Cytokine therapy

Although several cytokines have shown antitumor activity in RCC, the most consistent results have been reported with IL-2 and IFN-α. In contrast to the results seen with molecularly targeted therapies (eg, sorafenib, sunitinib), which lead to tumor shrinkage in most treated patients but do not produce remissions of cancer when therapy is discontinued, the administration of HD IL-2 has consistently produced durable responses in a small percentage of patients with advanced RCC. However, the substantial toxicity and limited efficacy that are associated with IL-2 have narrowed its application to highly selected patients treated at specialized centers. Although IFN-α has produced modest benefits in unselected patients, randomized clinical trials have revealed a small survival benefit with manageable toxic effects when compared with non–IFN-α control arms. As it became the de facto standard of care worldwide, regulatory agencies have supported the use of IFN-α as the control arm for randomized trials with targeted therapies that are described elsewhere in this issue. The results of these investigations have, in general, established the superiority of targeted agents in previously untreated patients, thereby narrowing the future use of IFN-α as a single agent in this setting.

In recent years, the relative merits of these low-dose and high-dose cytokine regimens have been clarified by the results of 4 randomized trials ( Table 1 ). In the most consequential trial, the French Immunotherapy Group randomized patients with an intermediate likelihood of response to IL-2 and IFN-α to receive medroxyprogesterone (control group), subcutaneous IFN-α, subcutaneous IL-2, or the combination of IFN-α and IL-2. Although significant toxicity was more common in the IL-2 and IFN-α arm, median overall survival did not differ between the arms. The investigators concluded that subcutaneous IFN-α and IL-2 should no longer be recommended in patients with metastatic RCC and intermediate prognosis.

Taken together, these studies suggest that high-dose intravenous (IV) bolus IL-2 is superior in terms of response rate and possibly response quality to regimens that involve low-dose IL-2 and IFN-α, intermediate-dose or low-dose IL-2 alone, or low-dose IFN-α alone. Consequently, although low-dose single cytokine therapy has a limited role in patients with metastatic RCC, high-dose IV IL-2 remains a reasonable option for appropriately selected patients with access to such therapy. More significantly, correlative biomarker investigations associated with these trials suggest that the potential exists for identifying predictors of response (or resistance) and limiting IL-2 therapy to those most likely to benefit.

Pathologic and molecular predictors of response to IL-2

Pathologic and molecular predictors of response to IL-2

Current investigation in patient selection

The CWG conducted the high-dose IL-2 Select trial to determine, in a prospective fashion, if the predictive model proposed by Atkins and colleagues can identify a group of patients with advanced RCC who are significantly more likely to respond to high-dose IL-2–based therapy (good risk) than a historical, unselected patient population. The preliminary clinical results of this trial revealed a response rate (28%) that was significantly higher that the historical experience with high-dose IL-2. However, analysis of proposed tumor biomarkers (eg, central pathology review and staining for CAIX) was unable to confirm hypotheses generated in retrospective studies and limit the application of HD IL-2. Efforts to confirm other proposed biomarkers (eg, CAIX SNPs, B7-H1 expression) are ongoing to understand tumor and host factors that predict for remissions after IL-2 therapy. An improved model for IL-2 patient selection will likely emerge from these efforts and improve its therapeutic index. Lessons from this work should guide the development of targeted immunotherapies (eg, CTLA-4, PD-1 antibodies) in solid tumors. As the list of effective therapies for metastatic RCC grows, improvements in patient selection will be necessary to ensure that patients who might attain a durable remission with immunotherapy do not miss this opportunity.

Combination of immunotherapy and targeted/antiangiogenic therapy

Although the role of low-dose single-agent cytokines is limited, combinations of immunotherapy with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) targeted therapy may have merit. Two recently completed, large phase III trials of IFN plus bevacizumab versus IFN alone have shown superior efficacy with the combination regimen compared with cytokine monotherapy and suggest the potential of an additive effect.

Soon after bevacizumab became the first VEGF targeted agent to show efficacy as monotherapy in metastatic RCC, investigators explored the value of combining it with the de facto standard of care, IFN. Two phase III trials of IFN plus bevacizumab versus IFN (AVOREN and CALGB 90,206) were initiated in Europe and the United States for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic RCC. In both trials, patients were randomized bevacizumab plus IFN versus IFN alone. Unlike the CALGB trial, AVOREN (N = 649) was placebo-controlled, double-blind, and mandated previous nephrectomy. Compared with IFN alone, the combination arm in the AVOREN trial showed significantly better median progression-free survival (PFS) (10.4 vs 5.5 months; P = .0001), overall response rate (ORR) (31% vs 13%; P = .0001), and median time to progression (10.2 vs 5.5 months; P = .0001). The overall survival data analysis was subsequently published in 2010 and showed no significant survival difference between 2 arms (23.3 vs 21.3 months; P = .1291).

Further confirmation of the superiority of bevacizumab plus IFN to IFN alone came from the CALGB 90,206 trial. Unlike AVOREN, CALGB 90,206 was an open-labeled study and did not require previous nephrectomy. Relative to IFN alone, therapy with bevacizumab plus IFN significantly improved ORR (25.5% vs 13.1%, P <.0001) and median PFS (8.4 vs 4.9 months, P <.0001.) On the other hand, overall survival was similar in both arms: 18.3 months in the combination arm and 17.4 months in the IFN-only arm ( P = .097). Although the AVOREN and CALGB trials led to the regulatory approval of this combination of VEGF pathway inhibition with immunotherapy in patients with RCC, clarification of the relative contribution of IFN to this regimen requires a randomized trial comparing the combination with bevacizumab alone.

Bevacizumab has also been combined with high-dose IL-2 in a CWG phase II trial. Investigators reported a response rate of 28% and a median PFS of 9 months. These results suggest that these 2 agents may be given safely in combination and produce efficacy improvements that are additive but not synergistic. Sorafenib and IFN have been combined in 2 separate single-arm phase II trials. These trials showed objective response rates of 18% and 35%. Toxicity observed was typical of that observed with each single agent with a notable reduction in hand-foot syndrome compared with sorafenib monotherapy data. The benefit/toxicity ratio of this combination regimen awaits further investigation in randomized trials.

Investigational immunotherapy in RCC tumor vaccines

Metastatic RCC is a setting in which there has been great interest in testing novel immunotherapies. Several such approaches, including vaccination and allogeneic bone marrow transplantation, have been tested over the past 2 decades. The initial reports evaluating allogeneic bone marrow transplantation were encouraging; however, further clinical trials have highlighted the potential toxicity and limited applicability of this approach.

The use of tumor vaccines has been explored in RCC, in an effort to limit treatment-related toxicity and enhance tumor-specific immune responses. A variety of antigens associated with RCC have been identified, including MAGE-A6, MAGE 9, PRAME, and MUC1. Therefore, early clinical trials evaluated irradiated tumor cells or tumor lysate as a means of inducing antitumor responses. In the first published clinical trial reporting results of 120 patients, no improvement in PFS or overall survival was observed with treatment with irradiated autologous tumor cells given BCG. In contrast, results of a large multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluating an autologous tumor lysate-based vaccine in patients with high-risk nonmetastatic kidney cancer showed an improvement in PFS in vaccinated patients (5-year PFS 77.4% in vaccinated patients vs 67.8% in controls, P = .02). In a recent study, May and colleagues published results of 495 patients treated with an autologous tumor lysate-based vaccine in the adjuvant setting after undergoing radical nephrectomy for high-risk disease. Results were compared with a control group of 495 matched patients treated with nephrectomy alone. Overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 80.6% and 68.9%, respectively, in vaccinated patients, and 79.2% and 62.1%, respectively, in the control group ( P = .066). A statistically significant increase in overall survival was observed in the subset of patients with pT3 tumors (5-year overall survival 71.3% in vaccinated patients vs 65.4% in controls, P = .022). These data have yet to be confirmed in a randomized, controlled phase III trial.

Despite the presence of tumor-specific antigens, tumor cells lack appropriate costimulatory molecules and stimulatory cytokines to elicit an effective immune response. Therefore, in an attempt to augment effective immune response to vaccination, the use of renal carcinoma cells that have been genetically engineered to encode stimulatory cytokines and/or costimulatory molecules have been evaluated in phase I and II studies. Vaccination was well tolerated, and both complete and partial responses were observed, although in a minority of patients. Recently, tumor antigens have been engineered into vaccinia virus vectors. Trovax, a modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) encoding the human oncofetal antigen 5T4, has been studied in phase I and II trials, which revealed suggestions of clinical efficacy. In a recent phase III clinical trial, 733 patients with metastatic RCC were randomized to receive Trovax versus placebo in combination with either sunitinib, IL-2, or IFN-γ. However, no difference in overall survival was observed in the Trovax-treated cohort. The magnitude of immune response to vaccination was associated with improved survival.

An alternative means of augmenting tumor antigen presentation and reversing tumor-induced anergy lies in the use of dendritic cell-based vaccines. Dendritic cells are potent antigen-presenting cells, uniquely capable of eliciting primary immune responses. Dendritic cell vaccines present tumor antigens in the context of dendritic cell-derived costimulatory molecules, resulting in effective antitumor immune responses. Several clinical studies have evaluated the ability of dendritic cell-based vaccines to elicit immunologic and clinical responses in patients with metastatic RCC. In a recent study, 18 patients with metastatic RCC were treated with autologous ex vivo generated dendritic cells loaded with autologous tumor lysate. Patients were treated with 5 cycles of intranodal injection with vaccine, in conjunction with a day continuous infusion of IL-2 (18 MiU/m ² ) and 3 injections of IFN-α 2a every other day. Three patients showed a complete response, 6 patients showed a partial response, and 6 patients showed stable disease. Avigan has conducted studies evaluating a dendritic cell/tumor fusion vaccine, in which ex vivo generated dendritic cells are fused to patient-derived tumor cells. In 1 study, 23 patients were treated (10 patients with breast cancer, 13 renal patients with renal cancer) with escalating doses of dendritic cell /tumor fusion cells, ranging from 1 × 10 ⁶ – 4 × 10 ⁶ fusion cells. No significant treatment-related toxicity was observed. Tumor-specific immunity was assessed by measuring IFN-γ secretion by T cells after ex vivo exposure to autologous tumor lysate. Immunologic responses, defined as a 2-fold or greater increase in IFN-γ secretion by CD4 and or CD8 T-cell populations, was observed in more than half of patients. Five patients with renal cancer showed disease stabilization. In a subsequent study, patients with metastatic RCC underwent vaccination with allogeneic dendritic cell/tumor fusions. Of 24 patients who underwent vaccination, 2 patients showed a partial response, and 8 patients showed stable disease. A correlation between clinical and immunologic response was observed.

Although dendritic cell-based vaccines show promise, clinical responses are observed in a minority of patients. This finding may be in part because of the paradoxic increase in regulatory T cells that is observed in response to vaccination. In a recent study, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from 25 patients enrolled in a clinical trial in which patients with metastatic RCC were treated with autologous dendritic cells pulsed with tumor antigens given in conjunction with low-dose IL-2. The proportion of regulatory T cells increased more than 7-fold after vaccination compared with pretreatment levels. Strategies to deplete regulatory T cells and inhibit the effect of inhibitory pathways may be required to augment clinical response to vaccination strategies.

Overcoming obstacles to effective immunotherapy in RCC

An improved understanding of the molecular mechanisms that govern the interaction between a tumor and host immune response has provided insight into why immunotherapies too often fail to achieve satisfactory results. In RCC, obstacles to effective immunotherapy likely include the physiologic downmodulation of the immune response through the increased expression of molecules such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) on the surface of activated T cells, the proliferation of regulatory (CD4+CD25+) T cells (T-regs) in response to nonspecific cytokine administration, and the immunosuppressive effects of increased circulating VEGF levels and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC). These insights have encouraged investigators to pursue agents that block T-cell regulation (eg, programmed death 1 [PD-1] and CTLA-4 antibodies), inhibit tumor-induced immunosuppression (eg, transforming growth factor beta [TGF-β] antibody, PD ligand 1 [PD-L1] antibody) and more specifically activate T cells (eg, CD137 antibody, IL-21), and dendritic cells (eg, toll-like receptor agonists) ( Table 2 ). Several of these approaches have shown encouraging efficacy in early trials both as single agents and in combination with standard therapies.

Investigational targeted immunotherapy

In a single-institution phase II trial, the CTLA-4 antibody ipilimumab produced major tumor regressions but also significant toxicities in patients with metastatic RCC who had failed previous immunotherapy. Toxicities associated with CTLA-4 antibodies, including enteritis, skin rash, and hypophysitis, have occasionally been life threatening and have also been associated with tumor response. Combination of cytokines and agents that block immune downregulation may prove particularly effective in select patients. A recent report of high-dose IL-2 and ipilimumab (CTLA-4 antibody) in patients with metastatic melanoma revealed manageable toxicity with a complete response rate of 17%, suggesting a potential role for this combination in patients with RCC. However, the combination of another CTLA-4 antibody (tremelimumab) and a VEGF tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI; sunitinib) proved more toxic than expected, in large part because of acute renal toxicity. Investigators at the Dana-Farber Harvard Cancer Center have recently launched a phase I trial of the combination of ipilimumab and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. Should this combination prove tolerable, it should represent a rational combination for investigation in patients with RCC.

One of the most critical and promising pathways responsible for tumor-induced immune suppression in RCC is the interaction between B7-1, otherwise known as PD-1, and its ligand B7-H1 (PD-L1) interaction, which serves to restrict the cytolytic function of tumor-infiltrating T lymphocytes. Renal tumors that express B7-H1 have been shown to behave more aggressively, which leads to a shorter survival ( Fig. 1 ). Blocking the receptor (PD-1)/ligand (PD-L1) interaction with monoclonal antibodies (eg, PD-1 antibody BMS-936558, PD-L1 antibody MDX–1105), may facilitate immunotherapy and represents one of the most promising therapeutic strategies being studied in patients with RCC. These agents have recently completed phase I testing.

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Share this:

• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Related posts:

Renal Cell Carcinoma mTOR Inhibitors in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Future Directions in Renal Cell Carcinoma: 2011 and Beyond Small Renal Masses: Risk Prediction and Contemporary Management mTOR Inhibitors in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Non–Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Recent Progress and Future Directions

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Join