Surgical Management of Metastatic Bone Disease: Humeral Lesions



Surgical Management of Metastatic Bone Disease: Humeral Lesions


Jacob Bickels

Martin M. Malawer



BACKGROUND



  • The humerus is a common site of metastatic bone disease requiring surgery. A metastasis at that site, and especially one involving the dominant extremity, has an immediate and profound impact on the affected individual’s ability to perform activities of daily living. The quality of surgery, therefore, is an important determinant in restoring vital function.


  • A detailed preoperative clinical and imaging evaluation is mandatory for defining the morphologic characteristics of the lesion and, in turn, establishing the indication for surgical intervention as well as distinguishing between lesions that can be managed with curettage and cemented fixation and those which require resection with endoprosthetic reconstruction.2,3,5,6


  • Unlike primary sarcomas of the humerus, metastatic tumors usually have a small soft tissue component, even in the presence of extensive bone destruction. This characteristic allows resection of bony elements only and the sparing of the extracortical structures, such as the joint capsule, overlying muscles, and muscle attachments, and affords the opportunity for using them to reconstruct and preserve function (FIG 1). To this end, exposure of the proximal humerus is done by splitting the deltoid muscle rather than using the deltopectoral interval, as is done in the case of a primary sarcoma of bone, which necessitates en bloc resection of the deltoid muscle with the tumor. Moreover, a few centimeters of upper limb shortening following resection of bone segment has minimal impact on function because a slight difference in positioning of that extremity in space can easily compensate for such limb length discrepancy.






    FIG 1A. Primary bone sarcomas usually have considerable extension into the soft tissues. Resection of such tumors at the proximal humerus would require en bloc removal of the overlying deltoid muscle, rotator cuff tendons, and the joint capsule. B. Bone metastases, however, usually present with less soft tissue involvement, and their resection involves removal of bony elements with only a thin layer of surrounding soft tissues.


  • In contrast, a similar discrepancy in the lower extremities that require almost equal length for normal gait would result in an inevitable limp, the extent of which would be proportional to the shortening of the operated extremity.2


  • Because of different anatomic and surgical considerations, surgeries around the proximal humerus (type I), humeral diaphysis (type II), and distal humerus (type III) will be discussed separately (FIG 2).1


ANATOMY



  • Proximal humerus: type I metastasis



    • Covered anteriorly and laterally by the deltoid muscle


    • Joint capsule encircles the humeral head and attaches to the base of anatomic neck.


    • Attachment site for the rotator cuff muscles. Long head of the biceps muscle crosses the anterior aspect within the bicipital groove.


  • Humeral diaphysis: type II metastasis



    • Upper half is occupied by muscle insertions:



      • Medial aspect—teres major, latissimus dorsi, coracobrachialis


      • Lateral aspect—pectoralis major, deltoid







      FIG 2 • Illustrations and plain radiographs showing a type I humeral metastasis (A,B) extending across the anatomic neck to the humeral head, a type II humeral metastasis (C,D) involving the humeral diaphysis between the anatomic neck and the supracondylar ridges of the humerus, and a type III humeral metastasis (E,F) extending to the humeral condyles below the supracondylar ridges.


    • Radial nerve curves at the back from medial to lateral at the midarm level


    • Lower half is occupied by muscle origins:



      • Medial aspect—brachialis


      • Lateral aspect—brachioradialis


    • Neurovascular bundle along its medial aspect


  • Distal humerus: type III metastasis



    • Neurovascular bundle along its medial aspect between the biceps and brachialis muscles


    • Radial nerve along its lateral aspect between the brachialis and brachioradialis muscles




IMAGING AND OTHER STAGING STUDIES



  • Plain radiographs of the entire humerus are mandatory to rule out synchronous metastases that may change the extent and technique of surgery. Computed tomography of the lesion will clearly define the extents of bone destruction and soft tissue component. Total body bone scintigraphy is done to detect synchronous metastases elsewhere in the skeleton. At the conclusion of imaging, the surgeon should be able to answer the following questions:



    • Are there additional humeral metastases and, if there are, can they be managed by nonoperative techniques or do they require surgery?


    • Are there additional skeletal metastases and, if there are, can they be managed by nonoperative techniques or do they require surgery?


    • What is the appropriate surgery? As a rule, the tumor curettage and cemented fixation approach is used for lesions in which the remaining cortices allow containment of the fixation device; otherwise, surgery involves resection of the affected bone segment with prosthetic reconstruction.



Jul 22, 2016 | Posted by in ONCOLOGY | Comments Off on Surgical Management of Metastatic Bone Disease: Humeral Lesions

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access