Gene (description)
Function
Sample obtained
Case #
Methy. status
Marker
Reference
14-3-3-σ/stratifin (SFN)
Cell cycle regulation
Cell lines, tissue
20
Hyper
Therapeutic
Ferguson et al. [202]
14-3-3-σ/stratifin (SFN)å
Cell cycle regulation
Serum
100
Hyper
Diagnostic, prognostic
Mirza et al. [203]
ESR1 (estrogen receptor 1) or 14-3-3-σ/stratifin (SFN)
Cell cycle regulation
Serum
106
Hyper
Diagnostic
Martínez-Galán et al. [204]
RASSF1A (ras association domain family protein1)
Cell cycle regulation
Cell lines, tissue
45
Hyper
Therapeutic
Dammann et al. [205]
APC (adenomatous polyposis of the colon)
Inhibitor of β-catenin
Tissue
50
Hyper
Therapeutic
Jin et al. [206]
RASSF1, APC, DAPK1
Serum
34
Hyper
Diagnostic
Dulaimi et al. [207]
RARβ (retinoic acid receptor β)
Cell cycle regulation
Cell lines, tissue
24
Hyper
Therapeutic
Sirchia et al. [208]
RASSF1A and RARβ
Cell cycle regulation
Serum
20
Hyper
Diagnostic, prognostic
Shukla et al. [209]
RASSF1A or ATM
Cell cycle regulation
Plasma
50
Hyper
Diagnostic
Papadopoulou et al. [210]
RASSF1, RARB, MGMT, APC
Serum, tissue
33
Hyper
Prognostic
Taback et al. [211]
TMS1 (target of methylation-induced silencing-1)
Involved in apoptosis
Cell lines, tissue
27
Therapeutic
Conway et al. [212]
TMS1, BRCA1, ERα, and PRB
Serum
50
Hyper
Diagnostic
Mirza et al. [173]
CCND2 (cyclin D2)
Cell cycle regulation
Tissue
106
Hyper
Diagnostic, prognostic
Evron et al. [213]
CCND2, CDKN2A, and SLIT2
Serum, tissue
36
Hyper
Diagnostic, prognostic
Sharma et al. [214]
CDH1 (E-Kadherin)
Cell adhesion and invasion
Tissue
151
Hyper
Prognostic
Shinozaki et al. [215]
CDH1 (E-Kadherin)
Cell adhesion and invasion
Tissue
79
Hyper
Prognostic
Caldeira et al. [216]
CDKN2A (cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors)
Cell cycle regulation
Plasma
35
Hyper
Diagnostic
Silva et al. [217]
CDKN2A or CDH1
Serum
36
Hyper
Diagnostic, prognostic
Hu et al. [218]
CDH 13 (H-Kadherin)
Cell adhesion and invasion
Cell lines, tissue
55
Hyper
Therapeutic
Toyooka et al. [219]
BRCA1 (breast cancer 1)
DNA repair and recombination
Tissue
143
Hyper
Diagnostic
Birgisdottir et al. [220]
BRCA1, CDKN2A, or 14-3-3σ
Serum
38
Hyper
Diagnostic
Jing et al. [221]
APC, RASSF1, or ESR1
Serum
79
Hyper
Prognostic
Van der Auwera et al. [222]
GSTP1 (glutathione-S-transferase P1)
Carcinogen detoxification
Tissue
77
Hyper
Prognostic
Esteller et al. [223]
GSTP1, RARB, RASSF1, or APC
Plasma
47
Hyper
Diagnostic
Hoque et al. [224]
TWIST (TWIST homology of drosophila)
Involved in cell death
Mammary ducts’ fluid
72
Hyper
Therapeutic
Vesuna et al. [225]
CCND2, RARB, TWIST1, or SCGB3A1
Plasma
34
Hyper
Diagnostic
Bae et al. [226]
RUNX3 (run-related transcription factor 3)
Transcriptional regulation
Cell lines, tissue
44
Hyper
Diagnostic
Lau et al. [227]
RUNX3, CDKN2A, RASSF1, or CDH1
Serum
19
Hyper
Diagnostic, prognostic
Tan et al. [228]
MDR1 (multidrug resistance 1)
Transmembrane efflux pump
Serum, tissue
100
Hypo
Prognostic
Sharma et al. [97]
CAV1 (Caveolin 1)
Cell invasion, metastasis
Cell line
30
Hypo
Prognostic
Rao et al. [229]
NAT1 (N-acetyltransferase type 1)
Cell invasion, metastasis
Tissue
103
Hypo
Prognostic
Kim et al. [230]
UPA (Urokinase)
Cell invasion, metastasis
Cell line
1
Hypo
Therapeutic
Pakneshan et al. [231]
Moreover, global hypomethylation can be seen in breast cancer. It is widely assumed that global hypomethylation activates the gene expression. However, it might decrease the gene expression when accompanied by a gain of repressive chromatin. Taken together, it has been found that the global hypomethylation silences tumor-suppressor genes via repressive chromatin domains in breast cancer [98].
Male breast cancers often differ from female breast cancers in several respects. Kornegoor et al. studied the comparison of male and female breast cancers in terms of the DNA methylation patterns. The methylation patterns of the most frequently methylated genes (MSH6, WT1, PAX5, CDH13, GATA5, and PAX6) were found to be similar in male and female breast cancer. On the other hand, methylation occurred less often in male breast cancer when compared to female breast cancer [99].
Histone Modifications in Breast Cancer
The chromatin is a highly organized structure of DNA and protein. The organization of DNA in chromatin (euchromatin, active; heterochromatin, inactive) has many functions, such as packaging DNA into smaller volume, preventing DNA damage, and controlling DNA replication, transcription, and repair [100]. The fundamental unit of chromatin is the nucleosome, an octomeric structure containing two copies each of histones (H3, H4, H2A, and H2B) around which 147 base pairs of DNA are wrapped [101]. The states of chromatin are controlled by chemical modification of histone tail (N-terminus) via posttranscriptional including acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, sumoylation, poly(ADP)-ribosylation, and ubiquitination and histone composition in conjunction with other nonhistone proteins [102, 103].
It was first proposed in 1964 that histone modifications may affect the regulation of gene expression, after demonstrating acetylation of the ε-amino group of lysine residues on histones [104]. After nearly half a century, it is has been elucidated that the posttranscriptional modifications of histone tails determine not only transcriptional activity but also all DNA-templated processes. The identification of the coexistence of histone modifications associated with activation or repression led to the proposal that the modification constitutes a code that could be recognized by transcription factors to determine the transcriptional state of a gene 10 years before [105]. However, these patterns appear to be not static, and a dynamically changing and complex landscape via the chromatin signaling pathway led to the new concept termed “histone cross talk.” This term represents the influence one or more coexisting histone modifications have on the deposition, interpretation, or erasure of other histone modifications [5, 106]. The recent investigations showed that histone cross talk mechanisms commonly seen and have a great importance for biological processes in organism [107, 108].
Histone modifications affect the chromosome function via several mechanisms. Generally it is believed that histone modifications cause structural changes in histone. This structural change may act as specific binding sites for protein domains (e.g., bromodomains, chromodomains, tudor domains) [109, 110]. Among the epigenetic mechanisms, histone modifications have further grown over the last decade with the discovery and characterization of a large number of histone-modifying molecules and protein complexes. The deregulation of these molecules or complexes may lead to deregulation of the control of chromatin-based processes by changing histone modifications and may have been associated with a large number of human malignancies. Genome-wide studies revealed that the histone modifications of malignant cells patterns disrupted when compared to healthy cells [111]. The posttranslational modification at amino acid tail of histone protein may result in changed transcription of important genes such as tumor suppressors. Changed patterns of histone modifications are a hallmark of cancer, and great amount of histone modifications have been linked to several cancer types to date [112]. The most well-known histone modifications types are acetylation/deacetylation and methylation/demethylation [113].
Histone Acetylation/Deacetylation in Breast Cancer
Histone acetylation/deacetylation status regulates several important regulatory proteins and transcription factors and is controlled by the interplay of histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs), respectively. HATs transfer acetyl groups from acetyl-CoA to the amino group of lysine residues in histone tail. It removes the positive charges, thereby reducing the affinity between histones and DNA. This makes RNA polymerase and transcription factors easier to access the promoter region. So histone acetylation facilitates gene expression by allowing transcription factors to access the DNA. In contrast, the HDACs remove the acetyl group from histones to coenzyme A (CoA), resulting in coiling of chromatin, which inhibits transcription [22, 103].
At least 25 HATs and 18 HDACs have been identified in humans [114]. HATs were the first enzymes shown to modify histones [115]. There are two major classes of HATs: type A and type B. The type A HATs are nuclear proteins and can be grouped into at least three families—Gcn5/PCAF, MYST, and p300/CBP—depending on amino acid sequence homology [116]. In contrast to type A HAT, the type B HATs are predominantly cytoplasmic and show similar highly conserved primary structures, with acetylate-free histones but not those already deposited into chromatin, and newly synthesized histones H4 at K5 and K12. This pattern of acetylation is important for deposition of the histones [117]. The HDACs also have critical importance in the regulation of expression of genes involving cell survival, proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis and can be divided into four major groups depending on sequence homology and target both histone and nonhistone proteins. Class I includes HDACs 1, 2, 3, and 8; class II includes HDACs 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, and 10; and class IV includes HDAC 11. In contrast to other HDACs, class III HDACs consist of NAD+-dependent sirtuin family 1–7 [5]. HDACs also regulate the expression of tumor-suppressor and specific cell cycle regulatory genes. It has been observed that high HDAC expression level and hypoacetylation can be seen in several cancers. So HDAC inhibitors have been targeted for cancer therapy [118, 119]. The mechanism of the antiproliferative effects of HDAC inhibitors is complex. The target of HDAC inhibitors is the zinc cofactor at the active site of the HDACs to change chromatin structure and cause re-expression of aberrantly silenced genes [120].
Histone Methylation/Demethylation in Breast Cancer
Besides the gene promoter regions, the methylation/demethylation can occur on histone protein residues. DNA methylation at CpG islands of promoter regions generates long-term gene silencing and makes the majority chromatin inaccessible for transcription, but histone methylation results in short-term inhibition of gene expression. Methylation, unlike acetylation and phosphorylation, does not alter the overall charge of the molecule [5, 18]. Histone methylation takes place at lysine and arginine residues by histone methyltransferases (HMTs). HMTs transfer a methyl group from the cofactor S-adenosyl methionine to lysine or arginine residues on histone tails, which play important roles in chromatin remodeling and transcriptional activity. The methylation at arginine residue of histone tails usually activates the gene transcription, although it may be involved in transcriptional repression in some cases. The methylation at lysine residue of histone tails can contribute to either activation or repression of transcription, depending on the position of methylation, and adjacent modifications [121, 122]. Some lysine methylases (like H3K4, H3K36, H3K79) often activate genes in euchromatin, while others (like H3K9, H3K27, and H3K20) are associated with heterochromatin regions of the genome. The methylation status (mono-, di-, or trimethylation) also alters gene expression. For example, the monomethylations of H3K27, H3K9, H4K20, H3K79, and H2BK5 are all linked to gene activation, whereas trimethylations of H3K27, H3K9, and H3K79 are linked to repression [123]. Histone demethylases (HDMs), discovered nearly 7 years ago, have been classified into two groups depending on their mechanism of action [124].
Several HMTs and HDTs relevant to cancer development have been identified to date [125]. The EZH2 one of the HMTs acts mainly as a gene silencer; it is the major enzyme that methylates lysine-27 of histone H3 (H3K27). EZH2 can add up three methyl groups to the ε-amino group of the lysine side chain, leading to chromatin condensation [126, 127, 128]. The overexpression of EZH2 is seen in many cancer types, including prostate and melanoma [129, 130]. The elevated EZH2 levels are associated with breast cancer [131]. It also correlates with tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis, which suggests that EZH2 was an oncogene [132, 133]. However, loss-of-function mutations in EZH2 gene have described several malignancies, suggesting EZH2 was tumor-suppressor gene [134, 135]. In addition, some chemicals like diethylstilbestrol (DES) or bisphenol A (BPA) contribute to the formation of breast cancer by increasing EZH2 expression [136].
Another study relating EZH2 to breast cancer concluded that the overexpression of EZH2 regulates BRACA1 gene expression and genomic instability mediated by PI3K/Akt-1 pathway [137]. These investigations suggest that EZH2 histone methyltransferase is involved in breast cancer etiology.
The HMT G9a methylates at the ε-amino group of lysine 9 residues of histone 3. It has also been proven that G9a is involved in Snail-mediated E-cadherin repression by interacting with Snail in human breast cancer [138]. Another study proposed that G9a contributes to the estradiol (E2)-dependent induction of some endogenous target genes of estrogen receptor (ER)α in MCF-7 breast cancer cells [139]. Other lysine HMTs (NSD1, NSD3L, and SMYD3) are overexpressed in several cancers [125, 140]. Unlike lysine HMT, arginine HMTs have not been as well characterized. Arginine HMTs catalyze methylation of nitrogen of arginine residues, called protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMT). The 10 PRMTs are nearly identified and categorized into two groups based on the type’s methylarginine products they produced [141]. Among PRMTs, the altered PRMT1 gene expression has been investigated in breast cancer [142].
Several types of histone lysine demethylases (HDMs) have been identified, but the pathological roles of their dysfunction in human disease have not been clarified. Among them, lysine-specific demethylase (LSD1) is the first identified histone lysine demethylase. LSD1 specifically demethylates histone H3 lysine 4, which is linked to active transcription [143]. After discovery of LSD1, the concept of histone methylation changed, and it is understood that histone methylation is a dynamically regulated process under enzymatic control rather than chromatin marks that could only be changed by histone replacement [19]. It has been reported that the expression level of LSD1 is elevated in human bladder [144], small cell lung, colorectal, and neuroblastoma cancers, and the mutation of LSD1 gene causes prostate cancer [145].
In breast cancer, LSD1 expression has been found to be strongly upregulated in ER-negative breast cancer; it makes LSD1 a putative biomarker for aggressive tumor biology and a novel attractive therapeutic target for treatment of ER-negative breast cancer [146]. It is also demonstrated that LSD1 inhibits the invasion of breast cancer cells in vitro and suppresses breast cancer metastatic potential in vivo [147]. Other histone demethylase genes GASC1, PLU-1, and JMJD2B are involved in human breast cancers. The GASC1 gene may be linked to the stem cell phenotypes and show oncogene properties in human breast cancer [148]. PLU-1 is an H3K4 demethylase and plays an important role in the proliferative capacity of breast cancer cells through repression of tumor-suppressor genes, including BRCA1 [149]. The methylation status of histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) and of H3K9 is mutually exclusive, and H3K9 trimethyl demethylase JMJD2B is an integral component of the H3K4-specific methyltransferase MLL2. It has been demonstrated that the JMJD2B/MLL2 complex interacts to define the methylation status of H3K4 and H3K9 in ERα-activated transcription, and JMJD2B itself is transcriptionally targeted by ERα and may thus form a feed-forward regulatory loop in promoting hormonally responsive breast carcinogenesis [150]. JMJD2B also functions as coregulator of ERα signaling in breast cancer growth and mammary gland development [151]. And the histone protein LSD1 is able to demethylate nonhistone proteins, such as p53 and DNMT1 [152, 153].
miRNA in Breast Cancer
Scientists have long been aware of the existence of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs). In spite of the great amount of knowledge about the function and types of ncRNAs, we are still far from fully knowing the role of large fractions of the transcriptome that do not encode for proteins [154]. Among ncRNAs, microRNAs are 18–25 nucleotides-long RNA molecules encoded in the genome that are transcribed by RNA polymerase II and important regulators of protein of gene expression that control both physiological and pathological processes, such as DNA methylation, development, differentiation, apoptosis, and proliferation [155, 156]. miRNAs are synthesized and processed in the nucleus, exported to the cytoplasm, and then bind to the target mRNA. The regulation of RNA transformation by miRNA is accomplished through RNA-induced silencing complex (RISC). miRNAs can inhibit mRNA translation or degrade mRNA [157, 158]. Major mechanisms of miRNA deregulation include genetic and epigenetic alterations as well as defects in the miRNA processing machinery. Each miRNA regulates multiple mRNAs and, conversely, each mRNA may be targeted by multiple RNAs (several hundreds). They can act as oncogenes or tumor suppressors and have been implicated in cancer initiation and progression, and the profiles of miRNA expression differ between normal and tumor tissues and between tumor types [159–161]. To date, several investigations relating to miRNA profiling has led to the identification of miRNAs’ changed expression level in human breast cancer [162, 163]. The expression level of these miRNAs was correlated with specific breast cancer biopathological features, such as estrogen and progesterone receptor expression, tumor stage, vascular invasion, or proliferation [164]. miRNAs act as tumor suppressors and are oncogenic in breast cancer like other cancer types. So, tumor formation may arise from the overexpression (or amplification) of oncogenic miRNA and/or reduction (or deletion) of a tumor-suppressor miRNA [165].
miRNA-21 is overexpressed in breast cancer like in other cancer types [164, 166]. p53 and programmed cell death 4 (PDCD4) are tumor-suppressor proteins, and the deregulation of them may lead to cancer development. miRNA have been linked to breast cancer by targeting these proteins in breast cancer cells [167].
Epigenomic Markers for Breast Cancer Prognosis
Despite the extreme heterogeneity of breast cancer, global breast cancer survival rates have increased during the past decades due to advances in the central role of genetic alterations in the diagnosis, treatment, prevention of breast cancer, and prognosis [2, 168]. Survival rates should be further improved by finding epigenetic molecular markers associated with risk assessment and/or prognosis of breast cancer. The knowledge about epigenetic alterations profiles in detail might prove vital in many respects. First, it might help us to estimate breast cancer risk and take precautions before breast cancer develops. In addition, there are several subtypes of breast cancer and corresponding therapies currently used. Each subtype, even each individual, has unique molecular epigenetic characteristics. The elucidating of epigenetic characteristic might contribute to a better estimation of breast cancer prognosis and lead to the choice of the most useful therapy [169]. In this way, patients will not be exposed to ineffective toxins associated with expensive therapy. Several reports have proposed that hypermethylation or hypomethylation of specific genes and global methylation status might be useful epigenetic markers for breast cancer prognosis. The recent studies also included miRNAs’ expression profiles into putative epigenetic markers of breast cancer.
The major breast cancer subtype is ER-positive, and it has generally had a more favorable prognosis than ER-negative tumors. It is well established that ERα and E-cadherin are frequently involved in pathogenesis of breast cancer. The aberrant methylation of these genes is associated with malignant progression in human breast cancer [170]. ERα expression level is also regulated by miRNAs in the context of breast cancer. miRNA-206 [171] and miRNA-221/222 [77] target and regulate human ERα. miRNA-206 was upregulated in ERα-negative breast cancer. Another study found that miRNA-206 inhibits the expression of ESR1 mRNA through two binding sites in the ESR1 3′-untranslated region (3′-UTR). The researchers also found other miRNAs (miRNA-18a, miRNA-18b, miRNA-193b, and miRNA-302c) targeting to ESR1 mRNA in breast cancer cells [172]. Therefore, the aberrant methylation of the ESR1 gene and certain miRNAs altering the ESR1 gene expression might be putative epigenetic markers for human breast cancer prognosis.
BRCA1-associated breast cancer, hereditary or nonhereditary, occurs at early age due to involvement of the cellular DNA repair machinery. The inactivation of the BRCA1 by hypermethylation has been suggested to be the putative prognostic marker in breast cancer [173]. Besides the methylation, BRCA1 expression level could be regulated by miRNA-335. Overexpression of miR-335 resulted in an upregulation of BRCA1 mRNA expression, suggesting a functional dominance of ID4 signaling [174].
RASSF1A (Ras association domain family 1 isoform A) is a recently discovered tumor-suppressor gene. The protein encoded by RASSF1A interact is involved in the regulation of the cell cycle, apoptosis, and genetic instability. Thus, loss or altered expression level of the RASSF1A gene has been associated with several cancers. After illustrating the association between inactivation of the RASSF1A gene and the hypermethylation of its CpG-island promoter region, the RASSF1A gene has become the attractive biomarker for early cancer detection, diagnosis, and prognosis in many cancer types [175, 176]. The increased methylation level of the RASSF1A gene was observed in tumor size and lymph node status in breast cancer [177]. Similar results have been obtained by a meta-analysis of published data conducted with 1795 breast cancer patients. They concluded that RASSF1A promoter hypermethylation associates with worse survival in breast cancer patients [178]. These findings have indicated the great potential for the methylation of the RASSF1A gene in terms of the prognostic value of the breast cancer.
EZH2, histone-lysine N-methyltransferase acts as gene silencer by methylation and is related to several cancers. The overexpression of EZH2 is associated with aggressive breast cancer because of the enhanced cancer cell proliferation and a marker of poor prognosis in many solid tumor carcinomas including breast [179–181].
It has been investigated that several miRNAs are involved in breast cancer pathogenesis like cell regulation, and it has been proposed to be a prognostic factor for breast cancer. The miRNA-17-5p and miRNA-17/20 have been reported to be involved in breast cancer cell proliferation [182, 183]. miRNA-21 also could be a molecular prognostic marker for breast cancer and disease progression because of its association with advanced clinical stage, lymph node metastasis, and patient poor prognosis [184].
Another strategy to clarify the role of miRNA in breast cancer is the analysis of DNA methylation and expression miRNAs in combination. Alteration of methylation in the promoters of miRNAs has also been linked to transcriptional changes in cancers. Morita et al. found that DNA methylation in the proximal promoter of miRNAs is tightly linked to transcriptional silencing [185].
Applications of Epigenomics in Breast Cancer Therapy
Cancer emerges not only because of the accumulation of genetic mutations, but also because of the reversible epigenetic changes. The dynamic alterations of the epigenetic mechanisms offer us a new field for developing novel cancer drugs that can react to epigenetically silenced tumor-suppressor genes [186]. So histone deacetylases and DNA methyltransferases have become the main targets for cancer therapy. In breast cancer, epigenetic silencing of tumor-suppressor genes due to alteration in both HATs and HDACs (histone modification) in combination with DNA hypermethylation is commonly observed [187]. The clarification of the epigenetic dysregulation mechanism in breast tumorigenesis has great importance in terms of the development of new therapies for breast cancer patients.
Aberrant HDAC activity has been investigated in several cancer types, especially in breast cancer. HDAC-1 expression and HDAC-3 protein expressions were analyzed immunohistochemically on a tissue microarray containing 600 core biopsies from 200 patients by Krusche et al. They found that moderate or strong nuclear immunoreactivity for HDAC-1 was observed in 39.8 % and for HDAC-3 in 43.9 % of breast carcinomas. HDAC-1 and HDAC-3 expressions correlated significantly with estrogen and progesterone receptor expression [188]. Another study concentrated on HDAC-6 expression levels in breast cancer has been done by Zhang et al. They also found that HDAC-6 mRNA expression is at significantly high levels in breast cancer patients with small tumors measuring less than 2 cm, with low histological grade, and in estrogen receptor α- and progesterone receptor-positive tumors. However, multivariate analysis concluded that the mRNA and protein of HDAC-6 were not independent prognostic factors for both overall survival and disease-free survival [189]. These studies led to the development of new therapies for breast cancer by finding suitable HDAC inhibitors. To date, a number of HDAC inhibitors have been designed and synthesized based on their chemical structure and are generally divided into four groups including hydroxamic acids, benzamides, cyclic peptide, and aliphatic acids (small chain fatty acids). The potential use of these inhibitors for breast cancer therapy has been investigated, as shown in Table 5.2.
Table 5.2
The investigations of HDAC inhibitors in breast cancer
Agent(s) | Alternative name | Class | Study design | Samples | Case # | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vorinostat | SAHA, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid | Hydroxamic acid | Preclinic | Human breast cancer cells | Munster et al. [190] | |
Vorinostat | Phase II | Metastatic breast cancer | 14 | Luu et al. [232] | ||
Vorinostat + tamoxifen | Phase II | ER-positive metastatic breast cancer | 43 | Munster et al. [191] | ||
Vorinostat + paclitaxel + bevacizumab | Phase I–II | Metastatic breast cancer | 54 | Ramaswamy et al. [233] | ||
Panobinostat | LBH-589 | Hydroxamic acid | Preclinic | Human breast cancer cells | Chen et al. [234] | |
Panobinostat | Preclinic | ER-negative human breast cancer cells | Zhou et al. [194] | |||
Panobinostat | Preclinic | Human breast cancer cells | Rao et al. [235] | |||
Panobinostat | Preclinic | Triple-negative breast cancer cells | Tate et al. [236] | |||
Entinostat | MS-275, SNDX-275 | Benzamide | Preclinic | Human breast cancer cells | Lee et al. [237] | |
Entinostat | Preclinic | Human breast cancer cells | Huang et al. [238] | |||
Entinostat | Preclinic | ERα-negative human breast cancer cells | Sabnis et al. [239] | |||
Entinostat + trastuzumab | Preclinic | Human breast cancer cells | Huang et al. [120] | |||
Romidepsin | Depsipeptide (FK-228), FR901228 | Cyclic peptide | Preclinic | Human breast cancer cells | Hirokawa et al. [240] | |
Valproic acid | – | Aliphatic acids | Preclinic | Human breast cancer cells | Jawed et al. [241] | |
Valproic acid + tamoxifen | Preclinic | Human breast cancer cells | Hodges-Gallagher et al. [242] | |||
Valproic acid + trichostatin A | Preclinic | Human breast cancer cells | Reid et al. [243] | |||
Valproic acid + retinoic acid + 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine | Preclinic | Human breast cancer cells | Mongan et al. [244] | |||
Phenylbutyrate | – | Aliphatic acids | Preclinic | Human breast cancer cells | Dyer et al. [245] |
Among them, some HDAC inhibitors like vorinostat (SAHA) and romidepsin (FK-228) have already been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for clinical treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Vorinostat is the first HDAC inhibitor and currently under evaluation in several phase II trials in breast cancer. It is already shown that vorinostat has profoundly antiproliferative activity and inhibits proliferation of both ER-positive and ER-negative breast cancer cell lines [190]. Entinostat (MS-275) and panobinostat (LBH-589) HDAC inhibitors are in phase I and II studies in combination with endocrine therapies, chemotherapeutic agents, or novel targeted therapy in women with breast cancer [12, 120]. A recent phase II study relating to the HDAC inhibitor vorinostat combined with tamoxifen for the treatment of patients with ER-positive metastatic breast cancer using 43 patients has been done. Even though the number of patients was small, they concluded that the combination of vorinostat and tamoxifen is well tolerated and exhibits encouraging activity in reversing hormone resistance. HDAC inhibitor with tamoxifen may restore hormone sensitivity by causing re-expression of a silenced ER gene [191].
In addition to phase trials, preclinical investigations have been widely done. The other idea for treatment of ER-negative breast cancer cells is using the synergistic effects of a combination treatment of HDAC inhibitors and DNMT inhibitors (demethylating agents). Fan et al. and Sharma et al. used 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (AZA) as a DNMT1 inhibitor and trichostatin A (TSA) as a HDAC inhibitor to investigate this synergistic effect. Both studies have shown the reactivate ERα and PR gene expression in ER-negative breast cancer cell lines, which are known to be aberrantly silenced in breast cancer [192, 193]. Other studies have shown that the HDAC inhibitors lead to reactive of ERα and PR expression by inhibition of the HDAC activity in breast cancer cells [194–196].
The other enzyme families to target for cancer therapy are HMTs and HDMs, previously implicated in cancer, inflammation, and diabetes [197]. The gene expressions level of the histone-modifying enzymes (HDMs and HTMs) are specific to cell types and highly correlated with target gene expression [198]. A recent study examined the expression profiles of 16 different histone-modifier genes including HATs, HDACs, and HDMs in breast cancer. They found that significantly different expression levels of histone-modifier genes exist between breast tumors and normal tissue, and their findings were significantly associated with conventional pathological parameters and clinical outcomes. So, it appears that histone-modifier enzymes offer utility as biomarkers and potential for targeted therapeutic strategies [199].
After these recent findings, miRNAs also have become the target for developing therapies for breast cancer. The miRNA-based treatments, in combination with traditional chemotherapy, may be a new strategy for the clinical management of drug-resistant breast cancers in the near future [200]. One of the initial studies has concluded that miRNA-221/222 confers breast cancer fulvestrant resistance by regulating multiple signaling pathways [201].
Conclusion and Future Perspective
A new field has been opened to developing effective clinical therapies now that we understand the importance of epigenetic alterations. In contrast to genetic code, the epigenetic codes may be easily affected by aging, environmental stimuli, and food in heritable manner. Breast cancer is a multifactorial disease with molecular, histological, and phenotypic diversity caused by the interaction of both inherited and environmental risk factors. The importance of epigenomics for breast cancer development has been realized after gaining of great amount of knowledge by large-scale methods. Epigenetics-based therapy for breast cancer will most likely become a reality in the near future.
References
1.
Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90.PubMed
2.
DeVita Jr VT, Lawrence TS, Rosenberg SA, DePinho RA, Weinberg RA. CANCER: principles & practice of oncology. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins; 2011.
3.
You JS, Jones PA. Cancer genetics and epigenetics: two sides of the same coin? Cancer Cell. 2012;22(1):9–20.PubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Lansdorp PM, Falconer E, Tao J, Brind’amour J, Naumann U. Epigenetic differences between sister chromatids? Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1266(1):1–6.PubMedPubMedCentral
5.
Dawson MA, Kouzarides T. Cancer epigenetics: from mechanism to therapy. Cell. 2012;150(1):12–27.PubMed
6.
Carone DM, Lawrence JB. Heterochromatin instability in cancer: from the Barr body to satellites and the nuclear periphery. Semin Cancer Biol. 2013;23(2):99–108.PubMedPubMedCentral
7.
Barneda-Zahonero B, Parra M. Histone deacetylases and cancer. Mol Oncol. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.molonc.2012.07.003.PubMed
8.
Christinat A, Pagani O. Fertility after breast cancer. Maturitas. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.07.013.PubMed
9.
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, Forman D, Mathers C, Parkin DM. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008. Int J Cancer. 2010;127(12):2893–917.PubMed
10.
DeSantis C, Siegel R, Bandi P, Jemal A. Breast cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(6):409–18.PubMed
11.
Liedtke C, Kiesel L. Breast cancer molecular subtypes—modern therapeutic concepts for targeted therapy of a heterogeneous entity. Maturitas. 2012;73(4):288–94.PubMed
12.
Huynh KT, Chong KK, Greenberg ES, Hoon DS. Epigenetics of estrogen receptor-negative primary breast cancer. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2012;12(4):371–82.PubMed
13.
Meeran SM, Patel SN, Li Y, Shukla S, Tollefsbol TO. Bioactive dietary supplements reactivate ER expression in ER-negative breast cancer cells by active chromatin modifications. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e37748.PubMedPubMedCentral