Myeloproliferative Neoplasms and Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Elias Jabbour
Hagop Kantarjian
I. MYELOPROLIFERATIVE NEOPLASMS (MPNs)
The MPNs are clonal disorders of pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells or of lineage-committed progenitor cells. MPNs are characterized by autonomous and sustained overproduction of morphologically and functionally mature granulocytes, erythrocytes, or platelets. Although one cellular element is most strikingly increased, it is not uncommon to have modest or even major elevations in other myeloid elements (e.g., thrombocytosis and leukocytosis in patients with polycythemia vera [PV]). Bone marrow aspirates and biopsy specimens typically show hyperplasia of all myeloid lineages (panmyelosis). Morphologic maturation and cellular function are essentially normal, although platelet dysfunction occasionally contributes to bleeding. The overproduction of blood elements in MPNs now appears related to “switched-on” tyrosine kinase signaling pathways. For chronic myelogenous leukemia (see Chapter 19), this arises from the t(9;22) translocation and the BCR-ABL gene product. For the MPNs discussed in this chapter, a single nucleotide mutation in the gene for JAK2, a tyrosine kinase normally activated by erythropoietin and other cytokines, plays an analogous role. JAK2 V617F is present in 74% to 97% of patients with PV, and in 30% to 50% of patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). Positivity for JAK2 V617F gives important diagnostic confirmation for MPN, though negative results do not exclude MPN.
A. Polycythemia vera (PV)
1. Diagnosis. PV must be distinguished from relative or spurious polycythemia (normal red blood cell [RBC] mass, decreased plasma volume) and from secondary erythrocytosis (increased RBC mass due to hypoxia, carboxyhemoglobinemia, inappropriate erythropoietin syndromes with tumors or renal disease, etc.). PV is suspected in patients with hemoglobin levels greater than 18.5 g/dL in men or 16.5 g/dL in women or hemoglobin levels greater than 17 g/dL in men or 15 g/dL in women if associated with a documented and sustained increase of at least 2 g/dL from an individual’s baseline value. Diagnostic evaluation begins with peripheral JAK2 V617F mutation screen and measurement of serum erythropoietin
levels. This is because JAK2 is present in 97% of patients with PV and is not associated with other causes of increased hemoglobin/hematocrit levels; similarly, a subnormal serum erythropoietin level is expected and encountered in more than 90% of patients with PV but not in secondary or apparent polycythemia. However, neither the absence of JAK2 nor the presence of a normal erythropoietin level rules out the diagnosis of PV.
The presence of a JAK2 V617F in suspected PV is highly supportive of the diagnosis, regardless of the serum erythropoietin level. In the absence of a JAK2 V617F mutation, the serum erythropoietin level is useful to guide further evaluation. If the serum erythropoietin level is subnormal, a JAK2 exon 12 mutation screen should be performed. In the setting of a negative JAK2 mutation and a normal erythropoietin level, the diagnosis of PV is unlikely and evaluation should focus on secondary causes of erythrocytosis.
The diagnosis of PV requires meeting either both major criteria and one minor criterion or the first major criterion and two minor criteria:
Major criteria
Hemoglobin greater than 18.5 g/dL in men, 16.5 g/dL in women, or other evidence of increased red cell volume
Presence of JAK2 V617F or other functionally similar mutation such as JAK2 exon 12 mutation.
Minor criteria
Bone marrow biopsy showing hypercellularity for age with trilineage myeloproliferation
Serum erythropoietin level below the normal reference range
Endogenous erythroid colony formation in vitro.
2. Aims of therapy. PV is generally an indolent disorder with the decision to treat based on risk stratification. Low-risk patients (i.e., those with no history of thrombosis, age less than 60 years, or platelets below 1 × 106/μL) are usually treated with phlebotomy and/or aspirin (ASA). The goal of phlebotomy is to keep the hematocrit level below 45% in men and below 42% in women. Initially, phlebotomy is used to reduce hyperviscosity by decreasing the red cell mass, and subsequent phlebotomies help maintain the red cell mass in a normal range. For patients with highrisk features (i.e., history of thrombosis, or an age greater than 60 years), treatment consists of phlebotomy, ASA, and/or cytoreductive therapy with hydroxyurea. Control of hypertension and diabetes and avoidance of smoking are also important.
3. Treatment regimens
a. Phlebotomy. Removal of 350 to 500 mL of blood every 2 to 4 days (less often in the elderly or in patients with cardiac disease) is the standard initial approach; the goal is getting the
hematocrit to 40% to 45%. The blood count is then checked monthly, and phlebotomy is repeated as needed to maintain the hematocrit at no more than 45%. Rapid lowering of the hematocrit may also be achieved in emergency situations by erythropheresis. Elective surgery should be deferred until the hematocrit has been stable at no more than 45% for 2 to 4 months. Platelet function should be evaluated before surgery or invasive procedures.
b. Antithrombotic therapy. Concomitantly with phlebotomy, use of low-dose ASA is now widely regarded as standard therapy, following a large European study (ECLAP) utilizing 100 mg ASA daily that showed an approximately 60% reduction in thrombotic events. Higher doses of ASA (325 mg daily) carry risk of bleeding, especially in patients with platelet counts greater than 1.5 × 106/μL, in whom acquired von Willebrand disease may be seen. The exact thrombogenic role of platelets in MPNs is not clear, but hydroxyurea and anagrelide have been shown to lower platelet counts and reduce the risk of thrombosis.
c. Myelosuppressive agents. Myelosuppressive agents are indicated in conjunction with phlebotomy for persistent thrombocytosis, recurrent thrombosis, enlarging spleen, or similar problems. They may also reduce the risk of progression to myelofibrosis compared with phlebotomy alone. Most alkylating agents carry a high risk of inducing a secondary myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or leukemia and should no longer be used. Currently recommended choices are as follows:
(1) Hydroxyurea 10 to 30 mg/kg by mouth daily. Weekly blood cell counts are required initially, with dose adjustments to maintain the hematocrit at no more than 45%, the platelet count at 100,000 to 500,000/μL, and the white blood cell (WBC) count at greater than 3000/μL. Side effects are usually minimal, but long-term use may cause painful leg ulcers and aphthous stomatitis. For younger patients and cases difficult to control with hydroxyurea, acceptable alternatives include the following.
(2) Interferon-α is usually effective in controlling hematocrit, platelet count, and splenomegaly and in relieving pruritus. The starting dose is 1 to 3 × 106 U/m2 three times weekly (pegylated interferon once weekly may also be an option—see Section I.B.2.c.). Common side effects include myalgia, fever, and asthenia, usually controlled with acetaminophen. Leukemogenic effects are presumably absent, but high cost is a deterrent to long-term use.
(3) Radioactive phosphorus (32P) 2.3 mCi/m2 intravenously (IV) (5 mCi maximum single dose). Repeat in 12 weeks if the response is inadequate (25% dose escalation optional).
Lack of response after three doses mandates a switch to other forms of therapy. Use of 32P entails an approximately 10% risk of leukemia by 10 years, and it is best reserved for the elderly and patients refractory to other modalities. Supplemental phlebotomies may be required for patients with satisfactory platelet and WBC counts but with rising hematocrit levels.
(4) Busulfan appears to have less leukemogenic potential than other alkylating agents and is appropriate in patients whose disease is not controlled by other treatments or in the elderly. It is best given in short courses over several weeks (to avoid prolonged marrow suppression) at 2 to 4 mg/day.
(5) Anagrelide selectively inhibits platelet production, and platelets start to fall in 7 to 14 days. The WBC count is unaffected; hemoglobin may fall slightly. Responses to anagrelide have been reported in more than 80% of patients with MPNs, and thrombotic risk is reduced. Recommended starting dose is 0.5 mg by mouth once a day. Average dose for control is 2.4 mg daily. Side effects include headache (44%), palpitations, diarrhea, asthenia, and fluid retention. It should be used with caution in cardiac patients and is contraindicated in pregnancy.
d. Ancillary treatments. To control hyperuricemia, allopurinol 300 mg/day is usually effective. Pruritus is a frequent problem, but usually abates with myelosuppressive therapy. Cyproheptadine 5 to 20 mg/day or paroxetine 20 mg/day may be helpful; interferon-α is also frequently effective. ASA is often helpful for erythromelalgia (hot, red, painful digits) and is commonly used to prevent thrombosis.
4. Evolution and outcome. The median survival in patients with PV exceeds 15 years and the 10-year risk of developing either myelofibrosis (MF; < 4% and 10%, respectively) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML; < 2% and 6%, respectively) is relatively low. To date, drug therapy has not been shown to favorably affect these figures. Therefore, at present, drugs should not be used with the intent to either prolong survival or prevent disease transformation into AML or MF.
B. Essential thrombocythemia (ET)
1. Diagnosis. Diagnosis of ET requires a persistent elevation of the platelet count above 450 × 103/μL plus the absence of known causes of reactive or secondary thrombocytosis (e.g., iron deficiency, malignancy, chronic inflammatory disease). After excluding obvious causes of reactive thrombocytosis (iron deficiency, trauma, infection, etc.), peripheral blood testing for the JAK2 V617F mutation is helpful. The presence of JAK2 V617F confirms
clonal thrombocytosis but careful review of the peripheral blood smear and bone marrow histology with cytogenetics must also be performed to confirm the diagnosis of ET. Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) can often present with thrombocytosis, therefore the presence of BCR-ABL must be excluded. As stated previously, the absence of JAK2 does not rule out the possibility of ET given that a large proportion of patients do not carry the mutation. Only 4% of patients with ET without a JAK2 V617F mutation will have a mutation in the MPL gene; however, if present, it does suggest clonal thrombocytosis. Moderate leukocytosis is common. Palpable splenomegaly is present in less than 50% of patients. Platelet function studies may show either spontaneous aggregation or impaired response to agonists. Microvascular occlusion may cause digital gangrene, transient ischemic attacks, visual complaints, and paresthesias. Large-artery thrombotic episodes are also common. Deep venous thrombosis is uncommon. The risk of hemorrhagic problems is significant, particularly with a platelet count greater than 1500 × 103/μL. The diagnosis of ET requires meeting four criteria, as follows:
Sustained platelet count of at least 450 × 103/μL
Bone marrow biopsy specimen showing proliferation mainly of the megakaryocytic lineage with increased numbers of enlarged, mature megakaryocytes. No significant increase or left-shift of neutrophil granulopoiesis or erythropoiesis.
Not meeting World Health Organization (WHO) criteria for PV or primary myelofibrosis, BCR-ABL-positive CML, or MDS or other myeloid neoplasm
Demonstration of JAK2 V617F or other clonal marker or, in the absence of JAK2 V617F, no evidence of reactive thrombocytosis
2. Treatment regimens. Given its typically indolent course, the primary goal of treatment in patients with ET is the prevention of complications from thrombocytosis, such as microvascular disturbances or hemorrhagic events caused by acquired von Willebrand disease. ASA therapy is often used to reduce microvascular symptoms for patients with all risk categories. Hydroxyurea, to reduce platelet counts, in combination with low-dose ASA, has been shown to decrease the risk of arterial thrombosis in patients with high-risk ET, such as those older than 60 years with platelets greater than 1000 × 103/μL or a history of hypertension, diabetes requiring treatment, or ischemia, thrombosis, embolism, or hemorrhage related to ET. For patients with ET whose platelet counts are refractory to therapy with ASA or other salicylates, therapy with interferon-α (including in pegylated preparations), anagrelide, or hydroxyurea can be used. Anagrelide was developed to prevent platelet aggregation
but was subsequently found to reduce platelet counts in ET and PMF when used at low dose.
a. Hydroxyurea 10 to 30 mg/kg by mouth daily, with dosage adjustments on the basis of weekly blood counts, should give satisfactory response in 2 to 6 weeks. Its use in combination with low-dose ASA may give optimal protection against arterial thrombosis and evolution to myelofibrosis.
b. Anagrelide can be a reasonable alternative to hydroxyurea and perhaps is preferable in younger patients. Anagrelide plus ASA was inferior to hydroxyurea plus ASA in a large recent trial, however. This agent should not be used in pregnancy.
c. Interferon-α. Most patients with ET respond to this agent, at an initial dose of 3 × 106 U/day subcutaneously (SC). Maintenance doses of 3 × 106 U three times weekly usually suffice. Pegylated interferon at an initial dose of 1.5 to 4.5 μg/kg/wk SC seems comparable in efficacy and side effects. Use of interferon in pregnancy is considered safe.
d. 32P and alkylating agents. Th ese agents are effective but carry increased risk of secondary leukemia. Nitrogen mustard (mechlorethamine 0.15 to 0.3 mg/kg [6 to 12 mg/m2] IV) can be helpful when rapid reduction in platelet count is needed. Busulfan 2 to 4 mg/day initial dose is appropriate in selected elderly patients resistant to other agents.
e. ASA 81 to 325 mg/day may control erythromelalgia and similar vaso-occlusive problems but is contraindicated in patients with a history of hemorrhagic symptoms. ASA may be useful in pregnant patients, in whom the preceding agents are contraindicated.
3. Evolution and outcome. The course of ET is often indolent, particularly in young patients. The median survival exceeds 15 years, and some patients appear to have normal life expectancy. Transformation to PMF, MDS, or acute leukemia occurs in 5% to 10%. Thrombosis is the major cause of ET-related death.
C. Primary myelofibrosis (PMF)
1. Diagnosis. This is a clonal disorder of the hematopoietic stem cell, marked by an intense reactive (nonclonal) fibrosis of the marrow; splenomegaly (frequently massive), reflecting ectopic hematopoiesis in the spleen and portal hypertension; and the presence of immature granulocytes and nucleated RBCs in the peripheral blood (leukoerythroblastic blood picture) plus teardrop RBCs and giant platelets. Mild to moderate elevations of WBC and platelet counts are common initially; cytopenias dominate later on.
JAK2 V617F mutation is present in approximately 50% of patients with PMF. An abnormal karyotype is also demonstrable in approximately 50% and connotes shortened survival
time. Other adverse prognostic factors include advanced age, anemia, WBC count of less than 4000/μL or greater than 30,000/μL, thrombocytopenia, blasts in peripheral blood, and hypercatabolic symptoms (weight loss, night sweats, fever). Diseases causing secondary marrow fibrosis, such as metastatic carcinoma, hairy-cell leukemia, and granulomatous infections, must be excluded. Similar to ET, the presence of a JAK2 V617F or an MPL mutation can be helpful to rule out reactive marrow fibrosis. However, the absence of both of these molecular markers does not exclude the presence of an MPN. Therefore, causes of reactive marrow fibrosis must be excluded in cases where no clonal marker is found. Again, bone marrow histology in combination with other clinical and laboratory features helps to establish the diagnosis of PMF. BCR-ABL should be performed to rule out the presence of CML and criteria for another myeloid neoplasm should not be met. The minor criteria, which help to establish a diagnosis of PMF, include leukoerythroblastosis, increased serum lactate dehydrogenase, anemia, and palpable splenomegaly. Major causes of death in PMF include marrow failure, infection, portal hypertension, and leukemic transformation. Cases of MDS with marrow fibrosis are easily confused with PMF. Postpolycythemic myelofibrosis is clinically indistinguishable but carries a poor prognosis, evolving to acute leukemia in 25% to 50% of patients (compared to 5% to 20% for de novo PMF). Acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (M7) may also present with a myelofibrotic picture and be confused with PMF.
The diagnosis of PMF requires meeting all three major criteria and two minor criteria:
Major criteria
Presence of megakaryocyte proliferation and atypia, accompanied by either reticulin or collagen fibrosis; or, in the absence of significant reticulin fibrosis, the megakaryocyte changes must be accompanied by an increased marrow cellularity characterized by granulocytic proliferation and often decreased erythropoiesis (i.e., prefibrotic cellular-phase disease)
Not meeting WHO criteria for PV, CML, MDS, or other myeloid disorders
Demonstration of JAK2 V617F or other clonal marker (e.g., MPL W515K/L); or, in the absence of the above clonal markers no evidence of secondary bone marrow fibrosis.
Minor criteria
Leukoerythroblastosis
Increased serum lactate dehydrogenase level
Anemia
Palpable splenomegaly.
2. Treatment regimens. PMF has a much more aggressive course than ET and PV, and treatments include androgen preparations (e.g., fluoxymesterone or danazol), corticosteroids, erythropoietin, and lenalidomide. Splenectomy should be considered for patients with portal hypertension, to improve anemia (due to sequestration) or for symptomatic relief of abdominal pain or problems with alimentation. Radiation therapy may be beneficial for palliative relief; however, a significant increase in the risk of neutropenia and infection is seen.
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is considered the only curable treatment option for patients with PMF. This option should be considered in young patients with intermediate-/high-risk PMF. For patients older than 60 years of age, a reasonable option would be a reduced-intensity conditioning regimen. Studies assessing the efficacy of JAK kinase inhibitors are ongoing and, in the setting of clinical benefit, may eventually change the course of the disease. Intervention is indicated in the following situations.