Palliative Care



Palliative Care: Introduction





Much attention has been focused on the importance of making end-of-life (EOL) care decisions before one is in a crisis situation. Some older adults, however, are ambivalent about what they want at the end of life and may change their minds about treatment options when actually threatened by an illness that can cause death (Caron, Griffith, and Arcand, 2005; Cherlin et al., 2005). An option that allows for realistic EOL supportive care without rescinding all efforts at treatment is palliative care. Palliative care is focused on symptom management and relieving suffering and improving quality of life of individuals rather than focusing on cure and lengthening of life. Avoidance of unnecessary, and potentially harmful, tests is initiated, and care is focused on comfort. Palliative care is a philosophy of care that is provided simultaneously with all other appropriate medical management of the patient.






Hospice differs from palliative care. Hospice is a comprehensive care system for patients with limited life expectancy who are living at home or in institutional settings. Hospice is a Medicare benefit that was established in 1982. To be eligible for hospice, the patient’s primary health-care clinician must certify that the patient has a remaining life expectancy of approximately 6 months or less, and the patient must elect hospice and agree to accept care from an identified hospice team. The patient’s primary health-care clinician may elect to continue to provide care for the patient and work with the hospice team. Services provided through hospice are shown in Table 18–1. Hospice services also include coverage of necessary supplies such as a bedside commode or medications.







Table 18–1. Hospice Services 











  1. Initiating the discussion



  2. Clarifying the prognosis



  3. Evaluating the patient/family



  4. Identifying end-of-life goals



  5. Developing a plan of care








Table 18–2. A Five-Step Framework for Discussing Care Choices at the End of Life 






A major emphasis during all discussions of end-of-life care should be on the types of care that will be provided. Statement such as “there is nothing more we can do for you” should be avoided. Rather, the discussion should focus on what types of care interventions will be provided (eg, pain medications, positioning therapies as appropriate, nonpharmacologic pain-relieving modalities). Following these steps can help to assure that communication is clearly provided, fears are allayed, and the patients are helped to achieve the goals they want at the end of life such as dying with minimal pain.






It is important to initiate discussions about care philosophies regarding the end of life with patients and their families. While it may be difficult to do this during the first patient visit, it is helpful to have the discussion early in the provider–patient relationship. One option is to ask the patient/family if they have had discussions about EOL care and, if so, to ask them to bring any documents addressing preferences to the next appointment. If this has not been previously addressed, then a plan to discuss this in more detail at the next visit can be initiated.






For older adults in long-term care settings, one important fact to obtain and clarify during the first visit with a patient involves identifying who will be the primary/first contact to call with changes in the patient’s condition (see Chapter 17). When there are differences of opinion between siblings or caregivers about how treatment should proceed (eg, to go to the hospital or not), the clinician may be asked to facilitate a discussion around the pros and cons of different treatment options. While time consuming, these conversations can help to ease the anxiety experienced among the caregivers and help the entire family feel comfortable with the decisions that are made. The primary care clinician may need to help families explain difficult situations to a patient. Examples include such things as helping a patient with mild cognitive impairment understand that refusing dialysis may result in death. The clinician may also have to interpret behavioral responses to interventions for families of individuals who are not able to verbally express their thoughts (eg, pulling out tubes or turning down feedings may be indicative of refusal).






Slow Medicine





Slow medicine is a philosophy of care that was developed to help older adults and their families and caregivers manage some of the changes that occur with aging and the declines that commonly occur (McCullough, 2008). Slow medicine is a common sense approach to care of older adults in which careful consideration is given to the pros and cons of each treatment option. The underpinning of slow medicine is a sustained relationship with a primary care clinician who the patient and family come to trust. This sustained relationship allows time for EOL issues to be broached and revisited, a situation in stark contrast to the requirement that such topics be broached on admission to a medical facility. Decisions are strongly based on quality-of-life factors, comfort, and the risk of doing more harm than good with any given intervention. In many situations in geriatrics, a “tincture of time” may in fact be the best approach to see if a symptom will resolve prior to initiating an intervention that may cause harm (eg, an antibiotic with side effects). The slow medicine philosophy can be used to help with decisions around prevention practices (eg, use of statins) as well when managing acute situations.






Older adults and/or families often request that tests and treatments be provided for themselves or their loved ones that may not necessarily be of benefit to them. In addition, clinicians may recommend tests and procedures based on guidelines and data provided for younger individuals or as a way to cover all possible outcomes. Increasingly, there are beliefs and concerns over testing and subsequent harm to older adults. In response to these concerns, the ABIM Foundation (2012) joined with nine leading medical specialty societies to develop a list of tests and procedures that should not be recommended for older adults. The goal of choosing wisely is to help health-care providers and older adults think about and talk about undergoing expensive interventions that are not likely to be beneficial for optimizing quality of life.






Helping Older Adults and Families Understand and Decide on Palliative Care Approaches





Discussing EOL care and decisions about how to approach care at the later stages of an older individual’s life are difficult. Usually these discussions occur during a significant change in the patient’s condition, following an acute event such as pneumonia or a fall, when a patient is suffering and aggressive treatment is not likely to help that suffering, around an aging milestone such as turning 100, or simply when the patient/family wants to discuss them. As delineated in Table 18–2, clinicians should use a step approach and discuss prognosis clearly, offer hope as needed, provide evidence-based options, coordinate transitions of care as needed and progression of disease, and relieve suffering, both physical and emotional. It is critical to determine what the patient/family wants to know and how much information they want to receive, be prepared to provide care and treatment-related options, be unbiased and open to what the patient/family wants, and be prepared to offer emotional support.




Jun 11, 2016 | Posted by in GERIATRICS | Comments Off on Palliative Care

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access