Allergy to Stinging Insects



Allergy to Stinging Insects


Robert E. Reisman




Allergic reactions to insect stings constitute a major medical problem, resulting in about 50 recognized fatalities annually in the United States (1), and are likely responsible for other unexplained sudden deaths. People at risk often are very anxious about future stings and modify their daily living patterns and lifestyles. Clinical observations correlated with the application of immunologic measurements have led to understanding of the natural history of insect sting allergy and the appropriate diagnosis and treatment for people at risk for insect sting anaphylaxis. For many affected people this is a self-limited disease; for others, treatment results in a “permanent cure.”


The Insects

The stinging insects are members of the order Hymenoptera of the class Insecta. They may be broadly divided into two families: the vespids, which include the yellow jacket, hornet, and wasp; and the apids, which include the honeybee and the bumblebee. People may be allergic to one or all of the stinging insects. The identification of the culprit insect responsible for the reactions is thus important in terms of specific advice and specific venom immunotherapy (VIT) discussed later.

The honeybee and bumblebee are quite docile and tend to sting only when provoked. The bumblebee is a rare offender although it has become an occupational hazard in greenhouse workers in Europe (2). Because of the common use of the honeybee for the production of honey and in plant fertilization, exposure to this insect is quite common. Multiple stings from honeybees may occur, particularly if their hive, which may contain thousands of insects, is in danger. The honeybee usually loses its stinging mechanism in the sting process, thereby inflicting self-evisceration and death.

The problem of many simultaneous insect stings has been intensified by the introduction of the Africanized honeybee, the so-called killer bee, into the southwestern United States (3). These bees are much more aggressive than the domesticated European honeybees which are found throughout the United States. Massive sting incidents have occurred, resulting in death from venom toxicity. The Africanized honeybees entered south Texas in 1990 and are now present in Arizona and California. It is anticipated that these bees will continue to spread throughout the southern United States. They are unable to survive in colder climates but may make periodic forays into the northern United States during the summer months.

The yellow jacket is the most common cause of allergic insect sting reactions. These insects nest in the ground and are easily disturbed in the course of activities, such as lawn mowing and gardening. They are also attracted to food and commonly found around garbage and picnic areas. They are present in increasing numbers in late summer and fall months of the year. Hornets, which are closely related to the yellow jacket, nest in shrubs and are also easily provoked by activities such as hedge clipping. Wasps usually build honeycomb nests under eaves and rafters and are relatively few in number in such nests. However, in some parts of the country, such as Texas, they are the most common cause for insect stings.

In contrast to stinging insects, biting insects such as mosquitos rarely cause serious allergic reactions. These insects deposit salivary gland secretions, which have no relationship to the venom deposited by stinging insects. Anaphylaxis has occurred from bites of the deer fly, kissing bug, black fly, and bed bug. Isolated reports also suggest that, on a rare occasion, mosquito bites have caused anaphylaxis. It is much more common, however, for insect bites to cause large local reactions, which may have an immune pathogenesis (4).


Reactions to Insect Stings


Normal Reaction

The usual reaction after an insect sting is mild erythema and swelling at the sting site. This reaction is transient and disappears within several hours. Little treatment is needed other than analgesics and cold compresses.
Insect stings, in contrast to insect bites, always cause pain at the sting site.


Large Local Reactions

Extensive swelling and erythema, extending from the sting site over a large area, is a fairly common reaction. The swelling usually reaches a maximum in 24 to 48 hours and may last as long as 10 days. On occasion, fatigue, nausea, and malaise may accompany the large local reaction. Aspirin and antihistamines are usually adequate treatment. When severe or disabling, administration of steroids, such as prednisone, 40 mg daily for 2 to 3 days, may be very helpful. These large local reactions have been confused with infection and cellulitis. Insect sting sites are rarely infected and antibiotic therapy rarely indicated.

Most people who have had large local reactions from insect stings will have similar large local reactions from subsequent re-stings (5). The risk for generalized anaphylaxis is very low, less than 5%. Thus, people who have had large local reactions are usually not considered candidates for VIT (discussed later) and do not require venom skin tests. Recently, Kelly et al. have successfully used VIT to decrease local reactions in people frequently exposed (6). This decision to use immunotherapy for treatment of people with large local reactions should be dependent on the frequency and severity of the reaction and the therapeutic response to steroids administered shortly after the sting.


Anaphylaxis

The most serious reaction that follows an insect sting is anaphylaxis. Retrospective population studies suggest that the incidence of this acute allergic reaction from an insect sting ranges between 0.4% and 3.0% (79). Allergic reactions can occur at any age; most have occurred in individuals younger than 20 years of age, and with a male-to-female ratio of 2:1. These factors may reflect exposure rather than any specific age or sex predilection. Several clinical studies suggest that about one-third of individuals suffering systemic reactions have a personal history of atopic disease. Stings around the head and neck most commonly cause allergic reactions, but reactions may occur from stings occurring on any area of the body (1014).

In most patients, anaphylactic symptoms occur within 15 minutes after the sting, although there have been rare reports of reactions developing later. Clinical observations suggest that the sooner the symptoms occur, the more severe the reactions may be. The clinical symptoms vary from patient to patient and are typical of anaphylaxis from any cause. The most common symptoms involve the skin and include generalized urticaria, flushing, and angioedema. More serious symptoms are respiratory and cardiovascular. Upper airway edema involving the pharynx, epiglottis, and trachea has been responsible for numerous fatalities. Circulatory collapse with shock and hypotension also has been responsible for mortality. Other symptoms include bowel spasm and diarrhea and uterine contractions (12,15).

Severe anaphylaxis, including loss of consciousness, occurs in all age groups. In one large study (16), the incidence of severe anaphylaxis was similar throughout all ages. Most deaths from sting anaphylaxis occur in adults. The reason for this increased mortality rate in adults might be the presence of cardiovascular disease or other pathologic changes associated with age. Adults may have less tolerance for the profound biochemical and physiologic changes that accompany anaphylaxis (1719).

There are no clinical, absolute criteria that will identify people at risk for acquiring venom allergy. Most people who have venom anaphylaxis have tolerated stings without any reaction before the first episode of anaphylaxis. Even individuals who have died from insect sting anaphylaxis usually had no history of prior allergic reactions (1). The occurrence of venom anaphylaxis after first known insect sting exposure is another confusing observation, raising the issue of the etiology of prior sensitization of the pathogenesis of this initial reaction. People who have had large local reactions usually have positive venom skin tests and often very high titers of serum venom-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE); thus, these tests do not discriminate the few potential anaphylactic reactors. Anecdotal observations suggest that the use of β-blocking medication, which certainly potentiates the seriousness of any anaphylactic reaction, may also be a risk factor for subsequent occurrence of anaphylaxis in people who have had large local reactions.

Many simultaneous stings (greater than 100) may sensitize a person, who then might be at risk for anaphylaxis from a subsequent single sting. Exposure to this large amount of venom protein can induce IgE production. This potential problem is now recognized more often because of the many stings inflicted by the so-called killer bees. After experiencing a large number of stings with or without a toxic clinical reaction, people should be tested to determine the possibility of potential venom allergy. After an uneventful insect sting, some people may develop a positive skin test, which is usually transient in occurrence. Currently, skin testing of people who do not have an allergic reaction from a single sting is not recommended.

The natural history of insect sting anaphylaxis has now been well studied and is most intriguing. People who have had insect sting anaphylaxis have an approximate 60% recurrence rate of anaphylaxis after subsequent stings (20). Viewed from a different perspective, not all people presumed to be at risk react to re-stings. The incidence of these re-sting reactions is influenced by age and severity of the symptoms of the initial reaction. In general, children are less likely to have re-sting
reactions as compared to adults. The more severe the anaphylactic symptoms the more likely it is to reoccur. For example, children who have had dermal symptoms (hives, angioedema) as the only manifestation of anaphylaxis have a remarkably low re-sting reaction rate (20,21). On the other hand individuals of any age who have had severe anaphylaxis have an approximate 70% likelihood of repeat reactions (16,20). When anaphylaxis does reoccur, the severity of the reaction tends to be similar to the initial reaction. No relationship has been found between the occurrence and degree of anaphylaxis and the intensity of venom skin test reactions. Thus, factors other than IgE antibodies modulate clinical anaphylaxis.


Unusual Reactions

Serum sickness type reactions, characterized by urticaria, joint pain, malaise, and fever, have occurred approximately 7 days after an insect sting. On occasion these reactions have also been associated with an immediate anaphylactic reaction. People who have this serum sickness type reaction are subsequently at risk for acute anaphylaxis after repeat stings and thus are considered candidates for VIT (22).


There have been isolated reports of other reactions such as vasculitis, nephritis, neuritis, and encephalitis occurring in a temporal relationship to an insect sting. The basic etiology for these reactions has not been established (23).


Toxic Reactions

Toxic reactions may occur as a result of many simultaneous stings. Insect venom contains a number of potent pharmacologic agents, and as a result of the properties of these substances, vascular collapse, shock, hypotension, and death may occur (24). The differentiation between allergic and toxic reactions sometimes can be difficult. As noted, after toxic reactions, individuals may develop IgE antibody and then be at risk for subsequent allergic sting reactions following a single sting.


Immunity

Studies of immunity to insect venoms were initially carried out with beekeepers, who are stung frequently and generally have minor or no local reactions (25). Beekeepers have high levels of serum venom-specific IgG, correlating to some extent with the amount of venom exposure (stings). These IgG antibodies are capable of blocking in vitro venom-induced histamine release from basophils of allergic individuals. In addition, administration of hyperimmune gammaglobulin obtained from beekeepers provided temporary immunity from venom anaphylaxis in sensitive individuals (26). Successful VIT is accompanied by the production of high titers of venom-specific IgG. These observations suggest that IgG antibodies reacting with venom have a protective function, although there are other factors which appear to influence the lack of an allergic reaction in people who have detectable venom-specific IgE.


Diagnostic Tests

Individual honeybee (Apis mellifera), yellow jacket (Vespula species), yellow hornet (Vespula arenaria), bald-face hornet (Vespula maculata), and wasp (Polistes species) extracts are available for the diagnosis and therapy of stinging insect allergy. Honeybee venom is obtained by electric stimulation. The vespid venoms (yellow jacket, hornet, and wasp) are obtained by dissecting and crushing the individual venom sacs. People with relevant stinging insect histories should undergo skin tests with the appropriate dilutions of each of the available five single Hymenoptera venom preparations. Venom dilutions must be made with a special diluent that contains human serum albumin. Testing is usually initiated with venom concentrations of 0.01 μg/mL to 0.0001 μg/mL. The initial studies of venom skin tests concluded that an immunologically specific reaction suggesting that the patient is sensitive is a reaction of 1+ or greater at a concentration of 1 μg/mL or less, provided the 1+ reaction is greater than that of a diluent control (27). Venom concentrations higher than 1 μg/mL cause nonspecific or irritative reactions and do not distinguish the insect-nonallergic from the insect-allergic population.

In vitro tests have been used for the diagnosis of stinging insect allergy. IgE antibodies have been measured by the radioallergosorbent test (RAST) (28,29) in vitro enzymatic assay (CAP, Phadia), and by histamine release from leukocytes (30). In general, about 15% to 20% of people who had positive venom skin tests do not react in the RAST or CAP assay. This may be a reflection of the sensitivity of the test. Also, the RAST results are affected by other factors, including the type and concentration of venom used for coupling and the presence of serum venom-specific IgG that could interfere by competing for the radiolabeled antisera. The in vitro test remains an excellent procedure for quantifying antibody titers over time. Histamine release from leukocytes is basically a laboratory procedure too cumbersome for routine diagnostic evaluation.

People have been described who have a history of venom anaphylaxis, have negative venom skin tests and reacted to a subsequent intentional skin challenge (31). The majority of these people had detectable serum venom specific IgE (RAST) usually in the low titer and several had positive venom skin test reactions when tested at a later date. This observation has raised the issue of the accuracy of the venom skin test. It is important to emphasize that those individuals represent a very small percentage of people who have had allergic reactions to insect stings (32).

From a clinical viewpoint, people who have had severe anaphylaxis following an insect sting and have negative venom skin tests, should have a venom in vitro test. If negative, epinephrine availability is advisable. If both the skin test and in vitro results are negative, it seems reasonable to repeat the skin tests at periodic intervals, which really need to be defined. An initial repeat test at 3 months seems reasonable, but there is no good evidence to suggest which time interval would be appropriate in the absence of further venom exposure.

Baseline serum tryptase levels have been found to be elevated in some people who had insect sting anaphylaxis, particularly in people who have had more severe symptoms. This has led to a search for occult mastocytosis in these people. It is postulated that with an increased number of mast cells, venom may release mediators on either an immunologic or a nonimmunologic basis and lead to more severe symptoms. These people may require more intensive VIT, as discussed later (33).


Therapy

People who have a history of systemic reactions after an insect sting and have detectable venom-specific IgE (positive skin tests or RAST) are considered at risk for subsequent reactions. Recommendations for therapy include measures to minimize exposure to insects, availability of emergency medication for medical treatment of anaphylaxis, and specific VIT.


Avoidance

The risk of insect stings may be minimized by the use of simple precautions. Individuals at risk should protect themselves with shoes and long pants or slacks when in grass or fields, and should wear gloves when gardening. Cosmetics, perfumes, and hair sprays, which attract insects, should be avoided. Black and dark colors also attract insects; individuals should choose white or light colored clothes. Food and odors attract insects; thus garbage should be well wrapped and covered and care should be taken with outdoor cooking and eating. Insect repellents are not effective against stinging insects (34).


Medical Therapy

Acute allergic reactions from the insect stings are treated in the same manner as anaphylaxis from any cause. See Chapter 14 for specific recommendations. Patients at risk are taught to self-administer epinephrine and are advised to keep epinephrine and antihistamine preparations available. Epinephrine is available in preloaded syringes (Twinject, Verus Pharmaceuticals, San Diego, CA; EpiPen, Dey LP, Napa, CA) and can be administered easily. Consideration should be given to having an identification bracelet describing their insect allergy.

At the present time, studies are being done with a fast-disintegrating tablet of sublingual epinephrine (35). Plasma concentrations of epinephrine 40 mg sublingually are similar to those obtained after intramuscular injection of 0.3 mg of epinephrine, which is the usual therapeutic dose. With further development, sublingual epinephrine tablets may replace intramuscular injections providing a more feasible alternative for the medical treatment of anaphylaxis.


Venom Immunotherapy

Venom immunotherapy (VIT) has been shown to be highly effective in preventing subsequent sting reactions (36,37). Successful therapy is associated with the production of venom-specific IgG, which appears to be the immunologic corollary to clinical immunity. Current recommendations are to administer VIT to individuals who have had sting anaphylaxis and have positive venom skin tests. As discussed previously, recent studies of the natural history of the disease process in untreated patients have led to observations that modify this recommendation. The presence of IgE antibody in an individual who has had a previous systemic reaction does not necessarily imply that a subsequent reaction will occur on re-exposure. Observations relevant to the decision to use VIT include age, interval since the sting reaction, the nature of the anaphylactic symptoms, and anticipated exposures. Immunotherapy guidelines are summarized in Tables 15.1 through 15.3.








Table 15.1 Indications for Venom Immunotherapy in Patients with Positive Venom Skin Testsa











































Insect Sting Reaction Venom Immunotherapy
aVenom immunotherapy is not indicated for individuals with negative venom skin tests.
bRecent studies suggest venom immunotherapy may be effective.
cPatients in this group might be managed without immunotherapy. See text.
“Normal”—transient pain, swelling No
Extensive local swelling Nob
Anaphylaxis—severe Yes
Anaphylaxis—moderate Yes
Anaphylaxis—mild; dermal only
 Children No
 Adults Yesc
Serum sickness Yes
Toxic Yes








Table 15.2 General Venom Immunotherapy Dosing Guidelines








Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

May 23, 2016 | Posted by in IMMUNOLOGY | Comments Off on Allergy to Stinging Insects

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access
Initial dose Dose of 0.01 μg to 0.1 μg, depending on degree of skin test reaction