Introduction to clinical problems in oncology

Chapter 1
Introduction to clinical problems in oncology


Sing Yu Moorcraft


The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, UK


Cancer is currently a major healthcare problem. For example, in the UK, approximately 33% of the population will develop some form of cancer during their lifetime. A person’s risk of developing cancer is dependent on age and therefore the importance of oncology is likely to grow even further in the coming decades as the average age of the population increases. Oncology is one of the fastest developing specialities in medicine, with increasingly complex treatments entering daily practice and a significant number of patients in clinical trials. In the UK, the specialty is comprised of clinical oncology and medical oncology. The main difference is that clinical oncologists deliver radiotherapy, while medical oncologists do not and have historically been more heavily involved in drug research and clinical trials.


Patients may present to their oncology team, local hospital, A&E or GP with symptoms due to their cancer (e.g. pain), secondary complications (e.g. bowel obstruction) or side effects from their treatment. This book aims to provide practical guidance on how to manage the most commonly occurring problems experienced by oncology patients. However, this book is not designed to replace local or national guidelines and patients who require admission to hospital should be discussed with their oncology team or the acute oncology team in accordance with local procedures.


General approach to the management of oncology patients


Types of treatment


Oncology treatments can be local or systemic. Local treatments include surgery and radiotherapy. Systemic treatments include chemotherapy, endocrine treatments, immunotherapy and targeted therapies (e.g. monoclonal antibodies or small molecules which target specific receptors or cell signalling pathways).


This book provides guidance on the management of toxicities associated with oncology treatment. It is important to consider the aims of treatment when deciding on the most appropriate management strategy. The aims of treatment can be:



  • Curative: treatment given as the definitive treatment for cure.
  • Radical: usually refers to chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy given with curative intent.
  • Neoadjuvant: treatment given before a definitive treatment with the aim to facilitate the procedure and/or improve the chances of curing the patient.
  • Adjuvant: treatment given after a definitive treatment, with the aim to reduce the risk of recurrence (and therefore increase the chances of curing the patient) by destroying micrometastatic disease.
  • Palliative: the aims of treatment are to improve patients’ symptoms and quality of life. The treatment may (but not necessarily) prolong the patient’s life and will not cure the patient.

The management of toxicities should be discussed with the patient’s oncology team, but in general, if a patient is receiving treatment with curative intent, it is important to try to minimise dose delays and reductions, whenever possible, to maintain treatment efficacy. However, in patients receiving palliative treatment, quality of life is the most important consideration.


Tumour types and extent of disease


In oncology, treatment decisions are often heavily influenced by both the type and extent of a patient’s tumour. This involves grading and staging their disease.



  • Grading: the grade of a tumour gives an indication of how well differentiated a tumour is. This often reflects the aggressiveness of the tumour, with grade I being the most differentiated and grade IV being the least differentiated.
  • Staging: staging is used to assess the extent of disease. Some cancers have their own specialised staging systems, but many are staged by the TNM staging system. In TNM staging, the T usually represents tumour size or depth, the N reflects nodal involvement (which may be number of nodes, size of nodes or pattern of nodal involvement) and the M indicates the presence or absence of metastatic disease.

Some cancers have a predictable pattern of nodal spread and therefore some patients undergo a sentinel lymph node biopsy to determine the presence of nodal involvement. The sentinel node is the first lymph node that a cancer drains to and if it is clear of tumour then it is unlikely that lymph nodes further down the chain are involved.


Other important tumour characteristics



  • Hormone/endocrine sensitivity: some cancers, such as breast cancer, can be hormone sensitive.
  • Increased receptor expression: some cell surface receptors are overexpressed in certain cancer cells, for example HER2 positive breast or gastric cancers.
  • Presence or absence of specific mutations: specific mutations have been linked to the development/progression of cancer. These mutations can be targeted by drugs, for example vemurafenib for BRAF mutation positive metastatic melanoma.

Decision making in cancer patients


Decision making in cancer patients can be complex. The following questions provide a framework to aid in making these decisions.




  1. What is the histology/type of cancer? i.e. ‘what is it?’


    This impacts on prognosis and treatment, for example some types of cancer are sensitive to radiotherapy (e.g. squamous cell carcinomas), whereas others are relatively radiation resistant.


  2. What is the stage of their cancer? i.e. ‘where is it?’

    1. This also impacts on prognosis and treatment.
    2. In general, localised disease is treated with local therapies, whereas systemic disease is treated with systemic agents.

  3. Is it potentially curable (based on tumour histology and staging)?
  4. If we could potentially cure their cancer, what would the treatment involve? (e.g. surgery +/− chemotherapy +/− radiotherapy).


    1. Would neoadjuvant therapy be beneficial?


      Neoadjuvant therapy may increase the chance of cure if the patient responds to treatment (e.g. by shrinking a tumour so that it can be surgically removed with clear margins). However, there is a risk of the patient’s cancer progressing if they do not respond to neoadjuvant therapy.



    2. Would adjuvant therapy be beneficial?


      This is often a complicated decision as the patient has already had a radical treatment aiming for cure. This treatment alone may have cured the patient. However, some patients will be cured by the addition of adjuvant treatment.


      The individual patient will not know if they personally benefited from the adjuvant treatment as the benefit is determined from population statistics. There is no biochemical or radiological evidence to show an immediate benefit of treatment.


      This can be difficult to explain to patients and the choice of statistics used to explain benefits and risks can influence their decisions regarding treatment.


      Decision-making aids (such as www.adjuvantonline.com) can assist with decision making and explanations.


    3. Factors to consider when making decisions regarding adjuvant therapy include:

      • The presence of risk factors for local recurrence, for example large tumours, close surgical margins, nodal involvement. Adjuvant radiotherapy may be indicated for these patients.
      • The presence of risk factors for haematogenous spread, for example high grade tumours, lymphovascular invasion, nodal involvement. Adjuvant chemotherapy may be appropriate to reduce the risk of developing metastatic disease.
      • The pattern of lymphatic spread:

        1. If this is predictable then radiotherapy may be appropriate to eradicate subclinical disease in the next echelon of nodes.
        2. If this is not predictable then systemic therapy is more appropriate.

      Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

      Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 13, 2016 | Posted by in ONCOLOGY | Comments Off on Introduction to clinical problems in oncology

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access