Strategies in Mantle Cell Lymphoma



Fig. 1
Our approach to MCL treatment




Table 1
Frontline regimens in patients ≤70 years
































































Frontline regimen

Age (years)

ORR (%)

PFS/FFS

OS

R-Hyper-CVAD [16]

≤81

97

3 years 64 % (≤65 3 years 73 %)

3 years 82 %

R-Hyper-CVAD [17]

<70

86

5 years 49 %

5 years 63 %

R-Hyper-CVAD [19]

≤70

83

5 years 61 %

5 years 73 %

CALGB 59909 [21]

<70

88

5 years 56 %

5 years 64 %

CALGB 50403 [22]

<70

81

3 years 67 %
 

NLG MCL-2 [23]

≤66

96

6 years 66 %

6 years 70 %

GELA [26]

≤66

95

5 years 64 %

5 years 75 %

European MCL [27]

≤65

95

Median TTF 88 months

Median OS not reached



Table 2
Frontline regimens in patients ≥70 years














































Frontline regimen

Age (years)

ORR (%)

PFS/FFS/TTF/DOR

OS

R-CHOP [34]

>60

78

TTF 28 months, median DOR 36 months

4 years 62 %

R-FC [34]

>60

86

TTF 26 months, median DOR 37 months

4 years 47 %

R-CHOP [35]

70 (median)

91

22.1 months (median)

Median not reached

BR [35]

70 (median)

93

35.4 months (median)

Median not reached

European older MCL [34] (R-CHOP + maintenance R)

>60

95

Median DOR >6 years

4 years 87 %




References



1.

Swerdlow S, Campo E, Harris N et al (2008) WHO classification of tumors of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues. World Health Organization, Lyon, pp 229–232


2.

Anderson JR, Armitage JO et al (1998) Epidemiology of the non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: distributions of the major subtypes differ by geographic locations. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma classification project. Ann Oncol 9(7):717–720PubMedCrossRef


3.

Zhou Y, Wang H et al (2008) Incidence trends of mantle cell lymphoma in the United States between 1992 and 2004. Cancerb 113(4):791–798CrossRef


4.

International Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project (1993) A predictive model for aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 329:987–994CrossRef


5.

Hoster E, Dreyling M, Klapper W et al (2008) A new prognostic index (MIPI) for patients with advanced mantle cell lymphoma. Blood 111:558–565PubMedCrossRef


6.

Hernandez L, Fest T, Cazorla M, Teruya-Feldstein J, Bosch F, Peinado MA et al (1996) p53 gene mutations and protein overexpression are associated with aggressive variants of mantle cell lymphomas. Blood 87(8):3351–3359PubMed


7.

Greiner TC, Moynihan MJ, Chan WC, Lytle DM, Pedersen A, Anderson JR et al (1996) p53 mutations in mantle cell lymphoma are associated with variant cytology and predict a poor prognosis. Blood 87(10):4302–4310PubMed


8.

Martinez A, Bellosillo B, Bosch F, Ferrer A, Marce S, Villamor N et al (2004) Nuclear surviving expression in mantle cell lymphoma is associated with cell proliferation and survival. Am J Pathol 164(2):501–510PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef


9.

Raty R, Franssila K, Joensuu H, Teerenhovi L, Elonen E (2002) Ki-67 expression level, histological subtype, and the International Prognostic Index as outcome predictors in mantle cell lymphoma. Eur J Haematol 69(1):11–20PubMedCrossRef


10.

Cohen JB, Ruppert AS, Heerema NA et al (2012) Complex Karyotype (CK) is associated with a shortened progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma. Blood A:2691


11.

Sarkozy C, Terré C, Jardin F et al (2014) Complex karyotype in mantle cell lymphoma is a strong prognostic factor for the time to treatment and overall survival, independent of the MCL international prognostic index. Genes Chromo Cancer 53(1):106–116. doi:10.​1002/​gcc.​22123 CrossRef

Jun 6, 2017 | Posted by in ONCOLOGY | Comments Off on Strategies in Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access