Fig. 10.1
Contributing factors to cancer-related fatigue (Reproduced with permission from Mortimer et al. [1])
There is a direct correlation between treatment and fatigue, with different treatment modalities such as surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and bone marrow transplantation, exhibiting distinct patterns of fatigue. This fatigue can lead to interruption or intolerance of therapy, thus negatively impacting response to therapy and potentially overall survival. Often, treatment-related fatigue lasts even beyond the cessation of therapy.
Although the incidence of CRF varies between patient subgroups, it affects many throughout the cancer spectrum; it appears worse in minorities, unmarried patients, those with lower household income, and patients with metastatic cancer [4]. The incidence of CRF is expected to increase in the coming years with ongoing improvement in cancer treatments and overall survival. Thus, fatigue is recognized as a major problem in cancer patients and survivors.
10.2 Evidence
It must be noted that most studies of CRF have been conducted in populations of breast cancer patients and far less often in patients with other solid and liquid tumors [7].
Fatigue has been reported in patients with most types of cancer and during all stages of disease. In a recent multicenter study, outpatients with breast, prostate, colorectal, or lung cancer undergoing active treatment rated their severity of fatigue and interference with function on a 1–10 scale (1–3 mild, 4–6 moderate, 7–10 severe); 983 of 2177 patients (43 %) reported moderate to severe fatigue. Among those patients with no evidence of disease and not currently receiving cancer treatment, 150 of 515 patients (29 %) had moderate to severe fatigue that was also associated with poor performance status and a history of depression [8].
Cancer treatment-related fatigue appears to display distinct patterns which correlate to the type of treatment the patient undergoes. Patients experiencing fatigue after a successful surgical tumor resection tend to display the most severe fatigue immediately after surgery that subsides over time. Fatigue related to chemotherapy displays a definitive pattern, worst immediately after a cycle of treatment and improving up until the next cycle with fatigue lasting up to a month after treatment [9]. The severity may become worse with each successive treatment cycle, likely due to the accumulation of toxic by-products [2]. Radiation therapy, on the other hand, shows a pattern of fatigue that increases throughout the course of treatment until mid-treatment and then plateaus [10, 11]. It may end after treatment or could extend beyond treatment for months or years. Many personal factors may influence the degree of fatigue. In women receiving treatment for breast cancer, the degree of fatigue is severely correlated with employment during treatment, the presence of children in the home, depression, anxiety, lack of sleep, younger age, and being underweight [12].
Fatigue also persists in patients who are cancer-free and long-term survivors. A longitudinal study of long-term breast carcinoma survivors revealed that 34 % of patients report significant fatigue even 5–10 years post-diagnosis and that the fatigue was worse in patients that had received chemo and radiation combination therapy [13].
10.3 Ongoing Research
Current research efforts in CRF include the study of etiologic mechanisms, development of assessment tools, descriptive studies of patients’ experiences, and intervention efforts. A review of ClinicalTrials.gov reveals hundreds of studies related to fatigue and cancer, targeting patients of differing age groups, ethnicities, and disease types. Some are observational in design, including the study of molecular genetics to identify possible risk factors. Bench research has focused primarily on identifying the mechanisms of CRF. In recent years, chief among these have been studies on the neuroimmune basis of fatigue and the role of inflammation and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Other studies focus on a wide range of interventions such as activity-based and psychological interventions, pharmaceuticals, supplements, acupuncture, light therapy, and diet modification, to name a few.
10.3.1 Neuroimmune Basis of Fatigue
Recent research has expanded our understanding of possible causes of CRF including inflammatory and immune responses from the cancer and/or its treatment. Inflammation is present at all stages of cancer, before treatment, during treatment, and even persisting up to a year posttreatment, which seems to correspond well with the onset and duration of fatigue [4]. In fact, a study comparing the levels of a number of markers in patients’ serum found that the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-6 was the single best indicator differentiating healthy controls, patients with locoregional breast cancer, and those with metastatic breast cancer [14]. This is of particular interest due to the observation that elevation in the blood levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, secreted proteins which influence the behavior of other cells, are known to generate fatigue-like symptoms in both humans and animal models [15], potentially through alterations in neuronal dopamine synthesis, release, and reuptake [16].
In early-stage cancer the tumor itself appears to be the source of inflammatory cytokines [17, 18], while after treatment cytokines are generated in the course of the response to treatment-induced tissue damage [19]. Clinical observation of patients with untreated breast cancer, acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and myelodysplastic syndrome reveals that inflammatory markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and a number of interleukins are present pretreatment [20–22].
It is well known that many cancer patients who undergo radiation or chemotherapy exhibit a marked increase in their fatigue [12] and a sharp increase in circulating levels of inflammatory markers [23, 24]. The levels of these markers of inflammation appear to correlate with severity of CRF from patient to patient [25]. In a within-subject study of early-stage breast cancer and prostate cancer patients before, during, and after radiation therapy, elevations in the levels of inflammatory markers CRP and IL-1RA correlated with increases in fatigue; however, elevations in IL-6 and IL-1β did not [26], indicating that there may be no single pathway by which inflammation contributes to fatigue.
Studies in animal models have been somewhat informative in unraveling the effects of inflammation and appear to confirm a role for inflammatory cytokines in CRF. Growth of ovarian tumors in mice causes increases in the levels of a number of inflammatory markers, including IL-6 and TNF-α, both locally and in systemic circulation and that these animals, while still physically capable of movement, display a reduction in spontaneous locomotion [27]. Total body irradiation of mice, the best model of radiation therapy, causes an increase in several inflammatory markers, including plasma IL-6, that lasts up to 24 h after treatment [28]. Increase in those markers correlates with a reduction in locomotion, the most common metric of animal fatigue, that persists up to 2 weeks after treatment mirroring the human tissue recovery response to irradiation [28, 29].
Overall, while the correlation between CRF and inflammation in patients remains strong, whether inflammation causes that fatigue remains unclear, and in fact one study of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients found no correlation between levels of CRP and fatigue severity [30]. This confusion exists in no small part due to uncertainty of the neurological mechanism by which inflammation causes fatigue. Further work, both at the clinical and preclinical level, is needed to uncover the mechanisms by which cancer and its treatments influence inflammation both locally and systemically, determine how inflammation affects CRF, and identify biomarkers for diagnosis and targets for intervention that may reduce fatigue.
10.3.2 Activity-Based and Psychological Interventions for CRF
10.3.2.1 Exercise
To date, the most convincing data of an effective intervention for CRF is that related to exercise. Exercise has been shown in multiple studies to improve patients’ level of fatigue [31–33]. In 2009 the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) convened a round table and, after an in-depth review of the literature, concluded that exercise training during and after adjuvant chemotherapy is safe and results in improvement in physical functioning, quality of life, and cancer-related fatigue in several groups of cancer survivors. ACMS recommended that cancer survivors avoid inactivity and follow the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans with exercise adaptations based on disease and treatment-related adverse events [34]. These recommendations include aerobic exercise at least 150 min per week and strength training at least two days per week.
Exercise has been studied in a variety of patient populations and at various time points throughout the cancer experience. One prospective study explored whether the type of cancer affects exercise-mediated improvements in cardiorespiratory function and fatigue; 319 cancer survivors with 7 different types of cancer participated in fatigue inventories, cardiorespiratory function assessments, and an individualized, multimodal exercise intervention with cardiorespiratory, flexibility, balance, and muscular strength training 3 days per week for 3 months. Cancer types included breast cancer (BC, n = 170), prostate cancer and other male urogenital neoplasia (PC, n = 38), hematological malignancies (HM, n = 34), colorectal cancer (CC, n = 25), gynecological cancers (GC, n = 20), glandular and epithelial neoplasms (GEN, n = 20), and lung cancer (LC, n = 12). Trends toward improved cardiorespiratory function and fatigue reached statistical significance in some groups, and no significant differences were seen between cancer types, suggesting that these improvements are not dependent on specific cancer types. Mean fatigue indices decreased by at least 17% in all groups, with changes significant in BC, HM, CC, and GC groups. The authors concluded that it is appropriate to prescribe exercise interventions to cancer patients based on individual needs without emphasis on cancer type and recommend further research to investigate a relationship between cancer type and exercise-mediated rehabilitation [35].
One meta-analysis reviewed the effectiveness of exercise intervention on overall health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in cancer survivors who had completed primary treatment. The review included 40 trials with 3,694 participants exposed to exercise interventions. At 12 weeks, cancer survivors who participated in an exercise intervention had greater improvement in overall HRQOL including a significant reduction in fatigue [36].
10.3.2.2 Yoga
Many studies suggest that yoga practice offers multiple health benefits. A large randomized controlled trial in breast cancer patients studied yoga’s impact on inflammation, mood, and fatigue [37]. Two hundred breast cancer survivors who had completed cancer treatment (between 2 months and 3 years from last therapy), including surgery, adjuvant chemotherapy, or radiation therapy, were assigned to either 12 weeks of 90 min twice per week hatha yoga classes or a wait list control with no yoga intervention. The study included the biological measures interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin-1b (IL-1b). Findings showed that immediately posttreatment, fatigue was not lower but vitality was higher in the yoga group. At 3 months posttreatment, comparing the women who had practiced yoga to the non-yoga group, fatigue was 57% lower, and pro-inflammatory cytokines were decreased up to 20% in the yoga group. A secondary analysis noted that more frequent yoga practice correlated with larger changes [37].
10.3.2.3 Qigong/Tai Chi
A double-blind, randomized control trial (RCT) tested 12 weeks of Qigong/Tai Chi (QC/TCE) versus sham Qigong (SQG) on fatigue, depression, and sleep among 87 postmenopausal, breast cancer survivors with persistent fatigue. Participants’ mean characteristics included: age 58, BMI 26.8, time to last treatment 2 years, and baseline fatigue 4.2, as measured by the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) on a 1–10 scale with ≥3 being clinically meaningful. QC/TCE showed a significant improvement in fatigue levels over time (baseline 4.6, at 1 month 2.1, at 3 months 2.3), compared to SQG (fatigue levels of 3.8, 2.6, 2.5, respectively). Both interventions showed improvement in depression and sleep quality. The authors conclude that adding gentle, low-intensity exercise in this patient population, as was done in both groups, may be beneficial in reducing several symptoms. However, the QC/TCE intervention, adding the focus on breath and meditative states to create a deep sense of relaxation, showed an advantage over gentle physical activity in improving fatigue levels in these breast cancer survivors [38].
10.3.2.4 Acupuncture/Acupressure
Acupuncture and acupressure have been studied in CRF with results suggestive of benefit in treating cancer-related fatigue. In a recent review of 11 RCTs conducted in adults with CRF, eight studies utilized acupuncture and three acupressure; the authors concluded that due to the methodological flaws of these studies, no firm conclusions could be drawn regarding the effectiveness or the optimal intensity and duration of the intervention. However, acupuncture and acupressure were noted to be safe in this patient population and warrant further investigation [39].
10.3.2.5 Psychosocial Interventions
Psychological issues arising from the cancer and its treatment contribute strongly to cancer fatigue. Fifteen to twenty-two percent of cancer patients become depressed and the stress, anxiety, and fear that follow a cancer diagnosis contribute as well. The cortisol response to stress is known to be blunted in cancer patients, further exacerbating cancer fatigue [40, 41].
Psychosocial interventions, including education on self-care, coping techniques, and energy management, have demonstrated beneficial effects on fatigue. For example, an Internet-based educational program providing information regarding fatigue, energy conservation, physical activity, nutrition, sleep hygiene, pain control, and stress management versus no intervention demonstrated a reduction in fatigue in the intervention group [42].
10.3.3 Pharmacologic Agents
A number of pharmacologic agents including psychostimulants, corticosteroids, supplements, and antidepressants have been tested in the treatment of CRF with mixed results.
10.3.3.1 Psychostimulants
Over the past two decades, there has been a growing interest in the use of psychostimulants in treating CRF. Methylphenidate, a dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, has been the most studied pharmacologic agent in the treatment of CRF. Although several studies demonstrated benefit [43], most recent large RCTs have been disappointing, showing no statistically significant benefit of psychostimulants in the treatment of CRF [44–46]. One study that showed no overall benefit of methylphenidate in patients with CRF did note a positive effect in a subset analysis of patients with more severe fatigue in advanced cancer [46].
Although recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network in 2014, current data does not support the general use of psychostimulants in treating fatigue outside a clinical trial unless new data supporting use become available [47]. However, in certain situations such as severe fatigue in advanced disease, a psychostimulant may briefly palliate the patient’s fatigue and improve quality of life.
10.3.3.2 Corticosteroids
Although limited evidence is available, corticosteroids are often used to palliate cancer-related symptoms [48]. Two recent placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trials in advanced cancer patients demonstrated benefit of corticosteroids in alleviating cancer-related symptoms, including fatigue in advanced cancer patients [49, 50]. Hydrocortisone, cortisone, prednisone, methylprednisolone, and dexamethasone have been studied with no evidence of a difference between these agents in the management of fatigue. Dexamethasone has been studied most extensively. The mechanism of action of corticosteroids in improving cancer-related fatigue is unclear. Several mechanisms have been suggested including modulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines including IL-6, TNF-a, and C-reactive protein [51], decrease in tumor mass and associated edema, and modulation of adrenergic activity in the dorsal horn [48].
A study of patients with advanced cancer experiencing fatigue compared dexamethasone 8 mg daily x 14 days versus placebo. Significant improvement in CRF was noted at both days 8 and 15 in the dexamethasone-treated patients [50].
Another study compared the effects of oral methylprednisolone 32 mg daily versus placebo on analgesic efficacy, fatigue, and anorexia, for a period of seven days in 50 patients with advanced cancer. Significant improvement in CRF and anorexia as measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 was noted: fatigue (−17 vs. 3; P = 0.003) and anorexia (−24 vs. 2; P = 0.003). No significant improvement was observed in pain intensity, and no significant difference in adverse events between the two arms was seen [49].
These studies have looked at the benefit and safety of only very short-term use of corticosteroids. The long-term use and associated risks of corticosteroids in palliating CRF have not been studied. However, these risks in the general population are known to include hyperglycemia, prolonged HPA axis suppression, myopathy, infections, osteoporosis, aseptic necrosis, and mood changes. Future studies are needed to evaluate the benefits and risks of moderate- and long-term use in patients with CRF [48].
10.3.4 Supplements
Although there is significant interest in the utilization of herbal and dietary supplements in treating fatigue, few controlled studies have been conducted in cancer patients.
10.3.4.1 Ginseng
A large RCT of 364 cancer patients from 40 institutions evaluated the effect of Wisconsin ginseng 2,000 mg/day on fatigue in cancer survivors. Statistically significant improvement in fatigue was seen at 8 weeks in the ginseng group compared with placebo. Greater benefit was noted in the patients receiving active treatment compared to those who had completed treatment. No discernable toxicities from the ginseng were observed [52].
10.3.4.2 L-Carnitine
In an RCT of cancer patients with moderate to severe fatigue (n = 376), most with metastatic disease undergoing chemotherapy or radiotherapy, patients received L-carnitine (2 g/day) or placebo for 4 weeks. The intervention group demonstrated no improvement in fatigue compared to placebo [53].
10.3.5 Antidepressants
Antidepressants as treatment for CRF are being studied in animal models, but limited data are available in human trials. One placebo-controlled RCT of paroxetine 20 mg daily in patients with mixed solid tumors showed no difference in CRF between the placebo and paroxetine groups [54].
10.3.6 Sleep
Lack of quality sleep can impact one’s level of fatigue. Cancer treatment and CRF both correlate strongly with a range of sleep disorders often brought on by a disruption in circadian rhythms. Commonly reported issues are insomnia, hypersomnia, and disrupted sleep patterns [55]. Sleep disorders including insomnia are more common in cancer patients compared to the general public [56]. This may be due to the psychological, behavioral, and physical effects of a cancer diagnosis and treatment. The American Association of Sleep Medicine recommends cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I). CBT-I is defined as “a non-pharmacological treatment that incorporates cognitive and behavior-change techniques and targets dysfunctional attitudes, beliefs, and habits involving sleep” [56].
Results of a systematic review of CBT-I in cancer patients suggest that CBT-I is associated with statistically and clinically significant improvements in subjective sleep outcomes and may improve mood, fatigue, and overall QOL in patient with cancer [56].
10.3.7 Cancer Cachexia/Nutrition
Cancer cachexia (CC) is a multifactorial paraneoplastic syndrome characterized by anorexia, body weight loss, and loss of adipose tissue and skeletal muscle and is associated with impaired function, quality of life, and fatigue [57]. Interventions under study in cancer cachexia include anabolic steroids, appetite stimulants, ghrelin analogs, and anti-myostatin agents, to name a few. Anabolic steroids are being studied in cancer cachexia but end points are muscle mass and strength and weight and have not included fatigue measures. Novel agents inhibiting myostatin which is a normal negative regulator of muscle growth have shown the ability to increase muscle volume [58]; however correlation between change in the volume of muscle mass and level of fatigue is yet unknown.
Physical activity is reduced in many cancer patients at some time throughout their disease experience. There are few studies that discern the potential contribution of muscle disuse and muscle wasting to CRF. Research is needed to better define skeletal muscle changes that may contribute to CRF and the utility of exercise and other muscle-building strategies in treating fatigue associated with muscle disuse and wasting [59].
10.4 Solutions
Although the full mystery of CRF is yet to be unraveled, much has been learned regarding contributing factors, biochemical mediators, and actions that patients and health-care providers can implement to improve frequency of diagnosis, identification of treatable causes, and implementation of evidence-based interventions in managing CRF.
10.4.1 Assessment
Current recommendations include that all patients at the time of diagnosis of cancer undergo an evaluation of the level of fatigue and continue regular assessments throughout treatment and recovery [1, 60]. A variety of validated assessment tools are available to health-care providers to assess for the presence and severity of fatigue, from a simple 1–10 rating scale which is the gold standard to more complex multidimensional scales commonly used in research (Table 10.1). Patients who report moderate or severe fatigue (e.g., ≥4 on a 1–10 scale) should be further assessed and examined for any underlying conditions and treated appropriately.
Fatigue instruments |
---|
Brief Fatigue Inventory [65] |
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Fatigue [66] |
The Schwartz Cancer Fatigue Scale [69] |
Fatigue Symptom Inventory [70] |
Lee’s Visual Analogue Scale for Fatigue [71] |
Cancer Fatigue Scale [72] |
Multidimensional Fatigue Symptom Inventory – short form [73] |
10.4.2 Evaluation and Treatment of the Cancer Patient with Fatigue
Evaluating a cancer patient with existing fatigue requires a careful history and physical examination looking for symptoms and signs that suggest contributing factors to the fatigue (Table 10.2). Patients are most worried about the status of their cancer and fear that recurrence or progression of disease is causative. Concurrent medications, especially narcotics, can contribute to sedation and fatigue. In some cases, adding a nonnarcotic such as an NSAID, if not contraindicated to the patient’s analgesic regimen, can decrease the need to escalate the dose of narcotic. A review of the patient’s alcohol and illicit drug use along with any social or financial stresses and symptoms of depression can open a discussion of available resources of support in the community. Sleep quality and disruption should be assessed. Patients who are dehydrated note significant fatigue and can benefit promptly with IV hydration. Attention to the patient’s endocrine function can reveal an undiagnosed hypothyroidism or a low testosterone level. Of note, men who are chronically ill or on chronic narcotics commonly have low testosterone levels that can easily be supplemented. Hemoglobin and hematocrit levels should be assessed and anemia treated according to the ASCO/ASH guidelines [61]. Identifying and treating other organ system dysfunctions, such as CHF from prior anthracycline use, can make a significant impact in the patient’s level of fatigue. A thorough assessment and identification of contributing factors of fatigue in each patient will lead to potential individualized management strategies (Table 10.3).
Table 10.2
Assessment/evaluation checklist for patients with CRF
Evaluation checklist | |
---|---|
Assessment of cancer disease status | □ |
Patient self-assessment 1–10 analogue scale | □ |
Concurrent medication review with special attention to: Analgesics/narcotics | □ |
Sedatives/sleep aids | □ |
Antihistamines | □
Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channelFull access? Get Clinical TreeGet Clinical Tree app for offline access |