References
Study type
Data source
Patient population
Sample size
Type of cost
Mean incremental cost
Mean total cost
Notes
Gordois et al. (2003) [7]
Cost-of-illness model
Prevalence and incidence rates from literature; unit costs from database and expert opinion
DPN
N/A
DPN
$1,975 (2001 US$)
N/A
Le et al. (2006) [8]
Retrospective database
Claims database
DPN (ICD-9: 205.6x)
2,146
AC
$19,946 (2003 US$)
$24,765 (2003)
Excludes patients with depression
D
$3,828 (2003 US$)
$5,125 (2003)
Excludes patients with depression
Boulanger et al. [9]
Retrospective database
Claims databases
DPN (ICD-9-CM: 250.6x and/or 357.2)
38,840
AC
N/A
$22,154 (2006)
D
N/A
$5,528 (2006)
Gore et al. (2011) [12]
Retrospective database
Claims database
DPN w/pregabalin or duloxetine
(ICD-9-CM: 250.6x and/or 357.2)
1,426
AC
N/A
$30,897
Gore et al. (2011) [11]
Retrospective database
Claims database
DPN w/pregabalin or gabapentin
(ICD-9-CM: 250.6x and/or 357.2)
2,356
AC
N/A
$32,258
Wu et al. (2011) [13]
Retrospective database
Claims database
DPN (ICD-9-CM: 250.6x and/or 357.2) w/ pregabalin, gabapentin, duloxetine, venlafaxine, or tricyclic antidepressants aged 18–64
AC
N/A
$30,951 (2007)
Excludes patients with depression
499
D
N/A
$9,223 (2007)
Excludes patients with depression
An analysis of a claims database comparing patients with neuropathy to those with diabetes provided a similar estimate of the diabetes-specific incremental cost of medical care (in 2003 dollars). Regression-adjusted mean annual cost of diabetes care of $5,125 among those with DPN compared with $1,297 for those with diabetes but without neuropathy or depression. Neuropathy patients also had higher rates of comorbidities, and greatly elevated all-cause healthcare costs. Those with neuropathy had approximately $25,000 in annual all-cause medical costs compared to approximately $5,000 for those with diabetes, with significantly higher costs in all types of care, including inpatient, outpatient, ER, and pharmacy costs [8]. Another study comparing DPN patients with depression and/or anxiety versus those without depression and anxiety across multiple claims databases found all-cause healthcare costs of approximately $22,000 per patient per year, with approximately $3,000 worth of diabetes-specific care (2006 US$).1 [9] The lower costs reported in this study are partially due to the inclusion of patients with Medicare supplemental insurance. Limiting analyses to commercially-insured patients would raise the diabetes-related and all-cause healthcare costs to approximately $3,900 and $24,900 per patient per year, respectively.
Much of the recent literature has focused on the costs associated with pDPN. Healthcare resource use is clearly elevated among those with DPN [10], and increased use begets increased costs. Several studies have compared costs between patients receiving different treatments for DPN pain. Though these comparisons are outside the scope of this review, the medical costs incurred by these patients are even higher than those reported for DPN in general. Those newly prescribed pregabalin or gabapentin for pDPN incurred approximately $32,000 worth of direct medical costs in the year following the index date [11]. A similar analysis comparing medical costs among those prescribed pregabalin or duloxetine found similar mean costs of approximately $31,000 in the year following the index date [12]. Likewise, the overall mean direct costs incurred by patients aged 18–64 with pDPN treated with either duloxetine or standard of care was approximately $31,000 [13].
Patient Reported Health Status and Functioning
Despite the large literature on the cost consequences of DPN, fewer studies have examined the health status of these patients. Most of these have focused on the health status among patients with pDPN, as non-painful DPN has a less perceptible impact on patient-reported outcomes [4]. Table 10.2 overviews the major studies which have investigated these issues.
Table 10.2
Summary of prior studies investigating the health status of patients with pDPN
References | Sample | Measures | Mean level of health status |
---|---|---|---|
Currie et al. (2006) [16] | Patients with ICD-10 code of TD1 or TD2 (n = 1,125) | QOL-DN | No pain: 25.84; Mild: 34.76Moderate: 40.83; Severe: 48.06 |
EQ-5D | No pain: 0.81; Mild: 0.63Moderate: 0.52; Severe: 0.25 | ||
SF-36 General Health Profile | No pain: 59.92; Mild: 41.78Moderate: 36.54; Severe: 25.54 | ||
DiBonaventura et al. [15] | Respondents from the 2006–2008 NHWS who reported T2D and pDPN (n = 1,506) | SF-12 Physical component summary score | Mild: 47.74; Moderate: 43.36;Severe: 39.26 |
SF-12 Mental component summary score | Mild: 39.64; Moderate: 31.21;Severe: 26.06 | ||
DiBonaventura et al. (2011) [14] | Longitudinal respondents from the NHWS who self-reported pDPN (n = 290), self-reported T2D but not pDPN (n = 1,037), and did not self-reported T2D (n = 8,162) | SF-8/SF-12 Physical component summary scorea | Non-diabetes control: 46.82; Non pDPN control: 46.07; pDPN: 41.58 |
SF-8/SF-12 Mental component summary scorea | Non-diabetes control: 50.43; Non pDPN control: 50.98; pDPN: 50.51 | ||
Gore et al. (2005) [31] | TD1 or TD2 patients with physician-diagnosed pDPN (n = 255) | SF-12 Physical component summary score | Mild: 37.5; Moderate: 31.7Severe: 27.6 |
SF-12 Mental component summary score | Mild: 47.8; Moderate: 43.7; Severe: 39.1 | ||
EQ-5D | Mild: 0.70; Moderate: 0.50; Severe: 0.20 | ||
Benbow et al. (1998) [30] | TD1 or TD2 patients with pDPN (n = 79) and non-diabetic controls (n = 37) | VAS | pDPN: 48.5 |
NHP-Emotional reactions | Non-pDPN: 0.0; pDPN: 27.3 | ||
NHP-Energy | Non-pDPN: 24.0; pDPN: 63.2 | ||
NHP-Pain | Non-pDPN: 0.0; pDPN: 53.5 | ||
NHP-Physical mobility | Non-pDPN: 10.7; pDPN: 22.0 | ||
NHP-Social isolation | Non-pDPN: 12.6; pDPN: 0.0 | ||
NHP-Sleep | Non-pDPN: 0.0; pDPN: 50.4 |
DiBonaventura and colleagues [14] conducted a longitudinal assessment of those with pDPN over a 3-year period using the US National Health and Wellness Survey, a patient-reported database from a representative sample of adults in the USA [14]. Although the NHWS is cross-sectional in its design, a modest number of respondents complete multiple surveys (due to its sampling-with-replacement across years). As a result, patients with pDPN (n = 290) were compared with patients with diabetes but without pDPN (n = 1,037) and patients without diabetes (n = 8,162). Controlling for various confounding variables such as demographics, health behaviors, and comorbidities, patients with pDPN reported significantly worse health status as assessed using the Short Form 12 (version 2) Health Survey instrument [14].
Particularly interesting, however, was the decline in health status observed over this 3-year period. The physical component summary scores of those with pDPN decreased at a significantly faster rate compared with the other groups [14]. This suggests that not only is pDPN associated with a decrement in physical health status but that the size of this decrement increases over time. One clear implication based on this result is the need for early intervention.