Theories, Constructs, and Applications in Working with LGBT Elders in Human Services


Stage 1: Sensitization—thinks about one’s sexual identity

Stage 2: Significance and disorientation—accepts the deviant label with all the potential social consequences. Social oppression creates disequilibrium where the homosexual person becomes stalled, perhaps for life, in this stage

Step 3: Coming-out—goes public with one’s rebuilt sexual identity. Disclosure is linked to the person’s willingness and ability to join the homosexual community

Stage 4: Stabilization—no longer questions one’s homosexual identity


Adapted from Plummer (1973)



Subsequent to Altman (1971) and Plummer’s (1973) theories, an abundance of stage models on sexual identity formation evolved, the majority of which moved away from the deviance model to a focus on healthy consequences of accepting one’s sexuality (see Table 1.2). Eliason and Schope (2007) identify two assumptions about stage model theorists. First, most assumed that one is or is not gay or lesbian and embraced the argument from an Essentialists’ perspective. Second, most models are based on a review of the literature and are not empirically tested or are based on single case or small sample size.


Table 1.2
Stage theories of sexual identity formation












































































Theorists

Population

Stages of identity formation

Ponse (1978)

Lesbian

“Gay trajectory”

Subjective feelings of difference from sexual/emotional desire for women

Understanding feelings as lesbian

Assuming a lesbian identity

Seeking company of lesbians

Engaging in lesbian relationship (sexual and/or emotional)

aColeman (1982)
 
Precoming-out

Coming-out

Tolerance

Acceptance

Pride

Integration

Minton and McDonald (1984)

Gay men

Egocentric

Sociocentric

Universalistic

aFaderman (1984)

Lesbian

Critical evaluation of societal norms and acceptance of lesbian identity

Encounters with stigma

Lesbian sexual experience (optional)

Sophie (1985/1986)

Lesbian

First awareness

Testing/exploration

Acceptance

Integration

Chapman and Brannock (1987)

Lesbian

Same-sex orientation

Incongruence

Self-questioning

Choice of lifestyle

Troiden (1988)

Men

Spirals rather than linear

Sensitization

Confusion

Assumption

Commitment

aMorales (1989)

Racial/ethnic minority LGB

Denial of conflicts

Bisexual versus gay/lesbian identity

Conflicts in allegiances

Establish priorities in allegiances

Integrate various communities

aReynolds and Pope (1991)

Multiple identity formation

Passive acceptance of society’s expectations for one aspect of self

Conscious identification with one aspect of self

Segmented identification with multiple aspects of self

Intersection identities with multiple aspects of self

aIsaacs and McKendrick (1992)

Gay men

Identity diffusion

Identity challenge

Identity exploration

Identity achievement

Identity commitment

Identity consolidation

aSiegel and Lowe (1994)

Gay men

Turning point

Aware of difference

Identify source of difference

Coming-out

Assumption

Acceptance

Celebration

Maturing phase

Reevaluation

Renewal

Mentoring

aFox (1995)

Bisexual

First opposite-sex attractions, behaviors, relationships

First same-sex attractions, behaviors, relationships

First self-identification as bisexual

Self-disclosure as bisexual

McCarn and Fassinger (1997); Fassinger and Miller (1996)

Lesbian and gay

Awareness

Exploration

Deepening/commitment

Internalization/synthesis

aEliason (1996)

Lesbian

Cycles/not linear

Pre-identity

Emerging identity

Recognition/experiences with oppression

Reevaluation/evolution of identities

aNutterbrock et al. (2002)

Transgender

Awareness

Performance

Congruence

Support

aDevor (2004)

Transgender

Abiding anxiety

Confusion

Comparison (birth sex/gender)

Discover trans identity

Confusion (trans)

Comparison (trans)

Tolerance (trans)

Delay before acceptance

Acceptance

Delay before transition

Transition

Acceptance of post-transition gender/sex

Integration

Pride


Adapted from Eliason and Schope (2007)

aNo empirical validation

Probably, one of the most influential and frequently cited theories of gay and lesbian identity development is that of Cass (1979). Cass describes a process of six stages of gay and lesbian development. Although these stages are sequential, some persons revisit stages at different points in their life. Each stage is accompanied by a task. Cass believes that coming-out is a lifelong process of exploring one’s sexual orientation and lesbian or gay identity and sharing it with others. Table 1.3 contains Cass’s model of identity formation.


Table 1.3
Cass model of gay and lesbian identity formation










































Stage 1

Identity Confusion—Personalization of information regarding sexuality. “Could I be gay?” This stage begins with the person’s first awareness of gay or lesbian thoughts, feelings, and attractions. The person typically feels confused and experience turmoil

Task

Who am I?—Accept, deny, reject

Stage 2

Identity Comparison—Accepts possibility one might be homosexual. “Maybe this does apply to me.” In this stage, the person accepts the possibility of being gay or lesbian and examines the wider implications of that tentative commitment. Self-alienation becomes isolation

Task

Deal with social alienation

Stage 3

Identity Tolerance—Accepts probability of being homosexual and recognizes sexual/social/emotional needs of being homosexual. “I am not the only one.” The person acknowledges that she or he is likely lesbian or gay and seeks out the other lesbian and gay people to combat feelings of isolation. There is increased commitment to being lesbian or gay

Task

Decrease social alienation by seeking out lesbian and gay persons

Stage 4

Identity Acceptance—Accepts (versus tolerates) homosexual self-image and has increased contact with lesbian/gay subculture and less with heterosexual. “I will be okay.” The person attaches positive connotation to her or his lesbian or gay identity and accepts rather than tolerates it. There is continuing and increased contact with the lesbian and gay culture.

Task

Deal with inner tension of no longer subscribing to society’s norm, attempt to bring congruence between private and public view of self

Stage 5

Identity Pride—Immersed in lesbian/gay subculture, less interaction with heterosexuals. Views world divided as “gay” or “not gay.” “I’ve got to let people know who I am!” There is confrontation with heterosexual establishment and disclosure to family, friends, coworkers, etc

Task

Deal with incongruent views of heterosexuals

Stage 6

Identity Synthesis—Lesbian or gay identity is integrated with other aspects of self, and sexual orientation becomes only one aspect of self rather than the entire identity

Task

Integrate lesbian and gay identity so that instead of being the identity, it is an aspect of self


Adapted from Cass (1979)

Bisexual Identity Formation. Though limited research as been conducted on development of bisexual identity formation, probably the most important research on bisexuality was that of Alfred Kinsey with the publication of Sexual Behavior in the Human Male (Kinsey et al. 1948) and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female (Kinsey et al. 1953) (as cited by Burleson 2005). Kinsey developed the Kinsey scale, in which individuals can fall anywhere along a continuum of 0 (exclusively heterosexual) and 6 (exclusively homosexual). Burleson contends that Kinsey had created the present model of bisexuality without ever once using the word bisexual. In addition, Kinsey scale clarified two issues: (a) There is great variability of sexual orientation, and (b) an implication that perhaps all human beings on this continuum are ranked the same way (i.e., heterosexuality is not primary or held above other sexual orientations). Kinsey’s work, while groundbreaking, was rudimentary and did not address the complexities of behavior and attraction and past behavior and future predictions. In response to questions of complexity, Fritz (1993) expanded on Kinsey’s continuum model to measure a person’s past and future sexual attraction, behavior, fantasies, emotional preference, social preference, lifestyle, and self-identification.

Stroms (1978) offers yet different model of sexual attraction, a multiple-variable model, in which sexual attraction to different genders is examined independently of each other. In this model, Stroms’ scale has one end representing no attraction to one gender and the other end presenting high attraction to that gender. The continuum offers great variation within this model. Although this model did not include transgender persons, a scale could be created for them. In addition, Strom’s model includes people who tend toward asexuality. The model describes attraction to women and men as two separate variables (Burleson 2005).

Theoretical State Stage Models. In the USA, the 1970s ushered in a new era of research about sexual orientation identity development with the emergence of theoretical state stage models. The primary focus of these models was on the resolution of internal conflict related to identification as lesbian or gay and informed the “coming-out” process. Bilodeau and Renn (2005) describe these models as having the following characteristics: (a) begin with a stage, (b) describe individuals using multiple defense strategies to deny recognition of personal homosexual feelings, (c) include a gradual recognition and tentative acceptance, (d) have a period of emotional and behavioral experimentation with homosexuality, (e) involve a time of identity crisis, and (f) marked by the coming-out process. Although difference exists among the stage models, which illustrate the difficulty of using one model to understand the complex psychosocial process of the development of sexual orientation identity, their predominance and persistence in the research literature and in current educational practice suggest that they represent with some accuracy the developmental process (Bilodeau and Renn 2005).

The minority stress model (Brooks 1981; Meyer 1995) is useful in understanding aspects of sexual minority identity development for older LGBT adults and the impact of sociocultural issues on their lives. Based on this model, individuals in minority groups experience additional minority-related stressors that individuals who are part of the majority do not have to contend. The minority stress model is a consolidation of several theories and models that propose that minority persons experience chronic stressors and these stressors can lead to negative psychosocial adjustment outcomes. According to Meyer (2010), the minority stress model does not attempt to imply that sexual minorities have higher rates of psychosocial issues because of their sexual orientation and gender identity; rather, the model identifies the pathogenic conditions that stigmatize LGBT persons and treat them as inferior to heterosexual individuals. Minority stressors for LGBT persons include experiences of discrimination, concealment or disclosure of sexual orientation/gender identity, expectations of prejudice and discrimination, and internalized homonegativity (Cox et al. 2011; Meyer 2003). Unlike ethnic and racial minority groups who experience minority stress, LGBT persons who experience sexual minority stress often do not receive support and understanding from their families of origin (Dziengel 2008). Minority stress in LGBT persons has been linked to higher levels of depression and negative health outcomes (Cox et al. 2009; Huebner and Davis 2007).

McCarn-Fassinger (1996) developed the lesbian identity development model, and Fassinger and Miller (1996) later validated the applicability of the theory with gay men (subsequently referenced in the literature as Fassinger’s gay and lesbian identity development model), which examines identity development from a personal and a group perspective. The lesbian identity development model includes four phases: awareness, exploration, deepening/commitment, and internalization/synthesis. The use of “phases” is intentional to explicitly indicate flexibility that individuals revisit earlier phases in new or different contexts. The model explores attitudes of lesbians and gay men toward self, other sexual minorities and gender identity, and heterosexuals. A distinguishing aspect of Fassinger’s model is that lesbians, gays, or bisexuals are not required to “come out” or to be actively involved in the lesbian, gay, or bisexual community.

A life span approach to sexual orientation development has been introduced an alternative to stage models. D’Augelli (1994) offers a “life span” model of sexual orientation development. This model takes social contexts into account in different ways than stage models. In addition, D’Augelli’s model has the potential to represent a wider range of experiences than do the theories relating to specific racial, ethnic, or gender groups and addresses issues often ignored in other models. D’Augelli presents human development as unfolding in concurring and multiple paths, including the development of a person’s self-concept, relationships with family, and connections to peer groups and community. This model suggests that sexual orientation may be fluid at certain times and more fixed at others and that human growth is intimately connected to and influenced by both biological and environmental factors. D’Augelli’s model has six “identity processes” that function more or less independently and are not sequenced in stages (see Table 1.4). An individual may experience development in one process to a greater extent than another, and, depending on context and timing, he or she may be at different points of development in a given process (Bilodeau and Reen 2005).


Table 1.4
D’Augelli life span model of sexual orientation development


















Exiting homosexuality

Developing a personal LGB identity

Developing an LGB social identity

Becoming an LGB offspring

Developing an LGB intimacy status

Entering an LGB community


D’Augelli (1994)

Renn and Bilodeau (2005) extended D’Augelli’s (1994) model and applied it to understanding corresponding processes in the formation of transgender identity development . Bilodeau (2005) found that transgender persons describe their gender identities in ways that reflect the six processes of D’Augelli’s model.

Since the inclusion of gender identity disorder (GID) for the first time in the diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) in 1980 as a mental illness, other theories on transgender identity formation have been proposed by Nutterbrock et al. (2002) and Devor (2004), bisexual identity formation by Fox (1995), and multiple identity formation by Reynolds and Pope (1991) (Table 1.2); however, none of these models have been empirically validated. In the fifth edition of the DSM, GID was deleted and replaced with gender dysphoria (GD), indicating that it is not a mental illness, rather a lifestyle with which individuals may need assistance in making adjustments. Feminist, postmodern, and queer theoretical theorists (e.g., Butler 1990, 1993; Creed 1995; Feinberg 1996, 1998; Halberstam 1998; Wilchins 2002) have introduced alternatives to medical and psychiatric perspectives on gender identity. These theorists suggest that gender is not necessarily linked to biological sex assignment at birth, but is created through complex social inequities, and gender identity is more fluid. These theorists propose transgender identities and gender fluidity as normative as oppose to the binary, two-gender system and the influence of themes reflecting fluidity of gender that have emerged in the discipline of human development (Bilodeau and Renn 2005).

As an extension of sexual minority identity, in 2004 Lev introduced the transgender emergence model, a stage model that examines at how transgender people come to understand their identity. Lev’s model comes from the perspective of a counseling or therapeutic point of view and focuses on what the individual is experiencing and the responsibility of the counselor or interventionist. As with other stage theories, Lev’s model begins with the first stage as awareness. (see Table 1.5 for Lev’s stages). Lev’s clinical and philosophical ideology is based on the belief that transgenderism is a normal and potentially healthy variation of human expression. As postulated by Goldner (1988), gender dichotomies are not only restrictive, but also constitutive, with the gendering of social spheres constraining personal freedom and gender categories determining what is possible to know. Lev’s approach is to consider the ecosystem (i.e., influence of environment on perception and behavior) in working with transgender persons. According to Lev, “gender variance does not simply live within individuals but exists ‘within’ a larger matrix of relationships, families, and communities” (p. xx).


Table 1.5
Lev’s transgender emergence model

























Stage 1

Awareness—Gender-variant people are often in great distress. The therapeutic task is the normalization of the experiences involved in emerging as transgender

Stage 2

Seeking Information/Reaching Out—Gender-variant people seek to gain education and support about transgenderism. The therapeutic task is to facilitate linkages and encourage outreach

Stage 3

Disclosure to Significant Other—Involves the disclosure of transgenderism to significant other. The therapeutic task involves supporting the transgendered person’s integration in the family system

Stage 4

Exploration (Identity and Self-Labeling)—Involves the exploration of various (transgender) identities. The therapeutic task is to support the articulation and comfort with one’s gendered identity

Stage 5

Exploration (Transition Issues and Possible Body Modification)—Involves exploring options for transition regarding identity, presentation, and body modification. The therapeutic task is the resolution of the decision and advocacy toward their manifestation

Stage 6

Integration (Acceptance and Post-Transition Issues)—The gender-variant person is able to integrate and synthesis (transgender) identity. The therapeutic task is to support adaptation to transition-related issues


Adapted from Lev (2004)

Lev offers three goals for therapists working with transgendered persons and their families. The first goal is “to accept that transgenderism is a normal expression of human potentiality.” The second goal is “to place transgenderism within a larger social context that includes an overview of the existence of gender variance throughout history.” The third goal is “to outline various etiological theories that impact assessment and diagnosis, as well as innovative, possibly iconoclastic treatment strategies to work with gender-dysphoric, gender-variant, transgendered, third-sexed, transsexual, and intersexed people as members of extended family systems” (pp. xx–xxi).


Counseling Theories and Practice for Older Adults


A commonly held view of older persons is that they are mentally incompetent. Although there is some cognitive decline associated with normal aging, the majority of older adults do not demonstrate significant mental decline. For LGBT elders, psychosocial issues arise from ongoing discrimination on the basis of their sexual orientation and gender identity, lack of acceptance from the heterosexual community and family members, and isolation and exclusion from LGBT communities because of ageism. The general lack of support in many political, educational, and religious institutions and the distinctively oppressive social climate for sexual minorities in which older LGBT generations live creates personal conflict that can manifest itself through internalized disorders (e.g., depression, homophobia) or externalized disorders (e.g., suicidal behavior) (Mabey 2007). Counseling or therapeutic intervention can help LGBT elders who experience multiple discrimination to come to terms with factors associated with ageism (Sue and Sue 2013) and how the historically negative climate of discrimination and oppression shapes their experiences with, and impressions of, their own sexual identity (Heaphy 2007; Porter et al. 2004). However, it is important for counselors not to view identity as necessarily problematic (Berger 1982; Mabey 2011). In fact, researchers have introduced the concept of “crisis competence” or “stigma competence” (Almvig 1982; Balsam and D’Augelli 2006; Vaughan and Waehler 2010), in which coming-out by LGBT persons allows them to develop a competency for dealing with other crises or stigma in the life span, including difficulties associated with aging (Heaphy 2007; Kimmel et al. 2006; Schope 2005). Stigma competence was first developed with regard to persons from racial and ethnic minority groups who have multiple minority statuses, including sexual minority identity. In a study testing the theory of stigma competence with lesbian, gay, and bisexual adults over age 60, Lawson-Ross (2013) found that older sexual minority adults who were more accepting of their sexual minority identities had lower levels of internalized ageism and had higher levels of life satisfaction and happiness than their peers who were less accepting of their sexual minority identities.

Counseling Approaches. In working with LGBT elders, the selection of the counseling approach should be based on the individual and his or her needs. Counselors tend to adapt their approaches to working with a client based on the person’s developmental changes in life, the particular cohort to which the person belongs, and the social context in which the person lives (Blando 2011). Older persons fit into a contextual, cohort-based, maturity-specific change model (Knight 1996) that suggests they face particular challenges that are unique in later life. Older LGBT persons belong to a particular cohort with a collection of experiences and norms that differ from those of the present and from heterosexual elders (Blando). In the remainder of this section, we will present select counseling approaches that may be effective with older LGBT populations. These counseling approaches are not intended to be either inclusive or suggestive; rather, they are a starting point or serve as guidelines.

One of the most common forms of therapy with the general population and with older adults is cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT). CBT may be particularly efficacious with older adults because of its focus on the present, strict structure, emphasis on self-monitoring, psychoeducational orientation, and goal oriented. Adjustment may need to be made for older adults who have developmental changes such as speed of processing in intellectual configuration (e.g., later life of crystalized over fluid intelligence), emotional changes (i.e., emotions are more nuanced and complex and may include co-experience of discrepant emotions such as being both happy and sad), and the person’s worldview (Blando 2011). CBT examines the role thoughts play in maintaining a problem, stress, or concern. Emphasis is on changing dysfunctional thoughts that influence behavior. The application of CBT with LGBT elders may be effective in addressing behaviors stemming from past experiences of discrimination with institutions and service providers, fear of homophobia-based victimization, and also from fear or anticipation of discrimination. In addition, Satterfield and Crabb (2010) demonstrated the effectiveness of CBT for depression in an older gay man.

Guided autobiography is another approach that is effective with older adults. Guided autobiography is used to help people understand and make meaning from their past through reading and sharing brief, written essays about their lives, and sharing their thoughts about these stories. It promotes integration, fulfillment, and competence (Blando 2011). LGBT elders often have not had a safe venue in which to explore or express their feelings, self-concept, or self-identity. Guided autobiography offers them a private mechanism to do so.

Another approach applicable to working with LGBT elders is persons-centered therapy (PCT) by Rogers (1951). Rogers described people who are becoming increasingly actualized as having four characteristics: (a) an openness to experience, (b) a trust in themselves, (c) an internal source of evaluation, and (d) a willingness to continue growing. PCT has emphasized on how individuals can move forward in constructive directions and how they can successfully deal with obstacles both within themselves and outside of themselves that are blocking their growth. Through self-awareness, an individual learns to exercise choice. The therapeutic goal is for an individual to achieve a greater degree of independence and integration (Corey 2103).


Theories of Public Health and Practice


A number of important theories and approaches germane to public health are salient for LGBT elders. It is important that at least two distinguishing approaches are borne in mind regarding public health constructs. First, public health primarily concerns population health versus the health of individuals, and so, allowing for within-group differences, public health efforts concern the population of LGBT elders rather than the actions of individuals. Second, public health stresses the importance of prevention efforts above and beyond any other efforts. Though this is not to say that public health does not involve intervention, public health experts seek to improve the health of LGBT elders far earlier than most other discipline’s current intervention efforts contemplate, for example, preventing poor health outcomes as a result of historic stressors and inequities, such as, until recently, the lack of health insurance coverage for same-sex partners. In this section, we explain four well-recognized approaches/theories to public health that have applicability to LGBT elders, in particular the socio-ecological model, the theory of reasoned action, the health belief model, and the transtheoretical model of change (DiClemente et al. 2013).

The first of these approaches is the socio-ecological model, most closely associated with Bronfenbrenner (1986). Applied to LGBT elders, the model places the elder at the center of four nested systems (depicted graphically as concentric circles), consistent with an “elder-centered” (Quandt et al. 1999) approach to prevention and intervention. The microsystem, which includes the older adult, includes biological and personal factors that converge to influence how individuals behave as well as risk factors for adverse health outcomes. Consideration of LGBT elders at the level of the mesosystem focuses on close relationships (e.g., family, friends, neighbors) in order to explore how such relationships either protect against or promote LGBT health and quality of life. The exosystem identifies community contexts in which social relationships occur (e.g., neighborhoods, service organizations). This system promotes how characteristics settings may affect LGBT elders’ health and well-being. Finally, the macrosystem includes broad ideological values, norms, and institutional patterns that may foster a climate in which LGBT elders are either encouraged or prohibited, including changes in power and control dynamics (e.g., dominance of spouse/partner; reversal of child/parent roles) as well as age-related changes in social positions and financial resources.

One of the most well-known value-expectancy theories in public health is the theory of reasoned action, which grew out of research Ajzen (2002) and Ajzen and Fishbein (1980) on behavior and attitude. Central to this theory is that people have control over their lives and can consequently make a decision made about a behavior to adopt or discontinue. The authors contend that an elder’s beliefs and attitudes shape his or her intent to take an action and that social influences or norms on LGBT elders also affect behavioral intent. For example, if an LGBT elder believes that stopping smoking is a goal but that society would offer little help for him or her to do so because of a pervasive attitude that the elder’s sexual orientation is causing the problem, then he or she is unlikely to attempt the change because the cost of doing so is too high or difficult.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 5, 2017 | Posted by in GERIATRICS | Comments Off on Theories, Constructs, and Applications in Working with LGBT Elders in Human Services

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access