Integrative Oncology: Scientific Research in Support of Patients: Useful, Possible, Valid


1

Reduction of adverse effects from chemotherapy and radiotherapy, with particular reference to nausea and vomiting

2

Management of pain

3

Reduction of adverse effects due to iatrogenic menopause

4

Improvement in quality of life

5

Resolution of anxiety, depression, fatigue; supportive treatment for chemotherapy and radiotherapy; perioperative noise reduction

6

Gastrointestinal disorders, sleep disorders

7

Prevention of relapse

8

Reduction of muscle disorders, palliative care, reduction of neuropathy




Table 25.2
Integrative oncology in Italy: ARTOI

















Spreading of scientific knowledge

Scientific research

To integrate therapies and methodologies (hyperthermia)

To develop personalized therapy (pharmaco and nutrigenomic)

To improve results and quality of life

Prevention


Our perspective must change from one of ‘the tumor in the patient’ to one of ‘the patient with the disease’ being at the center of our work. In order to achieve this, we must select chemotherapy tailored more specifically to the patient, more targeted biological therapy, and natural substances for improved synergy, as well as involving psycho-oncology to improve patient compliance. Although we know that many anticancer drugs come from natural substances (Table 25.3) and that the next generation of monoclonal antibodies may provide benefit at affordable costs, with numerous side effects so serious as to stop treatment (Table 25.4); however, medium- and long-term results are not yet well known. We know the immunomodulatory action and antineoplastic activity (Table 25.5) of many natural substances (Table 25.6). The dilemma is to understand whether sufficient scientific evidence exists to combine them with an antineoplastic drug. One of the most important factors is to understand the pharmacokinetics of substances. We know that the main pharmacokinetic mechanisms are related to absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Each of these mechanisms is important for optimum drug function: drugs must be ingested, inhaled, or infused into the body (absorption); they must be satisfactorily distributed to the various organs (distribution patterns); they must have a regular activation function (metabolism); and they must be regularly removed so as not to cause damage via accumulation (excretion). All these stages are important, but our main interest is in the metabolism of anticancer drugs and their interactions with natural substances that can affect induction and inhibition. An enzymatic induction action means that a substance may increase the metabolism of a drug, leading to reduced time in the bloodstream, and therefore a reduced pharmacological effect. Conversely, an enzyme inhibition action means that the drug will have reduced metabolism, much of it will remain in the bloodstream, with subsequent increased pharmacological effects, side effects and therefore toxicity. Whereas the enzymatic source of greatest interest is the cytochrome P450 (CYP) family and we know that 35 % of oxidation is carried out by CYP3A4, we also know that this enzyme metabolizes 70 % of anticancer drugs (Table 25.7). However, many natural substances have the same metabolic pathway as CYP, with inhibiting or inducing effects (Table 25.8). Therefore, we must be very careful when combining certain substances with chemotherapy (Table 25.9). We do know that many other substances interfere differently with anticancer drugs, increasing their action or reducing their side effects (Table 25.10).


Table 25.3
Orthodox chemotherapy: chemical substances synthesized in the laboratory















Extract of plants (taxanes)

Products of bacteria or fungi (antracyclins)

Alchilants substances (nitrosuree)

Composits of minerals (platinum)

Hormones



Table 25.4
Monoclonal antibodies






































































































Substance

Name

Cancer

Price E

% result
 

Erlotinib

Tarceva

Lung IV

4.600

2 month

ML20650, EURTAC

Gefitinib

Iressa

Lung IV

3.600

1.5 month

fase III ISEL

Cetuximab

Erbitux

Colon/head

600

15/70

CA225025-EMR 62 202-006

Trastuzumab

Herceptin

Breast-colon

1.000

35/10

MO16432-BO18225

Bevacizumab

Avastin

Breast-colon

2.000

10 month

ECOG E2100-AVF2107g

Rituximab

Mabthera

LNHodgkin

2.600

50/2 year

M39021

Pazopanib

Votrient

Kidney-sarcomas

1.800

3 month

VEG105192

Sunitinib

Sutent

Kidney IV

2.600

6–9 month

Fase III EORTC

Pertuzumab

Perjeta

Breast IV

4.500

6 month

CLEOPATRA

Lapatinib

Tyverb

Breast IV

1.800

2 month

EGF100151

Panitumumab

Vectibix

Colon IV

2.000

No results

Study of 1.189 pz

Ipilimumab

Yervoy

Melanoma IV

60.000

2 month

Fase 3 MDX010–20



Table 25.5
Plants with immunomodulatory activity




































Tinospora cordifolia

Arabinogalactan, a. glucano

Whatania somnifora

Arabinogalactan

Astragalus membranaceus

Beta-glucans

Echinacea purpurea

Arabinogalactans, pectins

Glycyrrhiza glabra

Pectins

Panax ginseng

Arabinogalactans, pectins

Viscum album

Arabinogalactans, pectins

Aloe barbadensis

Acemannan

Panax quinquefolium

Arabinogalactan: alfa glucan

Lentinus edodes
 



Table 25.6
Natural Substances with anticancer activity





















Apigenin

Licorice

N. acetil cisteine

Magnosalin

Curcumin (turmuric)

Omega-3 fatty acids

Epigallocatechin (green tea)

Polypodium leucotomos

Inosytol

Quercetin

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jan 31, 2017 | Posted by in ONCOLOGY | Comments Off on Integrative Oncology: Scientific Research in Support of Patients: Useful, Possible, Valid

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access