Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors




Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pancNETs) are rare neoplasms that comprise 2% to 4% of all clinically detected pancreatic tumors. They are usually indolent, and their malignant potential is often underestimated. The management of this disease poses a challenge because of the heterogeneous clinical presentation and varying degree of aggressiveness. Treatment decisions for this clinical entity are still patient- and/or physician-specific. Optimal clinical management of pancNETs requires a multidisciplinary approach. The only potentially curative treatment option, especially in the early stage disease, remains surgical resection; however, as many as 75% of patients present with advanced disease (nodal and/or distant metastases).


Key points








  • Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pancNETs) comprise 2% to 4% of all detected pancreatic tumors; they can be indolent, and yet their malignant potential is often underestimated.



  • The management of this disease poses a challenge because of the heterogeneous clinical presentation and varying degree of aggressiveness.



  • Surgical therapy remains the most efficient approach and offers the longest lasting benefits for patients with pancNETs.



  • Clinical management of pancNETs involves benefits substantially from a multidisciplinary approach.






Introduction


Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pancNETs) are uncommon tumors with an estimated incidence of 1 to 1.5 per 100,000 and a prevalence of 35 per 100,000 in the United States. They originate from the embryonic endodermal cells that give rise to the islets of Langerhans. These cells are specialized cells that produce, store, and secrete peptides and biogenic amines and were formerly known as the amine precursor uptake and decarboxylation cells or APUD cells.


PancNETs comprise 2% to 4% of all pancreatic neoplasms, and peak incidence is found between the sixth to the eighth decades. Data from the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) registry have shown an increase in incidence from 0.17 in 1970 to 0.43 in 2007, with the lowest 5-year survival compared with other gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) ( Fig. 1 ).




Fig. 1


Rising incidence of NETs in ( A ) all patients, ( B ) men, and ( C ) women.

( Data from [ A ] US National Cancer Institute. SEER Database. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov/ . Accessed April, 2015; and From [ B , C ] Ellis L, Shale MJ, Coleman MP. Carcinoid tumors of the gastrointestinal tract: trends in incidence in England since 1971. Am J Gastroenterol 2010;105:2566; with permission.)


PancNETs are often classified as functional (F) or nonfunctional (NF) based on the presence or absence of clinically evident hormone production. NF tumors are more common than functional tumors. Functional tumors secrete one or more biologically active peptides, which may result in systemic clinical symptoms ( Table 1 ). NF is likely a misnomer because these tumors often secrete various peptides, albeit in the absence of a clinical syndrome (see Table 1 ).



Table 1

Established pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor subtypes and syndromes (most frequent)



















































































pNET Syndrome Name Primary Location(s) Incidence (No. of New/100,000/y) Malignancy (%) Hormone-Causing Syndrome
Functional pNETs
Gastrinoma ZES Pancreas (30%), duodenum (60%–70%), other (5%–10%) 0.5–1.5 60–90 (30–560) Gastrin
Insulinoma Insulinoma Pancreas (100%) 1–3 5–15 Insulin
VIPoma Vemer-Morrison, Pancreatic cholera, WDHA Pancreas 85%–95%, other (neural, periganglionic, adrenal) (10%) 0.05–0.2 70–90 Vasoactive intestinal peptide
Glucagonoma Glucagonoma Pancreas (100%) 0.01–0.1 60–75 Glucagon
Somatostastinoma Somatostastinoma Pancreas (50%–60%), duodenal/jejunal (40%–50%) <0.1%, uncommon 40–60 Somatostatin
GRFoma GRFoma Pancreas (30%), lung (54%), jejunal (75%), other (adrenal, foregut, retroperitoneal) (13%) Unknown 30–50 Growth hormone–releasing factor
ACTHoma ACTHoma 4%–25% of all ectopic Cushing syndrome <0.1%, uncommon 95 ACTH
PET causing carcinoid syndrome PET causing carcinoid syndrome Pancreas (100%) (<1% of all carcinoid syndrome) Uncommon (<50 cases) 60–90 Serotonin, tachykinins
PET causing hypercalcemia PTHrPoma Pancreas (100%) <0.1%, uncommon >85 PTHrP, other unknown
NF pNET PPomas NF-PET Pancreas (100%) 1–5 60–90 None secrete pancreatic polypeptide (PP) (60%–85%), chromogranin A but cause no symptoms

Abbreviations: ACTH, adrenocorticotropic hormone; GRF, growth hormone releasing factor; pNET, pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor subtypes and syndromes; PP, pancreatic polypeptide; PPoma-pNET, secreting pancreatic polypeptide; PTHrP, parathyroid hormone–related peptide; WDHA, watery diarrhea, hypokalemia, and achlorhydria.


Efforts have been made to create a universal classification system of these tumors from a prognostic and therapeutic standpoint. In 2000, under the auspices of the World Health Organization (WHO), a NET classification was proposed with 3 categories: well-differentiated tumors with benign or uncertain behavior; well-differentiated carcinoma with malignant characteristics; and poorly differentiated carcinoma ( Table 2 ). This classification, updated in 2010, takes into account the anatomic location, mitotic activity, and the Ki67 proliferative index. This classification was then incorporated into the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging manual and into the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.



Table 2

Evolution of World Health Organization classification of neuroendocrine tumors












WHO 1980 WHO 2000 WHO 2010


  • I.

    Carcinoid


  • II.

    Mucocarcinoid


  • III.

    Mixed forms carcinoid-adenocarcinoma


  • IV.

    Pseudotumor lesions



  • 1.

    Well-differentiated endocrine tumor


  • 2.

    Well-differentiated endocrine carcinoma


  • 3.

    Poorly differentiated endocrine carcinoma


  • 4.

    Mixed exocrine-endocrine carcinoma


  • 5.

    Tumorlike lesions



  • 1.

    NET G1


  • 2.

    NET G2 a


  • 3.

    NEC G3 (large cell or small cell)


  • 4.

    Mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma


  • 5.

    Hyperplastic and preneoplastic lesions


Abbreviations: G, grade; NEC, neuroendocrine carcinoma; NET, neuroendocrine tumor.

a G2 NET may include WDET or WDEC of the WHO 2000 classification.





General features of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors


There are 10 different commonly recognized pancNETs, of which 9 are associated with a clinical syndrome, including gastrinomas, insulinomas, glucagonomas, VIPomas, GRFomas, ACTHomas, somatostatinomas, pancNETs causing carcinoid syndrome, and pancNETs causing hypercalcemia. Amounts of 60% to 100% of NF pancNETs secrete various peptides such as chromogranin A, neuron-specific enolase, pancreatic polypeptide, ghrelin, neurotensin, motilin, or subunits of human chorionic gonadotropin, all of which cause no obvious clinical syndrome. Insulinomas, gastrinomas, and nonfunctioning pancNETs were previously reported as representing about a third of all pancNETS, respectively. More recent reports suggest pancNETs occur with increasing frequency, making up twice the above percentage of pancNETs, often discovered when still asymptomatic and without advanced disease.


Some pancNETs are part of 1 of 4 different inherited syndromes: multiple endocrine neoplasia type-1 (MEN-1), von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL), von Recklinghausen disease neurofibromatosis 1, and tuberous sclerosis ( Table 3 ). These tumors frequently differ in clinical presentation, prognosis, and management from sporadic pancNETs. Of these, MEN-1 is the most important inherited pancNET because 20% to 80% of all patients with this autosomal-dominant disorder develop a clinically relevant NET. MEN-1 is found in 20% to 25% of patients with gastrinomas, 4% with insulinomas, and less than 3% with other pancNETs. Almost all patients with MEN-1 have multifocal, asymptomatic NF-pancNETs, whereas symptomatic pancNETs occur in less than 10% of this group of patients.



Table 3

Association of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors







































Syndrome Frequency Location/Type of Genetic Abnormality Altered Protein Function(s) Frequency of PETs, % Type of PETs (%)
MEN-1 (Wermer syndrome) Prevalence, 1–10 per 100,000 11q13; encodes 610 amino acid protein (menin) Nuclear location; exact function unclean interacts with JunD, NF-kB, SMAD signaling pathways; effects cell cycle, growth, genomic stability, and apoptosis 80–100 (microscopic), 20–80 (clinical) NF-PET, microscopic; > functional (20–80)
VHL Prevalence, 2–3 per 100,000 3p25: encodes 232 amino acid protein (pVHL) Interacts with elongins, which act as transcriptional regulators that degrade HIF, regulates cell cycle, VEGF 10–17 NF (>98)
Von Recklinghausen disease (neurofibromatosisl [NF-1]) Prevalence, 1 per 4000–5000 17q11.2: encodes 2485 amino acid protein (neurofibromin) Ras GTPase-activating activity, binds microtubules, modulates adenylate cyclase, mTor-regulates growth, cell cytoskeleton 0–10 (uncommon) Duodenal somatostatinomas, rare PETs
Tuberous sclerosis (Bourneville disease) Prevalence, 1 per 10,000 9q34 (TSC1): encodes 1164 amino acid protein (hamartin); 16p13 (TSC2): encodes 1807 amino acid protein (tuberin) Interacts with PI3K signaling pathway regulating GTPase and mTor, which play a key role in growth, energy regulation, response to hypoxia, nutrients Uncommon Rarely develop functional, NF-PETs

Abbreviations : HIF, hypoxia inducible factor; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor; VHL, von hippel lindau syndrome.


Diagnosis of pancNETs is often delayed for months to years, given their indolent nature and relatively nonspecific symptoms, even for patients with functional tumors. Around 60% to 70% of patients have metastatic disease at presentation, most commonly involving the liver and less frequently the bones. With the exception of insulinomas, where fewer than 10% are considered malignant, pancNETs typically demonstrate malignant behavior in at least 50% of cases.


Preoperative imaging and localization are essential before considering surgical resection of these tumors. The imaging modalities most commonly used are triple-phase multidetector computed tomography (CT) scan and MRI with gadolinium contrast. PancNETs are usually hyperenhancing masses in the arterial phase of the scan (both primary and metastatic lesions) due to their hypervascular nature ( Fig. 2 ). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound is used more frequently in Europe than in the United States and may be useful in monitoring response to treatment with peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and locoregional ablation of liver metastases. As most pancNETs (excluding insulinomas) express a high density of somatostatin receptors (specifically subtypes 2 and 5), indium-111-labeled somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS) is an effective localizing tool in this disease. There is evidence that SRS informs us of tumor receptor status, and that this may be useful for guiding therapeutic use of somatostatin analogues. Recent development of PET scanning with gallium-68-labeled somatostatin analogues (DOTATOC, DOTANOC, and DOTATATE) may be more sensitive than CT, MRI, and octreoscan in detecting NETs (100% vs 75%).




Fig. 2


CT imaging of pancreatic neuroendocrine primary tumor ( A , arrow ) and metastatic disease ( B , arrows ).


Management steps for pancNETs include establishing diagnosis, localizing tumor, assessing for underlying inherited disorder, controlling hormonal excess when present, removing and/or ablating tumor if possible and appropriate, and considering alternative forms of therapy (regional and/or medical). Depending on the situation, pancNETs can either be enucleated or removed with formal organ resection. The former approach is considered in cases of smaller tumors with presumed indolent behavior, assuming pancreatic duct disruption can be avoided. Intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) is an integral part of resection of these tumors. If the above criteria are not met, formal resection, such as pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, and the less commonly performed central pancreatectomy, is considered.




Surgical management of localized pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors


Insulinoma


Insulinoma is the most common form of F-pancNET encountered. It can be sporadic or associated with MEN-1. It is more commonly found in women (F:M = 2:1) in the fifth or sixth decade and can present in the third decade of life in patients with MEN-1. Sporadic insulinomas are usually unifocal, but those associated with MEN-1 may present with multifocal disease. Clinical presentation is characterized by the Whipple triad constituted by hypoglycemia after a fast or exercise, neuroglycopenic symptoms, and immediate relief with oral or intravenous glucose administration. Most patients also present with hyperphagia and new-onset weight gain.


The diagnostic criteria for insulinoma are established during a 72-hour fast or until symptoms develop with a blood glucose less than 50 mg/dL, elevated insulin, C-peptide, and proinsulin, in the absence of urine or plasma sulfonylureas, and relief of symptoms after an oral glucose load ( Box 1 ); 99% of insulinomas can be detected in this manner. Approximately 80% to 90% of insulinomas are small (<2 cm), solitary, benign tumors that are equally distributed among the head, body, and tail of the pancreas. The remaining 10% occur as multiple tumors in the setting of MEN-1. Most insulinomas are less than 2 cm in diameter and are benign, with a brick-red appearance due to increased vascularity. Given their small size, preoperative localization remains a challenge. CT scanning can detect approximately two-thirds of all lesions on arterial phase imaging. MRI is typically performed as a second-line imaging modality after CT, although the sensitivity for detecting these tumors may be higher than that of a CT scan. The sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) varies with tumor location (92.6%, 78.9%, and 40.0% for the head, body, and tail of the pancreas, respectively) and with user experience. SRS for this type of tumor is limited because only 30% possess somatostatin type 2 receptors. Intra-arterial calcium stimulation (selective infusion of calcium into branches of the celiac axis and superior mesenteric artery) with hepatic venous sampling for insulin can be a sensitive localizing modality, but carries some risk of complications, and is typically used when the tumor or tumors are not localized with other forms of imaging ( Fig. 3 ).



Box 1





  • Monitored fast for less than 48 hours with documented blood glucose less than 50 mg/dL with hypoglycemic symptoms



  • Relief of symptoms after oral glucose load



  • Elevated insulin level (>5–10 μU/mL)



  • Increased serum proinsulin level (>22 pmol)



  • Absence of urinary or plasma sulfonylureas



  • Elevated C-peptide levels



Diagnostic criteria for insulinoma



Fig. 3


Schematic of calcium stimulation testing for localization of insulinomas. Catheters are placed in the arterial system for calcium injection and in the venous system for sampling.

( From Vanderveen K, Grant C. Insulinoma. In: Morita SY, Dackiw APB, Zeiger MA, editors. Endocrine surgery. Chapter 17. McGraw-Hill Manual; 2010; with permission.)


Despite this, 20% to 50% of insulinomas remain undetected at the time of surgery. Some evidence suggests that preoperative localizing studies for the primary tumor may not be necessary. This finding is based on the observation that a combination of surgical exploration and IOUS can detect more than 90% of insulinomas.


Definitive treatment of insulinomas is surgical resection; however, presurgical medical therapy is provided to alleviate symptoms, including eating small, frequent meals and using insulin antisecretagogues, such as diazoxide or octreotide, both of which work only 40% to 60% of the time. Before proceeding to surgery, the presence of MEN-1 must be excluded by testing for other components such as hyperparathyroidism and pituitary tumors. Intraoperative glucose monitoring is essential to avoid hypoglycemia, and dextrose infusion must be stopped before surgical resection to permit intraoperative glucose measurements as an indicator of biochemical cure. Many sporadic adenomas are amenable to enucleation. Surgical exploration commences by gaining access to the pancreas in the lesser sac and traversing the gastrocolic omentum. A wide kocherization of the duodenum is essential for tumor involving the pancreatic head. This wide kocherization enables palpation to be combined with IOUS, which in experienced hands can detect up to 98% of insulinomas. It also helps to detect the location of the pancreatic duct to ascertain safety during enucleation and prevent a pancreatic fistula. Once the insulinoma is enucleated, a thorough examination must be performed to evaluate for a ductal leak, in the presence of which a suture repair can be attempted along with surgical drainage ( Fig. 4 ). Rates of pancreatic fistula reported after enucleation are higher than those after a formal resection, in the range of 18% to 38%.




Fig. 4


Enucleation of insulinoma: a salmon-colored tumor being dissected out from the pancreatic parenchyma.

( From Shah S, Patel A, Prajapati J, et al. Insulinoma: a commonly misdiagnosed pancreatic tumour. Internet J Gastroenterol 2009;9(1):2; with permission.)


In MEN-1 patients, these tumors are multiple and subcentimeter and usually coalesce. If multiple tumors are found throughout the pancreas, judicious use of surgical resection must be considered because total pancreatectomy should be avoided for insulinomas in most cases. If the lesion is not found, a pancreatic biopsy specimen should be obtained to rule out nesidioblastosis (a condition characterized by diffuse β-cell proliferation), in which case a subtotal pancreatectomy can improve symptoms.


No follow-up is necessary in the case of benign insulinomas unless symptoms recur. For malignant insulinomas and those associated with MEN-1, follow-up is every 3 to 12 months with biomarkers, CT/MRI, and octeroscan/PET.


The treatment of malignant/metastatic pancNETs is discussed in a separate section.


Gastrinoma


Gastrinomas are the second most common functional islet cell tumor of the pancreas. Mean age at diagnosis is 50 years with a slight male predominance. Although slow growing in nature, more than 60% demonstrate malignant behavior. Because of their indolent growth pattern, 10-year patient survival approaches 90% even in the presence of metastatic disease. Two-thirds of all gastrinomas are sporadic, with the remainder associated with MEN-1. Individuals with gastrinomas associated with MEN-1 may have a better 20-year survival rate than individuals with sporadic gastrinomas. As with other pancNETs, gastrinomas in the setting of MEN-1 tend to be multifocal, and as many as 50% of patients have distant metastases at the time of presentation.


The clinical syndrome associated with gastrinoma (Zollinger-Ellison syndrome [ZES]) arises principally from dysregulated hypergastrinemia and subsequent luminal hyperacidity resulting in development of intractable gastrointestinal ulcers. Diarrhea, heartburn, nausea, and weight loss are the typical constellation of symptoms at presentation. With the advent and widespread use of antisecretory medications, patients may or may not present with intractable ulcer disease at the time of diagnosis. Given the nonspecificity of symptoms and relative rarity of this disorder, the mean time to diagnosis is around 5.9 years. The diagnostic criteria ( Table 4 ) include an increased basal acid output in the presence of a fasting gastrin level (FSG) >100 pg/mL or >10-fold the upper limit of normal. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are stopped at least a week prior and H2 antagonists 2 days before testing. Because almost two-thirds of patients with ZES have equivocal FSG levels, secretin stimulation testing or calcium provocative testing can be useful in establishing the diagnosis. An increase of 200 pg/mL in the serum gastrin level following secretin administration is consistent with ZES. Higher serum gastrin levels are seen with pancreatic rather than duodenal primaries and in patients with tumors larger than 3 cm and/or those with liver metastases.


Sep 27, 2017 | Posted by in ONCOLOGY | Comments Off on Surgical Management of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access