Venous and Arterial Thromboembolism in Children



Venous and Arterial Thromboembolism in Children


Paul Monagle

M. Patricia Massicotte

Anthony K. Chan



INTRODUCTION

Thromboembolic disease in infancy and childhood has been described as a new epidemic of tertiary pediatric care. Evidence supports the concept that the frequency of thromboembolism (TE), in all forms including venous, arterial, and intracardiac thromboembolic phenomenon, is increasing in neonates and children. The reasons for this are likely related to the increased survival of children with severe underlying medical and surgical conditions; the increased intensity and invasiveness of supportive care, in particular the increased use of vascular access devices; heightened awareness of this condition amongst pediatricians leading to more regular and appropriate investigations; and potentially the ever lowering age at which traditionally “adult” therapies such as, for example, the oral contraceptive pill are being used en masse. Similarly, the increased prevalence of previously “adult” risk factors such as obesity may also contribute to increased thrombotic risk in children.

The diagnosis of thrombosis in children is often difficult for practical and theoretical reasons. Invasive and even noninvasive imaging of children often requires general anesthesia which not only increases the risks involved, especially in sick children, but pragmatically often makes timely diagnosis difficult to organize. Further the algorithms for interpretation of diagnostic vascular imaging have not been validated in children.1 There are multiple reasons including reduced vessel size, lower pulse pressures, and blood flow rates, and potential other causes of bias that raise questions about whether the same algorithms and strategies used in adults are valid in children.

The natural history of TE in neonates and children remains largely unknown. This is problematic when clinicians are trying to balance the risks of antithrombotic therapy versus the risks of untreated disease. This dilemma is most evident when considering asymptomatic TE, which is often diagnosed on routine imaging or postprocedural examination. The aim of pediatrics in general is not only to ensure long-term survival of children, but to do so in a manner that enables the child to lead a productive and full adult life. Therefore, any impact of antithrombotic therapy on normal development needs to be considered, especially in situations that long-term anticoagulation therapy is being considered. Currently, the ability of clinicians to give parents and children good information about their longer term health and support requirements subsequent to a thromboembolic episode is very limited.

The use of antithrombotic drugs in pediatric patients is different from adults for a variety of reasons.2 First, the epidemiology of TE in pediatric patients is vastly different from that seen in adults.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 Second, the hemostatic system is a dynamic evolving entity that not only likely affects the frequency and natural history of TEs in children, but also the response to therapeutic agents.16, 17, 18 Third, the distribution, binding, and clearance of antithrombotic drugs are age dependent.19, 20, 21 Fourth, the frequency and type of intercurrent illnesses and concurrent medications varies with age. Fifth, limited vascular access reduces the ability to effectively deliver some antithrombotic therapies and can influence the choice of antithrombotic agent. Often, the only vascular access available is used for drug delivery; consequently accurate monitoring of blood anticoagulant levels is difficult. Sixth, specific pediatric formulations of antithrombotic drugs are not available, making accurate, reproducible dosing difficult. This is especially the case for vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) (no suspension/liquid preparation) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) (available most readily in predosed syringes based on adult weights). Seventh, dietary differences make the use of oral VKAs particularly difficult. This is especially true in neonates, as breast milk and infant formulas have very different vitamin K levels. Finally, compliance issues are vastly different in, for example, small infants who cannot understand the need for therapy, in adolescents who intellectually comprehend but emotionally are unable to cooperate, and in children who suffer the effects of inadequate parenting. The social, ethical, and legal implications of these issues frequently interfere with the ability to provide the “best” treatment for individual neonates and children.

This chapter discusses the epidemiology of TE in neonates and children, and then focuses on issues of clinical presentation, diagnosis, and management that are specific for children compared to adults. There remain many unanswered questions, and much research is required to improve the current standards of care for children with thromboembolic disease.


EPIDEMIOLOGY OF THROMBOEMBOLISM IN NEONATES AND CHILDREN


Venous Thromboembolism and Pulmonary Embolism

There are a number of published national or international registries that have collected data on venous thromboembolism (VTE) and other thrombotic events in neonates and children (Table 121.1).4, 11, 12, 13, 22 Two neonatal registries from Canada and Germany have prospectively collected data on neonatal thrombosis, while a third from the Netherlands includes data from both neonates and older children.11, 12, 13 Two registries (from Canada and the United Kingdom) have collected data on older children.4, 22 Inclusion criteria have varied between registries, particularly with regard to the registration of arterial and central nervous system (CNS) events, and the inclusion or not of asymptomatic events.









Table 121.1 National and international large pediatric thrombosis registries































































Registry


Dates of Case Collection


Age Criteria for Inclusion


Number of Children Reported


Types of Thrombosis Included


Inclusion of CNS Thrombosis


Incidence of Venous Thrombosis


Canadian & International-Neonatal12


1990-1993


1st mo


N = 97


VTE Arterial


No


2.4/1,000 NICUb admissions


German-Neonatal11


1992-1994


1st mo


N = 79


VTE Arterial


Yes


0.51/10,000 births


Canadian-Children22


1990-1992


1 mo to 16 y


N = 137


DVT/PE


No


0.07/10,000 children


DPSU13


1997-1999


Birth to 18 y


N ;= 115


VTEa


Yes


0.14/10,000 children


BPSU4


2001-2003


1 mo to 16 y


N = 200


VTE Arterial


No


0.07/10,000 children


United States15


2001-2007


Birth to 18 y


N = 11 337


VTE


No


34-58/10,000 pediatric hospital admissions


a Includes asymptomatic neonatal events.


b Neonatal intensive care unit.


The incidence of VTE is dramatically influenced by age in adults such that the estimated incidence of first time deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in those aged 25 to 30 years is around 30 cases per 100,000 persons, which increases exponentially to 300 to 500 cases per 100,000 persons in those aged 70 to 79 years.14 The incidence of DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE) in children in Canada, using data collected from 15 tertiary care centers, was estimated to be 0.07 per 10,000 children and 5.3 per 10,000 hospital admissions.22 However, more recently, Raffini et al.15 reported that the annual incidence of VTE in children discharged from pediatric hospitals in the United States increased from 34 per 10,000 admissions in 2001 to 58 per 10,000 admissions in 2007, representing an increase of 70% in 7 years. The Dutch registry collected data via the Dutch Paediatric Surveillance Unit (DPSU) using a monthly mailing system sent to all pediatricians in primary and secondary care and to specific contact persons in tertiary centres.13 The overall incidence of venous thrombosis was 0.14 per 10,000 children aged 0 to 18 years and 0.05 per 10,000 children after excluding neonates and nonextremity VTE.13 The British Paediatric Surveillance unit (BPSU) used a similar methodology,4 and the estimated incidence of all events was 0.07 per 10,000 children. The first registry of neonatal thrombosis was an international registry involving 64 centers in Canada, the United States, and Europe. Based on data reported from Canada, which was considered to be complete, the incidence of clinically apparent thrombosis was 2.4 per 1,000 admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit (ICU).12 In contrast, the German neonatal registry reported the incidence of symptomatic events was 0.51 per 10,000 births.11 The Dutch study reported the incidence of neonatal venous thrombosis as 0.07 per 10,000 children.13

Many other studies have examined the rates of VTE in specific high-risk groups such as children and neonates with central venous access.23, 24, 25 Children with malignancy, with or without central venous access, are often highlighted as a particular high-risk group, with rates as high as 30% to 50%, although there are many causative factors involved, including insertion technique, site of central line placement type of cancer involved, treatment protocol, and the diagnostic techniques applied.7, 10, 26, 27, 28 Children with short-term central venous access whilst in pediatric intensive care units have thrombosis in 18.3% to 26% of cases.29, 30 Children undergoing solid organ transplant have frequent thromboembolic complications,31, 32, 33, 34, 35 but perhaps the highest risk group in children is in those receiving long-term home parenteral nutrition, with cross-sectional studies reporting thrombosis in up to 66%.36, 37, 38 With respect to PE, there is limited data on epidemiology. General population retrospective autopsy studies report PE in children at 0.05% to



Arterial Thrombosis

There are few studies that report the incidence of arterial thrombosis in children. The majority of arterial thrombosis in children are iatrogenic, related to invasive vascular access,43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63 less commonly associated with solid organ transplantation and Kawasaki disease. Spontaneous arterial thrombosis is rare in children.64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76 One prospective registry conducted between 1999 and 2002 reported arterial thrombosis at 8.5 per 10,000 hospital admissions (102 thromboses in 119,487 admissions),77 suggesting that arterial thrombosis is as common as venous thrombosis in tertiary institutions.


Intracardiac Thrombosis

Right atrial and intracardiac thrombosis are most commonly diagnosed in children who have central venous access devices extending into the right atrium.78, 79 Children also may develop intracardiac thrombosis following cardiac surgery, including
after Glenn,80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85 Fontan,86, 87 Norwood procedures,88, 89 and prosthetic valve replacement.90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106








Table 121.2 Incidence of pulmonary embolus in children with selected underlying clinical conditions













































































































































Author


Year


Study Design


N


Clinical Condition


Diagnostic Method


Incidence (%)


Hoyer343


1986


Retrospective


26


Asymptomatic NS


V/Q


27


Desai344


1989


Retrospective


178


Fatal burns


Autopsy


1.7


Hsu345


1991


Cross-sectional


62


Preheart transplantation


V/Q, PA


9.7


Marraro346


1991


Prospective


205


Leukemia


Perfusion scan, PA


3.4


Uderzo347


1993


Retrospective


67


BMT for leukemia


V/Q, PA


4.5


Uderzo348


1993


Prospective


452


Leukemia and respiratory failure


Perfusion scan, PA


2.7


McBride323


1994


Retrospective


28,692


Trauma


Clinical


0.0069


Dollery37


1994


Cross-sectional


34


Long-term total parenteral nutrition (TPN)


V/Q, CRX


32


Andrew22


1994


Prospective


137


Venous thrombotic event


V/Q


16


Nuss349


1995


Retrospective


61


Thrombotic event


V/Q


20


Derish350


1995


Retrospective


21


Intensive care unit deaths


Autopsy


24


Massicotte351


1998


Prospective


244


Catheter-related thrombosis


V/Q


16


Huang352


2000


Prospective


20


NS and elevated D-dimer


V/Q,CRX


40


Monagle8


2000


Prospective


405


Venous thrombosis


V/Q


17


Van Ommen13


2001


Prospective


100


Venous thrombosis


V/Q


10


Levy353


2003


Retrospective


24


SLE with positive LAC


V/Q


8.3


Adapted from Van Ommen CH, Peters M. Acute pulmonary embolism in childhood. Thromb Res 2006;118(1):13-25.


These complex surgical procedures are common in children with congenital heart disease, and the underlying surgical procedures may have specific implications for the potential consequences of intracardiac thrombosis.107 A few specific examples are described below.

Blalock-Taussig (B-T) shunts are commonly performed in the neonatal period to increase pulmonary blood flow. B-T shunts may be performed as a single palliative procedure with more definitive surgery planned later or as part of a more complex surgical intervention (e.g., Norwood procedure). B-T shunts are performed as either classic or modified B-T shunts. In classic B-T shunts, the subclavian artery is anastomosed directly to the ipsilateral pulmonary artery. The shunt is usually performed on the right side unless there is a right-sided aortic arch, in which case, the shunt is performed on the left. In contrast, modified B-T shunts involve a Gore-Tex tube graft being placed between the subclavian artery and the ipsilateral pulmonary artery. The Gore-Tex tube may be as small as 3 mm in diameter, depending on the size of the infant, but is usually 3.5 or 4 mm in diameter. Blockage of the B-T shunt will compromise pulmonary blood flow and is often a major clinical event requiring immediate surgery. Patients with B-T shunts may have reduced peripheral pulses in the ipsilateral arm and may have measurably reduced growth of the arm. This can be of significance when assessing for postthrombotic syndrome, which may occur in the upper limbs secondary to central venous thrombosis.

The Norwood procedure is the initial surgery performed in infants with hypoplastic left heart syndrome (HLHS). The surgery is performed early in the neonatal period. HLHS usually includes severe hypoplasia of the left ventricle, hypoplasia of the ascending aorta and aortic arch, and critical stenosis of aortic or mitral valves.

The first stage involves the following:



  • Division of the main pulmonary artery and closure of the distal stump with a patch.


  • Ligation and division of the patent ductus arteriosus.


  • Using an aortic or pulmonary artery allograft, the proximal pulmonary artery is anastomosed to the hypoplastic aortic arch, which itself is enlarged to create a large arterial trunk.



  • The atrial septum is excised to allow adequate interatrial mixing.


  • A modified B-T shunt (right-sided, Gore-Tex tube, usually 3.5 to 4 mm) from the right innominate to the right pulmonary artery. This will be the only source of pulmonary blood flow.

This procedure results in systemic venous and pulmonary venous return entering into a common atrium. Blood then enters a common ventricle and leaves the heart via a common outflow tract, providing systemic blood flow via the aortic arch and pulmonary blood flow via the B-T shunt.

The implications of this procedure with respect to thrombosis are as follows:



  • Venous flow has direct access to systemic arterial flow, so deep venous thrombosis, whether central venous line (CVL) related or otherwise, readily causes systemic emboli and potentially arterial ischemic stroke.


  • A clotted B-T shunt causes loss of entire pulmonary blood flow.


  • There are substantial intravascular suture lines as potential sources of thrombosis.


  • The patients will need a subsequent Glenn procedure and eventually completion to a full Fontan procedure. The development of central thrombosis with associated collateral branches can significantly hinder these subsequent surgical interventions. Therefore, increased aggressiveness of any antithrombotic therapy may be appropriate. Even in the absence of symptoms, thrombolysis or surgical thrombectomy may be considered if a central venous thrombosis was thought to be impairing the hemodynamics required for future surgery.

The bidirectional cavopulmonary shunt (BCPS) or bidirectional Glenn procedure is an end (superior vena cava [SVC]) to side (right pulmonary artery) venous shunt. This is a palliative procedure that increases oxygen saturation, but without increasing left ventricular work, and is usually performed in children with univentricular cardiac physiology as the first stage of the two-stage Fontan procedure. The inferior vena cava (IVC) is unchanged after a Glenn procedure.

The implications with respect to thrombosis are that, following a Glenn procedure, the SVC blood flows directly to the lungs without any assistance from the heart. Hence, any reduction in SVC flow, owing to thrombus occlusion, will dramatically reduce pulmonary blood flow. Pulmonary emboli are of specific concern in that if the pulmonary vascular resistance is increased, the patient may become unsuitable for a Fontan completion, which limits long-term survival significantly in the absence of cardiac transplantation. Blood flow from the IVC still bypasses the lungs, meaning that any thrombus in the lower venous system can give rise to paradoxical emboli. Collateral branches around central venous thrombosis may interfere with the ability to complete the Fontan surgery. The threat of being unable to complete the Fontan may be justification for more aggressive antithrombotic therapy (thrombolysis or surgery) than might otherwise be indicated.

There are numerous modifications of the final Fontan procedure, but the basic principles remain the same. Both the SVC (usually done in a first-stage BCPS) and the IVC are anastomosed to the pulmonary arteries. Hence, the pulmonary blood flow is totally passive, depending on venous flow mechanisms without any cardiac pump assistance. The univentricle is then able to function as a left ventricle, providing systemic blood flow. Postoperatively, many patients have deliberate, limited, right to left interatrial shunting via a “fenestration.” The blood flow in such cases increases the risk of paradoxical emboli.

The implications with respect to thrombosis following Fontan surgery are significant. First, the presence of right to left communication continues the potential for paradoxical emboli. Second, any pulmonary emboli that increase pulmonary vascular resistance have an accentuated impact on pulmonary blood flow because the pulmonary pressure cannot be increased to overcome a pressure gradient. The Fontan circuit makes the diagnosis of pulmonary emboli particularly difficult. Depending on the attachment of the SVC and IVC to the pulmonary arteries, isotope may need to be injected into both an arm and a leg to achieve full lung perfusion scanning. As for patients with severe pulmonary hypertension having ventilation-perfusion scans, the transient obstruction of pulmonary capillaries by the macroaggregated isotope-labeled albumin may rarely precipitate a hypoxic episode. Finally, depending on the exact type of Fontan surgery, the risk of late (many years later) thrombosis associated with dysrhythmias may be increased.


CLINICAL PRESENTATION OF THROMBOSIS IN NEONATES AND CHILDREN


Venous Thrombosis

The clinical symptoms/complications of VTE can be classified as acute or long term and vary depending on site and severity. A high proportion of venous thrombosis in children occur in the upper venous system (defined as subclavian, brachiocephalic, internal jugular veins, and SVC), as distinct from the lower venous system (defined as the popliteal, femoral, iliac veins, and the IVC), which is more commonly affected in adults with VTE. These upper system VTEs are commonly associated with CVL placement. The acute clinical symptoms, besides loss of CVL patency, include swelling, pain, and limb discolouration,22 swelling of the face and head with SVC syndrome,108 and respiratory compromise with PE.8 Renal vein thrombosis (RVT) classically presents with a flank mass, hematuria, proteinuria, thrombocytopenia, and nonfunction of the involved kidney. Any venous thrombosis may present with a paradoxical embolus causing a stroke, notably in neonates with a patent foramen ovale.

Children often do not present with acute symptoms (FIGURES 121.1 and 121.2). Long-term clinical symptoms and/or complications include prominent cutaneous collateral circulation, loss of CVL patency requiring local thrombolytic treatment, CVL replacement, loss of venous access, CVL-related sepsis, chylothorax,109, 110 chylopericardium,111 recurrent VTE necessitating long-term anticoagulation, and postthrombotic syndrome (PTS).112 Specific long-term sequelae of umbilical vein catheter (UVC)-related VTE include portal hypertension,113 splenomegaly,114 gastric and esophageal varices, variceal bleeding, and hypertension.115


Arterial Thrombosis

Arterial thrombosis is most frequently iatrogenic, and loss of vascular access is a common presenting symptom.77 Acute symptoms will depend on the site of arterial thrombosis and whether there is adequate collateral flow to prevent tissue ischemia. Peripheral limb ischemia is characterized by diminished
or absent pulses, a prolonged capillary refill time, and a cool, pale limb. Thrombotic occlusion of the radial artery produces more severe symptoms with accompanying ulnar artery occlusion. Chronic symptoms may develop even in the absence of acute symptoms and include limb hypoplasia and claudication (FIGURE 121.3). The clinical presentation of umbilical artery catheter (UAC)-related thromboembolic events varies, the majority of newborns being asymptomatic or only minimally affected, but a small proportion having major symptoms of severe leg ischemia and organ dysfunction, including necrotizing enterocolitis secondary to mesenteric artery occlusion, hypertension with or without renal failure secondary to renal artery thrombosis, and limb compromise secondary to embolic events.






FIGURE 121.1 This boy presented at 10 years of age with prominent abdominal collaterals. He had gastroschisis repaired during the neonatal period and had a lower system venous access device placed during this period. There were no acute symptoms of thrombosis documented; however on current scans he has chronic thrombosis with no flow to the IVC below the renal veins.




ANTITHROMBOTIC THERAPY IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS

The evidence supporting most recommendations for antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children remains weak.133 Studies addressing appropriate drug target ranges and monitoring requirements are urgently required in addition to site- and clinical situation-specific thrombosis management strategies.133 While there is some data to guide treatment decisions in neonates, almost none of the data reported separates premature from term infants, despite the obvious differences in risk/benefit considerations. Similarly adolescents are often managed according to data based on adults, but at what point an adolescent should transition from recommendations based on data in children to that in adults and whether age alone should be the determining factor for that transition is unknown.133 The remainder of this chapter discusses the principles of antithrombotic therapy applicable to neonates and children. For specific treatment recommendations, the reader is referred to the most recent guidelines published by the American College of Chest Physicians.133


Heparin in Neonates and Children

Unfractionated heparin (UFH) remains a commonly used anticoagulant in pediatric patients. In tertiary pediatric hospitals, approximately 15% of inpatients are exposed to UFH each day.134 There are a number of specific factors that may alter the effect of UFH in children. For example, UFH acts via antithrombin (AT)-mediated inhibition of thrombin and factor Xa, but children have reduced levels of AT and prothrombin,17, 135, 136, 137 reduced capacity to generate thrombin,3, 136, 138 an age-related different ratio of anti-Xa: anti-IIa activity,139, 140, 141 alterations in plasma binding of UFH,19, 20, 21, 139 and age-related differences in tissue factor pathway inhibitor release.139 The clinical implications of these changes on dosing, monitoring, and the effectiveness/safety profile of UFH in children remain to be fully elucidated.

There have been no reported clinical outcome studies to determine the therapeutic range for UFH in neonates or children, so the therapeutic range for all indications is extrapolated from those used in adults. This equates to an activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) that reflects a heparin level by protamine titration of 0.2 to 0.4 U/mL or an antifactor Xa level of 0.35 to 0.7 U/mL.142 Extrapolating the APTT range from adults to pediatric patients may well be invalid. For example, baseline APTTs in pediatric patients, especially neonates, are often increased compared to adults, so a therapeutic range represents a reduced increment in APTT values in pediatric patients receiving adult-equivalent heparin therapy.17, 18 Schmidt reported that routine assays underestimate UFH concentration especially in neonates.143 Recent in vitro and in vivo data also indicate that the APTT range that correlates to an antifactor Xa level of 0.35 to 0.7 U/mL varies significantly with age and heparin dose.19, 138, 139, 140, 141, 144 Further, protamine titration results vary with age140 and different commercial anti-Xa kits produce substantial variations in results on the same samples.138 These differences are magnified in infants whose endogenous AT levels are reduced.145

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 21, 2016 | Posted by in HEMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Venous and Arterial Thromboembolism in Children

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access