Saquinavir

Chapter 15 Saquinavir




INTRODUCTION


On the 4 December 1997, the Society for Medicines Research Award for Drug Discovery was presented to Redshaw, Duncan, and Roberts for their contributions to the discovery of the HIV protease inhibitor (PI) saquinavir. Mapping of the HIV genome had revealed the existence of the virus-specified protease and this had become a target for several of the leading pharmaceutical companies.1 A series of compounds which inhibited the protease were prepared, resulting in the synthesis of Ro 31-8959 (saquinavir) also known as compound XVI.2 Antiviral activity was in the low nanomolar range and this, combined with a relatively clean preclinical safety profile resulted in the development of saquinavir by Hoffman–La Roche (patent #5196438). In 1995, saquinavir became the first HIV PI approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).3 It was produced as a hard gel formulation (saquinavir-HGC), known as Invirase.


Saquinavir-HGC had poor oral bioavailability and so two further formulations were developed. In 1997, in the era when PIs were administered without ritonavir boosting, a soft gel capsule (saquinavir-SGC) marketed as Fortovase was approved for use. At the recommended dosage of 1200 mg three times daily (tid) it provided much higher plasma saquinavir concentrations and drug exposure than those attained with the conventional saquinavir-HGC formulation, administered at the recommended dosage of 600 mg tid.4,5 Unfortunately, saquinavir-SGC was associated with an increase in gastrointestinal side effects.6 It contained the excipient capmul which is absent in the saquinavir-HGC formulation which was probably responsible for the gastrointestinal problems seen with the saquinavir-SGC formulation. The large size of the saquinavir-SGC capsules and their need for refrigeration was also a problem. A few years later, however, low-dose ritonavir was demonstrated to significantly improve the pharmacokinetic profile of saquinavir-HGC. Saquinavir-SGC was no longer needed and production was discontinued in February 2006. In addition, the reformulation of saquinavir-HGC into a 500 mg tablet as saquinavir-500 has reduced the daily pill burden from ten tablets to four which has obvious adherence advantages. Saquinavir-500 is the only formulation of saquinavir being marketed, although saquinavir-HGC is still available for the few patients who prefer to remain on it.





SAQUINAVIR IN COMBINATION WITH OTHER AGENTS


In a range of cell lines, saquinavir in combination with various other antiretroviral drugs, (compared with the activity of saquinavir alone) showed additive or synergistic activity against various strains of HIV-l without increased cytotoxicity.1113 Although saquinavir and indinavir showed antagonistic activity in vitro against a range of clinical isolates of HIV-l at all drug concentrations investigated,14 recent data suggest that saquinavir is highly synergistic with other PIs (Table 15-1).


Table 15-1 Synergistic Anti-HIV Activity of Saquinavir with FDA Approved HIV-1 Agents Determined in Drug Combination Studies15































Saquinavir + Mean Synergy/Antagonism Volume (μM2%; n = 3) Interpretation < −50 μM2 % = antagonistic -50 to 50 μM2% = Additive 550–100 μM2% = Synergistic >100 μM2%= Highly synergistic
Amprenavir 473/−4.5 Highly synergistic
Atazanavir 205/−0.5 Highly synergistic
Indinavir 151/−8.1 Highly synergistic
Lopinavir 224/−31 Highly synergistic
Nelfinavir 275/−8.3 Highly synergistic
Ritonavir 237/−6.9 Highly synergistic


CYTOTOXICITY


Saquinavir has a high therapeutic index in vitro and only shows cytotoxicity at concentrations more than 1000 times higher than those producing inhibition of HIV-1.16 In CD4 T lymphocyte cell lines, concentrations of saquinavir producing 50% toxicity (assessed by cell viability markers) ranged from 5 to 100 nmol/L. The in vitro effects of various concentrations of saquinavir on the development of mature virions has been assessed and has demonstrated decreasing amounts of mature particles with increasing concentrations of saquinavir from 10 nM up to 1000 nM concentrations of saquinavir. At the highest concentrations none of the virions produced had a mature appearance.17


In a model of chronic infection in MT-4 cells with an HIV-1 laboratory strain, 100 nM of saquinavir completely suppressed evidence of infection for 87 days. HIV-l reemerged in this culture system when saquinavir was removed from the culture medium after a minimum of 11 days postinfection.18



PHARMACOKINETIC PROPERTIES






Metabolism


There is first-pass metabolism, predominantly by the cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) isoenzyme in the liver and small intestine.22,23 Drugs that induce the CYP3A4 isoenzyme such as rifampicin (rifampin), rifabutin, phenytoin and carbamazepine have the potential to decrease concentrations of saquinavir. Conversely, administration of saquinavir with drugs that inhibit CYP3A4, such as the PI ritonavir, results in an increase in the concentrations of saquinavir formulations.24





PHARMACOKINETICS OF SAQUINAVIR BOOSTING BY LOW-DOSE RITONAVIR


Saquinavir was one of the first antiretroviral agents for which an increase in plasma drug levels was demonstrated when given in combination with ritonavir. This was later found to be related to profound inhibition of CYP450 pathway responsible for metabolism of saquinavir and other antiretroviral medications by ritonavir. The dose regimen initially used was 400/400 mg bid saquinavir-SGC or saquinavir-HGC/ritonavir. The significant increase of saquinavir levels in the presence of ritonavir was demonstrated in an open-label, randomized, parallel, multiple-dose study involving 64 healthy HIV-1-negative volunteers who were given saquinavir-HGC (800 mg bid) alone, ritonavir (400 mg bid) alone, or a combination of saquinavir (400–800 mg bid) with ritonavir (200–400 mg bid) for 14 days.28 Among those given saquinavir at a dose of 800 mg bid, there were overall 17-, 22-, and 23-fold increases in saquinavir (AUC-24 h) when ritonavir was administered at doses of 200, 300, and 400 mg bid, respectively.


It was later found that lower doses of ritonavir are sufficient to ‘boost’ saquinavir levels2931 and saquinavir/ritonavir is now frequently prescribed using 1000 mg of saquinavir with 100 mg of ritonavir twice daily (bid) or 2000 mg of saquinavir with 100 mg of ritonavir once daily (qd). The ritonavir should be given simultaneously in order to maximally increase saquinavir exposure.32 Pharmacokinetics of the currently recommended dose was investigated in 24 healthy volunteers in a study that compared saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir (1000/100 mg bid) with saquinavir-HGC/ritonavir (1000/100 mg) in which each subject was given each combination separately for 10 days. Saquinavir-HGC/ritonavir led to significantly higher plasma saquinavir levels than saquinavir-SGC/ritonavir for all the pharmacokinetic variables evaluated.33 Addition of ritonavir leads to significant increases in saquinavir exposure irrespective of whether the saquinavir-HGC or saquinavir-500 formulation is used.31,3437


Increasing the dose of ritonavir above 100 mg does not improve the pharmacokinetic profile of saquinavir. A combined pharmacokinetic analysis of two dose-ranging studies indicates that the boosting effect on saquinavir is similar over the dose range 100–400 mg bid of ritonavir.30 Furthermore, the combination of saquinavir/ritonavir 1000 mg/100 mg bid resulted in higher exposures to saquinavir in HIV-1 infected patients compared with the exposure to saquinavir seen historically using a saquinavir/ritonavir 400 mg/400 mg bid combination.38 Since the toxicity of ritonavir is directly proportional to its plasma levels3941 use of low ritonavir doses 100–200 mg/day diminishes the potential for ritonavir-associated adverse effects such as nausea, vomiting, oral paraesthesia, taste perversion and elevated lipid levels.40 Saquinavir does not alter the pharmacokinetic parameters of ritonavir.29





PHARMACOKINETICS OF SAQUINAVIR IN CHILDREN


The clinical pharmacologic characteristics of saquinavir-SGC have been investigated in HIV-1-infected children and adolescents. It was shown that the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir in children is different from that of adults. However, the study only looked at unboosted saquinavir so the relevance to today’s practice is limited. PK was assessed after single-dose administration and after short- and long-term administration of 50 mg/kg saquinavir-SGC tid. The single-dose pharmacokinetics of fixed (1200 mg) versus unrestricted weight-adjusted dosing (50 mg/kg) was also investigated. Saquinavir-SGC in children resulted in lower saquinavir exposure (steady-state geometric mean AUC from time 0–24 h, 5790 ng h−1 mL−1; steady-state concentration 8 h after drug administration (C (8 h, SS)), 65 ng/mL) and adolescents (steady-state geometric mean AUC (0–24 h), 5914 ng h−1 mL−1) than that reported in adults treated with 1200 mg tid (steady-state geometric mean AUC (0–24 h), 21 700 ng h−1 mL−1; C (8 h, SS), 223 ng/mL).43


This finding appeared to be attributable to markedly higher apparent oral clearance, potentially as a result of increased systemic clearance and reduced oral bioavailability. A significant correlation between average trough concentration and sustained viral load suppression was observed in these children. The apparent threshold for maintaining viral load suppression was a mean trough saquinavir concentration above 200 ng/mL.







DRUG INTERACTIONS


The potential for drug interactions between saquinavir and other drugs is significant because the CYP3A4 isoenzyme is a common metabolic pathway for many agents.22 Drugs that are metabolized by or induce or inhibit the cytochrome P450 system, especially isoenzyme 3A4, may affect the metabolism, plasma levels, and systemic exposure of saquinavir. In addition, saquinavir is a mild inhibitor of cytochrome P450 enzymes and may affect the metabolism of some other drugs. Furthermore, as saquinavir is a substrate for Pglycoprotein (Pgp), drugs that modify Pgp activity may modify the pharmacokinetics of saquinavir. Similarly, saquinavir has the potential to modify the pharmacokinetics of other drugs that are substrates for Pgp.23,49



Antiviral Agents


Concomitant use of certain other antiretroviral agents with saquinavir may significantly increase or decrease saquinavir plasma concentrations. These antiretrovirals include delavirdine (Rescriptor), indinavir (Crixivan), nelfinavir (Viracept), and ritonavir (Norvir).14,23 There is little clinical relevance apart from the ritonavir interaction as these drugs are rarely prescribed together. Saquinavir-HGC has no clinically significant interaction with nevirapine, lopinavir/ritonavir or with fosamprenavir/ritonavir. There is no clinical significant interaction of saquinavir with tenofovir or abacavir.








Methadone


With ritonavir-boosted saquinavir there was a small reduc-tion in the free fraction of R-methadone.56 However, it is not clinically significant so no methadone dose changes are required.






TOXICITY


In controlled studies more than 5000 patients have received saquinavir-HGC, and more than 850 patients have received saquinavir-SGC. Overall, saquinavir appears to be well tolerated. Some data are available from early studies in which saquinavir-HGC was administered as monotherapy, but most available data are from the use of saquinavir-HGC or saquinavir-SGC in combination with other antiretroviral agents. The most frequent side effects with both formulations are gastrointestinal and include diarrhea, nausea, and abdominal discomfort or pain.60 Most treatment-related side effects have been mild. Overall, moderate or severe gastrointestinal side effects at least possibly related to treatment have occurred in 5–10% of patients receiving saquinavir-HGC and 10–20% of patients on saquinavir-SGC therapy; additional patients may have milder symptoms. Some of the GI intolerance to saquinavir-SGC was probably related to excipients in the formulation. Other toxicities that occurred in more than a few percent of patients treated included headaches, fatigue, and elevations in serum transaminases. Elevations in creatine phosphokinase have also been observed but are believed to be related to HIV-1 or other therapies, rather than to saquinavir.


Metabolic complications have been increasingly described in patients receiving PI therapy. On the basis of postmarketing surveillance reports, the FDA issued an alert in 1997 about a possible relation between PI use and the development or worsening of diabetes mellitus, hyperglycemia, and diabetic ketoacidosis; some of the reported cases occurred in persons receiving saquinavir.61 There have also been other metabolic complications in persons receiving PIs, including body habitus changes, intraabdominal fat deposition, hypertriglyceridemia, and hypercholesterolemia.6267 The frequency and relation of these events to treatment with either saquinavir formulation is unknown.



Lipodystrophy


Lipoatrophy is associated with nucleoside analogue treatment especially thymidine analogs. Fat accumulation especially abdominal with an increase in waist size and abnormal waist hip ratio, buffalo hump, and breast enlargement are associated with PI use. In early studies of saquinavir larger doses of ritonavir were used from 400 to 600 mg and the prevalence of fat accumulation as assessed by physical examination was 4–14% at 5 years.68


An assessment of the prevalence and severity of lipodystrophy (LD) after 48 weeks was performed in the MaxCmin1 trial of indinavir/r (IDV/r) 800/100 mg bid or saquinavir/r (SQV/r) 1000/100 mg bid combined nucleosides and non-nucleosides. LD Case definition study questionnaires for patients and physicians were used at week 48. Fat accumulation severity scores were significantly higher in females (P < 0.001 for both), with no difference in lipoatrophy severity score (p = 0.79).69


The contribution of ritonavir to these metabolic and morphological changes was examined in a randomized pilot study evaluating the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of qd atazanavir plus saquinavir, as compared with bid ritonavir plus saquinavir, both in combination with two NRTIs.70 Small lipid changes from baseline with atazanavir/saquinavir were not clinically significant in comparison with the prompt, marked and sustained changes of a magnitude that suggests clinical relevance that occurred in the ritonavir/saquinavir group.


Overall, it appears that saquinavir has fewer effects on fat accumulation and lipids than some of the other PIs; but as it has to be given with ritonavir, any combination it is part of may be associated with lipid and morphological changes.

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 11, 2016 | Posted by in INFECTIOUS DISEASE | Comments Off on Saquinavir

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access