Fig. 1
Following the Principles of Geriatric Medicine and Preventing Hospital Admissions and Readmissions
Accountable Care Organizations (ACO)
Over the past several yea rs population Health Management (PHM) and ACOs have become initia tives of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Most health care planners agree that the present health system has failed to provide health care value (HCV) to American consumers. Dr. Dan Berwick has defined HCV as quality (quality measures and patient satisfaction scores) divided by the cost of care.
Future health care must develop healthcare delivery systems that make healthcare more clinically effective and safe at less cost.
One of the high cost drivers of the current system of care is the inducement to NFs to admit and readmit their patients to hospital. Having a three night hospital stay creates more opportunities for the NF to receive higher per diem reimbursement for those patients returning on SNF Medicare A services. In 2013, CMS initiated a hospital reimbursement system that penalizes hospitals that have a higher than expected 30-day readmission rate. Penalizing hospitals became a game changer for the many NFs that previously had benefited financially as a result of repeated hospitalizations.
ACOs were created by CMS in an attempt to emphasize prevention and early treatment of serious medical illness. Medicare decided to incentivize the ACOs by allowing the ACO to share with Medicare any cost savings but at the same time placing them at risk for financial losses. In the future, a successful ACO will be defined by low occupancy hospital bed rates and a system of care that is able to diagnose and treat chronic medical conditions before crises occur, thus preventing hospitalization.
How will ACOs impact those who care for the frail adults? There is growing evidence that NF physicians and management will have be prepared to work collaboratively and successfully with others in the health care system in order to be successful in the ACO market. If a NF is considering involvement with an ACO there are at least three questions on readiness that need to be addressed:
1.
Can the NF/SNF promote a culture of early assessment, diagnosis, and treatment in place for a patient’s change of condition?
2.
Is the NF/SNF prepared to develop better educational programs to train staff and providers?
3.
Is the practitioner readily available to assess patients when a change in condition occurs?
Medicare data demonstrates three diagnoses that consistently show up on its yearly reports on Common Reasons for Hospitalization: pneumonia; congestive heart failure; and urinary tract infections. Medicare data published in 2014 demonstrated that of all causes for NF/SNF admissions to the hospital: 9 % are due to pneumonia, 6 % due to CHF, and 4 % due to urosepsis.
It has been suggested that 30 % of pneumonia, 17 % of CHF, and 13 % of admissions for urosepsis could possibly have been avoided and successfully treated at the NF/SNF [5]. There are a number of opinions published in the medical literature stating that perhaps up to 75 % of the hospital admissions for these three illnesses could possibly have been avoided.
ACOs will also impact NFs/SNFs by referring frail adults suffering from an acute illness directly to the NFs/SNFs rather than admitting them to the hospital. Frail adults who are medially stable but unable to care for themselves during an acute illness, could more appropriately be directly referred to a NF/SNF from the hospital emergency room. Licensed ACO provider groups that take both upside and downside Medicare and Medicaid risks will have incentive to place patients directly into the NF/SNF. Patients in commercially insured mature ACOs are already being directly admitted to NFs/SNFs. Nursing facilities that are prepared to receive admissions 24 h/7, including holidays, and which demonstrate good HCV (i.e., outcomes at less cost) will be role models in defining how future care will be provided for the elderly. These successful nursing facilities will be attractive partners for ACOs because they will help to ensure the ACOs success.
Responding to Acute Change in Condition
When nursing faci lities make a commitment to reduce preventable hospital admissions and readmissions, attention needs to be given to appropriate training of licensed staff in the early recognition and assessment of patients experiencing an acute change in condition. There are many excellent training materials available. One of the best educational and user-friendly tools is the Know-It-All tool available at the AMDA.com website. It is a thorough assessment tool for many common symptoms and geriatric conditions, is easy to use, and has been shown to improve the skills of licensed staff. Dr. Ouslander has also developed an excellent tool, INTERACT II, which when used has demonstrated improvements in quality of care and reduction of avoidable hospitalizations [6].
In addition to a well-trained staff, it is equally important to have physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants available to assess patients with an acute change in condition within 24–48 h. While the 48-h guideline may be a hardship in rural areas, frequent contact with well-trained licensed staff is very important. Timely communication needs to occur until the change in condition is accurately assessed, treatment initiated, stabilization obtained, and improvement has begun to occur. Currently there are entrepreneurs developing a telemedicine model to fill this void, offering emergency physician care on nights and weekends via telecommunication.
While the list for acute changes in condition is extensive, included here are some of the more commons conditions with which licensed staff should be knowledgeable. They include the following:
Change in mental status
Chest pain
Dehydration
Acute onset of physical or verbal aggressive behavior
Congestive heart failure
Fever of unknown origin
Asymptomatic bacteriuria and urinary tract infection
Pneumonia.
Change in Mental Status
An acute change in mental status is com monly observed among frail older adults. There are many possible reasons that a NF resident/patient can have a change in mental status. Commonly seen triggers include medication, infection, and/or pain. Research suggests that the prevalence of memory loss in NF patients varies between 50 % and 80 %, therefore it is critical to get a baseline cognitive assessment completed within the first few days after admission. If a recently admitted patient is diagnosed with delirium and/or depression, their cognition should be reevaluated after successful treatment of their acute change in mental status (see chapter “Dementia, Delirium, and Depression” for further discussion of Depression and Delirium).
Many clinici ans have heard staff report, “the patient seems more confused”. When this occurs, use the opportunity to educate staff that an increase in confusion is more appropriately called delirium and reinforce the importance of recognizing such a change in mental status and notifying the PCP. After recognizing a change in mental status and obtaining vital signs, staff should contact the PCP. The patient’s complaints and any significant physical findings on nurse assessment need to be conveyed to the PCP. The PCP should then inquire about the patient’s medical history, medications and recent laboratory studies. Vital signs should be monitored each shift for at least 3 days. When reviewing the patient’s medications, it is important to look for any problematic medications (see chapter “Medication Management in Long Term Care” on Medication Management for further discussion) and recent medication changes. Recent laboratory studies should be reviewed for any evidence of disease including but not limited to hematologic, liver or renal abnormalities. Some laboratory studies may need to be repeated. Nursing facilities should have established systems of care that facilitate licensed staff assessing any resident’s acute change in condition in a timely manner. Early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of an acute change of condition plays an important role in preventing avoidable hospitalizations.
Chest Pain
In most setti ngs chest pain is viewed as a potential 911 call. However, 911 may not always be appropriate in the nursing facility setting. If the PCP has had a previous conversation with the resident/POA regarding goals of care and the risks and benefits of hospitalization, many residents prefer treatment in the NF whenever possible. This is especially true for patients who have established “comfort” as their goal of care at which time the primary treatment of chest pain is usually focused on pain relief. Then treating chest pain with aspirin, nitroglycerin, and morphine sulfate would be appropriate.
Dehydration
Dehydration is freq uently caused by acute onset of protracted vomiting and/or diarrhea without adequate fluid replacement. Early diagnosis and intervention can potentially prevent an avoidable hospitalization. Early interventions include adding medication to treat the symptoms, holding or reducing any medications that may cause further adverse effects (such as warfarin, digoxin, diuretics, iron, bowel medications) and administering intravenous (IV) fluids or giving careful attention to oral fluid intake. Intravenous fluids may not be appropriate in patients who have multi-morbidities associated with progressive unavoidable weight loss (see chapter “Weight and Nutrition” for further discussion).
If goals of care h ave previously been addressed, the decision to withhold artificial hydration or to not hospitalize is usually less difficult for the patient/POA. Occasionally, if the problem is acute, some patients/POAs request IV therapy. Since more than 60 % of long-term care facilities (LTCF) residents have significant cognitive impairment, it is appropriate to request that a family member be present when administering IV therapy. This family member can calm a delirious patient and prevent the accidental removal of the IV line.
Behavioral Problems
Acute onset of phy sically or verbally aggressive behavior is common among NF residents in memory loss specialty units. The PCP should have a conversation with the POA regarding physical or verbal abusive behaviors that are unresponsive to behavioral interventions. This is especially important when a patient is attempting to physically harm staff or other patients. Residents that are subjected to verbally aggressive speech from another resident may manifest distress by becoming abusive to the offender.
Hospitalizing residents with se rious behavioral problems has little benefit other than temporarily removing them from the NF until the staff can successfully de-escalate the behaviors of the remaining patients. Consequently, successful memory loss units have experienced staff and PCPs who use creative behavioral interventions to de-escalate most physically or verbally aggressive behavior. Maintaining educated and consistent caregivers and staff that are familiar with the nuances of the unit residents is extremely important. Administrators frequently find preventing high staff turnover very challenging as they work to maintain consistency and quality of care in memory loss units.
Because of the lack of ps ychiatrists trained in geriatrics, many NF PCPs use psychiatrists trained in adult psychiatry to assist with residents who have challenging behaviors. Unfortunately these psychiatrists often are not trained in evaluating and treating behavioral problems in residents with memory loss. There are no psychotropic medications approved by the FDA or proven effective in treating behavioral symptoms of dementia as of 2015. Although there are no medications that have been shown to improve the behaviors of residents with dementia, many clinicians and facilities have found the advice of psychologists who are interested in helping staff manage the behaviors of these cognitively impaired residents to be extremely helpful.
As a last resort, medicati ons can be used off-label to attempt improvement of disruptive resident behaviors. Before resorting to using any off-labeled medications, a family member or the resident’s POA may want to assist with de-escalating their family member’s behavior by phone contact or by a visit to the NF. If a PCP is considering using an off-label medication for behavioral problems, it is important that staff or preferably the PCP to share with the POA the risks and benefits of using these medications.
Congestive Heart Failure (CHF)
Unexpected we ight gain that occurs either very rapidly or is not due to high calorie intake is usually congestive heart failure until proven otherwise. CHF is the second most common diagnosis for which residents are hospitalized, and the hospitalization is often avoidable. During monthly or bimonthly visits the residents’ weights should be reviewed. Except for very rare situations (e.g., ruptured heart valve), PCPs should be able to treat CHF at the faculty and avoid hospitalization unless refractory pulmonary edema develops. The management of heart failure is thoroughly reviewed in AMDA’s clinical practice guideline on Heart Failure in the Post–Acute and Long–Term Settings.
Acute Onset of Fever
One of the m ost commonly overlooked vital signs is a slightly elevated temperature among frail older adults. It is not uncommon for fevers in NF residents to be symptomatically treated like they are in younger and healthier people. Standing orders for antipyretics in NFs should be avoided. Giving medication for a fever without identifying the underlying cause can lead to poor outcomes. Castle et al. have reported that repeated oral temperatures greater than 99 °F (37.2 °C) has a sensitivity of 80 % and specificity of 89 % for fever. In addition, Castle advised that either a single oral temperature greater than 100 °F (37.8 °C) or, a single temperature 2 °F (1.1 °C) above a patient’s baseline, or repeated oral temperatures greater than 99 °F (37.2 °C) are significant for infection and need to be addressed by the PCP [7]. CMS has indicated that pneumonia and urosepsis are two common diagnoses among NF/SNF residents that lead to potentially avoidable hospitalizations. It is reasonable to suspect that many of these potentially avoidable hospitalizations resulted from poor monitoring of vital signs, lack of licensed staff adequately assessing the ill resident, and lack of timely notification of the PCP.
Asymptomatic Bacteriuria and Urinary Tract Infections
Guidelines for Diagnosing Urinary Tract Infection or Urosepsis
Whether to initiate treatm ent or not for an abnormal urin alysis is common dilemma faced when caring for frail older adults. However, knowing when to order a urinalysis is the greater challenge for the clinician. Often when cognitively impaired resident demonstrates disruptive behavior, an order for a urinalysis is requested from the PCP. However over 40 % of all urine specimens of frail older adult females residing in nursing facilities will have bacteriuria. If a resident solely has a mental status change and no other symptoms or signs to suggest a UTI, it has been found that only 11 % of these residents will have a UTI [8]. Unless a resident meets the criteria for a UTI/urosepsis with or without an indwelling catheter (see criteria below), the clinician should refrain from diagnosing a UTI or urosepsis.
New criteria have recently been developed for LTC facility-acquired infections by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) [9]. These criteria for a urinary tract infection address residents with and without a urinary catheter.
1.
For residents without an indwelling urinary catheter (both criteria 1 and 2 must be present)
Get Clinical Tree app for offline access
Criteria 1
At least one of the following sign or symptom subcriteria:
Acute dysuria or acute pain, swelling, or tenderness of the testes, epididymis, or prostate.Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel
Full access? Get Clinical Tree