Surgical Site Infections



Surgical Site Infections


Ioana Chirca

Camelia E. Marculescu



There are more than 25 million surgical procedures performed every year in the United States, and surgical site infections (SSI) complicate 1% to 5% of cases.1 SSI increase the risk of death by 2- to 12-fold, length of hospitalization on average more than a week, and cost of treatment up to $60,000 depending on the type of SSI.2,3




EPIDEMIOLOGY

The microbiology associated with SSI has not significantly changed over the previous few decades with the most common pathogens being Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (Table 34-1).5 Other important pathogens are Enterococcus spp., Pseudomonas spp., and other gram-negative bacteria. The site of surgery is generally the primary determinant of the organism responsible for the infection and depends on established colonizing organisms (e.g., staphylococcal predominance for orthopedic, cardiac, and vascular surgeries and gram negatives for abdominal surgeries). Antimicrobial resistance exhibited by some of these pathogens has been associated with poorer outcomes. Resistance also impacts antibiotic prophylaxis and empiric treatment of SSI. Surgeons and clinicians providing care for patients with SSI should be familiar with their local microbiology and resistance data. Recent CDC data report that approximately half of S. aureus SSI are methicillin resistant, 20% of enterococcal SSI are vancomycin resistant, and many gram-negative organisms causing SSI are resistant to fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins. Additionally, one needs to be aware of emerging SSI pathogens such as fungi, including invasive molds, and rapidly growing mycobacteria.


PATHOGENESIS AND RISK FACTORS

SSI is the result of complex interactions between multiple factors.



  • Microbial factors: Bacteria can reach the surgical wound by endogenous and exogenous contamination. The most frequent mechanism is by endogenous contamination from organisms that reside on the skin and in skin appendages as antiseptic measures cannot completely eliminate bacteria.6 Exogenous contamination is rare but has been reported such as colonization with S. aureus of operating room personnel and contamination of water sources or water-based solutions with organisms such as Legionella, Pseudomonas, or nontuberculous mycobacteria.7,8,9,10 Bacterial virulence factors such as increased adhesion to wound matrix components by S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci, biofilm production, exotoxin production by staphylococci and streptococci, and endotoxin production by gram-negative organisms may also be important for SSI risk and pathogenesis.11,12,13,14 Also, it is intuitive that the higher the bacterial inoculum, the higher the risk of SSI and this served as the basis for classification of surgical wounds by the level of probable contamination (Table 34-2).15








    Table 34-1 Major Pathogens Responsible for Surgical Site Infection5






























    Pathogen


    Percentage of SSI


    Staphylococcus aureus


    30


    Coagulase-negative staphylococci


    13.7


    Enterococcus spp.


    11.2


    Pseudomonas aeruginosa


    5.6


    Escherichia coli


    9.6


    Klebsiella pneumoniae


    3


    Acinetobacter, Serratia, Citrobacter


    1 to 3


    Candida spp.


    2










    Table 34-2 Wound Classification According to the Level of Contamination

























    Class


    Type of Wound


    Characteristics


    I


    Clean


    Uninfected, primarily closed, drained with closed drainage


    II


    Clean-contaminated


    Respiratory, urinary, gastrointestinal (GI), and genital tract are entered under controlled conditions.


    III


    Contaminated


    Open, fresh wounds; procedures with major breaks in sterile techniques, gross spillage from GI tract


    IV


    Dirty-infected


    Old, traumatic wounds; perforated viscus; preexisting clinical infection.


    Adapted from Mangram et al. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control 1999;27:97-132, with permission.



  • Patient characteristics: Age is not modifiable but has clearly been linked to the risk of developing an SSI, likely due to an increased incidence of other comorbid conditions.16 Nutritional status has been considered to be important in determining risk for SSI; however, recent studies have not identified malnutrition as an independent risk factor. Conversely, obesity has been linked to increased risk for SSI due to mechanical issues of increased body mass as well as likely underdosing of prophylactic antimicrobials. Hyperglycemia increases the risk for SSI. Current recommendations suggest a goal serum glucose <180 mg/dL.17 Smoking increases risk for SSI almost twofold, likely via vasoconstriction.18 Smoking cessation is advised at least 4 weeks prior to surgery.17 Nasal colonization with S. aureus has been reported as an independent risk factor for SSIs in some surgeries, including orthopedic procedures.19,20 Nasal colonization has also been associated with colonization at other body sites, and thus, it is recommended to administer chlorhexidine bathing in close proximity to the surgical procedure.17 Despite this recommendation, outcome data on SSI prevention have been mixed. Immunosuppressive medications have also been associated with increased risk of SSI, and if possible, they should be avoided in the perioperative period.21

    Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

    Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 22, 2016 | Posted by in INFECTIOUS DISEASE | Comments Off on Surgical Site Infections

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access