Poly(Adenosine Diphosphate–Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Cancer Treatment




Recently, the development of poly(adenosine diphosphate–ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors as a synthetic lethality approach has brought a major breakthrough in the treatment of breast cancer susceptibility gene (BRCA)-mutant cancers. Because sporadic cancers have also been found to commonly have other defects in DNA repair, PARP inhibitors are under active clinical investigation in combination with DNA-damaging therapeutics in a wide range of sporadic cancers. In this review, the authors discuss DNA repair mechanisms and PARP as a therapeutic target and summarize an update on clinical trials of available PARP inhibitors and predictive biomarkers for their efficacy.








  • Many mechanisms are present in a cell to repair DNA damage, which when effective allow for cell survival. Understanding these mechanisms are important for both therapeutic treatment of cancer and overcoming resistance.



  • The concept of synthetic lethality has be tested in treating patients with BRCA mutation with a PARP inhibitor. Initial results with olaparib was encouraging and supportive of synthetic lethality principle.



  • The role of PARP inhibitor outside of BRCA mutation tumors await confirmation. Multiple studies are ongoing investigating PARP inhibitor with chemotherapy to see if inhibiting DNA repair will lead to tumor reduction and ultimately benefit to the patients.



Key Points
Recently, the development of poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors has brought a major breakthrough in the treatment of germline breast cancer susceptibility gene ( BRCA )-mutant cancers. These agents target a DNA repair pathway via a novel mechanism of action. A better understanding of DNA damage repair mechanisms can extend the therapeutic application of this novel drug class to a wide range of sporadic cancers. Early clinical success has accelerated the development of various PARP inhibitors that are being explored in many cancers with single agents or in combination with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. In this article, the authors review DNA repair mechanisms and the role of PARP as a therapeutic target and summarize available PARP inhibitors, their clinical trials, biomarkers of PARP inhibitor sensitivity, and resistance mechanisms.


DNA damage and repair mechanisms


DNA damage is generated by a variety of factors, not only from external factors such as chemical agents, UV light, or ionizing radiation but also from internal factors such as reactive oxygen species or intrinsic DNA replication errors during cell division. DNA damages, if let unrepaired, can cause errors of DNA synthesis during replication, leading to cell death or irreversible mutations resulting in long-term oncogenesis. Thus, individuals with an inherited defect in the DNA repair system are often at an increased risk of cancer. Common errors include (1) base modifications by frequently reactive oxygen species or chemical agents, such as loss of an amino group (deamination) or alkylation; (2) mismatch of nucleotide pairs by replication errors; (3) single-strand break (SSB) or double-strand break (DSB) by ionizing radiation; (4) failures in normal DNA metabolism by topoisomerases and nuclease; or (5) cross-links, covalent linkages between bases on intrastrand or interstrand. DSBs are the most critical form of DNA damage and can result in problems for transcription, replication, and chromosome segregation, eventually leading to apoptosis or carcinogenesis.


To maintain genetic stability against constantly occurring DNA lesions, several strategies of DNA damage detection and repair have evolved. The principal and partly overlapping DNA repair pathways in humans can be largely divided into 2 groups: one is the repair pathway for DNA SSB and the other is for DNA DSB. The former can be subdivided into 3 different repair processes: (1) repair of base damage and SSBs by base excision repair (BER), (2) repair of bulky DNA adducts by nucleotide excision repair (NER), and (3) repair of mismatches and insertion/deletion loops by DNA mismatch repair (MMR). The DSB is repaired through (1) homologous recombination (HR) and (2) nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ).


Base Excision Repair


The BER pathway repairs damage to a single or a few bases caused by reactive oxygen species, alkylating agents, or ionizing radiation, such as oxidation, alkylation, hydrolysis, or deamination, that could cause mutations by incorrect base pairing or lead to breaks in DNA during replication if uncorrected ( Fig. 1 A). PARP1 and PARP2 are recruited to the site of the SSB in this pathway.




Fig. 1


Major DNA damage repair mechanisms. ( A ) BER: a specific DNA glycosylase removes a damaged base, for example, uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG) for uracil. Subsequently, an apyrimidinic/apurinic (AP) site incision by an AP endonuclease 1 (APEX1) and the removal of 5′-deoxyribose-phosphate (dRP) residue by a dRP lyase occur followed by nucleotide gap filling by DNA polymerase β. ( B ) NER: after a DNA-distorting lesion is recognized with or without the xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C (XPC)/Rad23 homolog B (RAD23B) protein complex, dual incisions on both sides of the lesion and excision of the damaged site occur by the general transcription factor TFIIH, XPG, and excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1)/XPF complex. DNA polymerase fills the resulting nucleotide gap. ( C ) MMR: the mismatched bases are recognized by a heterodimer of MSH2/MSH6 and excised by exonuclease 1 (EXO1), which is recruited by a heterodimer of MLH1/PMS2. The resulting gap is filled by DNA polymerase δ along with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and replication protein A (RPA). ( D ) NHEJ: the 2 broken ends are processed and ligated directly by Ku70/Ku80 complex and the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) followed by DNA ligase IV (LIG4)/XRCC4. ( E ) HR: repair is initiated by resection of a DSB resulting in 3’single-stranded DNA overhangs, which invade into a homologous sequence followed by DNA synthesis at the invading end. Subsequently, the second 3’end is captured to form a Holliday junction. After gap-filling DNA synthesis and ligation, the structure is resolved at the Holliday junction in a crossover or noncrossover mode.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 16, 2017 | Posted by in HEMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Poly(Adenosine Diphosphate–Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitors in Cancer Treatment

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access