Esophageal Cancer



Fig. 8.1
Classification of tumor depth for superficial esophageal cancer. Ep epithelium, lp lamina propria, mm muscularis mucosae, m mucosa, sm submucosa, mp muscularis propria, ad adventitia (from Ancona et al. 2008)



In addition, skip metastases as an intraesophageal spread of tumor cells in submucosal lymphatics are frequently observed in esophageal cancer (Cheng et al. 2013). This influences the target volume, too, with an increasing likelihood from pT1 tumors (about 4 %) to pT4 tumors (about 30 %). It should also be regarded that a metachronous or even synchronous secondary cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract can occur in up to 10 %.

This tumor behavior has major implication on the target volume of definite and preoperative radiotherapy as well. On the other hand, patient’s status and comorbidities should be taken into account, not to unnecessarily increase the risk of side effects by unjustified enlargement of the target volume. It is not yet proven if elective nodal irradiation is reasonable (Zhao et al. 2010).

As a basis for treatment planning, the classification of the Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases may be used (Table 8.1), although only very recent publications with detailed prescription of lymph node spread refer to this terminology (Cheng et al. 2013) (Table 8.2).


Table 8.1
Terminology of the regional lymph nodes in esophageal cancer (according to the Japanese Society of Esophageal Diseases (Fujita et al. 2002; Japanese Society for Esophageal Diseases 2004; Cheng et al. 2013) and according to the RTOG (Korst et al. 1998)
























































































































Description of LN position

Numbering (Japanese)

Numbering (RTOG)

Superficial cervical

100 (right, left)
 

Cervical paraesophageal

101 (right, left)
 

Deep cervical

102 (right, left)
 

Peripharyngeal

103 (right, left)
 

Supraclavicular

104

1

Upper thoracic paraesophageal

105
 

Middle thoracic paraesophageal

108

8 (middle)

Lower thoracic paraesophageal

110

8 (lower)

Recurrent nerve

106 rec
 

Pretracheal

106 pre
 

Aortopulmonal
 
5

Paratracheal superior
 
2 (right, left)

Paratracheal inferior
 
4 (right, left)

Tracheobronchial

106 tbL (left)

10 (right, left)

Bifurcational

107

7

Main bronchus

109 (right, left)
 

Supradiaphragmatic

111

15

Posterior mediastinal

112

3

Ligamentum arteriosum Botallo

113
 

Anterior mediastinal

114

6

Cardiac

1 (right), 2 (left)

16

Lesser curvature

3
 

Greater curvature

4
 

Left gastric artery

7

17

Common hepatic artery

8

18

Splenic artery

11

19

Celiac artery

9

20



Table 8.2
Prediction of lymph node status according to infiltration depth (positive lymph nodes in %)

















































































































First author

Pat. No.

T-stage

Histology
 
     
AD

SCC

Ancona et al. (2008)

27

1 m

0

0

71

1sm1

8.3

12.5

1sm2 – 3

42.9

50

Bollschweiler et al. (2006)

16

1 m

0

0

44

1sm1

22

33

1sm2

0

17

1sm3

78

69

Siewert et al. (2008)

1002

1 m

0

22

1sm1 – 3

18

22

2

67

50

3

85

74

4

89

79

Gockel et al. (2011)

289

1sm1

6

27

340

1sm2

23

36

601

1sm3

58

55

Hölscher et al. (2011)

70

1 m

0

0

101

1 sm1

9

29

1sm2

13

27

1sm3

43

76

In principle, the direction of lymphatic flow is primarily directed to the upper mediastinum and cervical region in patients with suprabifurcal tumors and to the lower posterior mediastinum and celiac axis in patients with infrabifurcal tumors. Tumors located at the level of the tracheal bifurcation tend to metastasize in both directions (Cheng et al. 2013). It should be considered that, especially in squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus, even very early cancer (T1sm1) may infiltrate lymphatic vessels and disseminate into regional and distant lymph nodes (a detailed recommendation is presented in Table 8.4). Lymphographic studies and histopathological specimen indicate a lymphatic pathway from the lower esophagus upward into the mediastinum and also downward along the celiac axis (Fig. 8.2).

A303689_1_En_8_Fig2_HTML.gif


Fig. 8.2
Spread of esophageal cancer into regional lymph nodes: cervical cancer infiltrates predominantly in cranial direction and lower mediastinal cancer to the lower posterior mediastinum and celiac axis. Tumors at the level of the tracheal bifurcation metastasize in both directions



8.3 Target Volume Definition in Trials and Guidelines


The guidelines and recommendations of radiation therapy have been extremely simple in the vast majority of former clinical trials. While the length of treatment portals, later the length of the target volume, has been described just by two numbers in former trials – margins between 3 and 5 cm above and below the primary – it became nowadays obvious that an optimization of radiation therapy besides an improvement of surgery and further escalating the combinations of chemo- or targeted therapies is essential. Only by optimizing the locoregional control, making the risk of regional tumor recurrences by far less than 40 %, cure can be achieved. On the other hand, normal tissue sparing especially in multimodality concepts is a prerequisite. Therefore, in modern trials, precise definitions of clinical target volumes and dose-volume constraints are standard (Table 8.3).


Table 8.3
Definition of clinical target volume (CTV) in recent clinical trials (without cervical esophageal cancer) and guidelines






























































































First author

Tumor

Oral margin (CTV) (cm)

Aboral margin (CTV) (cm)

Axial margin (CTV) (cm)

Further recommendations

Stahl et al. (2009)

AEG 1-2

5

3

2

All positive LN with 1 cm margin

Elective nodal irradiation (No. 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 11)

Mean dose kidney < 15 Gy

Mean dose liver < 17 Gy

Crosby et al. (2013)

SCC and AEG 1-2

2

2

1

No nodal irradiation

V20 lung < 25 %

V40 heart < 30 %

Tomblyn et al. (2012)

SCC and AEG 1

5

5

1

All positive LN with 2 cm margin

Elective nodal irradiation for upper (No. 104) and for lower mediastinal cancer (No. 9)

Wang et al. (2012)

SCC

3

3

0.8

V20 lung < 30 %

V30 lung < 18 %

Dmean heart <45 Gy

CALGB 9781

SCC and AEG 1

5

5

2

Elective nodal irradiation in upper (No. 104) and in lower mediastinal cancer (No. 9)

French FFCD 9102

SCC and AEG 1

3

3

2

Elective nodal irradiation in upper (No. 104) mediastinal cancer

SAKK 75/08

SCC and AEG 1-2

3.5

3.5

1

All positive LN

Elective nodal irradiation in upper/middle (No. 105, 108) and distal esophageal cancer (No. 9)

NCCN (2013)

SCC and AEG

3–4

3–4

1

All positive LN with 0.5–1.5 cm margin

Elective nodal irradiation in cervical (No. 101, 102, 103,104), upper and middle mediastinal cancer (No. 104, 105) and AEG I (No. 110, 9, 3)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Oct 16, 2016 | Posted by in ONCOLOGY | Comments Off on Esophageal Cancer

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access