Wilbert S. Aronow
Diagnosis and Management of Coronary Artery Disease
The most common cause of death in older adults is coronary artery disease (CAD). Coronary atherosclerosis is very common in older adults, with autopsy studies demonstrating a prevalence of at least 70% in persons older than 70 years. The prevalence of CAD is similar in older women and men.1 In one study, clinical CAD was present in 502 of 1160 men (43%), mean age 80 years, and in 1019 of 2464 women (41%), mean age 81 years.1 At 46-month follow-up, the incidence of new coronary events (myocardial infarction, sudden cardiac death) was 46% in the older men and 44% in the older women.1
CAD is diagnosed in older adults if they have coronary angiographic evidence of significant CAD, documented myocardial infarction (MI), typical history of angina pectoris with myocardial ischemia diagnosed by stress testing, or sudden cardiac death. The incidence of sudden cardiac death as the first clinical manifestation of CAD increases with age.
Clinical Manifestations
Dyspnea on exertion is a more common clinical manifestation of CAD in older adults than the typical chest pain of angina pectoris. The dyspnea is usually exertional and is related to a transient rise in left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic pressure caused by ischemia superimposed on reduced LV compliance. Because older adults are more limited in their activities, angina pectoris is less often associated with exertion. Older adults with angina pectoris are less likely to have substernal chest pain, and they describe their anginal pain as less severe and of shorter duration than younger persons. Angina pectoris in older adults may occur as a burning postprandial epigastric pain or as pain in the back or shoulders. Acute pulmonary edema unassociated with an acute MI may be a clinical manifestation of unstable angina pectoris due to extensive CAD in older adults.2
Myocardial ischemia, appearing as shoulder or back pain in older adults , may be misdiagnosed as degenerative joint disease. Myocardial ischemia, appearing as epigastric pain, may be misdiagnosed as peptic ulcer disease. Nocturnal or postprandial epigastric discomfort that is burning in quality may be misdiagnosed as hiatus hernia or esophageal reflux instead of myocardial ischemia because of CAD. The presence of comorbid conditions in older adults may also lead to misdiagnosis of symptoms as a result of myocardial ischemia.
Older adults with CAD may have silent or asymptomatic myocardial ischemia.3–5 In a prospective study of older adults with CAD, 133 of 195 men (68%), mean age 80 years, and 256 of 771 women (33%), mean age 81 years, had silent myocardial ischemia detected by 24-hour ambulatory electrocardiograms (ECGs).5 At 45-month follow-up, the incidence of new coronary events in older men with CAD was 90% in those with silent myocardial ischemia versus 44% in older men without silent ischemia.5 At 47-month follow-up, the incidence of new coronary events in older women with CAD was 88% in those with silent ischemia versus 43% in older women without silent ischemia.5
The reason for the frequent absence of chest pain in older patients with CAD is unclear.
Recognized and Unrecognized Myocardial Infarction
Pathy6 reported that in 387 older patients with acute MI, 19% had chest pain, 56% had dyspnea or neurologic or gastrointestinal symptoms, 8% had sudden death, and 17% had other symptoms. Another study showed that in 110 older patients with acute MI, 21% had no symptoms, 22% had chest pain, 35% had dyspnea, 18% had neurologic symptoms, and 4% had gastrointestinal symptoms (Box 40-1).7 Other studies have also shown a high prevalence of dyspnea and neurologic symptoms in older patients with acute MI.8–10 In these studies, dyspnea was present in 22% of 87 patients,8 in 42% of 777 patients,9 and in 57% of 96 patients.10 Neurologic symptoms were present in 16% of 87 patients,8 30% of 777 patients,9 and 34% of 96 patients.10
As with myocardial ischemia, some patients with acute MI may be completely asymptomatic or the symptoms may be so vague that they are unrecognized by the patient or physician as an acute MI. Studies have reported that 21% to 68% of MIs in older patients are unrecognized or silent.7,11–17 These studies also found that the incidence of new coronary events, including recurrent myocardial infarction, ventricular fibrillation, and sudden death in patients with unrecognized MI is similar to11,14–16,18 or higher19 than in patients with recognized MI.
Older patients with acute MI have a higher prevalence of non–ST-segment elevation MI (NSTEMI) with absence of pathologic Q waves than ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) with pathologic Q -waves.20–22 Of 91 consecutive patients with acute MI aged 70 years and older, mean age 78 years, 61 (75%) had NSTEMI.21 Of 4,017,367 patients aged 65 years and older with acute MI during 2001to 2010, 64.3% had NSTEMI.22 During this period, STEMI decreased 16.4% in patients with acute MI aged 65 to 79 years and by 19% in patients with acute MI aged 80 years and older.22
Diagnostic Techniques
Resting Electrocardiography
In addition to diagnosing recent or prior MI, the resting ECG may show ischemic ST-segment depression, arrhythmias, conduction defects, and LV hypertrophy related to subsequent coronary events. At 37-month mean follow-up, older patients with ischemic ST-segment depression 1 mm or greater on the resting ECG were 3.1 times more likely to develop new coronary events than were older patients with no significant ST-segment depression.23 Older patients with ischemic ST-segment depression of 0.5 to 0.9 mm on the resting ECG were 1.9 times more likely to develop new coronary events during 37-month follow-up than older patients with no significant ST-segment depression.23 At 45-month mean follow-up, pacemaker rhythm, atrial fibrillation, premature ventricular complexes, left bundle branch block, intraventricular conduction defect, and type II second-degree atrioventricular block were associated with a higher incidence of new coronary events in older patients.24 Numerous studies have also demonstrated that older patients with LV hypertrophy on the ECG have an increased incidence of new coronary events.25–27
Many studies have found that complex ventricular arrhythmias in older adults with CAD are associated with an increased incidence of new coronary events, including sudden cardiac death.28–31 The incidence of new coronary events is especially increased in older adults with complex ventricular arrhythmias and abnormal LV ejection fraction (LVEF)28 or LV hypertrophy.29 At 45-month follow-up of 395 men with CAD, mean age 80 years, complex ventricular arrhythmias detected by 24-hour ambulatory ECGs significantly increased the incidence of new coronary events by 2.4-fold.30 At 47-month follow-up of 771 women with CAD, mean age 81 years, complex ventricular arrhythmias detected by 24-hour ambulatory ECGs significantly increased the incidence of new coronary events by 2.5-fold.30 Over an 8-year follow-up of 2192 ambulatory volunteers aged 70 to 79 years without CAD, major baseline ECG abnormalities (Q waves, bundle branch block, atrial fibrillation or flutter, or major ST-T wave changes) were associated with a 50% increased risk of coronary events independent of conventional risk factors.32 Minor ST-T changes were associated with a 35% increased risk of coronary events independent of conventional risk factors.32
Stress Testing
Exercise Stress Testing
Hlatky and colleagues33 found the exercise ECG to have a sensitivity of 84% and specificity of 70% for the diagnosis of CAD in persons older than 60 years. Newman and Phillips34 found a sensitivity of 85%, specificity of 56%, and positive predictive value of 86% for the exercise ECG in diagnosing CAD. The increased sensitivity of the exercise ECG with increasing age found in these two treadmill exercise studies was probably due to the increased prevalence and severity of CAD in older adults.
Exercise stress testing also has prognostic value in older patients with CAD.35–37 Deckers and associates37 demonstrated that the 1-year mortality was 4% for 48 patients 65 years of age or older who were able to do an exercise stress test after acute MI and 37% for the 63 older patients unable to do the exercise stress test after acute MI.
Exercise stress testing using thallium perfusion scintigraphy, radionuclide ventriculography, and echocardiography is also useful for the diagnosis and prognosis of CAD.38–40 Iskandrian and coworkers38 showed that exercise thallium-201 imaging can be used for risk stratification of older patients with CAD. The risk for cardiac death or nonfatal MI at 25-month follow-up in 449 patients 60 years of age or older was less than 1% in patients with normal images, 5% in patients with a single-vessel thallium-201 abnormality, and 13% in patients with multivessel thallium-201 abnormality.
Pharmacologic Stress Testing
Intravenous (IV) dipyridamole thallium imaging may be used to determine the presence of CAD in older patients who are unable to undergo treadmill or bicycle exercise stress testing.41 In patients 70 years of age or older, the sensitivity of IV dipyridamolethallium imaging for diagnosing significant CAD was 86% and the specificity was 75%.41 In 120 patients older than 70 years, adenosine echocardiography had a 66% sensitivity and 90% specificity in diagnosing CAD.42 An abnormal adenosine echocardiogram predicted a threefold risk of future coronary events, independent of coronary risk factors.42 In 120 patients older than 70 years, dobutamine echocardiography had a 87% sensitivity and 84% specificity in diagnosing CAD.42 An abnormal dobutamine echocardiogram predicted a 7.3-fold risk of future coronary events.42 In 101 patients older than 70 years, the sensitivity and specificity of dipyridamole thallium imaging for CAD were 86% and 75%, respectively, compared with 83% and 70%, respectively, in younger patients.43 Dobutamine stress echocardiography predicted at 3-year follow-up in 227 octogenarians a 2.7-fold increase in all-cause mortality and a 3.2-fold increase in major cardiovascular events.44
Electrocardiography
Ambulatory Electrocardiography
Ambulatory electrocardiography performed for 24 hours is also useful for detecting myocardial ischemia in older adults with suspected CAD who cannot perform treadmill or bicycle exercise stress testing because of advanced age, intermittent claudication, musculoskeletal disorders, heart failure, or pulmonary disease. Ischemic ST-segment changes demonstrated on 24-hour ambulatory ECGs correlate with transient abnormalities in myocardial perfusion and LV systolic dysfunction. The changes may be associated with symptoms, or symptoms may be completely absent, which is referred to as silent myocardial ischemia. Silent myocardial ischemia is predictive of future coronary events, including cardiovascular mortality in older adults with CAD.3–5,31,45–47 The incidence of new coronary events is especially increased in older adults with silent myocardial ischemia plus complex ventricular arrhythmias,31 abnormal LVEF,45 or echocardiographic LV hypertrophy.47
Signal-Averaged Electrocardiography
Signal-averaged electrocardiography (SAECG) was performed in 121 older postinfarction patients with asymptomatic complex ventricular arrhythmias detected by 24-hour ambulatory ECGs and an LVEF of 40% or higher.48 At 29-month follow-up, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for predicting sudden cardiac death were 52%, 68%, 32%, and 83%, respectively, for a positive SAECG; 63%, 70%, 38%, and 87%, respectively, for nonsustained ventricular tachycardia; and 26%, 89%, 41%, and 81%, respectively, for a positive SAECG plus nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.48
Multislice Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
A direct comparison of multislice computed tomography angiography (MSCTA) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for noninvasive coronary arteriography was performed in 129 patients, mean age 64 years, with suspected CAD.49 Sensitivity for coronary stenoses larger than 50% of luminal diameter was 82% for MSCTA versus 54% for MRI; the respective specificities were 90% and 87%. The negative predictive value was slightly higher for MSCTA (95% vs. 90%). In this study, 74% of patients preferred MSCTA over MRI. The greater diagnostic accuracy of MSCTA over MRI in this study is consistent with meta-analyses of both tests.50,51
64-MSCTA and coronary angiography were performed in 145 patients, mean age 67 years, and stress testing was done in 47 of these patients to determine the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of these tests in diagnosing obstructive CAD in patients with suspected CAD.52 Of 145 patients, 64-MSCTA had a 98% sensitivity, 74% specificity, 90% positive predictive value, and 94% negative predictive value in diagnosing obstructive CAD. Of 47 patients, stress testing had a 69% sensitivity, 36% specificity, 78% positive predictive value, and 27% negative predictive value for diagnosing obstructive CAD, whereas 64-MSCTA had a 100% sensitivity, 73% specificity, 92% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value for diagnosing obstructive CAD. 64-MSCTA has a better sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value than stress testing in diagnosing obstructive CAD.52 The ability to estimate myocardial blood flow and fractional flow reserve with MSCTA may allow more accurate assessment of hemodynamically significant coronary lesions without the need for invasive coronary angiography.53 Unrecognized MI can be detected by resting electrocardiography, echocardiography, nuclear imaging, or cardiovascular MRI.54
Coronary Risk Factors
Cigarette Smoking
The Cardiovascular Health Study of 5201 men and women 65 years of age or older demonstrated that more than 50 pack-years of smoking increased 5-year mortality 1.6-fold.55 The Systolic Hypertension in the Elderly Program pilot project showed that smoking was a predictor of first cardiovascular event and MI and sudden death.56 At 5-year follow-up of 7178 persons 65 years of age or older in three communities, the relative risk for cardiovascular disease mortality was 2.0 for male smokers and 1.6 for female smokers.57 The incidence of cardiovascular disease mortality in former smokers was similar to that in those who had never smoked.57 At 40-month follow-up of 664 men, mean age 80 years, and at 48-month follow-up of 1488 women, mean age 82 years, current cigarette smoking increased the relative risk of new coronary events 2.2-fold in men and 2.0-fold in women.58 At 6-year follow-up of older men and women in the Coronary Artery Surgery Study registry, the relative risk of MI or death was 1.5 for persons 65 to 69 years of age and 2.9 for persons 70 years and older who continued smoking compared with those who quit during the year before study enrollment.59
Older men and women who smoke cigarettes should be strongly encouraged to stop smoking to reduce the development of CAD and other cardiovascular diseases. Smoking cessation will decrease mortality from CAD, other cardiovascular diseases, and all-cause mortality in older men and women. A smoking cessation program should be instituted.60
Hypertension
Systolic hypertension in older adults is diagnosed if the systolic blood pressure is 140 mm Hg or higher from two or more readings on two or more visits.61 Diastolic hypertension in older adults is similarly diagnosed if the diastolic blood pressure is 90 mm Hg or higher.61 In a study of 1819 persons, mean age 80 years, living in the community, the prevalence of hypertension was 71% in older African Americans, 64% in elderly Asians, 62% in older Hispanics, and 52% in older whites.62
Isolated systolic hypertension in older adults is diagnosed if the systolic blood pressure is 140 mm Hg or higher, with a diastolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg.61 Approximately two thirds of older adults with hypertension have isolated systolic hypertension.62
Isolated systolic hypertension and diastolic hypertension are both associated with increased CAD morbidity and mortality in older adults.63 Increased systolic blood pressure is a greater risk factor for CAD morbidity and mortality than increased diastolic blood pressure.63 The higher the systolic or diastolic blood pressure, the greater the morbidity and mortality from CAD in older women and men. The Cardiovascular Health Study demonstrated in 5202 older men and women that a brachial systolic blood pressure greater than 169 mm Hg was associated with a 2.4-fold greater 5-year mortality.55
At 30-year follow-up of persons 65 years and older in the Framingham Heart Study, systolic hypertension was related to a greater incidence of CAD in older men and women.64 Diastolic hypertension correlated with the incidence of CAD in older men but not in older women.64 At 40-month follow-up of 664 older men and 48-month follow-up of 1488 older women, systolic or diastolic hypertension was associated with a relative risk of new coronary events of 2.0 in men and 1.6 in women.58 Data from the Framingham study have also suggested the importance of increased pulse pressure, a measure of large artery stiffness. Among 1924 men and women aged 50 to 79 years, at any given level of systolic blood pressure of 120 mm Hg or higher, the risk of CAD over 20 years rose with lower diastolic blood pressure, suggesting that higher pulse pressure was an important component of risk.65 Among 1061 men and women aged 60 to 79 years in the Framingham Heart Study, the strongest predictor of CAD risk was pulse pressure (hazard ratio, 1.24).66
Older adults with hypertension should be treated with salt restriction, weight reduction if necessary, cessation of drugs that increase blood pressure, avoidance of alcohol and tobacco, increase in physical activity, decrease of dietary saturated fat and cholesterol, and maintenance of adequate dietary potassium, calcium, and magnesium intake. In addition, antihypertensive drugs have been shown to reduce CAD events in older men and women with hypertension.67–75
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET) randomized 3845 patients aged 80 years and older, mean age 84 years, with a sitting mean blood pressure of 173/90 mm Hg, to indapamide plus perindopril if needed versus a double-blind placebo.75 The study was prematurely stopped at 2 years (median follow-up, 1.8 years) because antihypertensive drug therapy reduced fatal or nonfatal stroke by 30%, fatal stroke by 39%, all-cause mortality by 21%, death from cardiovascular causes by 23%, and heart failure by 64%.75
Older adults with CAD should have their blood pressure reduced to less than 140/90 mm Hg and to less than 140/90 mm Hg if diabetes mellitus or chronic renal disease is present.61 Most older patients with hypertension will require two or more antihypertensive drugs to achieve this blood pressure goal.61 The drugs of choice for treating CAD with hypertension are β-blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors.61,76 If a third antihypertensive drug is needed, a thiazide diuretic should be administered.61
Left Ventricular Hypertrophy
Elderly men and women with ECG LV hypertrophy and echocardiographic LV have an increased risk of developing new coronary events hypertrophy.25–27,29,77 At 4-year follow-up of 406 older men and 735 older women in the Framingham study, echocardiographic LV hypertrophy was 15.3 times more sensitive in predicting new coronary events in older men and 4.3 times more sensitive in predicting new coronary events in older women than electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy.77 At 37-month follow-up of 360 men and women with hypertension or CAD, mean age 82 years, echocardiographic LV hypertrophy was 4.3 times more sensitive in predicting new coronary events than electrocardiographic LV hypertrophy.26
Physicians should try to prevent LV hypertrophy from developing or progressing in older men and women with CAD. A meta-analysis of 109 treatment studies found that ACE inhibitors were more effective than other antihypertensive drugs in decreasing LV mass.78
Dyslipidemia
Numerous studies have demonstrated that a high serum total cholesterol level is a risk factor for new or recurrent coronary events in older men and women.58,79–81 At 40-month follow-up of 664 older men and at 48-month follow-up of 1488 older women, an increment of 10 mg/dL of serum total cholesterol was associated with an increase in the relative risk of 1.12 for new coronary events in men and women.58
A low-serum, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol level is a risk factor for new coronary events in older men and women.58,79,82–84 In the Framingham study,79 Established Populations for Epidemiologic Studies of the Elderly study,81 and a large cohort of nursing home patients,58 a low serum HDL cholesterol level was a more powerful predictor of new coronary events than total serum cholesterol. At 40-month follow-up of 664 older men and 48-month follow-up of 1488 older women, a decrement of 10 mg/dL of serum HDL cholesterol increased the relative risk of new coronary events 1.70 times in men and 1.95 times in women.58
Hypertriglyceridemia is a risk factor for new coronary events in older women but not in older men.58,79 At 40-month follow-up of older men and 48-month follow-up of older women, the level of serum triglycerides was not a risk factor for new coronary events in men and was a very weak risk factor for new coronary events in women.58
Numerous studies have demonstrated that statins reduce new coronary events in older men and women with CAD.85–98 The absolute reduction in new coronary events in these studies is greater for older adults than for younger persons. In an observational prospective study of 488 men and 922 women, mean age 81 years, with prior MI and a serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level of 125 mg/dL or higher, 48% of persons were treated with statins.89 At 3-year follow-up, statins reduced new coronary events by 50%.89 The lower the LDL cholesterol level achieved in this study, the greater the reduction in new coronary events.89
In the 1263 persons aged 75 to 80 years at study entry and 80 to 85 years at follow-up in the Heart Protection Study, any major vascular event was significantly reduced 28% by simvastatin. Lowering the serum LDL cholesterol level from less than 116 mg/dL to less than 77 mg/dL by simvastatin caused a 25% significant reduction in vascular events.88
In the Heart Protection Study, 3500 persons had initial serum LDL cholesterol levels less than 100 mg/dL.88 A decrease of the serum LDL cholesterol level from 97 to 65 mg/dL by simvastatin in these persons caused a similar decrease in risk, as did treating patients with higher serum LDL cholesterol levels. The Heart Protection Study investigators recommended treating those at high risk for cardiovascular events with statins, regardless of the initial levels of serum lipids, age, or gender.88
On the basis of these and other data,89,95–98 the American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) guidelines60 and updated National Cholesterol Education Program III guidelines99 stated that in very high-risk persons, working toward a serum LDL cholesterol level of less than 70 mg/dL is a reasonable clinical strategy.
A meta-analysis was performed in nine randomized trials of statins for secondary prevention in 19,569 patients aged 65 to 82 years.100 Over 5 years, statins reduced all-cause mortality by 22%, CAD mortality by 30%, nonfatal by MI 26%, need for revascularization by 30%, and by stroke 25%. The estimated number needed to treat to save one life was 28.100
The 2013 ACC/AHA lipid guidelines recommend the use of high-dose statins (20 to 40 mg daily of rosuvastatin or 40 to 80 mg daily of atorvastatin) to adults aged 75 years and younger with arteriosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) unless contraindicated with a class I indication.101 Moderate-dose or high-dose statins are reasonable to administer to persons with ASCVD older than 75 years with a class IIa indication. Persons aged 21 years and older with a serum LDL cholesterol level of 190 mg/dL or higher should be treated with high-dose statins with a class I indication. For primary prevention in diabetics aged 40 to 75 years and a serum LDL cholesterol level between 70 to 189 mg/dL moderate-dose statins should be administered with a class I indication. For primary prevention in diabetics aged 40 to 75 years, a serum LDL cholesterol level between 70 to 189 mg/dL and a 10-year risk of ASCVD of 7.5% or higher calculated from the pooled cohort equation, high-dose statins should be administered with a class IIa indication. For primary prevention in diabetics aged 21 to 39 years or older than 75 years and a serum LDL cholesterol level between 70 to 189 mg/dL, moderate-dose statins or high-dose statins should be administered with a class IIa indication. Adults aged 40 to 75 years without diabetes mellitus or ASCVD with a serum LDL cholesterol level between 70 to 189 mg/dL and a 10-year risk of ASCVD of 7.5% or higher calculated from the pooled cohort equation should be treated with high-dose statins or moderate-dose statins with a class I indication. Adults aged 40 to 75 years of age without diabetes mellitus or ASCVD with a serum LDL cholesterol level between 70 to 189 mg/dL and a 10-year risk of ASCVD of 5% to 7.4%, calculated from the pooled cohort equation, should be treated with moderate-dose statins with a class IIa indication.101
Diabetes Mellitus
Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for new coronary events in older men and women.58,79,102 In the Cardiovascular Health Study, an elevated fasting glucose level (>130 mg/dL) increased 5-year mortality by 1.9-fold.55 At 40-month follow-up of 664 older men and 48-month follow-up of 1488 older women, diabetes mellitus increased the relative risk of new coronary events by 1.9-fold in men and 1.8-fold in women.58 Older diabetics without CAD have a higher incidence of new coronary events than older nondiabetics with CAD.103
Persons with diabetes mellitus are more often obese and have higher serum LDL cholesterol and triglyceride levels and lower serum HDL cholesterol levels than nondiabetics. Diabetics also have a higher prevalence of hypertension and LV hypertrophy than nondiabetics. These risk factors contribute to the increased incidence of new CAD events in diabetics compared to nondiabetics. Increased age can further amplify these risk factor differences and contribute to greater CAD risk.
Diabetics with microalbuminuria have more severe angiographic CAD than diabetics without microalbuminuria.104 Diabetics also have a significant increasing trend of HbA1c levels over the increasing number of vessels with CAD.105
Older adults with diabetes mellitus should be treated with dietary therapy, weight reduction if necessary, and appropriate drugs if necessary to control hyperglycemia. The HbA1c level should be maintained at less than 7%.60,106,107 Other risk factors such as smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia, obesity, and physical inactivity should be controlled. Diabetics should be treated with statins, as recommended by the 2013 ACC/AHA lipid guidelines.101 The blood pressure should be reduced to less than 140/90 mm Hg.61 Metformin is the drug of choice.107 Sulfonylureas should be avoided in persons with CAD.108,109
Obesity
Obesity was an independent risk factor for new CAD events in older men and women in the Framingham Heart Study.110 Disproportionate distribution of fat to the abdomen assessed by the waist-to-hip circumference ratio has also been shown to be a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, mortality from CAD, and total mortality in older men and women.111,112
Obese men and women with CAD must undergo weight reduction. Weight reduction is also a first approach to controlling mild hypertension, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia. Regular aerobic exercise should be used in addition to diet to treat obesity. The body mass index should be reduced to 18.5 to 24.9 kg/m2.54
Physical Inactivity
Physical inactivity is associated with obesity, hypertension, hyperglycemia, and dyslipidemia. At 12-year follow-up in the Honolulu Heart Program, physically active men 65 years of age or older had a relative risk of 0.43 for CAD compared with inactive men.113 Lack of moderate or vigorous exercise increased 5-year mortality in older men and women in the Cardiovascular Heart Study.55
Moderate exercise programs suitable for older adults include walking, climbing stairs, swimming, and bicycling. However, care must be taken in prescribing any exercise program because of the high risk of injury in this age group. Group or supervised sessions, including aerobic classes, offered by senior health care plans are especially appealing. Exercise training programs are not only beneficial in preventing coronary heart disease (CHD) but have also been found to improve endurance and functional capacity in older adults after MI.114,115
Therapy of Stable Angina
Nitroglycerin is used for relief of the acute anginal attack. It is given as a sublingual tablet or as a sublingual spray.116 Long-acting nitrates prevent recurrent anginal attacks, improve exercise time until the onset of angina, and reduce exercise-induced ischemic ST-segment depression.117,118 To prevent nitrate tolerance, it is recommended that a 12- to 14-hour nitrate-free interval be established when using long-acting nitrate preparations. During the nitrate-free interval, the use of another antianginal drug will be necessary.
β-Blockers prevent recurrent anginal attacks and are the drug of choice to prevent new coronary events.119 β-Blockers also improve exercise time until the onset of angina and reduce exercise-induced ischemic ST-segment depression.119 β-Blockers should be administered along with long-acting nitrates to all patients with angina unless there are contraindications to the use of these drugs. Antiplatelet drugs such as aspirin or clopidogrel should also be administered to all patients with angina to reduce the incidence of new coronary events.120–122
There are no class I indications for the use of calcium channel blockers in the treatment of patients with CAD.60 However, if angina pectoris persists despite the use of β-blockers and nitrates, long-acting calcium channel blockers such as diltiazem or verapamil should be used in older patients with CAD and normal LV systolic function and amlodipine or felodipine should be used in patients with CAD and abnormal LV systolic function as antianginal agents.116
Ranolazine reduces the frequency of angina episodes and nitroglycerin consumption and improves exercise duration and time to anginal attacks without clinically significant effects on heart rate or blood pressure.123,124 Ranolazine should be used as combination therapy when angina is not adequately controlled with other antianginal drugs.116,125,126 The recommended dose of sustained-release ranolazine is 750 or 1000 mg twice daily.
If angina persists despite intensive medical management, coronary revascularization with coronary angioplasty or coronary artery bypass surgery (CABS) should be considered.127,128 Addition of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to optimal medical therapy in older adult patients with stable CAD did not improve or worsen the 5-year incidence of all-cause mortality or MI.129 The use of other approaches to manage stable angina pectoris, which persists despite antianginal drugs and coronary revascularization, is discussed elsewhere.116
Acute Coronary Syndromes
Unstable angina pectoris is a transitory syndrome that results from disruption of a coronary atherosclerotic plaque, which critically decreases coronary blood flow and causes new-onset angina pectoris or exacerbation of angina pectoris.130 Transient episodes of coronary artery occlusion or near-occlusion by thrombus at the site of plaque injury may occur and cause angina pectoris at rest. The thrombus may be labile and cause temporary obstruction to flow. Release of vasoconstrictive substances by platelets and vasoconstriction due to endothelial vasodilator dysfunction contribute to a further reduction in coronary blood flow and, in some patients, myocardial necrosis with NSTEMI occurs. Elevation of serum cardiospecific troponin I or T or creatine kinase-MB levels occur in patients with NSTEMI but not in patients with unstable angina.
Older patients with unstable angina pectoris should be hospitalized and, depending on their risk stratification, may need monitoring in an intensive care unit.131 In a prospective study of 177 consecutive unselected patients hospitalized for an acute coronary syndrome (91 women and 86 men) aged 70 to 94 years, unstable angina was diagnosed in 54%, NSTEMI in 34%, and STEMI in 12%.132–134 Obstructive CAD was diagnosed by coronary angiography in 94% of older men and in 80% of older women.131
Treatment of Unstable Angina Pectoris and Non–ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Treatment of patients with unstable angina pectoris and NSTEMI should be initiated in the emergency department. Reversible factors precipitating unstable angina pectoris should be identified and corrected. Oxygen should be administered to patients who have cyanosis, respiratory distress, congestive heart failure, or high-risk features. Oxygen therapy should be guided by arterial oxygen saturation and should not be given if the arterial oxygen saturation is more than 94%. Morphine sulfate should be administered IV when anginal chest pain is not immediately relieved with nitroglycerin or when acute pulmonary congestion and/or severe agitation is present.
Aspirin should be administered to all patients with unstable angina pectoris and NSTEMI unless contraindicated and continued indefinitely.134,135 The first dose of aspirin should be chewed rather than swallowed to ensure rapid absorption.
The ACC/AHA 2011 guidelines have updated conditions for which clopidogrel should be administered in addition to indefinite use of aspirin in hospitalized patients with unstable angina pectoris and NSTEMI for whom an early noninterventional approach or PCI is planned. Clopidogrel should be withheld for 5 to 7 days in patients for whom elective coronary artery surgery is planned.135 Prasugrel may be considered instead of clopidogrel if PCI is planned if there is a low bleeding risk, no history of stroke or ischemic attack, age younger than 75 years, body weight more than 60 kg, and the need for CABS considered unlikely.136 Ticagrelor may also be used instead of clopidogrel if PCI is planned, but the aspirin dose must not be more than 100 mg daily.137,138 When possible, ticagrelor should be stopped at least 5 days prior to any surgery. On the basis of data from the Clopidogrel in Unstable Angina to Prevent Recurrent Events (CURE) trial139,140 and Clopidogrel for the Reduction of Events During Observation (CREDO) trial,141 81 mg of aspirin daily plus 75 mg of clopidogrel daily should be administered to patients with unstable angina and NSTEMI for at least 1 year.
Nitrates should be administered immediately in the emergency department to patients with unstable angina and NSTEMI.135,142 Patients whose symptoms are not fully relieved with three 0.4-mg sublingual nitroglycerin tablets or a spray taken 5 minutes apart and initiation of an IV β-blocker should be treated with continuous IV nitroglycerin.135,142 Topical or oral nitrates are alternatives for patients without ongoing refractory symptoms.135,142
β-Blockers should be administered IV in the emergency department unless there are contraindications to their use, followed by oral administration and continued indefinitely.135,142 Metoprolol may be given in 5-mg IV increments over 1 to 2 minutes and repeated every 5 minutes until 15 mg has been given, followed by oral metoprolol 100 mg twice daily. The target resting heart rate is 50 to 60 beats/min.
An oral ACE inhibitor should also be given unless there are contraindications to its use and continued indefinitely.135,142 In patients with continuing or frequently recurring myocardial ischemia despite nitrates and β-blockers, verapamil or diltiazem should be added to their therapeutic regimen in the absence of LV systolic dysfunction (class IIa indication).135,142 The benefit of calcium channel blockers in the treatment of unstable angina pectoris is limited to symptom control.135,142 Intraaortic balloon pump counterpulsation should be used for severe myocardial ischemia that is continuing or occurs frequently, despite intensive medical therapy, or for hemodynamic instability in patients before or after coronary angiography.135,142
A platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor should also be administered in addition to aspirin and clopidogrel and heparin in patients in whom coronary angioplasty is planned.135,142 Abciximab can be used for 12 to 24 hours in patients with unstable angina/NSTEMI in whom coronary angioplasty is planned within the next 24 hours.135,142 Eptifibatide or tirofiban should be administered in addition to aspirin and low-molecular-weight heparin or unfractionated heparin to patients with continuing myocardial ischemia, an elevated cardiospecific troponin I or T, or with other high-risk features in whom an invasive management is not planned.135,142
IV thrombolytic therapy is not recommended for the treatment of unstable angina and NSTEMI.135,142 Prompt coronary angiography should be performed without noninvasive risk stratification in patients who fail to stabilize with intensive medical treatment.142 Coronary revascularization should be performed in patients with high-risk features to reduce coronary events and mortality.135,142–144
On the basis of the available data, the ACC/AHA 2013 guidelines have recommended the use of statins in all patients with acute coronary syndromes without contraindications.101 Statins should be continued indefinitely after hospital discharge.95,99,101,142,145
Patients should be discharged on aspirin plus clopidogrel, β-blockers, and ACE inhibitors in the absence of contraindications. Nitrates should be given for ischemic symptoms. A long-acting nondihydropyridine calcium channel blocker may be given for ischemic symptoms that occur, despite treatment with nitrates plus β-blockers. Hormone therapy should not be administered to postmenopausal women.146,147