As a result of advances in cancer treatment, the prevalence of these complications has been progressively rising in recent years. Bleeding is common in patients with leukemias, particularly those with acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL); however, due to improved targeted therapies, early hemorrhagic deaths have decreased to 5–10% within the context of clinical trials, but not replicated in clinical practice as evidenced from recent-population-based registries.1 In general, bleeding complications occur relatively infrequently in patients with solid tumors, except those with melanoma, germ cell tumors, carcinoma of the cecum and prostate cancer,2 although carcinomas of the kidney, bladder, endometrium, and cervix may first time be recognized by bleeding. In particular, gemcitabine and bevacizumab-based therapies are associated with an increased risk of high-grade hemorrhage in patients with solid tumors.3,4 Cancer-mediated hypercoagulability occurs as a consequence of direct activation of procoagulant pathways by cancer cells. Cancer patients account for about 20% of newly diagnosed venous thrombosis events (VTEs) and in up to 50% in postmortem studies.5 This chapter reviews the physiology of normal hemostasis, and then discusses the relationship of the coagulation system and cancer, and the pathophysiology of bleeding and thrombosis in the cancer patient. Next, the diagnostic and treatment approaches to the disorders most frequently encountered in cancer patients are described. Finally, the new generation of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) such as anti-Factor Xa and anti-Factor IIa inhibitors are addressed.
Physiology of normal hemostasis
Hemostasis dependent on both cellular components and soluble plasma proteins is the physiologic mechanism that halts bleeding after injury to the vasculature. Circulating platelets adhere and aggregate at sites of blood vessel injury. Platelet adhesion is dependent on the presence of the von Willebrand factor (vWF) and is followed by an aggregation response. Activation of platelets results in a flipping of the polarity of inner and outer leaflets of the cytoplasmic membrane and consequent exposure of anionic phospholipids that serve as platforms for the assembly of blood coagulation enzyme complexes. The extrinsic pathway of blood coagulation is initiated when blood is exposed to tissue factor (TF), a transmembrane protein expressed in the deeper portions of the blood vessel wall that may also be present in stimulated endothelial cells. Thrombus propagation occurs via incorporation of active, blood-borne TF into the growing clot.6 TF binds activated factor VII (factor VIIa) and the resulting complex activates factors X and IX. Activated factor IX (factor IXa) combines with factor VIIIa to provide a second pathway to activate factor X. Factor Xa complexes with factor Va and prothrombin to form prothrombinase, which cleaves prothrombin to generate thrombin, the key enzyme in hemostasis. In the final step of the coagulation cascade, thrombin cleaves fibrinogen to generate fibrin monomers, which then polymerize. This polymer is covalently cross-linked by factor XIIIa (itself generated from factor XIII by thrombin) to form a chemically stable clot. Thrombin also feeds back to activate cofactors V, VIII, and XI further amplifying the coagulation system.7
Fibrin deposition is limited by an endogenous anticoagulant system. Antithrombin (AT) is a plasma protein member of the serpin (serine protease inhibitor) family that inhibits the activities of all of the activated coagulation enzymes particularly factors IIa and Xa. Protein C is a vitamin K-dependent protein that proteolyzes factors Va and VIIIa to inactive fragments. Protein C binds to an endothelial cell protein C receptor (EPCR)8 and is activated by thrombin bound to thrombomodulin, another endothelial cell membrane-based protein, in a reaction that is modulated by a cofactor, protein S. TF pathway inhibitor is a plasma protein that forms a quaternary complex with TF, factor VIIa, and factor Xa, thereby inhibiting the extrinsic coagulation pathway.
There has been increasing intriguing evidence that, in addition to its role in hemostasis, factor XI plays a role in venous thrombosis. This has been supported by a recent clinical trial of a factor XI antisense oligonucleotide in patients who were at increased risk for DVT because of knee replacement surgery in which this strategy significantly reduced venous thrombosis. This type of anticoagulant strategy has the possibility of yielding important clinical benefits for cancer patients as it appears that factor XI level did not need to be reduced below a homeostatic level of 20% in order to gain a prophylactic effect. It is therefore possible that this strategy may be able to reduce the rate of thrombosis without significantly increasing the risk of bleeding.9 However, this possibility will require testing in well-designed clinical trials.
The fibrinolytic system refers to a cascade of serine proteases that result in fibrin degradation and clot dissolution. The final step in this process is the conversion of the circulating zymogen plasminogen into its active form plasmin. In the circulation, this is mainly achieved by tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA). This catalysis is highly dependent on the presence of fibrin, as binding of both plasminogen and t-PA to fibrin increases plasmin generation by more than two orders of magnitude. Mechanistically, plasminogen binds to exposed lysine residues formed in fibrin and these binding sites increase in number during fibrin cleavage allowing more plasminogen binding to occur, thereby amplifying the process allowing more plasmin to be generated. Naturally occurring plasma inhibitors [α2 antiplasmin, plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI)-1, and PAI-2] also exist to limit plasmin activity or its generation in the circulation. The most potent of these is α2 antiplasmin. Plasmin is largely protected from α2 antiplasmin while bound to fibrin, allowing fibrin cleavage to occur. Other key regulatory steps occur at the level of the plasminogen activators, as the activity of t-PA and also urokinase-type plasminogen activator (u-PA), the second important endogenous plasminogen activator, are both regulated by PAI-1 and PAI-2.
The most recently described mechanism that limits the fibrinolytic system is via “thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor.” The protein, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI), is a carboxypeptidase that specifically removes exposed lysine residues from fibrin, thereby removing the ability of plasminogen and t-PA to dock onto lysine binding sites in fibrin. As it requires activation by thrombin, TAFI becomes engaged as a direct consequence of coagulation to stabilize and protect clots from premature removal by the fibrinolytic system.10
Relationship of coagulation system, inflammation, and cancer
The relationship between blood coagulation and cancer was first described in the medical literature during the latter half of the nineteenth century with Trousseau’s classic report of the association of migratory thrombophlebitis and gastric carcinoma.11 In 1878, Billroth demonstrated cancer cells within a thrombus and theorized that tumor cells were spread by thromboembolism.12 The interaction between blood coagulation and tumor angiogenesis and growth is supported by the involvement of several coagulation factors, specifically TF and thrombin in cancer neoangiogenesis, growth, and dissemination. Cancer cells or host cells in response to the neoplastic process cause local and systemic inflammatory stimuli that can switch the endothelium to a prothrombotic surface.13 Endothelial damage leads to exposure of subendothelial VWF and TF. VWF in turn induces platelet and tumor cell adhesion, with subsequent platelet activation and aggregation. TF plays a key role in the initiation of the coagulation cascade. TF is aberrantly expressed on the surface of activated endothelial cells, monocytes, and tumor cells.14 TF is upregulated in endothelium in pathologic states such as cancer as evidenced by the expression of TF and cross-linked fibrin on the endothelium of newly formed blood vessels within human tumors.15
Microparticles
Cell-derived vesicles, in particular extracellular vesicles (EVs) such as microparticles (MPs) and microvesicles, besides exosomes, are raising more and more attention as a novel and unique approach to detecting diseases.16 MPs are generally defined as 0.1 to 1 µm membrane particles that expose the anionic phospholipid phosphatidylserine and membrane antigens representative of their cellular origin. Platelet-derived microparticles (PMPs) represent the most abundant MP subtype. Their presence reflects platelet activity, physiopathology, and the thrombotic state of cancer patients. Because platelets play a key role in cancer progression, as well as formation of metastasis, PMPs also may be important in the proliferation of cancer cells, cancer cell interactions, metastatic progression, angiogenesis, and inflammation.17
While this is of great research interest and has diagnostic potential, the methodology(ies) for MP analysis has not yet been sufficiently standardized for routine clinical use. The authors of a recent consensus workshop concluded that there was significant variability among laboratories even when a common protocol was utilized.18
Bleeding disorders
Cancer can cause both quantitative and qualitative changes in platelets.19 Reactive thrombocytosis occurs in approximately 60% of cancer patients, while thrombocytopenia occurs in up to 11% of patients with untreated malignancy (Table 1).
Table 1 Hemostatic abnormalities in cancer patients
Abnormality | Mechanism |
Platelets | |
Thrombocytopenia | Marrow infiltration by tumor |
Chemotherapy effects | |
Biological response modifiers | |
Monoclonal antibodies and immunotoxins | |
Proteasome inhibitor (bortezomib) | |
Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) | |
Hypersplenism | |
Immune mediated (autoimmune, alloimmune) | |
Thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) | |
Thrombocytosis | Increased production:
|
Platelet function abnormalities | Uremia |
Acquired von Willebrand syndrome | |
Myeloproliferative disorders | |
Abnormalities in coagulation factors and clinically available coagulation activation markers | |
Hypofibrinogenemia | Asparaginase, DIC |
Dysfibrinogenemia | Hepatocellular carcinoma |
Factor X (decreased) | Amyloidosis |
Decreased coagulation factors | Impairment in hepatic synthesis, DIC, vitamin K deficiency |
Elevated D-dimer and fibrin degradation products | Inflammation, thrombosis, fibrinolysis, DIC, renal insufficiency, hepatic failure |
Elevated prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 | Disseminated malignancies, DIC |
Fibrinolysis | |
Increased secretion of plasminogen activators | Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) |
Overexpression of annexin II | APL |
Decreased levels of plasminogen activator inhibitors | Increased fibrin(ogen) degradation products and D-dimer |
Acquired thrombophilias | |
Antithrombin deficiency | Impaired hepatic synthesis of anticoagulant proteins, DIC, |
L-asparaginase, unfractionated heparin (UFH), and | |
low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) | |
Protein C deficiency | Impaired hepatic synthesis, DIC, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) |
Protein S deficiency | Impaired hepatic synthesis, DIC, VKA |
Tissue factor pathway inhibitor deficiency (TFPI) | Impaired hepatic synthesis, DIC |
Cytokines and hemostasis | |
Proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF) | Key role in tissue factor expression in monocytes and endothelial cells |
Elevated microparticles have increasingly been associated with thrombosis in cancer; however, these tests have not yet been sufficiently standardized to be useful.
DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; TMA, thrombotic microangiopathy; IL, interleukin; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.
The major bleeding problems are commonly caused by tumor invasion of blood vessels and adjacent organs, complications of treatment, and vitamin K deficiency. Bleeding in the cancer patient may present as either localized bleeding usually as a result of tumor invasion or as generalized bleeding diathesis caused by thrombocytopenia, thrombocytopathies, specific coagulation factor deficiencies, disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC), or hyperfibrinolysis.19 Appropriate treatment of bleeding in cancer patients needs to address the underlying disorder responsible for the bleeding.
Thrombocytopenia
Thrombocytopenia is the most frequent hemostatic disorder in cancer patients, occurring in approximately 10% of cases, even before starting chemotherapy. In the acute setting, thrombocytopenia is usually caused by decreased production either secondary to chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy or bone marrow infiltration, platelet sequestration in the spleen, or increased peripheral destruction, as in sepsis, disseminated DIC, and thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA)20 (Table 2). Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor used in newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma, causes a transient, cyclical, and reversible thrombocytopenia.20 Thrombocytopenia as a result of bone marrow infiltration commonly occurs in patients with small-cell lung cancer, breast cancer, and prostate cancer, as well as in patients with acute leukemia. On the other hand, thrombocytopenia secondary to splenic sequestration is usually observed with myeloproliferative disorders and less commonly with lymphomas and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Clinically evident bleeding episodes are more likely to occur when thrombocytopenia is caused by diminished production of megakaryocytes rather than by immune destruction.
Table 2 Differential diagnosis of thrombocytopenia in cancer patients
Decreased platelet production
|
Platelet destruction
|
Splenic sequestration
|
Combination of the above mechanisms |
DIC, disseminated intravascular coagulation; HUS, hemolytic uremic syndrome; TTP, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura.
May consider adding liver insufficiency as etiology of thrombocytopenia due to decrease in thrombopoietin synthesis.
The most common clinical manifestation of thrombocytopenia is mucocutaneous bleeding. This can occur in the form of petechiae, or ecchymoses, and epistaxis, oral, gastrointestinal, or genitourinary bleeding. Spontaneous bleeding usually does not occur unless the platelet count is less than 5000–10,000/mm3. However, in the presence of sepsis, uremia, trauma, or surgery, bleeding complications, including into the central nervous system, may occur with a higher platelet count.
The clinical history, physical examination, review of medications, and timing of prior chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiation therapy must be reviewed. In addition, examination of the peripheral blood smear is vital in the diagnostic work-up of thrombocytopenia. Spurious thrombocytopenia manifested by platelet clumping on the peripheral smear or platelet satellitism (platelets surrounding the polymorphonuclear leukocytes) must be excluded.
The treatment of bleeding associated with thrombocytopenia in the cancer patient is often managed empirically even when a specifically defined cause cannot be identified. Table 3 lists the critical platelet counts in various situations and general guidelines for platelet transfusion. Prophylactic transfusion of platelets is not indicated in patients who are asymptomatic for bleeding unless the platelet count is below 5000/mm3. However, in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and those with leukemia, prophylactic platelet transfusions are generally beneficial in decreasing the risk of bleeding when the platelet count is below 10,000/mm3.21, 22 For cancer patients undergoing major surgery or invasive procedures such as central venous catheterization, bronchial or endoscopic biopsy, lumbar puncture, thoracentesis, thoracostomy tube placement, and abdominal paracentesis, it is generally recommended that platelet transfusions should be administered in thrombocytopenic patients to a target level of greater than 50,000.23 For minor invasive procedures such as arterial puncture or cannulation, prophylactic transfusion is not necessary if the platelet count is at least 20,000/mm3 and local pressure is applied at the puncture site until hemostasis is achieved.23 Platelet transfusions are usually indicated in thrombocytopenic patients to keep the platelet count above 50,000/mm3 when evidence of microscopic or gross bleeding is detected, as manifested by either occult blood stool tests and mucocutaneous bleeding. The risk of central nervous system bleeding is generally low and bleeding depends on several factors such as concurrent anticoagulant therapy, etiology of thrombocytopenia, coagulation abnormalities, impaired renal or hepatic function, severe sepsis, trauma, and the use of mechanical ventilation. Subdural and intracerebral hematomas occur in approximately 2.5–5%24 and 2%, respectively, of leukemic patients following hematopoeitic stem cell transplantation.25, 26 Comparative studies show that platelets derived from single or random donors produce similar posttransfusion increments, hemostatic benefits, and side effects.23
Table 3 Critical platelet counts and recommendations for transfusion in cancer patientsa
Platelet count threshold | |
Mucocutaneous or gastrointestinal bleeding | >50,000 |
Leukemias | |
Preinduction chemotherapy | >20,000 |
Acute promyelocytic leukemia | >5000 to 10,000 |
Prophylaxis | |
Asymptomatic | >5000 |
Major surgery | >50,000 |
Invasive procedures | |
Major | >50,000 |
Minor | >20,000 |
a These are intended to serve as general guidelines. Actual treatment will vary depending on specific circumstances.
Thrombocytopathies
In addition to quantitative platelet changes, cancer can also cause qualitative platelet abnormalities. The main disorders are described in the following sections.
Acquired von Willebrand Syndrome
Several types of cancer have been reported in association with acquired von Willebrand syndrome (aVWS). Among the lymphoproliferative disorders, monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is the condition most frequently associated with aVWS. It can also be associated with multiple myeloma, Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, hairy cell leukemia, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Among the myeloproliferative disorders, essential thrombocythemia (ET) is the most common while polycythemia vera (PV) and chronic myeloid leukemia are less frequent. Solid tumors including Wilms tumors and carcinomas have also been associated with aVWS.27
The clinical manifestations of aVWS are similar to those seen in patients with the hereditary form of the disease except for the notable absence of a family history or lifelong personal history for bleeding. Spontaneous mucocutaneous and gastrointestinal bleeding may be present. Postsurgical bleeding may also occur. Laboratory screening tests generally reveal a prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and a normal or borderline prolonged bleeding time, or by prolonged closure times of the PFA-100. Treatment is directed to the underlying malignancy and supportive measures such as corticosteroids, deamino-8-D-arginine vasopressin (desmopressin acetate or DDAVP), factor VIII/vWF concentrate, and intravenous immunoglobulin.27, 28
Acquired hemophilia (factor VIII autoantibodies)
Patients with solid tumors, plasma cell dyscrasias, and lymphoproliferative disorders may develop an acquired hemophilia as a consequence of autoantibodies against factor VIII, often referred to as “acquired inhibitors.” The inhibitors are almost always immunoglobulin G (IgG) molecules. The most common presenting complaint is bleeding into the skin or muscles in patients with no previous history of bleeding diathesis. The hallmark finding is a prolongation of the aPTT in the presence of a normal prothrombin time (PT) along with plasma mixing studies that demonstrate an aPTT that remains prolonged after incubation at 37 °C for 1–2 h. In contrast, in patients with coagulation factor deficiencies, plasma mixing studies normalize the aPTT. Contamination of the blood sample with heparin, which frequently is the inadvertent result of instillation for maintaining vascular access line patency, may artifactually prolong the aPTT and affect the mixing tests. Heparin that has entered the sample may be removed in the testing laboratory with the enzyme heparinase or resin absorption, after which the plasma may be retested. The acute bleeding can be managed with desmopressin acetate if there is a low inhibitor titer [<5 Bethesda units (BU)] or with human or porcine factor VIII. Factor VIII bypassing agents such as recombinant human factor VIIa or activated prothrombin complex concentrate are used in case of moderate- to high-titer inhibitor (>5 BU). Immunosuppressive therapy such as corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, cyclosporine, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) may be used in addition to the treatment of the underlying neoplasm. Rituximab should be considered in patients who are resistant to first-line therapy or cannot tolerate standard immunosuppressive therapy.29
Uremia
Platelet dysfunction is common in cancer patients with chronic renal failure and causes significant bleeding. The pathophysiology of uremic bleeding is multifactorial and includes dysfunctional vWF, increased levels of cyclic adenosine monophosphate and nitric oxide generated by platelets, uremic toxins, and anemia that causes the platelets to be displaced from the vascular endothelium, thereby decreasing their ability to adhere and aggregate in response to endothelial damage.25 Treatment is recommended for patients with active bleeding or for those undergoing an invasive procedure, such as placement of hemodialysis catheters. Patients usually respond to hemodialysis and administration of DDAVP at a dose of 0.3 µg/kg intravenously; cryoprecipitate (10 bags given intravenously over 30 min) and conjugated estrogens (0.6 mg/kg over 30–40 min once daily for 5 consecutive days) may occasionally be required. Erythropoietin-stimulating agents such as recombinant human erythropoietin and darbepoetin have been shown to reduce and prevent bleeding in uremic patients and have a more sustained effect than either DDAVP or conjugated estrogens.30
Myeloproliferative disorders
Among the myeloproliferative conditions, PV and ET are the most likely to be associated with hemorrhagic and thrombotic complications. Thrombosis represents the initial manifestation for 12–39% of patients with ET and PV28 Increasing age (>65) and a previous history of thrombosis were identified as major risk factors for thrombosis.31 An acquired point mutation in the pseudokinase domain of Janus kinase 2 (JAK2(V617F)) is found in approximately 97% and 50% of patients with PV and ET, respectively.
Other potential determinants of thrombotic risk include cardiovascular risk factors. Leukocytosis was reported to be an independent risk factor for thrombosis and survival both in PV and ET.32, 33 All patients with PV are managed with phlebotomy and low-dose aspirin. The recommended HCT target is below 45%34 ET patients at low risk for major vascular complications should be observed without treatment. Low-dose aspirin is given in the presence of microvascular symptoms. A careful correction of concomitant cardiovascular risk factors should be pursued. In high-risk patients, hydroxyurea (HU) remains the first choice drug for most PV and ET patients requiring a cytoreductive therapy because it is the only treatment proven to be effective in reducing life-threatening thrombotic complications.34, 35 IFN-α and anagrelide may be considered in younger patients, pregnancy (for IFN-α), and in cases resistant or intolerant of HU. JAK2 inhibitors with limited side effects can be considered for patients with PV and/or ET if therapy is required.36
Coagulation factor deficiencies
Cancer patients may develop various coagulation factor abnormalities resulting from vitamin K deficiency as a consequence of malnutrition, diarrhea, liver disease, biliary obstruction, use of oral anticoagulants, and antibiotic therapy. Patients with primary or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma have deficiency of vitamin K-dependent factors (factors II, VII, IX, and X and proteins C and S), similar to that seen with liver cirrhosis. These patients almost always have increased levels of fibrinogen, unlike patients with cirrhosis or acute liver failure who have decreased fibrinogen levels. Acquired inhibitors of coagulation factors are frequently seen in multiple myeloma and other plasma cell dyscrasias.
The treatment of cancer patients with coagulation factor deficiencies, aside from the treatment of the underlying neoplasm, is generally supportive, and consists of vitamin K, fresh-frozen plasma, and cryoprecipitate. Oral vitamin K is the treatment of choice. Cryoprecipitate is administered IV, generally at a dose of 1 unit of cryoprecipitate for every 5 kg of body weight.37
Amyloidosis
Haemostatic disorders are common in amyloidosis. Laboratory abnormalities include a prolongation of the PT and the aPTT. Moreover, prolongations of the thrombin time (TT) that have been associated with hepatic amyloid infiltration and reptilase time (RT) have also been found. The PT, but not the TT, appears to be a clinically useful predictor of bleeding tendency.38
Drug effects (L-asparaginase)
L-Asparaginase is used in combination with other agents, for induction of remissions in acute lymphocytic leukemia. L-Asparaginase can cause depletion of many of the coagulation factors with an associated risk for thrombosis and hemorrhage. Levels of t-PA and PAI were increased during treatment while cross-linked fibrin degradation products remained within normal limits, excluding the presence of DIC.39
Acute promyelocytic leukemia
APL-associated hemostasis disorders result from at least two distinct mechanisms, the release of procoagulant activities and plasminogen activators from the leukemic cells. The T15–17 translocation induces hyperexpression of TF and renders the patient hypercoagulable. It appears that plasmin-dependent primary fibrinogenolysis is the major etiologic factor for low fibrinogen levels in APL patients. In vivo differentiation therapy with all-trans-retinoic acid induces a rapid decrease in plasmin activation and a normalization of fibrinogen level, and was associated with a significant decrease in TF gene expression in bone marrow cells.40 Administration of heparin in APL has been discontinued in current treatment regimens that include ATRA. Heparin has been thought to control the coagulopathy associated with APL by inhibiting intravascular fibrin formation and reducing the consumption of clotting factors and platelets, thereby decreasing the bleeding tendency.1
Thrombotic complications
The pathogenesis of thrombotic complications in cancer patients is multifactorial. In addition to the common predisposing factors for thrombosis such as immobility, venous stasis, advanced age, history of previous thrombosis, sepsis, and the use of central venous access devices, tumor cells have unique prothrombotic characteristics. Transformed malignant cells can induce platelet abnormalities, abnormal activation of the coagulation cascade, decreased hepatic synthesis of anticoagulant and coagulant proteins, fibrinolytic abnormalities, acquired thrombophilias, and expression of inflammatory and angiogenic cytokines (Table 1). Multiple biomarkers have been linked to cancer-associated thrombosis. The highest level of evidence currently exists for pre-chemotherapy-elevated platelets and leukocyte counts and low hemoglobin levels. D-Dimer is also predictive of cancer-associated VTE. Many cancer patients have elevated D-dimer levels without obvious thrombosis and there is no consensus on the cutoff levels that would be predictive of cancer-associated thrombosis. TF, the physiologic initiator of hemostasis, is widely expressed across many types of cancer. TF is released into the circulation in the form of MPs, and levels can be detected in cancer patients. There is no consensus “standard” TF assay however. Initial reports suggested a significant association of elevated TF with subsequent VTE. The majority of these data were derived from patients with specific cancers, particularly pancreatic cancer.
Several factors contribute to the increased risk for bleeding and thrombotic complications in the cancer patient (Table 4). Thrombotic manifestations in cancer patients may present as one of the following: migratory thrombophlebitis or Trousseau syndrome, venous thromboembolism (VTE), thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), arterial thrombosis, and DIC.
Table 4 Risk factors for bleeding and thrombotic complications in cancer patients
Use of indwelling catheters—Thrombosis |
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS)—Thrombosis |
Sepsis—Thrombosis and bleeding |
Prior chemotherapy and radiation treatment—Mainly bleeding but also thrombosis |
Selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs): tamoxifen, raloxifene |
Concomitant use of hormone replacement therapy or oral contraceptives—Thrombosis |
Antiangiogenic agents (thalidomide, lenalidomide, bevacizumaba, sunitinib, sorafenib) — Thrombosis |
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents—Thrombosis |
Metastatic disease to the liver and/or bone marrow—Mainly bleeding |
Vitamin K deficiency—Mainly bleeding |
Acute peptic ulcer—Bleeding |
Slipped ligatures from recent surgery—Bleeding |
a Also bleeding.
Migratory thrombophlebitis (Trousseau syndrome)
Trousseau syndrome is a classically described variant form of venous thrombosis characterized by a recurrent and migratory pattern preferentially involving superficial veins of the arms and chest.11 This syndrome should precipitate the search for an occult malignancy, especially in patients with recurrent and migratory venous thrombosis affecting unusual sites such as subclavian veins, or veins of upper extremities, axilla, or neck. Trousseau syndrome is highly associated with mucin producing adenocarcinomas.41 Its clinical manifestations also include chronic DIC associated with microangiopathy, non-bacterial endocarditis, and arterial emboli in patients with cancer. Migratory thrombophlebitis has also been associated with the use of somatostatin or octreotide therapy for malignant carcinoid syndrome.
Venous thromboembolism
VTE, involving DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE), may occur in 4–20% of cancer patients and is one of the leading causes of death. The overall incidence of cancer-related VTE in postmortem studies has been reported as high as 50%. In patients presenting with de novo idiopathic VTE, there is a high risk for a concurrent cancer, especially within the first year after the diagnosis of thromboembolism. Cancer patients at greatest risk for VTE include those with mucin-secreting tumors (e.g., pancreatic and gastrointestinal cancer), cancers of the lung, brain, prostate, breast, and ovary, and patients with APL and myeloproliferative disorders, specifically PV and ET. VTE often complicates the care of cancer patients after major surgery and of patients receiving chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy.5
The risk of developing thrombosis in cancer patients is influenced by the age and hormonal status of the patient. Postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer receiving tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors in addition to adjuvant chemotherapy have a higher risk for thrombotic events than do premenopausal women with breast cancer.42 Thromboembolic events have also been reported with angiogenesis inhibitors (thalidomide, lenalidomide, and bevacizumab).15,43 The pathogenic mechanisms of thromboembolic events associated with thalidomide are thought to be related to the development of acquired activated protein C resistance and a reduction in thrombomodulin level.15,44 Endothelial injury produced by the combination of thalidomide with chemotherapy and subsequent restoration of endothelial cell PAR-1 expression are probably factors that promote thrombosis.45 Cancer patients receiving erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia have also been reported to have increased risks of thrombotic complications.46
Major advances in the diagnosis of VTE generally—that is, not cancer-specific—include the development and validation of a standardized clinical model (Table 5)47 to determine the pretest probability of VTE and the measurement of plasma D-dimer. The integration of these two advances has resulted in the formulation of safe, diagnostic algorithms that decrease the need for serial and/or invasive testing.48 A study in oncologic patients has shown that D-dimer results have high negative predictive value and sensitivity for PE and, if negative, can be used to exclude PE in this population.49
Table 5 Wells criteria for pulmonary embolism
Variables | Points |
Previous DVT or PE | 1.5 |
Heart rate > 100 per minute | 1.5 |
Surgery or immobilization within the past 4 weeks | 1.5 |
Hemoptysis | 1 |
Active cancer | 1 |
Clinical signs of DVT | 3 |
Alternative diagnosis less likely than PE | 3 |
0–1 point: low clinical probability; 2–6 points: intermediate clinical probability; >7 points: high clinical probability for PE.
Source: Wells et al. 1997.47 Reproduced with permission from Elsevier.
As with other patients, the majority of DVT in cancer patients originate in the iliofemoral venous system. Diagnostic imaging modalities for DVT include ascending contrast venography, compression ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance venography. Ascending contrast venography remains the gold standard for diagnosing DVT, but this procedure is invasive and requires contrast material, which is frequently irritating and may result in complications. The finding of an intraluminal filling defect caused by thrombus surrounded by contrast is diagnostic for DVT. Noncompressibility of a proximal lower limb vein on compression ultrasonography has a diagnostic sensitivity rate of 97% and a specificity rate of 94%.50 Although compression ultrasonography is highly sensitive for detecting proximal DVT, it is not as accurate for diagnosing isolated distal DVT. Magnetic resonance venography has sensitivity and specificity rates of 92% and 95%, respectively, for proximal DVT.51 It is useful in diagnosing pelvic vein DVT, especially isolated iliac vein thrombosis, which is difficult to diagnose with compression ultrasonography.
Several studies conducted in cancer patients with suspected DVT have demonstrated that two of the following studies can reliably exclude DVT and decrease the need for invasive testing: a low pretest probability, a normal D-dimer level, and a normal compression ultrasonogram.47
The standard treatment of VTE outside the setting of malignancy is to initiate anticoagulation with either intravenous or subcutaneous unfractionated heparin (UFH) or subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or fondaparinux (an indirect Xa inhibitor) at therapeutic doses followed by oral warfarin therapy for a minimum of 3 months to achieve an international normalized ratio (INR) between 2.0 and 3.0.52 However, in patients with active cancer, continued anticoagulation is recommended following the first episode of VTE.52 Intravenous UFH can be started with an initial bolus of 80 U/kg followed by a continuous IV infusion of 18 U/kg/h, adjusted to maintain the aPTT at 1.5–2.5 times the control value. Alternatively, LMWH can be administered in weight-adjusted, once- or twice-daily subcutaneous doses without the need for laboratory monitoring. Warfarin therapy can be commenced within 24 h after heparin treatment is started. Heparin therapy is continued for at least 5 days until the INR is within the therapeutic range for 2 consecutive days. However, in patients with large iliofemoral vein thrombosis or major PE, some investigators have recommended extending heparin treatment to 7–10 days.
Retrospective and prospective clinical trials have demonstrated a survival advantage in cancer patients treated with LMWH for established thrombosis.53, 54 LMWHs have several advantages when compared to UFH: laboratory monitoring is rarely required, only subcutaneous injection is necessary, and there are lower incidences of bleeding, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT),55 and osteoporosis.56 The use of long-term LMWH as an alternative to warfarin therapy in cancer patients with acute VTE has been analyzed in two clinical trials. The CANTHANOX trial compared 3 months of warfarin versus enoxaparin anticoagulation in cancer patients with DVT and/or PE. Although the risk of recurrent VTE was lower in the enoxaparin group, the difference was not statistically significant. Warfarin was associated with a high bleeding rate.57 In the CLOT trial, which continued treatment for 6 months, the cumulative risk of recurrent VTE was reduced from 17% in the oral anticoagulant group to 9% in the LMWH group resulting in a statistically significant risk reduction for VTE.58 Overall, there were no differences in bleeding between the groups. Current guidelines recommend the use of LMWH for the first 3–6 months as long-term treatment of VTE in cancer patients.52 Cancer patients with recurrent VTE tend to have a short survival. Escalating the dose of LMWH has not been shown to be effective for treating cases that are resistant to standard, weight-adjusted doses of LMWH or a vitamin K antagonist (VKA).59
The use of systemic thrombolytic agents such as t-PA should be restricted to patients with massive iliofemoral DVT or massive PE and hemodynamic instability because of the significant risks of bleeding associated with thrombolysis.52 Furthermore, despite the proven efficacy of thrombolytic agents in achieving more rapid resolution of radiologic and hemodynamic abnormalities in patients with PE, studies to date have not shown any survival benefit with thrombolysis. At the present time, catheter-directed thrombolysis for initial treatment of VTE should be confined to selected patients requiring limb salvage. In general, thrombolytic therapy is contraindicated in cancer patients with brain metastases who develop VTE because of their significant risk for intracranial bleeding.60 Surgical thromboembolectomy is restricted to patients with massive PE in extremis, or who have contraindications to or who do not respond to thrombolysis.52 For cancer patients with VTE who have contraindications to anticoagulant therapy or those with recurrent VTE despite anticoagulation, placement of a retrievable or permanent inferior vena cava (IVC) filter is generally recommended. However, IVC filters are associated with undesirable side effects, such as debilitating leg symptoms caused by filter-related thrombosis.61 A recent study reported that IVC filters were safe and highly effective in preventing PE-related deaths in patients with cancer with VTE disease.62 However, patients with a history of DVT and bleeding or a metastatic/disseminated stage of disease had the lowest survival after IVC filter placement.
The major concern about treatment of VTE in cancer patients is the higher risk of bleeding and VTE recurrence compared to non-cancer patients. A prospective cohort study demonstrated that the 12-month cumulative incidence of recurrent VTE in cancer patients was 20.7% versus 6.8% in patients without cancer, and the parallel estimate for major bleeding was 12.4% versus 4.9%, respectively.63 Recurrence and bleeding were both related to cancer severity and occurred predominantly during the first month of anticoagulant therapy and, remarkably, could not be explained by sub- or overanticoagulation. The risk of recurrent VTE has been reported to be two- to threefold higher and the risk of major bleeding is three- to sixfold higher in cancer patients than in patients without cancer.58
Routine anticoagulant prophylaxis for central venous catheters is not recommended.64 Recombinant t-PA is effective in restoring flow to indwelling catheters occluded by thrombus.65 Perioperative cancer patients, particularly those with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy or on selective estrogen receptor modulators and patients with advanced cancers that are associated with high risk of VTE such as brain tumors, and colorectal, pancreatic, lung, renal cell, and ovarian adenocarcinomas, should receive antithrombotic prophylaxis with intermittent pneumatic compression devices or compression elastic stockings and LMWH. The recommended doses are dalteparin 5000 U SC daily, enoxaparin 40 mg SC daily, or fondaparinux 2.5 mg SC starting 8–12 h postoperatively.64, 65 Two trials in cancer patients undergoing surgery reported that continuation of LMWH prophylaxis for 3 weeks after hospital discharge reduced the risk of late venographic DVT by 60%. Finally, cancer patients who are immobile or bedridden with an acute medical illness also should receive antithrombotic prophylaxis with low-dose UFH or LMWH. However, ambulatory cancer patients do not require VTE prophylaxis. Cancer patients receiving chemotherapy or hormonal therapy also do not require routine primary thromboprophylaxis.66 Of note, thromboprophylaxis with aspirin, warfarin, or LMWH is widely used by clinicians for patients with multiple myeloma receiving thalidomide or lenalidomide in combination with chemotherapy or high-dose steroids.67, 68
General prophylaxis and treatment
A recent consensus clinical practice guideline from ASCO described recommendations for VTE prophylaxis and treatment in patients with cancer, and based on a systematic review of the literature recommended that most hospitalized patients with cancer require thromboprophylaxis throughout hospitalization. Thromboprophylaxis was not routinely recommended for outpatients with cancer. It may be considered for selected high-risk patients. Patients with multiple myeloma receiving antiangiogenesis agents with chemotherapy and/or dexamethasone should receive prophylaxis with either LMWH or low-dose aspirin. Patients undergoing major cancer surgery should receive prophylaxis, starting before surgery and continuing for at least 7–10 days. Extending prophylaxis up to 4 weeks should be considered in those with high-risk features. LMWH is recommended for the initial 5–10 days of treatment for deep vein thrombosis and PE as well as for long-term (6 months) secondary prophylaxis. Use of novel oral anticoagulants is not currently recommended for patients with malignancy and VTE.66
Anticancer effects of anticoagulation treatment
Experimental and indirect clinical evidence suggests that anticoagulants, particularly LMWH, may have antineoplastic effects. It has been suggested that anticoagulants can interfere with tumor angiogenesis, proliferation potential of cancer cells, and the immune system by augmenting the antitumor activity of tumor necrosis factor and interferon mediated by NK cells.69 Anticoagulants may also interfere with the various stages of the metastatic cascade.
Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT)
HIT is an immune-mediated thrombocytopenia that occurs in approximately 1–5% of patients receiving heparin.70 The decrease in platelet count typically occurs 5–10 days after starting heparin but may develop within 24 h if there has been exposure to heparin during the preceding 3 months. Occasionally, the platelet count starts to fall only after heparin has been stopped (delayed-onset HIT). The frequency of HIT varies according to the type of heparin preparation (bovine UFH > porcine UFH > LMWH), the exposed patient population (postoperative > medical > pregnancy), and gender (female > male).70 HIT is caused by heparin-dependent, platelet-activating antibodies that recognize platelet factor 4 (PF4) bound to heparin. The resulting platelet activation is associated with increased thrombin generation. Venous or arterial thromboses including deep venous thrombosis, PE, limb artery thrombosis, thrombotic stroke, and myocardial infarction can occur. A clinical pretest probability score known as the 4T’s (degree of thrombocytopenia, timing of thrombocytopenia, other etiologies of thrombocytopenia, and thrombosis) is useful in clinical practice. HIT should be suspected and treatment rapidly instituted in a patient with an intermediate of high test probability.71 In clinical practice, the laboratory diagnosis of HIT is made with a positive PF4-dependent immunoassay. Management consists of discontinuing all forms of heparin and using direct thrombin inhibitors such as lepirudin or argatroban, which do not have any cross-reactivity to HIT antibodies. For patients receiving warfarin at the time of diagnosis of HIT, reversal of warfarin anticoagulation with vitamin K is recommended.
Thrombotic microangiopathies
TMAs involve hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, neurologic symptoms, renal dysfunction, and fever. The majority of these cases are reported in patients with adenocarcinoma, particularly gastric cancer; however, TMA also occurs in patients with breast cancer and lung cancer, and in Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas.72 Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura/hemolytic uremic syndrome also occurs in association with cancer chemotherapy, especially with mitomycin C, bleomycin, cisplatin, and tamoxifen,73 use of cyclosporine,74 and interferon,75 after hematopoeitic stem cell transplantation,76 and with Sunitinib maleate, an oral multitargeting tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma.77
The pathophysiology of cancer-associated TMA is postulated to be similar to that of usual primary TMA. It involves injury to vascular endothelium with release of ultralarge vWF multimers due to a deficiency of a vWF-cleaving protease (ADAMTS-13) causing platelet aggregation.78, 79
Typically, the microangiopathic hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia are severe and reticulocytosis is usually present, with increased levels of lactic acid dehydrogenase, reflecting intravascular hemolysis. The peripheral blood smear demonstrates numerous schistocytes. Renal failure and neurologic and pulmonary dysfunction are common. Standard treatment of TTP is plasmapheresis. Other treatment modalities that may be used in refractory cases include vincristine, intravenous gamma globulin, rituximab, and splenectomy.80–82 Platelet transfusions are usually contraindicated because infused platelets may amplify the extent and severity of the formation of microvascular thrombi. Regardless of treatment, the prognosis of cancer patients with TMA is generally poor.
Arterial thrombosis and nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis
The association between arterial thrombosis and cancer is less well described. Isolated cases have been reported and chemotherapy has been implicated as a cause.83 The selective estrogen receptor modulators tamoxifen and raloxifene increase the risk of stroke,84 especially in postmenopausal women at increased risk for coronary events and in current smokers.85 Importantly, patients with acute ischemic stroke in the setting of active cancer (especially adenocarcinoma) have a significant short-term risk of recurrent ischemic stroke and other types of thromboembolism.86
Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis (NBTE) represents a form of consumptive coagulopathy most commonly seen with adenocarcinomas of the lung and pancreas. The diagnosis should be suspected in any cancer patient who presents with ischemic embolic events. Echocardiography is diagnostic with the finding of sterile thrombotic vegetations on cardiac valves. In addition to valvular vegetations, ventricular segmental wall motion abnormalities resulting from silent embolization to the coronary arteries have been reported in 18% of cancer patients with NBTE. Management is essentially supportive and consists of treatment of the underlying cancer and anticoagulant therapy with unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin.
Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)
DIC is a clinicopathological syndrome that complicates patients with malignancy. Patients with solid tumors (prostate, pancreas, lung, stomach, colon, and breast) and those with leukemia, especially APL, may be complicated by DIC that is manifested primarily by bleeding. Patients with hematologic malignancies often present with a state of chronic DIC in the absence of active thrombosis and/or bleeding. The bleeding disorder in APL is thought to be due to the abnormally high levels of expression of annexin A2 on APL cells, which leads to increased production of plasmin and ensuing bleeding from unopposed fibrinolysis. Annexin A2 is a phospholipid-binding protein on the surface of endothelial cells that serves to bind plasminogen and its activator, tPA. In APL cells, the t15–17 translocation induces hyperexpression of TF in the leukemic cell, linking the primary oncogenic event with induction of hypercoagulability.87
Plasma MP-associated TF procoagulant activity may play an important pathogenic role in the evolution of overt DIC in various types of malignancy.88
The thrombotic disorders associated with DIC include recurrent venous thrombosis, peripheral arterial thrombosis, cerebrovascular thrombosis, disseminated arterial disease with organ failure, peripheral limb ischemia, and gangrene. Chronic forms of DIC are characterized by less florid clinical findings and more subtle, but persistent, laboratory abnormalities. Metastatic cancer is a common cause of chronic DIC. Over time, approximately 25% of patients with metastatic cancer develop a thrombotic event. In cancer patients, the diagnosis of DIC is made clinically and corroborated by a constellation of laboratory abnormalities (Table 6).89 There is no single laboratory test that can establish or exclude the diagnosis of DIC. In most cases, a combination of tests in a patient with a clinical condition that is associated with DIC can be used to diagnose the disorder with reasonable certainty. In the presence of an underlying disease associated with DIC, an initial platelet count of less than 100,000/mm3 or a rapid decline in the platelet count and prolongation of the PT and aPTT is seen in about 50–60% of cases of DIC, and the presence of fibrin(ogen) degradation products and D-dimers in plasma. Fibrinogen levels may remain in the normal range in the face of its consumption because of increased synthesis of this acute-phase reactant. A finding of hypofibrinogenemia is only useful diagnostically in very severe cases of DIC. The peripheral blood smear may also demonstrate the presence of red cell fragmentation or schistocytes, but rarely >10% of the red cells. Soluble fibrin (SF) monomer, which is only generated intravascularly, is a sensitive but not specific test for the diagnosis of DIC.90 There appears to be no added value measuring the natural anticoagulant protein C and/or AT.91 The International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) sub-committee of the Scientific and Standardization Committee (SCC) on DIC has recommended the use of scoring system for overt DIC.91 The sensitivity and specificity of the ISTH overt DIC score are 91% and 97%, respectively.92 It is important to repeat the tests to monitor the dynamically changing scenario based on the laboratory results and clinical manifestations.
Table 6 Abnormalities in cancer patients with disseminated intravascular coagulation
Thrombocytopenia |
Prolongation of PT and aPTT |
Hypofibrinogenemiaa |
Decreased levels of factors V and VIIIb |
Presence of fibrin(ogen) degradation products and D-dimerc with secondary interference with fibrin polymerization and platelet aggregation |
Presence of schistocytes or fragmented red blood cells in the peripheral blood smear indicating microangiopathic hemolysis |
a Fibrinogen levels may remain in the normal range despite consumption because of increased production: a finding of hypofibrinogenemia is only useful diagnostically in very severe cases of DIC.
b Factor VIII levels may be increased in some patients with early DIC because of thrombin activation of factor VIII.
c Plasma D-dimers are specific cross-linked fibrin derivative generated when the endogenous fibrinolytic system degrades fibrin.
In general, the treatment of DIC is directed against the underlying cancer but supportive management to the bleeding or thrombotic manifestations is required. Cancer patients with DIC who are bleeding or at high risk for bleeding (patients undergoing surgery or invasive procedures) should receive platelet transfusions to maintain the platelet count greater than 50,000/μL and FFP (initial doses of 15 mL/kg, although a dose of 30 mL/kg produces a more complete correction of coagulation factor levels) if the PT or aPTT is prolonged. The administration of purified coagulation factor concentrates in DIC is not generally recommended unless patients are fluid overloaded and cannot receive FFP. Coagulation factor concentrates contain only specific factors, whereas in DIC, there is a global deficiency in coagulation factors. Severe hypofibrinogenemia (<1 g/L) needs to be treated with cryoprecipitate or fibrinogen concentrates if available. A dose of 3 g would raise plasma fibrinogen by 1 g/L, this can be given as two cryoprecipitate pools (10 donor units) or as 3 g of a fibrinogen concentrate. The response to the supportive transfusion therapy should be monitored clinically and with laboratory tests.89 The bleeding associated with DIC in APL oftentimes responds dramatically to treatment with all-trans-retinoic acid.86
Although there are no clinical randomized controlled trials demonstrating that the use of heparin in patients with DIC results in improved clinical outcome, intravenous heparin may be used in cancer patients with DIC-associated thrombosis for stabilization while the cancer is being treated unless moderate to severe thrombocytopenia or bleeding is present. The recommended dose of heparin is 10 U/kg/h by continuous IV infusion without a loading dose. Monitoring aPTT may be complicated but monitoring for signs of bleeding is important. In critically ill, nonbleeding patients with DIC, pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with either unfractionated or low-molecular-weight heparin is recommended.89 In general, patients with DIC should not be treated with antifibrinolytic agents. However, in patients with DIC and bleeding secondary to primary fibrinolysis (e.g., prostate cancer), the fibrinolytic inhibitor, epsilon aminocaproic acid, can be administered with an initial IV loading dose of 4–6 g over 1 h followed by an IV infusion of 1 g/h while monitoring the clinical response. The recommended oral dose of aminocaproic acid is 50–60 mg/kg every 4–6 h.93 However, in those patients with a primary thrombotic presentation and secondary fibrinolysis, fibrinolytic inhibitors should be avoided until the thrombotic process is controlled.89
Drugs for treatment of bleeding and thrombotic disorders
Recombinant factor VIIa
Recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) is FDA approved for patients with bleeding secondary to hemophilia A or B who have inhibitors against factors VIII and IX and in patients with hereditary factor VII deficiency.94 It has also been shown to be effective in controlling bleeding due to thrombocytopenia, thrombocytopathies, acquired coagulation factor deficiencies, and in patients undergoing cancer surgery. There is increasing evidence on the use of rFVIIa in patients with hematological malignancies and in patients who develop critical bleeding associated with hematopoeitic stem cell transplantation.95
Thrombopoietin receptor agonists
Thrombopoietin receptor agonists (TPO-RAs), romiplostim and eltrombopag, are FDA approved to increase platelet counts in patients with chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). They have shown benefit in splenectomized and nonsplenectomized patients. TPO-RAs are approved to treat thrombocytopenia in the setting of hepatitis C and cirrhosis and recently in aplastic anemia. Both agents, although not licensed yet, have efficacy in the treatment of MDS and in nonmyeloablative chemotherapy. Short-term efficacy and safety are well documented and long-term efficacy and safety are emerging. Potential risks include thrombosis, myelofibrosis, development of hematologic malignancies, and liver toxicity with eltrombopag.96
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs)
Oral direct factor Xa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban and oral direct thrombin inhibitors such as dabigatran are being used in clinical practice for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in the setting of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and for the prevention and treatment of VTE. In the context of cancer patients, current clinical practice guidelines all recommend the use of therapeutic doses of LMWHs for the initial and long-term treatment of cancer-related thrombosis. The use of vitamin K antagonists (VKA) is acceptable if LMWH is not available. For the long-term treatment of VTE in patients with cancer, LMWH compared with VKA reduces venous thromboembolic events but not mortality. The decision for a patient with cancer and VTE to start long-term LMWH versus oral anticoagulation should balance the benefits and harms and integrate the patient’s values and preferences for the important outcomes and alternative management strategies.
DOACs have been shown to be comparable to conventional therapy for the acute treatment of VTE but their efficacy and safety in cancer patients remain uncertain. Their use cannot be supported until trials comparing them with LMWH are available.97, 98
Summary
Bleeding and thrombotic complications are common in cancer patients. Significant advances in the understanding of the interrelationship between cancer, blood coagulation, and tumor angiogenesis have occurred in recent years. Bleeding complications usually result from abnormalities in platelets or deficiency of coagulation factors and require specific blood or coagulation factor replacement. Thromboembolic events including deep venous thrombosis and PE are not only common but also serious complications seen in cancer patients. Advances in novel biomarkers, diagnostic imaging, and availability of newer anticoagulant agents have greatly facilitated the care of these patients. Ongoing research in the understanding of the various disturbances in hemostasis, application of innovative treatment modalities, and use of appropriate thromboprophylaxis in cancer patients should ultimately lead to decreased morbidity and improved survival.