Cancer and pregnancy

Cancer and pregnancy


Jennifer K. Litton, MD



Overview


The diagnosis of cancer during pregnancy is a clinical and emotional challenge for both the patient and the caregivers. A multidisciplinary approach including medical oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, and obstetrics is vital to coordinate the treatment of the mother and the monitoring of the fetus. The available data regarding the treatment of cancer during pregnancy, including staging, surgery, radiation, and systemic therapy as well as outcomes for the patients and the children exposed to chemotherapy in utero is reviewed.






The diagnosis of cancer during pregnancy presents a complex set of challenges for the patient, family members, and physicians. The welfare of the mother may be perceived to be threatened by the pregnancy owing to concerns regarding the disease, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures required for treatment, and a desire to avoid harm to the fetus during treatment for the mother’s malignancy. Many have perceived that treatment may require compromise of the wellbeing of either the mother or the fetus. However, in some circumstances, fetal death may be an unavoidable consequence of cancer treatment. Frequently, however, judicious decision making not only can provide appropriate cancer care for the pregnant woman but also will preserve the pregnancy through successful labor and delivery.


Many issues arise in the realm of concurrent cancer and pregnancy (Table 1). The data for specific tumor types, diagnostic procedures, therapeutic interventions, and long-term cancer outcomes have been derived primarily from case reports, small case series, and retrospective reviews. Controlled studies are rare, and prospective data is even rarer. Data on labor and delivery outcomes for patients completing pregnancy remains scarce, as are long-term data on growth and development of children exposed to cancer treatment in utero. Over the past decade, the treatment for cancer during pregnancy has evolved and is now within guidelines of care for several tumor types as cohort descriptions and prospective case series have been reported.1 With that, there is emerging data on outcomes of patients as well as small, but emerging data on the children exposed to chemotherapy in utero.


Table 1 Issues related to cancer and pregnancy

























Impact of cancer on pregnancy
Impact of pregnancy on cancer
Termination of pregnancy/fetal death with cancer treatment
Diagnostic procedures and staging during pregnancy
Cancer treatment, maternal effects
Cancer treatment, fetal effects
Placental metastasis
Transplacental malignancy
Long-term outcome for children
Ethical, moral, and legal concerns
The UNKNOWN

Cancer and pregnancy epidemiology


The diagnosis of cancer during pregnancy is rare and tracking the true incidence remains challenging. Much of the data includes pregnancy-associated breast cancers, defined as those cancers diagnosed both during pregnancy and within the 1-year period after delivery. With emerging data that biology and outcomes may be influenced by the timing of diagnosis, evaluating and reporting these incidences separately may be important. Smith et al.2 used the California Cancer Registry, evaluating 4,846,505 women of whom 4539 had an identified invasive malignancy either during pregnancy or within 12 months after delivery. In this analysis, cancer occurred in approximately 1 in 1000 deliveries from 1991 through 1999. However, 64% of these cases occurred within the 12 months after delivery. Per 1000 live singleton births, the most common tumor types were breast (0.19), thyroid (0.14), cervix (0.12), melanoma (0.09), Hodgkin’s disease (0.05), ovarian leukemia (0.05), and acute leukemia (0.04). In an Australian linkage study between 1994 and 2008, 1798 pregnancy-associated cancers, encompassing diagnoses both during and within 1 year from delivery, were identified in 1,309,501 deliveries.3 Four hundred and ninety five of these cancers were identified during pregnancy. During pregnancy, the most common cancer identified in this cohort was melanoma (15.1/100,00), breast (7.3/100,000), thyroid (3.2/100,000), and gynecological (3.9/100,000). However, cancer from nearly any anatomic location can occur with pregnancy.


Interestingly, in this study from Australia, and others, the incidence of pregnancy-associated breast cancer has been increasing. This may be secondary to increasing maternal age as well as other changes in epidemiological risk factors. In the Australian cohort, from 1994 to 2007, the incidence of pregnancy-associated breast cancer increased from 112.3 to 191.5/100,000 deliveries. A Swedish registry also showed a trend to increasing incidence that may be partially explained by advancing maternal age, with an increase of 16.0 to 37.4 cases per 100,000 deliveries from the beginning to the end of cohorts collected from 1963 to 2002.4 This may also be influenced as further advances in reproductive technologies are making pregnancies more accessible to older women.


Diagnosis and staging


A biopsy, with review of cytologic and histologic materials, is required for the diagnosis of any malignancy during pregnancy. The type of biopsy is determined by the accessibility of the disease site and the quantity of material required.


If a surgical biopsy if required, the anatomic location of the biopsy and the gestational age of the fetus are factors to be considered before proceeding. A surgical biopsy can be performed safely.1, 5, 6 It is imperative that adequate material for pathologic diagnosis and required studies be obtained; for example, hormone receptors and HER-2/neu status are necessary for the proper evaluation of breast cancer, and morphologic and immuno-phenotyping of lymphomas and leukemias is essential to their optimal assessment and treatment.


Staging provides guidance for discussions regarding cancer prognosis, recommended loco-regional and/or systemic therapies, and potential risks of treatment in relation to benefit and outcome for the patient. Frequently, staging assessment in the non-pregnant patient involves exposure to ionizing radiation, which is to be avoided whenever possible during pregnancy. The impact of radiation upon the fetus varies with respect to fetal gestational age. Pre-implantation and fetal organogenesis are most sensitive to the negative effects of radiation exposure.7 Fetal exposures of < 5 cGy are not thought to be harmful.8 With abdominal computerized tomography, exposure may be as high as 30 mSv. As a consequence of known fetal toxicity associated with exposure to ionizing radiation during pregnancy, abdominal shielding and non-ionizing techniques should be used whenever possible during these imaging procedures.8 Ultrasonography (US) for breast, liver, and other abdominal organ imaging can also contribute to the staging evaluation without ionizing radiation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can be used to assess for bone and liver diseases, as well as fetal abnormalities, if required.9, 10 The use of gadolinium as a contrast agent for MRI during pregnancy remains controversial. Although multiple case reports have not demonstrated an increase in adverse effects to the fetus, gadolinium is often avoided if possible owing to lack of toxicity information.11–13 Accurate determination of disease stage is essential in ensuring accurate cancer treatment decisions, and findings during the staging process also may influence the woman’s decision regarding the maintenance of her pregnancy.


The use of PET/CT scanning has become standard in the treatment and evaluation of lymphomas and has had an increase in use in evaluation of metastatic disease in solid tumors as well. There is very limited data regarding the use of PET/CT in the pregnant breast cancer patient. Evidence that FDG crosses the placenta and can accumulate in fetal brain, bladder, and cardiac tissue has been demonstrated in animal studies.14 Zanotti-Fregonara et al.15 estimated that the FDG uptake by embryo tissues in early pregnancy is at least 3.3E-2mGy/MBq in a patient found to be pregnant at the time of scanning. Few other case reports exist. Hove et al.16 describe an 18-year-old woman with Hodgkin’s disease who underwent PET/CT. There was significant uptake in the fetal myocardium. The patient developed HELLP syndrome and the child was delivered at 31 weeks by caesarian section. Therefore, there is insufficient safety data to support the use of PET/CT scanning during pregnancy and should be delayed until after delivery whenever possible.


Cancer treatment during pregnancy


The optimal treatment of cancer during pregnancy requires a meticulously coordinated multidisciplinary approach. Careful and repeated consultations with the obstetrician and/or maternal fetal medicine specialist are essential during the course of the pregnancy. Accurate assessment of fetal age, maturation, and the expected delivery date must be performed before treatment planning. The therapeutic options for the pregnant patient do not differ from those of the non-pregnant patient with cancer, but the application of treatment may be more complex. When evaluating multiple tumor types during pregnancy, Stensheim et al.17 described 516 women from Norwegian health registries with no difference identified in cause-specific death. However, it is interesting to note that when diagnosed instead during lactation, there was an increase in both breast and ovarian death rates. Outcomes in large cohorts are otherwise described with cancer-specific sites and the timing and treatment are important in relation to the outcomes of the patient.


Surgery


Surgery remains the mainstay for treatment of solid tumors, and pregnancy is not a contraindication for cancer surgery. Mazze and Kallen6 have reported on a registry series of 5405 pregnant patients on whom emergency surgery was performed. They did not observe an increased incidence of congenital malformations or stillbirths in women who had surgical procedures while pregnant. An increased frequency of low- and very low birth-weight infants was noted and attributed to prematurity and intrauterine growth retardation and may have been influenced by the underlying reason behind the necessary surgery. No specific type of surgical procedure or anesthesia was associated with an increase in adverse reproductive outcomes. In a case-control study, Duncan et al.18 did not observe an increase in congenital anomalies in 2565 pregnant women who had surgery while pregnant, when compared to control patients who did not have surgery. If warranted by tumor type and disease stage, surgery should proceed and should be coordinated with the obstetrician, anesthesiologist, and neonatal specialist.


Radiation


Pregnancy has been considered an absolute contraindication to radiation therapy for cancer. Radiation therapy for cervical cancer during pregnancy usually leads to fetal death and spontaneous abortion.19 The fetus is most sensitive to malformation from radiation exposure 2 to 8 weeks after conception, whereas exposure from 8 to 25 weeks of gestation may have a greater risk of mental retardation.7 Nevertheless, successful radiation therapy of pregnant women with Hodgkin’s disease has been reported.20 If radiation is warranted, appropriate fetal shielding, careful dosimetry calculations, and estimates of fetal dose exposure are necessary. However, owing to the very limited safety, data should be considered only in very select cases.21–25 Radiation therapy for breast cancer, following mastectomy or breast conservation surgery, can usually be delayed until the postpartum period, especially if chemotherapy is administered.


Systemic therapy


Many different agents have been reported to have been used in pregnancy. Representative chemotherapeutic, hormone, and biologic agents are listed in Table 2.


Table 2 Drugs reported to have been used during pregnancy


































































































Regimens Systemic therapies
MACOP-B Hydroxyurea α-Interferon
MOPP-ABVD All-trans retinoic acid Rituximab
FAC Methotrexate Trastuzumab
CMF Doxorubicin/epirubicin Lapatinib
AC Cyclophosphamide and nitrogen mustard Imatinib
VACOP-B Vincristine and triethylene melamine Prednisone
CHOP Bleomycin Tamoxifen
BEP Cisplatin Erythropoietin
Vinorelbine, vinblastine, and vincristine Filgrastim
Paclitaxel Dasatinib
Docetaxel
Etoposide
Idarubicin and daunorubicin
Cytosine-arabinosine
5-Fluororucil, busulfan
Teniposide
6-Mercaptopurine
Dacarbazine
Aminopterin
Actimomycin D
Procarbazine
Amsacrine
L-asparaginase

ABVD, Adriamycin (doxorubicin), bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine; AC, Adriamycin (doxorubicin) and cyclophosphamide; CMF, cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil; FAC, 5-fluorouracil, Adriamycin (doxorubicin), and cyclophosphamide; MACOP-B, methotrexate, Adriamycin (doxorubicin), cyclophosphamide, Oncovin (vincristine), prednisone, and bleomycin; MOPP, mechlorethamine, Oncovin (vincristine) procarbazine, and prednisone; and VACOP-B, VePesid (etoposide), Adriamyicn (doxorubicin), cyclophosphamide, Oncovin (vincristine), prednisone, and bleomycin.


Systemic therapy is of concern because of the potential deleterious effects on the fetus. Physiologic changes associated with pregnancy (elevated blood volume, increased cardiac output, amplified glomerular filtration rate, and changes in circulating protein levels) make predictions about drug pharmacokinetics uncertain at best.26 In addition, systemic agents are designed to be anti-proliferative compounds, and their administration during pregnancy poses genuine risk to the developing fetus. Potential concerns include stillbirth, spontaneous abortion, fetal malformations/teratogenesis, organ-specific toxicities, intrauterine growth retardation with low birth weight, and premature delivery.27


In addition to cytotoxic therapy, there are also reports regarding supportive medications. Erythropoietin use during pregnancy was reported by Scott et al.28 as well as others. No maternal or fetal toxicities have been noted. FDA Black Box warnings about the use of erythropoietin in breast cancer patients would apply to the pregnant patient as well, even in the absence of specific risk data in these patients. Dale et al.29 found that the use of filgrastim during pregnancy was not associated with a change in neonatal outcome, when compared to untreated patients. There have been limited case reports of the safe use of pegfilgrastim during pregnancy after dose-dense chemotherapy for breast cancer.30 Dexamethasone and lorazepam have also been reported as premedications without significant toxicity.9


Outcomes in the children exposed to chemotherapy in utero


The fetal risks related to chemotherapy appear to be greatest during the first trimester of pregnancy. Doll et al.27 reviewed antineoplastic agents and fetal malformations in relation to the trimester of pregnancy. They reported that in utero exposure to systemic agents was associated fetal malformation risks of 14% and 19% for alkylating agents and antimetabolites, respectively. A similar review of second- and third-trimester exposure demonstrated a 1.3% incidence of fetal malformation. Thus, they concluded that single-agent or combination chemotherapy could be given during the second and third trimesters with low risk of fetal malformation, but these agents should be avoided during the first trimester of pregnancy. Similarly, in a review of cytotoxic agents used during pregnancy, Ebert et al.26 collected 217 cases from the literature published between 1983 and 1995. They classified the use of the agents by disease category and analyzed outcome of pregnancy in relation to agent, dose, and gestational age at exposure. There were 94 cases of leukemia, 57 cases of lymphoma, 26 cases of breast or ovarian cancer, 16 cases of cytotoxic therapy used for rheumatic diseases, and the remainder of the malignancies. Eighteen newborns were reported to have congenital developmental abnormalities. Of these 18 newborns, 15 neonates had been exposed to cytotoxic drugs during the first trimester. Chromosomal abnormalities were noted in two neonates who had experienced exposure to cytotoxic agents during the first trimester.26 Antimetabolite use was found in 50% of the neonates with congenital abnormalities following first trimester exposure to chemotherapy. Of the reviewed cases, 82.3% of leukemia patients, 75.4% of lymphoma patients, and 75% of breast or ovary cancer patients with associated pregnancies were reported to have live births with normally developed neonates. Germann et al.31 collected data involving 160 patients who received anthracyclines during pregnancy. In this group, five cases of fetal malformations (3%) were found, with three cases occurring with the use of chemotherapy in the first trimester. The remaining two cases of fetal malformation occurred after chemotherapy administration in the second trimester; one involved Down’s syndrome unrelated to chemotherapy, and the other involved a congenital adherence of the iris to the cornea that demonstrated no clinical consequence. The combination chemotherapy regimens associated with fetal malformations included cytosine arabinoside or cyclophosphamide. As these initial reports that there have been multiple case studies showing safety of systemic therapy with anthracyclines and taxanes as well as limited information regarding platinums when treated in the second and third trimesters.32–34 Systemic treatment, especially with antimetabolites such as methotrexate, should be avoided during the first trimester of pregnancy except in circumstances in which delay in cancer treatment would jeopardize the life of the patient, such as acute leukemia.


A long-term report on children exposed to chemotherapy in utero during treatment of mothers for a variety of hematologic malignancies has been presented by Aviles and Neri.35 They described 84 children followed a median of 18.7 years. Thirty-eight had been exposed to chemotherapy in utero during the first trimester of pregnancy. Fertility was reported to be preserved, some of the chemotherapy-exposed children having become parents. No learning, neurologic, or psychological problems were reported for any of the in utero chemotherapy-exposed subjects. Van Calsteren et al.36 report on ten children from nine pregnancies exposed to chemotherapy in utero for differing primary cancers. The children who were born prematurely had multiple abnormalities ranging from speech delay to mental and motor retardation. These were children born at less than 33 weeks gestation. Echocardiograms were also obtained demonstrating a tendency towards a thinner ventricular wall. Abdel-Hady et al.37 describe 118 children born to mothers who received chemotherapy during pregnancy with no significant difference when compared to a control group of children.


Much of the data in the children exposed to chemotherapy has come from studies of breast cancer diagnosed and treated during pregnancy. Murthy et al.38 have updated on the outcomes of the children exposed to chemotherapy in utero. Complications for the neonate included prematurity, neutropenia, tachypnea of the newborn, and respiratory distress syndrome. One case of spontaneous cryptogenic intracranial hemorrhage occurred which all resolved. There were three congenital abnormalities reported which included Down syndrome (1), congenital ureteral reflux (1), and clubfoot (1).38 Cardonick et al.39 also described a voluntary registry of outcomes in children exposed to chemotherapy demonstrating a 3.8% rate of congenital malformations which is similar to the national average of pregnant patients without cancer. Loibl et al.40 reviewed a registry of patients diagnosed with breast cancer during pregnancy from multiple different European sites. Of the 447 patients followed, 197 received chemotherapy during pregnancy from 2003 to 2011. Of these, 22 babies had reported complications and were delivered before the 37th week with four congenital malformations (trisomy 18, rectal atresia, polydactylia, and craniosynostosis). Nine of these babies were delivered after the 37th week with three malformations (asymmetric head, polydactyly, and Moebius syndrome). When evaluating for longer term outcomes in children exposed to chemotherapy in utero, Amant et al.41 described 70 children and evaluated that for neurocognitive and cardiac outcomes as well as general health, there was no significant finding except for those children who were born prematurely. Both of these studies highlight the need for to avoid iatrogenic preterm delivery whenever possible, with holding treatment past the 35th week of pregnancy in order to avoid blood nadirs and allowing the children to proceed full term.


Specific cancers


Breast cancer


The diagnosis of breast cancer during pregnancy is often delayed, presumably due to the anatomical and physiologic changes in the pregnant breast.42 However, women with breast cancer during pregnancy have demonstrated the same survival rates, stage for stage, as non-pregnant patients with breast cancer.34, 43, 44 Imaging, local, and systemic therapies have been well described in the successful treatment of breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy.


Imaging of the breast in women with a palpable mass or thickening is warranted, especially if it persists for 2 weeks or longer. Mammography and US may confirm the presence of a malignant mass. Although Max and Klamer reported normal mammograms in six of eight women with breast cancer during pregnancy, others have reported abnormal mammograms in the majority of women with pregnancy and breast cancer (18 of 23 and 5 of 8).45–47 There are limited data on US; Liberman reported positive findings in six of six patients, and Samuels found positive findings in two of four patients.46, 47 Yang et al.48 diagnosed 100% of the masses as well as axillary metastases in 18 of 20 women. US was also shown to be effective for restaging to evaluate response to pre-operative chemotherapy in the pregnant breast.48 US may be useful for guiding either fine needle aspiration (FNA) or core biopsy in order to confirm a diagnosis of malignancy.49–51 Chest radiography, liver US, and MRI of the thoracic/lumbar spine can be used to assess for extant organ metastasis.1, 9


Lymph node evaluations can be tailored to clinical findings. If clinically suspicious regional nodes are identified on physical examination or by imaging techniques, an FNA that is guided by palpation or US can be utilized to confirm metastases. The theoretical dosage of radiation that would be absorbed by the fetus following sentinel lymph node biopsy has been calculated to be less than 5 cGy.52, 53 Khera et al.54 have reported their experience with sentinel node procedures in the pregnant patient. Ten patients had sentinel node procedures, six with blue dye and Tc99m, two with Tc99m alone, and two with blue dye alone. No adverse sequelae were reported for nine neonates. One woman chose elective termination of pregnancy. Gropper et al.55 have published their series of 25 women who underwent sentinel lymph node dissections during pregnancy with no procedure complications. Gentilini et al. have performed the technique on 12 patients with one child born with a ventricular septal defect.10


Breast-conserving surgery is possible with postpartum breast irradiation. Pre- or postoperative chemotherapy is used with the same criteria for selection of therapy as in the non-pregnant patient. However, breast-conserving therapy should be considered only when radiation can be given in a timely manner after delivery. Often, given the timing of chemotherapy, this will allow for postpartum radiation. Dominici et al.49 have described a single institution experience of mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery as well as biopsy procedures with no significant difference in wound complications or complications from FNA or core biopsies.


Other agents have been described in the literature to treat breast cancer and include vinorelbine, paclitaxel, docetaxel, and cisplatin.56, 57 The use of taxanes, both paclitaxel and docetaxel, has been described also in the second and third trimesters56, 58–65 with all available follow-up data reported healthy children.56 Vinorelbine has been reported to be used in both adjuvant and metastatic settings, with five of the six children reported healthy at 6–35 months of follow-up. Information on one of the children was not available in the literature. Neonatal complications included one episode of grade 4 neutropenia and transient cytopenia at day 6 of life.63, 66–68 Multiple case reports of trastuzumab administered during pregnancy have been identified. This has been associated with oligo- and anhydramnios with its use was described in case reports.62, 66, 69–73 One case was of reversible heart failure in the mother with no anhydramnios in the fetus was reported.71 One of the children born developed respiratory failure, capillary leak syndrome, infections, and necrotizing enterocolitis, dying from multiple organ failure 21 weeks after delivery.73 In addition, Bader et al.62 described a case of reversible renal failure in the fetus. One report of the use of lapatinib was recently described in a patient who conceived while on lapatinib. Despite approximately 11 weeks of exposure, the pregnancy was otherwise uncomplicated with the delivery of a healthy baby.74 Routine administration of biologic agents is not recommended during pregnancy and trastuzumab now has an FDA Category D rating.


Tamoxifen is a standard treatment for hormone receptor positive tumors in pre-menopausal women. Although some case reports of tamoxifen fetal exposure demonstrated no effect on the newborn, there are other reports including Goldenhar syndrome (microtia, preauricular skin tags, and hemifacial microsomia),75 ambiguous genitalia, and other birth defects. In addition, vaginal bleeding and spontaneous abortion have also been reported.75–79 Braems et al.80 described 11 babies with congenital malformations out of 44 live births and 3 stillbirths. Aromatase inhibitors are not indicated as a single agent in pre-menopausal women and should not be used in conjunction with ovarian suppression in a pregnant patient. Endocrine therapy should be delayed until after delivery.


Outcomes of pregnant breast cancer patients appear to be similar to non-pregnant cancer patients when treated with appropriate therapies in the second and third trimesters. Litton et al.81 have described the outcomes of a single institution cohort treated at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center since 1989 where all women presented for early-stage breast cancer and received chemotherapy with 5-fluoruracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. There were all live births. Rouzier et al.82 reviewed 48 patients with pregnancy-associated breast cancer and have concluded that chemosensitivity and pathological response rates were modeled to be similar in pregnant and non-pregnant breast cancer patients. Amant et al. compared 311 women to 865 non-pregnant breast cancer patients with no statistically significant difference in OS.


Azim et al.33 performed a meta-analysis of 30 studies of PABC which did show a higher risk of relapse and death. However, this did not hold true for the diagnosis during pregnancy which may further emphasize the importance of separating the situations of being diagnosed during versus after pregnancy. This analysis also included multiple older studies that either delayed or gave substandard therapy to pregnant patients that may also have affected survival outcomes.


Thyroid cancer


In pregnant women, thyroid cancer presents most often as an asymptomatic nodule in the neck. Ultrasound evaluation can confirm the size and solid character of the nodule. FNA biopsy is the most reliable diagnostic test and is safe and accurate during pregnancy.83–85 Most often, pregnancy-associated thyroid cancers are differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC). Radioiodine scans and therapeutic radioiodine should not be given during pregnancy and can be safely delayed until after delivery.86 Thyroid surgery can be delayed until after delivery for many patients, especially if the diagnosis is made during the third trimester of pregnancy.86, 87 If warranted, thyroid resection can be done under local anesthesia.88 Moosa and Mazzaferi89

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Apr 12, 2017 | Posted by in ONCOLOGY | Comments Off on Cancer and pregnancy

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access