Overview of Musculoskeletal Tumors and Preoperative Evaluation



Overview of Musculoskeletal Tumors and Preoperative Evaluation


Martin M. Malawer

Amir Sternheim



BACKGROUND



  • An understanding of the basic biology and pathology of bone and soft tissue tumors is essential for appropriate planning of their treatment.


  • This chapter reviews the unique biologic behavior of soft tissue and bone sarcomas, which provides the basis for their staging and resection and the use of appropriate adjuvant treatment modalities.


  • A detailed description of the clinical, radiographic, and pathologic characteristics for the most common sarcomas is presented.


EPIDEMIOLOGY



  • Soft tissue and bone sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous group of tumors. These neoplasms represent less than 0.2% of all adult and 15% of pediatric malignancies.


  • As of 2013, the annual incidence in the United States, which remains relatively constant, is approximately 11,400 soft tissue sarcomas (STS) and 3010 new bone sarcomas.1 About 4390 deaths from STS and 1440 deaths from bone cancers are expected in 2013.


  • In adults, over 40% of primary bone cancers are chondrosarcomas.


  • This is followed by osteosarcomas (OSs) (28%), chordomas (10%), Ewing tumors (8%), and malignant fibrous histiocytoma (MFH)/fibrosarcomas (4%). The remainder of cases are several rare types of bone cancers.


  • In children and teenagers (those younger than 20 years), OS (56%) and Ewing tumors (34%) are much more common than chondrosarcoma (6%).


  • In the United States, the 5-year survival rates for all bone sarcomas is about 70%. OS and Ewing sarcoma were comparable among 15 to 29 years old, about 60% for the most recent era. The U.S. bone cancer mortality was highest for males and females 15 to 19 years of age.


  • The 5-year survival rates for localized STS is 83% in 2013. This drops to 16% for systemic disease.2


RISK FACTORS



  • Risk factors for soft tissue and bone sarcomas include previous radiation therapy, exposure to chemicals (eg, vinyl chloride, arsenic); immunodeficiency; prior injury (scars, burns); chronic tissue irritation (foreign body implants, lymphedema, chronic infection); neurofibromatosis; Paget disease; bone infarcts; and genetic cancer syndromes (eg, hereditary retinoblastoma, Li-Fraumeni syndrome, Gardner syndrome, Rothmund-Thomson syndrome, Werner syndrome, Bloom syndrome), Maffucci syndrome, Ollier disease, multiple osteochondromatosis, and hereditary multiple exostoses. In most patients, however, no specific etiology can be identified.


PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND BIOLOGIC BEHAVIOR



  • Sarcomas originate primarily from elements of the mesodermal embryonic layer.


  • STS are classified according to the adult tissue that they resemble.



    • Bone sarcomas usually are classified according to the type of matrix production: Osteoid-producing sarcomas are classified as OSs, and chondroid-producing sarcomas are classified as chondrosarcomas.


  • Tumors arising in bone and soft tissues have characteristic patterns of biologic behavior because of their common mesenchymal origin and anatomic environment. Those unique patterns form the basis of the staging system and current treatment strategies.



    • Histologically, sarcomas are graded as low, intermediate, or high grade. The grade is based on tumor morphology, extent of pleomorphism, atypia, mitosis, matrix production, and necrosis, with the two main factors being mitotic count and spontaneous tumor necrosis.


    • Tumor grade represents the tumor’s biologic aggressiveness and correlates with the likelihood of metastases. Low-grade lesions rarely metastasize. High-grade lesions metastasize in over 20% of patients.


  • Sarcomas form a solid mass that grows centrifugally, with the periphery of the lesion being the least mature.



    • In contradistinction to the true capsule that surrounds benign lesions, which is composed of compressed normal cells, sarcomas usually are enclosed by a reactive zone or pseudocapsule. This pseudocapsule consists of compressed tumor cells and a fibrovascular zone of reactive tissue with a variable inflammatory component that interacts with the surrounding normal tissues.


    • The thickness of the reactive zone varies according to the histogenic type and grade of malignancy. High-grade sarcomas have a poorly defined reactive zone that may be locally invaded by the tumor (FIG 1A).


  • Tumor foci within the reactive zone are called satellite lesions.


  • High grade, and occasionally low grade, may break through the pseudocapsule to form metastases, termed skip metastases, within the same anatomic compartment in which the lesion is located. By definition, these are locoregional micrometastases that have not passed through the circulation (FIG 1B).



    • This phenomenon may be responsible for local recurrences that develop in spite of apparently negative margins after a resection.


    • Although low-grade sarcomas regularly interdigitate into the reactive zone, they rarely form tumor skip nodules beyond that area (FIG 1C,D).







    FIG 1A. Gross specimen. A pseudocapsule of a high-grade STS (arrowheads) composed of compressed tumor cells and a fibrovascular zone of reactive inflammatory response. B. Pathology specimen. Multiple satellite nodules (arrows) associated with a high-grade MFH. Note the normal intervening tissue. C. Biologic behavior of bone and STS. Unique features are formation of reactive zone, intracompartmental growth, and, rarely, the presence of skip metastases. Skip nodules are tumor foci not in continuity with the main tumor mass that form outside the pseudocapsule. “Satellite” nodules, by contrast, form within the pseudocapsule. D. Gross specimen. Skip metastases (arrows) from an OS of the distal femur. This finding is documented preoperatively in less than 5% of patients. E. Sagittal section of a high-grade OS of the distal femur. The growth plate, although not invaded by the tumor in this case, is not considered an anatomic barrier to tumor extension, probably because of the numerous vascular channels that pass through the growth plate to the epiphysis. However, the articular cartilage is an anatomic barrier to tumor extension and very rarely is directly violated by a tumor. F. Coronal section of a high-grade OS of the distal femur. Although gross involvement of the epiphysis and medial cortical breakthrough and soft tissue extension are evident, the articular cartilage is intact. This phenomenon allows intra-articular resection of high-grade sarcomas of the distal femur in most cases. Thick fascial planes are barriers to tumor extension. G. Axial MRI, showing a high-grade leiomyosarcoma of the vastus lateralis and vastus intermedius muscles. The tumor does not penetrate, looking in a clockwise direction, the lateral intermuscular septum, the adductor compartment, and the aponeuroses of the sartorius and rectus femoris muscles. (Courtesy of Martin M. Malawer.)



  • Sarcomas respect anatomic borders. Local anatomy influences tumor growth by setting natural barriers to extension. In general, sarcomas take the path of least resistance and initially grow within the anatomic compartment in which they arose. It is only at a later stage that the walls of the compartment are violated (either the cortex of a bone or aponeurosis of a muscle), at which time, the tumor breaks into a surrounding compartment.



    • Typical anatomic barriers are articular cartilage, cortical bone, and fascial borders. The growth plate is not considered an anatomic barrier because it has numerous vascular channels that run through it to the epiphysis (FIG 1E-G).


  • Sarcomas are defined as intracompartmental if they are encased within an anatomic compartment.


  • Extracompartmental tumors are those that grow out through the compartment barrier or tumors that have arisen in extracompartmental spaces (space tumors), that is, popliteal fossa, groin, sartorial canal, axilla, and antecubital fossa (FIG 2A,B).


  • Most bone sarcomas are bicompartmental at the time of presentation; they destroy the overlying cortex and extend directly into the adjacent soft tissues through the Haversian system and Volkmann canals of the cortical bone.






    FIG 2 • Extracompartmental extension. Ewing sarcoma of the distal two-thirds of the femur (A) and OS of the proximal tibia (B). Note the extraosseous component of the tumor. Most high-grade bone sarcomas are bicompartmental at the time of presentation (ie, they involve the bone of origin as well as the adjacent soft tissues). Tumors at that extent are staged as IIB. C. Plain radiograph of the proximal femur revealed direct invasion through the cortical bone with a pathologic fracture of the lesser trochanter (arrowheads). D. Axial MRI, showing metastatic bladder carcinoma to the posterior thigh. E. In surgery, exploration of the sciatic nerve revealed direct tumor involvement with extension under the epineural sheath. (Courtesy of Martin M. Malawer.)


  • Carcinomas, which typically present in the extremities as metastatic disease, directly invade the surrounding tissues, irrespective of compartmental borders (FIG 2C-E).


  • Joint involvement in sarcoma is uncommon because direct tumor extension through the articular cartilage is rare. Mechanisms of joint involvement in sarcoma are as follows:



    • Pathologic fracture with seeding of the joint cavity


    • Pericapsular extension


    • Structures that pass through the joint (eg, the cruciate ligaments) may act as a conduit for tumor growth (FIG 3).


    • Transcapsular skip nodules: demonstrated in 1% of all OSs


    • Direct articular extension


Metastatic Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcoma



  • Unlike carcinomas, bone and STS disseminate almost exclusively through the blood. Hematogenous spread of extremity sarcomas is commonly manifested by pulmonary involvement and less commonly by bony involvement. Abdominal and pelvic STS, on the other hand, typically metastasize to the liver and lungs.


  • Low-grade STS have a low (under 15%) rate of subsequent metastasis, whereas high-grade lesions have a significantly higher (over 20%) rate of metastasis.







    FIG 3A. The five major mechanisms of joint involvement by a bone sarcoma. The most common mechanisms are pathologic fracture and pericapsular extension. B. Pericapsular extension of an OS of the proximal humerus (arrowheads). C. Extension of an OS of the distal femur to the knee joint along the cruciate ligaments (arrow points to tumor); the articular cartilage is intact. Knee joint extension of a high-grade sarcoma of the distal femur is a rare event, necessitating extra-articular resection (ie, en bloc resection of the distal femur, knee joint, and a component of the proximal tibia). (Courtesy of Martin M. Malawer.)


  • Metastases from sarcomas to regional lymph nodes are uncommon; the condition is observed in only 13% of patients with STS and 7% of those with bone sarcomas at initial presentation. The prognosis is somewhat better than to that of distant metastasis (FIG 4).



    • Most patients with high-grade primary bone sarcomas, unlike STS, have distant micrometastases at presentation; an estimated 80% of patients with OS have micrometastatic lung disease at the time of diagnosis. For this reason, in most cases, cure of a high-grade primary bone sarcoma can be achieved only with systemic chemotherapy and surgery.






      FIG 4 • Metastatic sarcomas. Lateral plain radiograph of the lumbar spine, showing metastatic high-grade OS to the body of L3 vertebra (arrow). (Courtesy of Martin M. Malawer.)


  • As mentioned, high-grade STS have a lower metastatic potential. Because of that difference in metastatic capability, the role of chemotherapy in the treatment of STS and its impact on survival are still matters of some controversy.


PROGNOSTIC FACTORS



  • Prognostic factors for bone sarcomas include grade, size, extension of tumor beyond the bone cortex, regional and metastatic disease, and response of the tumor to chemotherapy (necrosis rate).


  • Prognostic factors for STS include grade, tumor size, depth, age, margin status, location (proximal vs. distal), histologic subtypes, and metastatic disease.


Staging



  • Staging is the process of classifying a tumor, especially a malignant tumor, with respect to its degree of differentiation, as well its local and distant extent, to plan the treatment and estimate the prognosis. Staging of a musculoskeletal tumor is based on the findings of the physical examination and the results of imaging studies. Biopsy and histopathologic evaluation are essential components of staging but should always be the final step. An important variable in any staging system for musculoskeletal tumors, unlike a staging system for carcinomas, is the grade of the tumor.


  • The system most commonly used for the staging of STS is the one developed by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (Table 1).3 It is based primarily on the Memorial Sloan Kettering staging system and does not apply to rhabdomyosarcoma. Critics of this system point out that it is based largely on single-institution studies that were not subjected to multi-institutional tests of validity. The Musculoskeletal Tumor Society adopted staging systems that originally were described by Enneking et al4,5,6 for malignant soft tissue and bone tumors (Table 2), and the American Joint Committee

    on Cancer developed, with a few changes, a staging system for malignant bone tumors (Tables 3 and 4).








    Table 1 System of the American Joint Committee on Cancer for the Staging of Soft Tissue Sarcomas



















































































































    Primary Tumor (T)


    TX


    Primary tumor cannot be assessed


    T0


    No evidence of primary tumor


    T1


    Tumor ≤5 cm in greatest dimension


    (Size should be regarded as a continuous variable, and the measurement should be provided)


    T1a


    Superficial tumora


    T1b


    Deep tumora


    T2


    Tumor >5 cm in greatest dimensiona


    T2a


    Superficial tumora


    T2b


    Deep tumor


    Regional Lymph Nodes (N)


    NX


    Regional lymph nodes cannot be assessed


    N0


    No regional lymph node metastasis


    N1b


    Regional lymph node metastasis


    Distant Metastasis (M)


    M0


    No distant metastasis


    M1


    Distant metastasis


    Anatomic Stage/Prognostic Groups


    Stage IA


    T1a


    N0


    M0


    G1, GX


    T1b


    N0


    M0


    G1, GX


    Stage IB


    T2a


    N0


    M0


    G1, GX


    T2b


    N0


    M0


    G1, GX


    Stage IIA


    T1a


    N0


    M0


    G2, G3


    T1b


    N0


    M0


    G2, G3


    Stage IIB


    T2a


    N0


    M0


    G2


    T2b


    N0


    M0


    G2


    Stage III


    T2a, T2b


    N0


    M0


    G3


    Any T


    N1


    M0


    Any G


    Stage IV


    Any T


    Any N


    M1


    Any G


    a Superficial tumor is located exclusively above the superficial fascia without invasion of the fascia; deep tumor is located either exclusively beneath the superficial fascia, superficial to the fascia with invasion of or through the fascia, or both superficial yet beneath the fascia.

    b Presence of positive nodes (N1) in M0 tumors is considered stage III.


    Reprinted with permission from American Joint Committee on Cancer. Soft tissue sarcoma. In: Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, ed 7. New York: Springer, 2010:291-298.









    Table 2 System of Enneking et al for Staging of Bone Sarcomas










































    Stage


    Grade


    Sitea


    Metastasis


    IA


    Low grade


    T1—intracompartmental


    M0 (none)


    IB


    Low grade


    T2—extracompartmental


    M0 (none)


    IIA


    High grade


    T1—intracompartmental


    M0 (none)


    IIB


    High grade


    T2—extracompartmental


    M0 (none)


    III


    Metastatic


    T1—intracompartmental


    M1 (regional or distant)


    III


    Metastatic


    T2—extracompartmental


    M1 (regional or distant)


    a Intracompartmental, bone tumors are confined within the cortex of the bone; extracompartmental, bone tumors extend beyond the bone cortex.


    From Enneking WF. A system of staging musculoskeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1986;(204):9-24.









    Table 3 System of the American Joint Committee on Cancer for the Staging of Bone Sarcomas



































    Stage


    Tumor Grade


    Tumor Size


    IA


    Low


    <8 cm


    IB


    Low


    >8 cm


    IIA


    High


    <8 cm


    IIB


    High


    >8 cm


    III


    Any tumor grade, skip metastasesa



    IV


    Any tumor grade, any tumor size, distant metastases



    a Skip metastases: discontinuous tumors in the primary bone site.


    Reprinted with permission from American Joint Committee on Cancer. Bone. In: Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC, et al, eds. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, ed 7. New York: Springer, 2010:281-290.



  • Enneking’s classical staging system is based on three factors: histologic grade (G), site (T), and the presence or absence of metastases (M). The anatomic site (T) may be either intracompartmental (A) or extracompartmental (B). This information is obtained preoperatively on the basis of the data gained from the various imaging modalities. A tumor is classified as intracompartmental if it is bounded by natural barriers to extension, such as bone, fascia, synovial tissue, periosteum, or cartilage. An extracompartmental tumor may be either a tumor that has violated the borders of the compartment from which it originated, or a tumor that has originated and remained in the extracompartmental space. A tumor is assigned to stage III (M1) if a metastasis is present at a distant site or in a regional lymph node.


  • Enneking’s classification system is based on clinical data from an era in which chemotherapy was not given preoperatively and compartmental resections were much more common. Therefore, there was a clear correlation between the extent of the tumor at presentation, its relation to the boundaries of the compartment in which it is located, and the extent of surgery. A close correlation also was found between surgical stage of bone sarcoma and patient survival (FIG 5). Since that time, the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy has been shown to decrease tumor size and facilitate limb-sparing surgery as well as reduce the local recurrence rate. As a result, compartmental resections have become rare. Nonetheless, Enneking’s classification is based on the biologic behavior of soft tissue and bone sarcomas, and its underlying concept is as relevant today as it was in the early 1980s (see Tables 1,2,3 and 4).








    Table 4 Enneking’s System for the Staging of Benign Bone Tumors





































    Typical Example


    Stage


    Definition


    Biologic Behavior


    Soft Tissue Tumor


    Bone Tumor


    1


    Latent


    Remains static or heals spontaneously


    Lipoma


    Nonossifying fibroma


    2


    Active


    Progressive growth, limited by natural barriers


    Angiolipoma


    Aneurysmal bone cyst


    3


    Aggressive


    Progressive growth, invasive, not limited by natural barriers


    Aggressive fibromatosis


    Giant cell tumor


    From Enneking WF, Spanier SS, Goodman MA. A system for the surgical staging of musculoskeletal sarcoma. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;153:106-120.







    FIG 5 • Survival by Enneking’s surgical stage of 219 patients with primary bone sarcoma. (Courtesy of Martin M. Malawer.)


  • Approximate survival rates by stage for extremity STS are 90% for stage I, 70% for stage II, and 50% for stage III.


Staging Benign Bone Tumors



  • Enneking also described a staging system for benign bone tumors, which remains the one that is most commonly used (see Table 4). That system is based on the biologic behavior of these tumors as suggested by their clinical manifestation and radiologic findings. Benign bone tumors grow in a centrifugal fashion, as do their malignant counterparts, and a rim of reactive bone typically is formed as a response of the host bone to the tumor. The extent of that reactive rim reflects the rate at which the tumor is growing: It usually is thick and well-defined around slowly growing tumors and barely detectable around fast-growing, aggressive tumors.


  • Latent benign bone tumors are classified as stage 1. Such tumors usually are asymptomatic and commonly are discovered as an incidental radiographic finding. Their natural history is
    of slow growth, and in most cases, they heal spontaneously. These lesions never become malignant and usually heal following simple curettage. Examples include fibrous cortical defects and nonossifying fibromas (NOF) (FIG 6A).






    FIG 6A. NOF of the distal femur (arrow). As in most cases of NOF, the lesion was asymptomatic, and the plain radiographs were ordered because of a trauma to the knee. Aneurysmal bone cyst of the distal tibia as seen by plain radiographs: anteroposterior (AP) (B) and lateral (C) views. Plain radiographs of benign GCT of the proximal tibia: AP (D) and lateral (E) views. The tumor had been neglected for 18 months and necessitated proximal tibia resection and reconstruction with endoprosthesis. (Courtesy of Martin M. Malawer.)


  • Active benign bone tumors are classified as stage 2 lesions. These tumors grow progressively but do not violate natural barriers. Associated symptoms may occur. Curettage and burr drilling are curative in most cases (FIG 6B-E).


  • Aggressive benign bone tumors (stage 3) may cause destruction of surrounding bone and usually break through the cortex into the surrounding soft tissues. Local control can be achieved only by curettage and meticulous burr drilling with a local adjuvant such as liquid nitrogen, argon beam laser, or phenol. Wide resection of the lesion with a margin of normal tissue (FIG 6D,E) is another option.

    Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

    Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jul 22, 2016 | Posted by in ONCOLOGY | Comments Off on Overview of Musculoskeletal Tumors and Preoperative Evaluation

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access