Older Age Bipolar Disorder and Substance Use




© Springer International Publishing AG 2017
Susan W. Lehmann and Brent P. Forester (eds.)Bipolar Disorder in Older Age Patients10.1007/978-3-319-48912-4_5


5. Older Age Bipolar Disorder and Substance Use



Chaya Bhuvaneswaran , Rita Hargrave  and E. Sherwood Brown 


(1)
35 Morrill Street, West Newton, MA 02465, USA

(2)
4338 Leach St, Oakland, CA 94602, USA

(3)
Department of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, MC 8849, Dallas, TX 75390-8849, USA

 



 

Chaya Bhuvaneswaran



 

Rita Hargrave



 

E. Sherwood Brown (Corresponding author)




Keywords
Substance abuseAlcoholOpioidBenzodiazepinesCannabisPsychostimulantsElderlyOlder adultsBipolarPsychiatric disorders



5.1 Introduction


The devastating impact of substance use disorders (SUDs) among older adults has only recently attracted the attention of researchers, clinicians, and the general public [1]. Despite the evidence that alcohol and other SUDs affect nearly 1 in 5 older adults, there has been limited examination of these areas in the substance abuse or gerontology literature [2]. There is an even greater paucity of research on the screening, assessment, and treatment protocols for older adults with bipolar disorder and coexisting SUD. Adults with bipolar disorder (compared to other psychiatric disorders) have the highest rate of alcohol use disorder [2]. With the predicted dramatic growth of the aging population, as well as more geriatric patients in outpatient opioid maintenance programs both due to the aging of patients first enrolled in the 1990s and due to patients with prescription opioid misuse in later life, the need and demand for effective, comprehensive mental health services for older adults with psychiatric illness and substance use disorders will continue to grow [3].


Clinical Vignette 5.1

Mr. V, a 67-year-old single man diagnosed with bipolar I disorder in his thirties, presented with manic and psychotic symptoms and intoxicated, has had recurrent, severe depressive episodes not ameliorated by valproic acid, carbamazepine, or antipsychotics. He is inconsistently adherent to a regimen of low-dose lithium—he refuses to allow the dose to be increased to therapeutic blood levels—and insists on continuing a fairly high dose of fluoxetine. Whenever he discontinues lithium, he experiences affective switching and manic episodes. Mr. V has had over twenty lifetime hospitalizations for mood episodes. In between episodes, he lives in an apartment paid for by a sister who manages his care and provides him with income to supplement disability income, but who is herself aging and concerned about her own retirement. He has written moving essays about bipolar disorder and occasionally attends support group meetings, which he calls “talking to the young ones about how it is.”

Mr. V recently had an inpatient alcohol detoxification admission where he expressed suicidal ideation while intoxicated. He refused a trial of naltrexone after he was stabilized. When younger, he participated in alcohol residential treatment programs and halfway house communities, but will not consider these options now, commenting that, “I’m too old for all that stuff, it’s embarrassing.” He has been referred to multiple day treatment and psychosocial groups as well as individual chronotherapy. (Chronotherapy is a therapy to prevent mood episodes in bipolar disorders by regulating exposure to light and darkness as well as manipulating sleep cycle, based on the theory that disrupted circadian rhythms and genetic polymorphisms in suprachiasmatic nucleus underlie sleep disruption in affective disorders.) [4] Mr. V was also enrolled in interpersonal therapy research studies and eventually dropped out of all of these, saying “the only thing that makes me feel better when I’m depressed is a few (vodka) nips.” Recently, his physician discussed a trial of an atypical antipsychotic medication for greater mood stability. However, his outpatient psychiatrist and therapist are concerned by the patient’s recent neurologic examination that was notable for gait ataxia and neuropsychological testing indicating working memory deficits and confabulation. Furthermore, a toxicology screen was positive for benzodiazepines despite the absence of any current prescription for benzodiazepines after discharge from his recent inpatient detoxification admission.

Learning Points





  • Substance abuse should be considered in older patients with bipolar disorder.


  • Clinical features—including cognitive changes, medication non-adherence, frequent hospitalization, and suicidal ideation—are all potential indicators of substance use.


  • Toxicology screens should be considered in older patients with bipolar disorder with suspected substance use.

In this chapter, we will discuss the following themes highlighted by this clinical vignette: the prevalence and correlates of bipolar disorder and substance use disorders (SUDs); demographic features of older adults with bipolar disorder and SUD; trajectory of illness in older adults with bipolar disorder and SUD; epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of specific SUDs in older age bipolar disorder (OABD); and future directions for treatment research among older adults with bipolar disorder.


5.2 Prevalence and Demographic Features of Substance Use Disorder in Older Age Bipolar Disorder


Current epidemiological studies suggest that up to 60 % of adults with bipolar disorder will experience one or more substance use disorders (SUDs) [57]. Several studies report that there is a lower prevalence of SUD in elderly bipolar patients compared with younger adults, ranging from 9 to 29 % [812]. Although SUD is less common among older than younger adults with bipolar disorder, even low intensity substance use may be particularly harmful for older adults, carrying negative medical and functional consequences [13].

Gender plays a critical role in the clinical presentation and course of bipolar disorder and coexisting SUDs among geriatric patients. Across the life span, women present more often with bipolar disorder later in life, with an average age of diagnosis from 30 to 35 years [14]. In studies of mixed-age populations, the combination of bipolar disorder and SUD is more common in men compared to women [8, 15]. Thus, the increased risk for SUD in men versus women with bipolar disorder follows the pattern observed in the general population. Men are also more likely to have risk factors for SUDs, such as divorced/widowed status, lower level of education, additional primary psychiatric disorders, and higher rates of medical comorbidities [15, 16]. Among women as compared to men with older age bipolar disorder, a coexisting anxiety disorder is more highly associated with SUDs [10]. Although prospective longitudinal studies of bipolar disorder in older adults report that women experience more frequent depressive episodes, older women have a lower prevalence of SUD than older men [17]. Elevated rates of SUD in men with bipolar disorder may be related to gender differences in patterns of substance use. Non-medical prescription opioid use also appears to be more common among men than among women with bipolar disorder [18].

Cross-cultural studies suggest that race/ethnicity exerts a significant influence on the diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis of bipolar disorder in older adults [19]. African American patients have historically been more likely to be diagnosed with psychotic disorders rather than mood disorders, with the true prevalence of bipolar disorder and bipolar disorder with coexisting SUD likely underestimated among older African Americans [19]. Nonwhite race among mixed-age groups has been identified as a risk factor for suicide within bipolar disorder [20]. There is limited research that examines whether this trend persists in the context of older adults, with bipolar disorder and SUD.

Some investigators suggest that ethnicity influences the efficacy of treatment interventions for bipolar disorder and SUD. The STEP-Bipolar Disorder study (after controlling for any SUD) reported 1-year treatment outcomes that were significantly poorer for African Americans compared to Hispanic and non-Hispanic patients [21]. The National Comorbidity Survey Replication (comprised of mixed-age patients) identified healthcare disparities affecting African Americans with bipolar disorder. Controlling for factors such as healthcare utilization, socioeconomic status, or symptom profile, African American patients with bipolar disorder were less likely to receive adequate treatment with mood stabilizer medications, thus placing them at great risk for SUD relapse including a higher rate of inpatient hospitalizations and ED visits [22].

Other factors contributing to reduced treatment response among African American older adults are higher medical burden (e.g., hypertension, diabetes, and obesity) [23] and higher rates of underdiagnosis and misdiagnosis of bipolar disorder [11]. The paucity of cross-cultural research on bipolar disorder and coexisting SUD makes it difficult to ascertain the presence of healthcare disparities among other ethnic minority groups. Native Hawaiians experienced longer and more frequent hospitalizations for bipolar disorder with coexisting SUDs compared to other Asian American groups [24]. Hispanics, Asian Americans, and Native Americans also have higher rates of involuntary commitment for co-occurring SUD and bipolar disorder compared with white counterparts [25]. Fleck et al. [25] postulate that culturally based stigma against seeking or complying with outpatient treatment contributes to greater treatment non-adherence among all ethnic minority patients.

Although ethnicity has been cited as a predictor of high rates of healthcare utilization for older adults, including acute psychiatric care versus outpatient treatment access, socioeconomic status may be a confounding factor [26]. In a study of older African American adults, the elevated rate of acute healthcare utilization was correlated with high rates of homelessness and inadequate insurance coverage (i.e., uninsured or underinsured) [27]. Studies of other cohorts suggest that housing instability (or homelessness) rather than race or ethnicity is predictive of high rates of re-hospitalization and utilization of acute healthcare services [28].


5.3 Trajectory of Illness among Older Adults with Bipolar Disorder and SUD


In general, the presence of bipolar disorder and coexisting SUD predicts more severe course of illness [29]. Of special consideration in older adults is their vulnerability to medication side effects and the physical effects of substances due to age-related changes in pharmacokinetics, multiple medical comorbidities, and polypharmacy [30, 31]. Although there are limited data on the clinical impact of lower severity substance use disorders in older adults, studies of younger populations suggest that even lower intensity substance use patterns could adversely affect the trajectory of bipolar disorder in older adults [32].

The lower rate of SUDs among geriatric bipolar patients may be influenced by underreporting of SUD by older adults due to stigma [33]. Additionally, healthcare professionals are less likely to diagnose bipolar disorder among older adults with SUD. A 2015 study of geriatric hospitalized patients meeting alcohol use disorders (AUDs) criteria found that few of these patients had been evaluated for or diagnosed with bipolar disorder prior to admission [34]. During acute clinical encounters (in emergency departments, medical units, or inpatient psychiatric units), accurate collateral information about current mood symptoms and past psychiatric history may not be available to assist the diagnostic process. Under recognition of SUDs among older adults with bipolar disorder, reflective of lower rates of assessment for SUDs in geriatric populations more generally, likely contributes to delays in diagnosis and treatment [35]. Based on the current rate of substance use among young and middle-aged patients, future cohorts of older adults will probably have higher rates of SUDs  than the present cohort [32]. Epidemiological trends suggest that the number of older adults with SUD will increase from 2.5 million people in 1999 to 5.0 million by 2020 [36]. This demographic trend suggests that there will be overall higher rates of older adults with coexisting bipolar disorder and substance use disorder [32]. Studies of mixed-age patients report that bipolar disorder and SUD are associated with increased mood instability [37], greater rates of medication non-adherence [38], and an increased duration of depressive and manic episodes [39]. The SUD–bipolar disorder comorbidity has been associated with higher rates of hospitalizations and suicides [8, 32, 40] and with longer time to symptom remission [41]. Recent studies suggest that among those with bipolar disorder across age groups, even moderate alcohol intake is associated with higher levels of inter-episode sub-syndromal symptoms [42].

Mortality rates may be higher for younger patients with the compared to older patients with bipolar disorder and the comorbidity [43]. Some investigators report that average life expectancy for younger bipolar patients is reduced by 10–12 years [43]. Major causes of the shortened life span are end-stage complications of alcohol dependence, and overdose and toxicity from stimulants and opioids [44]. Alcohol and other substance use disorders have been associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality for both bipolar disorder and depression [44]. The risk of suicide is elevated among bipolar disorder patients and accounts for a 15–20 % rate of suicide-related mortality [45]. Patients with comorbid bipolar disorder and substance use disorders regardless of age or gender are at least twofold more likely to attempt suicide than the general population [46, 47]. SUDs and coexisting bipolar disorder may be associated with aggression, impulsivity, and hostility that increase the propensity to act on suicidal thoughts [48]. Older adults with mood and affective disorders are at highest risk for suicide, and coexisting SUDs further increase their risk of suicide attempts and suicide-related mortality [49].

Research is scarce on resilience factors predictive of long-term remission of bipolar illness in the geriatric bipolar-SUD population; however, potential resilience factors include lower impulsivity, greater number of years of education [50], and earlier age of diagnosis [51]. Vulnerability factors include greater number of depressive episodes and higher scores for impulsivity and risk taking; lifetime trauma exposure [52]; and criminal justice involvement (more common among bipolar disorder patients than those in the general population and most common among bipolar-SUD patients within this group) [53]. Predictors of substance treatment outcome in this population have yet to be identified, though treatment outcome studies are discussed below.


5.4 Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Treatment for Specific SUDs among Older Age Bipolar Disorder Patients



5.4.1 Alcohol



5.4.1.1 Epidemiology


An estimated 1–2 % of older adults in the general population have alcohol use disorders (AUD) [54]. Specific estimates of geriatric bipolar disorder patients with this SUD range from 13 to 25 %, making it the most common substance use disorder [12]. Research on the relationship between alcohol use disorder severity and suicide risk has produced mixed results [46]. Carra [46] reported that both alcohol dependence and alcohol abuse were associated with increased risk of suicide attempts.


5.4.1.2 Diagnosis


Guidelines for the workup of alcohol use disorders among geriatric bipolar patients are described in Substance Abuse among Older Adults. Treatment Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 26 published by SAMHS [55]. Of special note is the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test-Geriatric Version, which has been adapted for use in this population for other substances and validated for different ethnic groups [56].


5.4.1.3 Treatment


Since patients with comorbid psychiatric disorders are routinely excluded from clinical trials of new treatments for SUD, the safety and efficacy of existing treatments for alcohol use and other SUDs are emerging areas of investigation for patients with bipolar disorder [57]. Given that adults over age 60 are also often excluded from these studies, there is even less information about effective, safe treatment options for older adults with the bipolar disorder–SUD comorbidity. Furthermore, our understanding of psychiatric and medical comorbidity in bipolar disorder derives largely from studies of younger and mixed-age samples [12]. However, it is a clinical priority to identify more effective evidence-based pharmacological [58] and behavioral treatments for comorbid AUD and bipolar disorder across age groups given the role of alcohol dependence in contributing to occupational dysfunction in bipolar disorder through a variety of mechanisms [59] Addressing substance abuse may beneficially impact the course of bipolar disorder. Improved stabilization of bipolar disorder is also likely to aid substance disorder treatment compliance [8].

Patients with AUD and a co-occurring psychiatric disorder have more complex symptoms than patients with either disorder alone, are least likely to engage in psychosocial interventions, and benefit the most from a full arsenal of treatment options including psychotherapy as well as pharmacotherapy [60, 61]. Although the cumulative scope and impact of bipolar disorder with co-occurring alcohol use disorder across age groups have been well documented, there are little data on selection and implementation of optimal treatment strategies [62, 63]. None of the current FDA approved treatments for alcohol use (i.e., disulfiram, naltrexone, and acamprosate) have been demonstrated to be clearly effective among patients with bipolar disorder [57]. Valproate [64] and the combination of lithium and valproate have been shown to improve mood symptoms as well as reduce days of heavy drinking [65]. Several studies suggest that quetiapine lacks efficacy in the treatment of comorbid bipolar disorder and AUD [66, 67]. Other studies of treatment with acamprosate and naltrexone have also failed to show a statistically significant benefit in patients with bipolar disorder and AUD [68, 69].

Several investigators suggest that topiramate is effective in reducing heavy drinking among individuals with alcohol dependence [22, 70]. However, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of topiramate for mixed-age adults with bipolar disorder and alcohol dependence (compared with a general population of alcohol dependent patients) (N = 12) did not support adjunctive use of topiramate [71].

Behavioral therapies for alcohol dependence—including 12-step programs, cognitive behavioral therapy for relapse prevention, and motivational interviewing—merit further exploration, including through randomized controlled studies, for older adults with bipolar disorder. In one mixed methods study of dually diagnosed patients, including OABD patients, the peer support group and peer education emphases of 12-step programs such as Alcoholics Anonymous were identified as helpful even by patients with significant psychiatric symptom burden (i.e., while still experiencing some level of psychosis or mania) [72]. Pilot studies of cognitive behavioral therapy for relapse prevention (including “Third Wave” cognitive behavioral approaches such as mindfulness-based relapse prevention) have shown significant benefit for older adults, including veterans, though have not been specifically tested in older adults with bipolar disorder and comorbid alcohol dependence [73]. Similarly, while case series reports on using integrated motivational interviewing and cognitive behavioral therapies have demonstrated promise among bipolar disorder patients (across age groups) with comorbid AUDs, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials of these psychosocial treatments for OABD patients. Potential future randomized clinical trials could apply existing knowledge to the OABD population, such as from protocols developed by Schmitz and Grillion [74] and Weiss et al. [75], including in integrated community-based group therapy.


5.4.2 Sedative-Hypnotics



5.4.2.1 Epidemiology


Substance use disorders involving benzodiazepines as well as other sedative-hypnotics (such as zolpidem, eszopiclone, and zaleplon) are common despite the well-known adverse effects of these medications among elderly patients (including increased fall risk and cognitive impairment). The estimated prevalence of benzodiazepine use in the general geriatric patient population is 11 % based on limited studies [76], making this SUD in some settings (e.g., outpatient psychiatry) nearly as common as alcohol use disorders. The risk of long-term continuous sedative-hypnotic use (not recommended by most prescribing guidelines) is greater among elderly patients, reflecting greater rates of anxiety and insomnia within this group [77]. It is not yet clear what role gender and ethnicity may play in prevalence. However, Petrovic et al. [78] and colleagues found that female gender, widowed status, borderline personality disorder, and anxiety disorders were risk factors for benzodiazepine dependence, and immigrant patients from developing countries may be at particular risk given high population-wide use (up to 26.7 % among women over age 60 and 14 % among males) of long-acting benzodiazepines for extended duration in Latin America, for example [79]. While studies to identify risk factors within older adults with bipolar disorder are still lacking, bipolar disorder is a known risk factor for benzodiazepine dependence in general due to the high rate of anxiety disorder comorbidity, with nearly 50 % of adults with BD meeting anxiety disorders criteria per lifetime. Further, some raise the possibility that anxiety symptoms, which are often treated and self-treated with sedative-hypnotics, may be primary features of bipolar illness rather than a comorbidity [80].


5.4.2.2 Diagnosis


In addition to the SAMHSA guidelines referenced above, tools such as the A-FRAMES (Assessment, Feedback, Responsibility, Advice, Menu, Empathy, and Self-efficacy) Questionnaire modify existing motivational interviewing tools to address geriatric issues [81]. Other tools are being developed for home evaluations, for more sensitive detection, and for use among prescribers (e.g., STOPP—Screening Tool of Older Person’s Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions) in inpatient and outpatient settings [82].


5.4.2.3 Treatment


Pharmacotherapy rests on use of benzodiazepines in detoxification taper protocol, with potential adjunctive medications proposed such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitors [83], phenobarbital [84], and oxcarbazepine [85]. These medications have yet to be tested among geriatric bipolar disorder patients in treatment for chronic benzodiazepine or other sedative-hypnotic use but hold relevant potential given wide baseline use for mood and cognition within the population. As for other older adults or other groups of patients with advanced liver disease, including cirrhosis, benzodiazepines that do not get oxidized by the liver (oxazepam and lorazepam) are preferable to chlordiazepoxide to minimize the risk of oversedation, accumulation, or toxicity, also given that oxazepam and lorazepam are shorter acting [86]. It is also worth noting that, contrary to the practice (in the 1980s) of “only using alprazolam to detoxify patients from alprazolam,” this motto is not supported by clinical evidence, and the recommendation is to use either oxazepam or lorazepam among elderly patients, with phenobarbital substitution also a possibility. Falls, myocardial infarctions, and delirium without signs of autonomic hyperactivity are risks of benzodiazepine withdrawal in the elderly general population, to which dually diagnosed patients may be particularly vulnerable given polypharmacy; thus, medically supervised benzodiazepine withdrawal among OABD patients is critical [87].


5.4.3 Cocaine



5.4.3.1 Epidemiology


Stimulant-induced psychosis or mania can mimic affective disorder-induced episodes in those without bipolar disorder. Among dual diagnosis patients, stimulants may also exacerbate actual mood episodes. Thus, it is critical to consider these substance use disorders (SUDs) on the differential diagnosis given high medical sequelae potentially more severe in elderly populations: primarily cardiovascular and neurologic, including tachycardia and other arrhythmias, cerebrovascular accidents (CVA), seizures (for which elderly patients may be at additional risk already due to polypharmacy), cocaine- and amphetamine-induced myocardial ischemia and infarction, and infectious diseases [88].

Notably, over 80 % of cocaine users, even those without comorbid bipolar disorder as a risk factor, experience paranoia. Further, upwards of 55 % in one cohort reported cocaine-related violent behaviors [89]. Both homicide and suicide risk are elevated in relation to the length and severity of cocaine use. Psychiatric symptoms are more pronounced among crack cocaine users than those dependent on other forms of cocaine (i.e., intranasal powdered cocaine) [89]. Male gender appears to be predictive of cocaine use in the elderly population, though studies specific to geriatric bipolar patients are still lacking. One emergency department study, conducted over a 6-month period of ED visits made by persons above the age of 60, demonstrated that 2 % of these individuals had cocaine-positive urines, with an average age of 66 and 90 % male [90].


5.4.3.2 Diagnosis


Diagnosis by routine toxicology may prove difficult given the short half-life of cocaine (remaining in urine 4–8 h after the dose, with benzoylecgonine (the psychoactive metabolite of cocaine) potentially remaining in urine for up to 60 h after use) and trends toward episodic or binge rather than daily use [91]. Specialized screening tools are under investigation, including adaptation of the Decision Balance Questionnaire for assessing vulnerability to cocaine relapse [92], although none have been validated for geriatric bipolar patients to date.


5.4.3.3 Treatment


Pharmacological studies designed for bipolar disorder patients with coexisting cocaine use disorder have shown initial promising results, including for citicoline, lamotrigine, and quetiapine in recent trials. Other drugs that have been considered in case reports, but not yet tested in randomized clinical studies, include gabapentin, mifepristone, valproate, and pramipexole. A randomized placebo-controlled trial of the cognitive enhancer citicoline, a moderator of phospholipid metabolism that increases acetylcholine levels, demonstrated improved declarative memory and an increased abstinence rate from cocaine, although citicoline did not improve mood [93]. In a 10-week randomized controlled trial of lamotrigine among bipolar disorder patients (depressed or in a mixed episode) with cocaine dependence, self-reported cocaine use (measured by dollars spent) decreased significantly. A follow-up uncontrolled replication study showed improvements in measures of cocaine craving, mood, and drug use [94], while an earlier open-label study also showed a significant decrease in craving [95]. A more recent study showed a similar reduction in cocaine use with benefits occurring earlier in treatment and attenuating over time [96]. Notably, drug dreams, predictors of use and correlated with research study treatment survival among patients with SUDs, also appeared to decrease in other larger studies of lamotrigine [97]. There is less evidence of quetiapine’s efficacy for the bipolar cocaine dependence comorbidity, with additional concerns of the possible abuse liability of this drug, though an open-label study (N = 17) showed good tolerability and improvement of psychiatric symptoms [98].


5.4.4 Amphetamines



5.4.4.1 Epidemiology


The rates of amphetamine use disorders (including prescribed psychostimulants, as well as illicit drugs such as methamphetamine) are unknown for geriatric bipolar patients specifically. However, given overlap between core affective disorder symptoms (such as impulsivity, risk taking, and euphoria) and the intoxication syndrome for amphetamines, as well as elevated rates of attention-deficit–hyperactivity disorders (ADHD) within the population, bipolar disorder patients in general are at particular risk [99]. Of the estimated 5 % of adults in the general population, over 20 % may have comorbid bipolar disorder [100].

While use of stimulants within the population carries a risk of mania, as well as the medical complications discussed above for cocaine (including cardiovascular and neurologic), studies are also underway of stimulant augmentation of mood stabilizers to address bipolar depression, with preliminary promising results [101, 102].

Prevalence of stimulant dependence estimated from a voluntary bipolar disorder patient registry (N = 100) was 2.8 % among those with bipolar I patients, with an age range of 18–65 and a specific prevalence unavailable for patients over age 60 [103]. While specific trends by ethnicity or gender are not known for geriatric bipolar patients, it is notable that bipolar disorder (along with anxiety disorders) was highly correlated with stimulant dependence in a group of gay and transgendered (GBT) men seeking outpatient psychiatric treatment, making elderly LGBT populations a potential priority for outreach and assessment [104].


5.4.4.2 Diagnosis


In addition to a thorough medical workup, including electrocardiogram and urine drug screen (which remain positive for amphetamines for 1–2 days after use), screening through Physical Symptom Screening Triggers checklists (as described in the SAMHSA Tip 26) that assess sleep changes, anxiety, agitation, and availability of stimulants in the household (i.e., prescribed to a family member) may be of particular relevance [1].


5.4.4.3 Treatment


A limited evidence base exists for adjunctive treatments of stimulant dependence among older adults with bipolar disorder. Nevertheless, effective mood stabilization remains the central strategy, and lithium’s neuroprotective benefits may ameliorate stimulant-induced reduction in brain choline levels [105]. Among behavioral treatments, in addition to those based on motivational interviewing, 12-step programs, and dual diagnosis models, recent research on contingency management (where participants earn vouchers or other compensation for continued program participation and/or continued verified negative urine screens) has been shown to decrease stimulant use among both younger and older bipolar disorder patients in community health settings [106]. Pharmacotherapy showing initial promise includes citicoline [107] (a randomized controlled trial demonstrating improved mood symptoms among mixed-age patients) and atypical antipsychotic medications. In a trial of quetiapine and risperidone among bipolar disorder patients of age 20–50, patients reported decreased drug craving related to decreased drug use [108]. Research among older adults with BD and psychostimulant use is warranted.


5.4.5 Prescription Opioids



5.4.5.1 Epidemiology


The most commonly abused prescription opioids by general population adults (across age group) are hydrocodone and oxycodone, although both have less abuse potential than the more potent mu agonists, morphine or fentanyl [109]. In large epidemiologic studies such as the National Epidemiologic Study on Alcohol and Related Conditions, there is evidence for bidirectional relationships between bipolar disorder and non-medical use of prescription opioids. Prescription opioid use appears to be a precipitating factor in bipolar mood episodes, the presentation of bipolar disorder, as well as a frequent complication of previously diagnosed bipolar disorder [110]. Male gender and young age are risk factors for prescription opioid use in the population [111], with a 28 % prevalence of bipolar disorder among male patients in one inpatient cohort, and mania a key risk of opioid detoxification [112, 113]. While men appear to be more likely to misuse prescription opioids, women are more likely to receive combination regimens of prescription opioids and sedative-hypnotics, placing them at possibly greater risk of overdose [114]. Other risk factors for prescription opioid use disorders include a positive family history of substance use, as well as personal exposure to violence and sexual assault, with some studies confirming that the diagnosis of bipolar illness constitutes a risk factor for subsequent trauma exposure for both men and women [115]. While comorbidity studies in older adults with bipolar disorder have been limited, rates of prescription opioid overdose deaths increased between 2000 and 2014 for patients over age 55 [116], with polypharmacy, medical comorbidities, and treatment refractory pain among the risk factors for mortality [117]. Up to 10 % of geriatric medical outpatients screen positive for bipolar disorder, type I or II, in cohorts receiving some form of an opioid pain regimen. Therefore, the increased risk of suicide and impulsive or accidental overdose that may be associated with bipolar illness merits thorough assessment for prescription opioid misuse among older adults with bipolar disorder [118].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Aug 25, 2017 | Posted by in GERIATRICS | Comments Off on Older Age Bipolar Disorder and Substance Use

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access