Management of Thrombotic Microangiopathic Hemolytic Anemias with Therapeutic Plasma Exchange




Thrombotic microangiopathies are a heterogeneous group of inherited and acquired disorders sharing a common clinical presentation of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and organ damage. These disorders have been treated with plasma exchange (TPE) based on randomized controlled trials, which found this therapy to be effective in thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). For the remaining disorders, low- to very low-quality evidence exists for the use of TPE. When TPE is applied, the treatment regimen used for TTP is usually applied. There is a need for further evaluation of the role of TPE in the treatment of thrombotic microangiopathies other than TTP.


Key points








  • Thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) are inherited and acquired disorders characterized by microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and organ damage resulting from microvasculature occlusion.



  • Randomized controlled trials involving plasma exchange (TPE) exist only for thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) with evidence supporting use in other TMA consisting of low- to very low-quality evidence.



  • The American Society for Apheresis considers TPE ineffective for the treatment of Shiga toxin–mediated TMA, selected complement-mediated TMA, and selected drug-associated TMA.



  • The usual course of TPE applied to TTP is usually applied to the other TMA.



  • The usual replacement fluid used in TMA is plasma, with the exception of Streptococcus pneumoniae -associated hemolytic uremic syndrome, where albumin is the suggested replacement fluid.






Introduction


Thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) are a heterogeneous group of disorders, some inherited and some acquired, that share common clinical features. These features are microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) ( Box 1 ), thrombocytopenia, and organ damage due to microvasculature endothelial damage. Although several disorders are considered to be TMA, this review is limited to those for which the use of plasma exchange (TPE) has been described in the medical literature. The disorders discussed are briefly described in Table 1 . Of note, in addition to the traditional names used, Table 1 also provides alternate names, where available, in parentheses as recommended by George and Nester. These suggested alternate names are intended to provide clarity when discussing these disorders by describing the cause of the TMA.



Box 1





  • Anemia



  • Schistocytes



  • Decreased haptoglobin



  • Elevated LDH



Features of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia


Table 1

Thrombotic microangiopathies treated with plasma exchange



































































Disorder a Pathophysiology Patient Population Signs and Symptoms ASFA Category ASFA Recommendation Grade
TTP (ADAMTS13 deficiency-mediated TMA) Deficiency of ADAMTS13 activity due to either congenital deficiency or development of inhibitory autoantibodies Adults or children MAHA, thrombocytopenia, fever, neurologic symptoms, renal dysfunction I 1A
Shiga toxin–associated HUS or typical HUS or diarrhea-associated HUS (ST-TMA) Direct endothelial damage due to toxic effects of Shiga toxin Predominantly a disease of children <5 y of age MAHA, thrombocytopenia, renal dysfunction, bloody diarrhea IV 1C
pHUS Endothelial damage due to crypt antigen exposure or inhibition of Factor H due to protein damage leading to unregulated complement activation A disease of children <2 y of age associated predominantly with S pneumoniae pneumonia MAHA, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury III 2C
aHUS (complement-mediated TMA) Endothelial damage due to unregulated complement activation Adults or children MAHA, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury Complement gene Mutations—II
Membrane cofactor mutations—IV
Factor H autoantibodies—I
Complement gene Mutations—2C
Membrane cofactor mutations—1C
Factor H autoantibodies—2C
HSCT-TMA Endothelial damage due to infection, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and/or GVHD Adults or children MAHA, thrombocytopenia, renal failure, and neurologic symptoms III 2C
Renal transplant-associated TMA Endothelial damage due to calcineurin inhibitors and possibly other transplant-related factors Renal transplant patients MAHA, thrombocytopenia, and worsening or delayed graft function NC NC
Drug-associated TMA (drug-mediated TMA immune reaction or drug-mediated TMA toxic dose-related reaction) See Table 3 Adults or children MAHA, thrombocytopenia, and renal failure See Table 3 See Table 3
Malignancy-associated TMA Coagulation cascade activation due to tumor tissue factor expression Adults with cancer, predominantly adenocarcinomas MAHA, thrombocytopenia, bone pain, respiratory symptoms, anorexia, and weight loss NC NC

Abbreviations: ADAMTS13, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13; ASFA, American Society for Apheresis; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; NC, not categorized.

Data from George JN, Nester CM. Syndromes of thrombotic microangiopathy. N Engl J Med 2014;371:654–66; and Schwartz J, Winters JL, Padmanabhan A, et al. Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice—evidence-based approach from the apheresis applications committee of the American Society for Apheresis. The sixth special issue. J Clin Apher 2013;28:145–284.

a Names in parentheses suggested by George and Nester for clarity.



TPE is a medical procedure whereby plasma is removed and replaced with a colloid or a combination of a colloid and crystalloid replacement fluid. The potential mechanisms of actions of TPE are numerous and vary according to the disease entity being considered. In the case of the TMA, possible mechanisms of action include the removal of pathologic antibodies, the removal of abnormal plasma proteins, and the replacement of absent or abnormal plasma proteins. The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) provides guidance on the use of TPE in the treatment of many, but not all, of the TMA. The role of apheresis therapy in the treatment of a disorder is defined by the ASFA category, with the ASFA recommendation grade providing an indication of the strength of the recommendation to perform the procedure and the quality of the published evidence supporting the treatment. These ASFA categories and the ASFA recommendation grade are defined in Box 2 and Table 2 , respectively, and given for each disorder, where available, in Table 1 . Key considerations in using TPE to treat any disorder are listed in Box 3 and are again described for many of the TMA in the ASFA guidelines. This information is provided in the sections discussing the various TMA.



Box 2





  • Strong recommendation: 1



  • Weak recommendation: 2




    • High-quality evidence (eg, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trials): A



    • Moderate-quality evidence (eg, controlled trials): B



    • Low- or very low-quality evidence (eg, case series or reports, expert opinion): C




American Society for Apheresis recommendation grade definitions

From Schwartz J, Winters JL, Padmanabhan A, et al. Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice—evidence-based approach from the apheresis applications committee of the American Society for Apheresis. The sixth special issue. J Clin Apher 2013;28:147,148; with permission.


Table 2

American Society for Apheresis category definitions



















Category Definition
I Accepted first-line therapy, stand-alone or as an adjunct to other therapies
II Second-line therapy, stand-alone or as an adjunct to other therapies
III Optimum role of apheresis is uncertain, decision-making should be individualized based on each patient’s clinical situation
IV Apheresis therapy ineffective or harmful

From Schwartz J, Winters JL, Padmanabhan A, et al. Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice—evidence-based approach from the apheresis applications committee of the American Society for Apheresis. The sixth special issue. J Clin Apher 2013;28:147; with permission.


Box 3





  • Volume of plasma exchanged



  • Fluid used to replace the removed plasma



  • Frequency of treatment



  • Length of treatment



Key considerations in treating thrombotic microangiopathies with plasma exchange




Introduction


Thrombotic microangiopathies (TMA) are a heterogeneous group of disorders, some inherited and some acquired, that share common clinical features. These features are microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) ( Box 1 ), thrombocytopenia, and organ damage due to microvasculature endothelial damage. Although several disorders are considered to be TMA, this review is limited to those for which the use of plasma exchange (TPE) has been described in the medical literature. The disorders discussed are briefly described in Table 1 . Of note, in addition to the traditional names used, Table 1 also provides alternate names, where available, in parentheses as recommended by George and Nester. These suggested alternate names are intended to provide clarity when discussing these disorders by describing the cause of the TMA.



Box 1





  • Anemia



  • Schistocytes



  • Decreased haptoglobin



  • Elevated LDH



Features of microangiopathic hemolytic anemia


Table 1

Thrombotic microangiopathies treated with plasma exchange



































































Disorder a Pathophysiology Patient Population Signs and Symptoms ASFA Category ASFA Recommendation Grade
TTP (ADAMTS13 deficiency-mediated TMA) Deficiency of ADAMTS13 activity due to either congenital deficiency or development of inhibitory autoantibodies Adults or children MAHA, thrombocytopenia, fever, neurologic symptoms, renal dysfunction I 1A
Shiga toxin–associated HUS or typical HUS or diarrhea-associated HUS (ST-TMA) Direct endothelial damage due to toxic effects of Shiga toxin Predominantly a disease of children <5 y of age MAHA, thrombocytopenia, renal dysfunction, bloody diarrhea IV 1C
pHUS Endothelial damage due to crypt antigen exposure or inhibition of Factor H due to protein damage leading to unregulated complement activation A disease of children <2 y of age associated predominantly with S pneumoniae pneumonia MAHA, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury III 2C
aHUS (complement-mediated TMA) Endothelial damage due to unregulated complement activation Adults or children MAHA, thrombocytopenia, and acute kidney injury Complement gene Mutations—II
Membrane cofactor mutations—IV
Factor H autoantibodies—I
Complement gene Mutations—2C
Membrane cofactor mutations—1C
Factor H autoantibodies—2C
HSCT-TMA Endothelial damage due to infection, chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and/or GVHD Adults or children MAHA, thrombocytopenia, renal failure, and neurologic symptoms III 2C
Renal transplant-associated TMA Endothelial damage due to calcineurin inhibitors and possibly other transplant-related factors Renal transplant patients MAHA, thrombocytopenia, and worsening or delayed graft function NC NC
Drug-associated TMA (drug-mediated TMA immune reaction or drug-mediated TMA toxic dose-related reaction) See Table 3 Adults or children MAHA, thrombocytopenia, and renal failure See Table 3 See Table 3
Malignancy-associated TMA Coagulation cascade activation due to tumor tissue factor expression Adults with cancer, predominantly adenocarcinomas MAHA, thrombocytopenia, bone pain, respiratory symptoms, anorexia, and weight loss NC NC

Abbreviations: ADAMTS13, a disintegrin and metalloproteinase with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13; ASFA, American Society for Apheresis; GVHD, graft-versus-host disease; NC, not categorized.

Data from George JN, Nester CM. Syndromes of thrombotic microangiopathy. N Engl J Med 2014;371:654–66; and Schwartz J, Winters JL, Padmanabhan A, et al. Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice—evidence-based approach from the apheresis applications committee of the American Society for Apheresis. The sixth special issue. J Clin Apher 2013;28:145–284.

a Names in parentheses suggested by George and Nester for clarity.



TPE is a medical procedure whereby plasma is removed and replaced with a colloid or a combination of a colloid and crystalloid replacement fluid. The potential mechanisms of actions of TPE are numerous and vary according to the disease entity being considered. In the case of the TMA, possible mechanisms of action include the removal of pathologic antibodies, the removal of abnormal plasma proteins, and the replacement of absent or abnormal plasma proteins. The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) provides guidance on the use of TPE in the treatment of many, but not all, of the TMA. The role of apheresis therapy in the treatment of a disorder is defined by the ASFA category, with the ASFA recommendation grade providing an indication of the strength of the recommendation to perform the procedure and the quality of the published evidence supporting the treatment. These ASFA categories and the ASFA recommendation grade are defined in Box 2 and Table 2 , respectively, and given for each disorder, where available, in Table 1 . Key considerations in using TPE to treat any disorder are listed in Box 3 and are again described for many of the TMA in the ASFA guidelines. This information is provided in the sections discussing the various TMA.



Box 2





  • Strong recommendation: 1



  • Weak recommendation: 2




    • High-quality evidence (eg, randomized, double-blinded, controlled trials): A



    • Moderate-quality evidence (eg, controlled trials): B



    • Low- or very low-quality evidence (eg, case series or reports, expert opinion): C




American Society for Apheresis recommendation grade definitions

From Schwartz J, Winters JL, Padmanabhan A, et al. Guidelines on the use of therapeutic apheresis in clinical practice—evidence-based approach from the apheresis applications committee of the American Society for Apheresis. The sixth special issue. J Clin Apher 2013;28:147,148; with permission.


Table 2

American Society for Apheresis category definitions



















Category Definition
I Accepted first-line therapy, stand-alone or as an adjunct to other therapies
II Second-line therapy, stand-alone or as an adjunct to other therapies
III Optimum role of apheresis is uncertain, decision-making should be individualized based on each patient’s clinical situation
IV Apheresis therapy ineffective or harmful

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 16, 2017 | Posted by in HEMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Management of Thrombotic Microangiopathic Hemolytic Anemias with Therapeutic Plasma Exchange

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access