Thrombocytopenia in Pregnancy: Fetal and Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia


Author and year

HPA-1a (%)

HPA-1b (%)

HPA-3a (%)

HPA-5a (%)

HPA-5b (%)

HPA-15 (%)

HPA-1a & HPA-5b (%)

Other (%)

Reznikoff-Etievant (1988) [23]

90
       
Mueller-Eckhardt et al. (1989) [24]

90
   
8
  
2

Kornfeld et al. (1996) [25]

90
   
10
   
Letsky and Greaves (1996) [26]

80–90
   
5–15
   
Khouzami et al. (1996) [27]

75
       
Kanhai et al. (1996) [28]

79
 
5

11
    
Uhrynowska et al. (1997) [29]

91

4
  
4
   
Spencer and Burrows (2001) [12]

78
 
4
 
4
   
Davoren et al. (2002) [30]

94
 
3
 
3
   
Davoren et al. (2004) [31]

79

4

2

1

9
 
2
 
Rayment et al. (2003) [32]

85
   
10

5
  
Mandelbaum et al. (2005) [33]
     
2
  
Ertel et al. (2005) [34]
     
1
  
Kroll et al. (2005) [35]

75
 
2
 
18
 
2
 
Porcelijn et al. (2006) [36]

73

1

5

1

15
   




16.3 Differences Between NAIT and Rhesus D Hemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn


Unlike in hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) caused by maternal sensitization to fetal Rhesus D (RhD) inherited from the father (the red cell equivalent of FNAIT), FNAIT often occurs in the first pregnancy. However, there is currently no consensus regarding the utility of screening in previously unaffected women for antiplatelet antibodies and thus identifying women whose babies could be affected by FNAIT early in gestation (discussed in Sect. 16.11). Active antenatal management of this disease is confined to those women who have had a previously affected fetus [7]. There are important differences between RhD isoimmunization and FNAIT (Table 16.2).


Table 16.2
Differences between RhD HDFN and FNAIT







































 
Rh

FNAIT

Incidence

1/100

1/1,000

First child affected

No

Yes

Routine screening in place

Yes

No

Testing readily available

Yes

No

Prophylaxis available

Yes

No

Severe clinical phenotype

Hydrops

Intracranial hemorrhage

Management of next pregnancy

Red cell transfusions in utero

IVIg ± prednisolone ± platelet transfusions


16.4 Diagnosis


The diagnosis of FNAIT is based on clinical and serological findings. The typical picture is of a neonate presenting with purpura within minutes to hours after birth, born to a healthy mother with no history of a bleeding disorder, after an uneventful pregnancy with a normal maternal platelet count [3740]. The first step in the diagnosis of FNAIT is confirmation of neonatal thrombocytopenia, followed by exclusion of the most frequent causes of neonatal thrombocytopenia such as infection, disseminated intravascular coagulation, and maternal immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) [11, 39]. The platelet count is low at birth and tends to fall further during the first 24–48 h of life. Laboratory diagnosis involves the detection of maternal circulating alloantibodies against a HPA type shared by neonatal and paternal platelets. This is accomplished using the monoclonal antibody-specific immobilization of platelet antigen (MAIPA) test [41], the platelet immunofluorescence test, or a novel antigen-specific particle assay [11, 26, 4246]. The diagnosis of FNAIT is unequivocal when a parental incompatibility with corresponding maternal alloantibody is present [4, 10, 39, 47].

Recognition of FNAIT and appropriate therapy are important both for the affected neonate and for the management of subsequent pregnancies [48]. Indications for testing for FNAIT prenatally include any fetus with ICH, selected cases of ventriculomegaly (e.g., moderate to severe unilateral), neonates with thrombocytopenia of unclear etiology, neonatal ICH with significant thrombocytopenia, and familial transient neonatal thrombocytopenia [4952]. A number of FNAIT cases (10 %) have been reported in which no HPA antibody could be detected [5356]. The diagnosis is then based on maternal-fetal or maternal-paternal HPA incompatibility and exclusion of other causes of thrombocytopenia [54, 57, 58]. In some cases, antibodies may become detectable in the weeks or months after delivery or during/after a subsequent pregnancy [39, 40, 59, 60]. In unconfirmed FNAIT cases, antibodies detected before 20 weeks in a subsequent pregnancy require confirmation by a later specimen, because early transient antibodies may exist and do not seem to be of clinical significance [60]. Some studies have demonstrated significant correlation between high anti-HPA-1a antibody titers (>1:32) and a fetal platelet count below 50 × 109/L [21, 59, 60], whereas others have not [17, 36, 61]. This discrepancy may be due to differences in the size of the series, parity of the women, timing of blood sampling, or the method of antibody titration [61].

HPA typing of mother, father and fetus/neonate is important, not only for the diagnosis of FNAIT but also for provision of HPA-matched blood components to neonates with FNAIT, for genetic counseling and for estimation of the recurrence risk [62]. Conventional serological immuno-phenotyping for HPA is limited by the lack of certain rare but well-characterized typing antisera, such as anti-HPA-1b and anti-HPA-4b [62]. Even when non-paternity has been ruled out, it is not always possible to demonstrate parental incompatibility of platelet-specific alloantigens in the presence of corresponding maternal alloantibodies, especially if the mother is sensitized to a rare paternal antigen, making the diagnosis more difficult [63]. If there is a strong suspicion of FNAIT, testing the maternal serum against the paternal platelets (using a blood sample from the father or the fetus/neonate) may confirm incompatibility.


16.5 Fetal/Neonatal Risks


FNAIT may affect the fetus as early as the beginning of the second trimester and usually remits spontaneously within 1–3 weeks after delivery, depending on the rate of removal of maternal platelet antibodies from the neonatal circulation. Thrombocytopenia can be severe and can cause antenatal ICH in around 10–30 % of severe cases. ICH is associated with death in 10 % and neurological sequelae in a further 10–20 % [6, 11, 39, 50]. Chaoying et al. [64] found that FNAIT is the most important cause of ICH and poor outcome in neonates.

Around 25–50 % of cases of FNAIT-related ICH occur in utero. The majority occur between 30 and 35 weeks of gestation [7, 50], but ICH have also been reported at earlier gestations. The international No IntraCranial Haemorrhage (NOICH) registry, an observational cohort study, characterised pregnancies between 2001 and 2010 where the fetus or neonate was diagnosed with fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) and suffered from intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), with special focus on time of bleeding onset. Of 592 FNAIT cases in the registry, 43 confirmed cases of ICH due to FNAIT were included in the study. The majority of bleeding episodes (23/43; 54 %) occurred before 28 weeks of gestation and often affected the first born child (27/43; 63 %). One-third (35 %) of the children died within 4 days after delivery. Twenty-three (53 %) children survived with severe neurological disabilities and only 5 (12 %) were alive and well at time of discharge. Antenatal treatment was not given in most (91 %) cases of fetal/neonatal ICH. The authors concluded that ICH caused by FNAIT often occurs during second trimester and the clinical outcome is poor. In order to prevent ICH caused by FNAIT, at-risk pregnancies must be identified and prevention and/ or interventions should start early in the second trimester [65]. Without treatment, there is a risk of ICH as long as severe thrombocytopenia persists [23]. Thrombocytopenia is most severe in the presence of HPA-1a incompatibility, which accounts for most cases of in utero ICH.

Although high levels of maternal anti-HPA-1a may correlate with the severity of thrombocytopenia [21, 66], in up to 30 % of cases no antibody is found [67]. In some cases, antibody detection can be improved by varying assay conditions [68, 69]. Severe thrombocytopenia or ICH in HPA-1a-alloimmunized pregnancies cannot be predicted with sufficient sensitivity and specificity for clinical application from maternal anti-HPA-1a potency, bioactivity or isotype [32, 70, 71]. The maternal antibody level therefore has limited use in prediction of the severity of fetal/neonatal thrombocytopenia.

Neonatal thrombocytopenia due to FNAIT usually becomes progressively more severe and occurs earlier in subsequent pregnancies [10, 38, 44]. Following severe neonatal thrombocytopenia (<50 × 109/L), a cerebral ultrasound or nuclear magnetic resonance (MRI) scan is advised to detect clinically silent ICH [7, 11]. A few cases of ICH resulting from incompatibility for HPA-3a, HPA-4b, HPA-5b, or HPA-9b alloantigens have been reported [72, 73].


16.6 Antenatal Management and Outcomes


The goal of antenatal management is to prevent severe thrombocytopenia and thus ICH which may result in death, either in utero or after birth, or long-lasting disability. A balance must be found between the inherent risks of the condition itself and the risks of diagnostic testing and therapy. The antenatal treatment of FNAIT has evolved over the past 25 years, largely based on published case series, detailing outcomes with differing regimens. They include: (a) fetal blood sampling (FBS) and serial intrauterine platelet transfusions (IUT) [54, 74]; (b) weekly intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) infusions; and (c) immunosuppression with corticosteroids [5, 57, 75]. Over the last 15 years, there has been a gradual change from invasive management to a less invasive management protocol to a completely non-invasive approach. However, controversy still exists over the optimal antenatal management strategy.


16.6.1 Diagnostic Fetal Blood Sampling and Intrauterine Platelet Transfusions


Fetal blood sampling (FBS) involves the insertion of a needle into the umbilical or intrahepatic vein to sample fetal blood in order to ascertain the fetal platelet count. The procedure is usually complemented by the transfusion of a specially selected, very concentrated platelet suspension that is both HPA and ABO and RhD blood group compatible, to reduce the risk of bleeding associated with individual procedures [74, 76, 77]. With reports of a fetal loss rate of around 6 % per pregnancy [78], serial (weekly) intrauterine platelet transfusions (IUPT) are reserved for the management of affected fetuses that do not respond to medical management alone. An important unresolved issue in the management of at-risk pregnancies is how to safely minimize or eliminate FBS [66, 79]. FBS, with its associated risks of bleeding, boosting antibody levels, fetal bradycardia requiring emergency (preterm) Cesarean section, and fetal loss, may not be necessary before medical therapy for FNAIT is instituted, but may be required subsequently to determine the fetal response to treatment and IUPT in selected cases [56, 8082].


16.6.2 Intravenous Immunoglobulin


After anecdotal observation by Bussel et al. [50] that antenatal maternal treatment with high-dose IVIg seemed to prevent ICH in high-risk pregnancies, IVIg became increasingly popular in the treatment of FNAIT [83]. It is often given to the mother on a weekly basis, using various regimens, until delivery. After birth, the neonatal platelet count and the absence of ICH provide measures of IVIg efficacy.

The mechanism of action of IVIg in FNAIT is still unclear. Four possible explanations are cited in the literature. First, in the maternal circulation IVIg will dilute the anti-HPA antibodies, resulting in a lower proportion of anti-HPA antibodies within the IgG transferred to the fetus via the Fc-receptors in the placenta. Secondly, in the placenta, IVIg may block the placenta receptor (Fc-R) and reduce the placental transmission of maternal antibodies, including anti-HPA antibodies. Thirdly, in the fetus, IVIg can block the Fc-receptors on the macrophages and thereby prevent the destruction of antibody-covered cells [66]. A fourth possible mechanism could be that IVIg may enhance the expression of inhibitory receptors on splenic macrophages [84] and, as a result, suppress maternal antibody production and reduce placental transfer of the antibodies [85]. So far, evidence for only the first mechanism exists.

Short-term mild side effects that have been associated with IVIg therapy include headache, febrile reactions, nausea, malaise and myalgia, but these are more common with rapid infusion and can be minimized by slowing the infusion rate. Several rare but serious side-effects such as aseptic meningitis, acute renal failure, thrombosis, transmission of blood-borne diseases, and reactions including severe headache and fever, and anaphylaxis, have also been reported.

The long-term side effects of IVIg for mother and child are still unclear, but it is generally considered safe. A possible increase of IgE in children after maternal IVIg administration compared to the normal population has been suggested. However, no clinically apparent adverse effects in early childhood could be demonstrated [66]. Since IVIg is known for its immunomodulating characteristics, there is always a possibility of long-time side-effects for the mother and child. Furthermore, weekly IVIg administration is expensive.

Weekly maternal IVIg is the most commonly used therapy today. Following IVIg infusion, the IgG level falls by 30 % after 24 h and by 50 % after 72 h [64]. Maternal administration of IVIg has been reported to increase the fetal platelet count and/or prevent ICH in 55–85 % of FNAIT cases [38, 8688]. IVIg treatment seems to reduce the risk of ICH even if the fetal platelet count is not altered [79, 89]; the mechanism of this latter effect is unclear. There is conflicting evidence on the efficacy of IVIg in preventing ICH, with most reports documenting favorable results [53, 86, 88] while others report failure of IVIg to prevent ICH [48, 75, 90]. However, in the latter reports, the IVIg dose used was only 1.0 g/kg/week.

The study by Bussel et al. [86] suggested a substantial elevation in fetal platelet count following treatment with IVIg 1.0 g/kg/week; the reported response rate in the literature varies from 30 to 85 %. Results from a randomized placebo-controlled trial [86] suggest no beneficial effect of adding dexamethasone to the administered IVIg. The dose of IVIg of 1.0 g/kg/week has been commonly used ever since the first publication by Bussel et al. in 1988 [57]. However, the optimal treatment dose regimen of IVIg has not been formally evaluated. In treating chronic ITP, the standard dose is 400 mg/kg daily for 5 days, although 1 g/kg/day for 2 days may be more effective. Placental antibody transfer does not appear to be further increased despite high IgG concentrations in the mother resulting from IVIg treatment. This suggests a limitation of the placental Fc receptor [66].

High levels of maternal anti-HPA 1a have been reported to be strongly associated with severe thrombocytopenia in the neonate [21, 66]. This has prompted the suggestion that in cases of low maternal titers of anti-HPA antibodies, a lower dose of IVIg may be sufficient to reduce transmission of pathogenic HPA antibodies leading to thrombocytopenia. Van den Akker et al. conducted a randomized international multicenter trial to compare the effectiveness of a low dose of IVIg (0.5 g/kg/week) with the commonly used dose (1.0 g/kg/week). Survival was 100 % and none of the neonates had an ICH. However, unfortunately this trial ended prematurely because of inadequate patient recruitment [91]. This study might be regarded as a successful pilot study, and the use of 0.5 g/kg/week IVIg in pregnant women with FNAIT and a previous child without ICH is still an option. However, this should be restricted to patients that participate in a formal prospective study. Van den Akker et al. also recommend non-invasive treatment without recourse to invasive strategies, which is both safe and effective in the antenatal management of FNAIT [56].


16.6.3 Corticosteroids


The administration of steroids as the sole treatment for FNAIT is controversial, as their efficacy is variable and chronic steroid therapy has been associated with adverse effects [57]. In a selection of studies corticosteroids have been administered as a means of supporting the action of IVIg. A study in which very high-risk patients (initial fetal platelet count <20 × 109/L or a sibling with perinatal ICH) received weekly IVIg infusions along with daily corticosteroid therapy showed that the combination was more effective than IVIg alone in eliciting a satisfactory fetal platelet response (82 % vs. 18 %) [49, 79]. Both IVIg alone and IVIg combined with any corticosteroids resulted in an improved clinical outcome in treated FNAIT fetuses compared to their untreated siblings [92]. At present, prednisone seems to be the corticosteroid of choice for treatment of FNAIT [49, 79].

Dexamethasone is now avoided as it may cross the fetal blood-brain barrier. In addition, at higher doses it has been associated with oligohydramnios [57] and, at lower doses, a lack of efficacy [86]. Although mothers may experience side-effects of systemic corticosteroids, clinical experience suggests no abnormalities in children of mothers treated with usual doses of prednisone throughout pregnancy.

In summary, IVIg is the mainstay of the antenatal management of FNAIT. It is recommended that treatment is started 4–6 weeks before the estimated gestational age at which the ICH occurred or severe thrombocytopenia was detected in the previous affected fetus. If this information about the previous pregnancy is unavailable or if the previous sibling did not suffer ICH, IVIg therapy can be instituted at 26–28 weeks’ gestation because intrauterine ICH has generally been reported after 30 weeks [73, 89].

The role of concomitant steroids alongside IVIg needs further clarification. Bussel et al. [93] treated women with a history of previous early ICH at various gestations. Treatment comprised initial IVIg 1 or 2 g/kg/week infusion at 12 weeks, with the addition of prednisone later only if the fetal platelet count fell below 30 × 109/L in non-responders to IVIg therapy alone. Clinical outcomes in this study were favorable. Similarly, Berkowitz et al. [79] have proposed that 1 g/kg/week of IVI alone is clearly insufficient in siblings of fetuses with a previous ICH in utero. If the initial fetal platelet count is <20 × 109/L at 20 weeks of gestation, IVIg alone 1 g/kg/week has a substantially lesser effect, and a lower response rate, than IVIg and prednisone combined [49, 79]. Furthermore, they claim that prednisone in low doses is almost as good as 1 g/kg/week of IVIg in the least affected fetuses (those with a sibling without an ICH and with a pre-treatment fetal platelet count of <20 × 109/L) [79].

Since there are substantial risks associated with FBS [8082] and non-invasive treatment is effective, therapy for FNAIT can be instituted without invasive procedures [38, 89, 94].

A Cochrane review in 2010 [95] concluded that there are insufficient data from randomized controlled trials to determine the optimal antenatal management of FNAIT and that future trials should consider the dose of IVIg, the timing of initial treatment, monitoring of response to treatment, laboratory measures to define pregnancies with a high risk of ICH, management of non-responders, and long-term follow-up of children.


16.6.4 Implications for Practice




1.

IVIg can be used as first-line treatment for standard-risk FNAIT, where there was no peripartum ICH in an affected sibling and the pre-treatment fetal platelet count (if performed) is >20 × 109/L. However, the optimal dose of IVIg has not been established and further guidance based on the results of the NOICH 2 study is awaited.

 

2.

IVIg in combination with prednisone may be more effective in raising the fetal platelet count than IVIg alone in high-risk pregnancies, where the pre-treatment fetal platelet count <20 × 109/L or the affected sibling sustained a peripartum ICH. The optimal timing of administration and the dose of prednisone and IVIg are unclear, but studies have demonstrated efficacy when treatment was initiated at 20–26 weeks.

 


16.7 Suggested Antenatal Management of a Subsequent Affected Fetus


Following the affected pregnancy, the father should be tested for the presence of the relevant HPA. The risk of recurrence in subsequent pregnancies is virtually 100 % if the father is homozygous for the responsible HPA and 50 % if he is heterozygous. In the latter case, it is possible to determine the fetal platelet type by 16 weeks of gestation via PCR amplification of DNA obtained from amniocytes (obtained at amniocentesis). If the fetus is found to be negative for the HPA allele, no further testing is indicated [12, 96, 97]. Pre-implantation diagnosis (PGD) can be considered [98]. Non-invasive prenatal diagnosis (NIPD) using cell-free fetal DNA obtained from maternal plasma and serum is now a clinical reality, particularly in the management of RhD hemolytic disease, and many investigators are evaluating NIPD in FNAIT that may in the future form part of national antenatal screening programs.

The severity of FNAIT usually increases with each pregnancy. Attempts have been made to predict a fetus at risk from severe thrombocytopenia by the use of serial antibody titers in order to determine which fetus needs treatment. As stated above (Sect. 16.5), the antibody titer measurements are not a reliable predictor of the severity of FNAIT and are thus of limited use in the clinical management of FNAIT. The clinical history of an affected sibling is currently the best indicator of risk in a current pregnancy [37, 38, 99]. The recurrence rate of ICH in the subsequent pregnancies of women with FNAIT was 72 % (when the previous pregnancy was without fetal death) and 79 % (when the previous pregnancy included a fetal death). Conversely, the risk of ICH in those with a history of FNAIT but without ICH was estimated at 7 % [99].

It is presumed that, in fetuses with early severe fetal thrombocytopenia, ICH will be seen in a second pregnancy even though this did not occur in the first sibling. In a study by Bussel and Kaplan [47], 50 % of 98 affected fetuses already had a platelet count of <20 × 109/L by 25 weeks’ gestation, indicating early severity. Forty percent had a lower fetal platelet count at that time than their previously affected siblings had at birth, indicating increasing severity in subsequent pregnancies. These authors concluded that when FNAIT occurs at an early gestation, it is severe; and it is more severe in fetuses with an older affected sibling that had an antenatal ICH. This suggests that fetuses may require different management strategies depending on the history of their previous sibling. There has been a trend and a strong recommendation to utilize non-invasive strategies (IVIg) in the management of FNAIT at high risk of in utero or postnatal ICH [100, 101].

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 31, 2016 | Posted by in HEMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Thrombocytopenia in Pregnancy: Fetal and Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access