Esophagus



Esophagus





ANATOMY



  • The esophagus is a thin-walled, hollow tube with an average length of 25 cm.


  • The normal esophagus is lined with stratified squamous epithelium similar to the buccal mucosa.


  • There are many methods of subdividing the esophagus, all of which are arbitrary.


  • The cervical esophagus begins at the cricopharyngeal muscle (C7) and extends to the thoracic inlet (T3). The thoracic esophagus represents the remainder of the organ, going from T3 to T10 or T11.


  • The American Joint Committee on Cancer divides the esophagus into four regions: cervical, upper thoracic, midthoracic, and lower thoracic.


  • Figure 23-1 correlates the basic anatomy of the esophagus with the subdivision schemes described above.


  • The esophagus has a dual longitudinal interconnecting system of lymphatics. As a result of this system, lymph fluid can travel the entire length of the esophagus before draining into the lymph nodes, so that the entire esophagus is at risk for lymphatic metastasis.


  • In “skip areas,” up to 8 cm of normal tissue can exist between gross tumor and micrometastasis within lymph fluid traveling in the esophagus (13).


  • Lymphatics of the esophagus drain into nodes that usually follow arteries, including the inferior thyroid artery, the bronchial and esophageal arteries from the aorta, and the left gastric artery (celiac axis) (27). Figure 23-2 illustrates the major lymph node groups draining the esophagus.


  • Lymph node metastases are found in about 70% of patients at autopsy.


NATURAL HISTORY



  • The estimated incidence of squamous cell cancer in each third of the esophagus is as follows: upper third, 10% to 25%; middle third, 40% to 50%; lower third, 25% to 50% (16, 21).


  • Achalasia of long duration (≥25 years) is associated with a 5% incidence of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (35). Caustic burns, especially lye corrosion, are related to the development of esophageal cancer (2, 15).


  • Adenocarcinoma has now surpassed squamous cell carcinoma as the most common histology (7). The incidence of adenocarcinoma has increased 350% since 1970 and now accounts for 75% of all esophageal cancers in Caucasian males.


  • The condition most commonly associated with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is Barrett’s esophagus.







FIGURE 23-1 A: Basic anatomy of the esophagus. Note the lengths of the various segments of the esophagus from the upper central incisors and the two classification schemes for subdividing the esophagus. (LN, lymph node.)







FIGURE 23-1 (Continued) B: Esophagus tissue cross section with various T1-4 stage tumors shown. (From Rubin P, Hansen JT. TNM staging atlas, Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2007:179, with permission.) T1 is at top; T4 is at bottom






FIGURE 23-2 Positive lymph node distribution according to the location of the primary tumor. (Modified from Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Kawamura T, et al. Principles of surgical treatment for carcinoma of the esophagus: analysis of lymph node involvement. Ann Surg 1981;194:438; and Dormans E. Das Oesophaguscarcinom. Ergebnisse der unter mitarbeit von 39 pathologischen instituten Deutschlands durchgeführten Erhebung über das oesophaguscarcinom (1925-1933). Z Krebforsch 1939;49:86; with permission.)







FIGURE 23-2 (Continued)


CLINICAL PRESENTATION



  • Symptoms of esophageal cancer usually start 3 to 4 months before diagnosis.


  • Dysphagia and weight loss are seen in over 90% of patients.


  • Odynophagia (pain on swallowing) is present in up to 50% of patients.






FIGURE 23-3 Diagnostic workup for patients with esophageal cancer. (CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CXR, chest X-ray; CBC, complete blood count; PA, posterior-anterior.)



DIAGNOSTIC WORKUP



  • All patients with suspected esophageal cancer should have a workup similar to that outlined in Figure 23-3.


  • Computed tomography (CT) (9) has an accuracy of 51% to 70% (based on a threshold for malignancy of 10 mm) in the detection of mediastinal nodes in patients with esophageal cancer, and 79% (based on a threshold of 8 mm) in the detection of left-sided gastric or celiac nodes (24). Understaging of disease with CT occurs more frequently than overstaging, increasing the likelihood of inappropriate surgery.


  • Endoscopic ultrasound is superior for T-staging (sensitivity, 81%; specificity, 67%), and for N-staging (sensitivity, 63%; specificity, 88%) (9).


  • Most malignant tumors metabolize glucose at a much higher rate than normal tissue; as a result, there is an increased accumulation of the glucose analog fluoro-18 2-deoxyglucose (FDG) in malignant tissue. Positron emission tomography (34) provides diagnostic information based on this increased FDG uptake and often demonstrates early-stage disease before any structural abnormality is evident. PET also can help exclude the presence of malignant disease in an anatomically altered structure.


  • FDG-PET imaging is superior to CT imaging for evaluating distant metastases (sensitivity, 74%; specificity, 90%) (9).


STAGING SYSTEMS



  • A number of staging systems have been proposed.


  • Table 23-1 represents the American Joint Committee on Cancer clinical and pathologic staging system (1). The T stages are illustrated in Figure 23-1B.








TABLE 23-1 AJCC Staging for Cancer of the Esophagus




































































































































































































Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 1, 2016 | Posted by in ONCOLOGY | Comments Off on Esophagus

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access

Primary Tumor (T)


TX



Primary tumor cannot be assessed


T0



No evidence of primary tumor


Tis



High-grade dysplasiaa


T1



Tumor invades lamina propria, muscularis mucosae, or submucosa



T1a


Tumor invades lamina propria or muscularis mucosae



T1b


Tumor invades submucosa


T2



Tumor invades muscularis propria


T3



Tumor invades adventitia


T4



Tumor invades adjacent structures



T4a


Resectable tumor invading pleura, pericardium, or diaphragm



T4b


Unresectable tumor invading other adjacent structures, such as aorta, vertebral body, and trachea


Regional Lymph Nodes (N)


NX



Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed


N0



No regional lymph node metastasis


N1



Regional lymph node metastases involving 1-2 nodes


N2



Regional lymph node metastases involving 3-6 nodes


N3



Regional lymph node metastases involving 7 or more nodes


Distant Metastasis (M)


M0



No distant metastasis (no pathologic M0; use clinical M to complete stage group)


M1



Distant metastasis


The previous M1 subclassifications a and b have been dropped in the 7th edition.


Tumors of Lower Thoracic Esophagus



M1a


Metastasis in celiac lymph nodes



M1b


Other distant metastasis


Tumors of Midthoracic Esophagus



M1a


Not applicable



M1b


Other distant metastasis


Tumors of Upper Thoracic Esophagus



M1a


Metastasis in cervical nodes



M1b


Other distant metastasis


Stage Grouping (Adenocarcinoma)



Grade


Stage 0



Tis (HGD)


N0


M0


1,X


Stage IA



T1


N0


M0


1-2,X


Stage IB



T1


N0


M


3




T2


N0


M0


1-2,X


Stage IIA



T2


N0


M0


3


Stage IIB



T3


N0


M0


Any




T1-2


N1


M0


Any


Stage IIIA



T1-2


N2


M0


Any




T3


N1


M0


Any




T4a


N0


M0


Any


Stage IIIB



T3


N2


M0


Any


Stage IIIC