Dementia: Making a Diagnosis and Managing Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms




© The Editor(s)  2018
Balakrishnan Kichu R. Nair (ed.)Geriatric Medicinehttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3253-0_6


6. Dementia: Making a Diagnosis and Managing Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms



Brendan Flynn1, 2  


(1)
Conjoint Senior Lecturer, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia

(2)
Director of Medical Services, Hunter New England Mental Health, Hunter New England Local Health District, Newcastle, NSW, Australia

 



 

Brendan Flynn




Key Points





  • Making a diagnosis of dementia can provide a degree of certainty about the future and allow for important personal, social and legal arrangements to be addressed.


  • The diagnosis of dementia rests on the clinical history, corroborative information, cognitive examination and evidence of functional decline.


  • The diagnosis is a clinical one—confirmation is only available by microscopic examination of neural tissue.


  • Person-centred care is an important principle in dementia care.


  • Non-pharmacological interventions should be tried first when treating behavioural or psychological symptoms of dementia.

This chapter considers two common clinical problems in dementia care—making the diagnosis and the management of behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD), with an emphasis on the behavioural symptoms. These are important and common clinical problems faced by geriatricians, psychogeriatricians, general practitioners and sometimes neurologists. Whilst each discipline may have a different perspective (including the psychogeriatric perspective of this author), dementia care is a truly multidisciplinary field of medicine, so effort has been made to emphasize the commonalities. There is also a focus on the older patient; thus much of the approach below may need modification in patients under, perhaps, 65 years of age. Similarly, younger onset dementia is not discussed here.

Definitions of dementia vary slightly, but the most recently updated criteria for clinical use come from the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fifth edition, known as the DSM–5 [1]. This publication has replaced the term dementia with major neurocognitive disorder. This terminology remains unfamiliar to many clinicians and patients. The diagnosis is made when there is (1) significant cognitive decline in one or more cognitive domains (complex attention, executive function, learning and memory, language, perceptual-motor or social cognition) based on concern by the individual (or informant) and objective impairment on a cognitive assessment instrument (2) functional impairment and (3) no co-existing delirium or other psychiatric disorder.

Worldwide, 47.5 million people have dementia, and there are 7.7 million new cases every year [2].


Case Study

Audrey, 74, is a retired pharmacist who is referred for specialist assessment. Her general practitioner is concerned about increasing difficulties that Audrey has had recalling her medication regime (for osteoporosis), some recent missed appointments and her increasingly repetitive conversations. She is otherwise well but does appear more anxious of late. There is no history of mental health problems. No immediate informant is available. Audrey’s only child, a computer engineer, lives overseas, though he speaks regularly with her by phone. He has had his own family issues in recent months and whilst he has not visited for a whilst, he has indicated by phone that he has no concerns, except for worrying his mother may be lonely. Audrey was widowed 4 years ago.


6.1 Diagnosis of Dementia


Before considering the diagnostic process itself, it is worth reflecting on the value of it. Historically, therapeutic nihilism has surrounded a diagnosis of dementia. As a result, some patients with the syndrome may never have been formally diagnosed. These patients may not have had an opportunity for reversible pathology to be excluded, which, whilst not frequently detected, can prevent significant morbidity. Further, making the diagnosis can, of itself, have therapeutic value. Being able to provide individuals and carers with a likely cause and prognosis, whilst often distressing in the short term, can provide a degree of certainty about the future and allow for important personal, social and legal arrangements to be addressed.


6.1.1 Taking the History


The key aspects when taking a history of apparent cognitive impairment relate to the nature and duration of the cognitive, physical or psychiatric symptoms, looking for evidence of functional decline and obtaining a corroborative history.

The medical history should focus on general physical health and symptoms that suggest a neurological, endocrine, metabolic or nutritional disorder, some of which can present with cognitive decline. Risk factors for dementia should be explored. It is important to note that classic vascular risk factors including dyslipidaemia, smoking and hypertension also increase risk for Alzheimer’s pathology [3].

Family history is relevant. The lifetime risk of dementia if a first-degree relative is affected with dementia is 20%, compared to 10% baseline population risk [4].

Current medications should be reviewed, particularly with reference to agents that can impair cognitive performance, such as anticholinergic medications and benzodiazepines. Cognitive assessment should be delayed if these can possible be weaned.

Psychiatric history is usually orientated around evaluating the likelihood of an explanatory (or comorbid) mood and anxiety disorder. Both can be seen when individuals are first referred for evaluation of a cognitive concern. Psychosis can be seen secondary to dementia, though this is usually at the moderate to advanced stage. Visual hallucinations are a characteristic feature of dementia with Lewy bodies.

Taking a cognitive history is essential. The task is to evaluate subjective concerns around problems with memory, problem solving or function. A useful (but not universal) principle is that early deficits due to (non-frontal) cortical pathology are often accompanied by awareness of the problem by the individual—with associated anxiety, embarrassment and attempts at minimizing the symptoms. Subcortical pathology often results in executive deficits—characteristic of which is a loss of insight, including awareness of one’s own cognitive changes. As a result, patients with the latter are frequently brought to a clinic by a relative or carer.

Asking the individual about short-term memory concerns often yields an answer that may recognize but minimize the concerns (‘yes, but doesn’t everyone at my age?’). Enquiring about how tasks such as banking, keeping track of appointments, computing, and password recollection are achieved, including the degree of assistance that is required, is useful. More marked amnestic deficits will result in a reduction in the number of people whose names are quickly remembered, difficulties with describing accurately an extended family structure and becoming lost in a locality previously well known. If these deficits are more advanced, individuals may have problems naming direct family members or becoming disorientated at home.

Finally, an awareness of functional abilities and decline is essential. An initial estimation must be made of premorbid function and comparison made with the present. If there is a deterioration in skills and abilities, the range of these needs to be explored. This includes personal hobbies; work within or outside the home; complex tasks such as driving or operating machinery; care tasks for dependents or animals; cooking, cleaning, gardening, and routine errands including shopping; and personal tasks including showering and using the toilet.

An important consideration for all of the domains above is the onset (insidious or acute) and duration of the symptoms. Characteristic patterns are commonly described, though clinical presentations are often not as clearly delineated. Insidious onset, with months to years of symptoms and increasing carer concerns is common in neurodegenerative disease. Acute onset is most often related to a significant cerebrovascular event. Episodic cognitive impairment may be less likely to be due to dementia and raises the possibility of periodic pathology such as transient ischaemia or seizures. The classically described ‘stepwise’ pattern of deterioration in multi-infarct dementia may be useful. This is the notion of a period of stable cognition and function (usually over some months) separated by identifiable episodes of deterioration. However, this can be misleading when informants who only have intermittent exposure to a person with progressive decline also describe the same pattern. It is also worthwhile being mindful of superimposed delirium that can temporarily worsen symptoms and give a false picture of rapid decline. A particularly rapid decline may be seen in neoplastic or prion disease.

Corroborative history is critical when assessing possible dementia. The informant should be familiar with the person pre-morbidly and given the opportunity to speak individually with the clinician, if consent is provided. The history can be clarified or confirmed. Carer stress should be explored, as well as issues relating to safety (such as driving, becoming lost or cooking with gas) or difficult behaviours. Clinicians should be mindful of the potential vulnerability of older people to elder abuse, including potentially from an informant.


6.1.2 The Examination


Physical examination is conducted to look for signs of endocrine or metabolic causes (such as thyroid disease) and for any evidence of focal neurological signs. Primary reflexes imply frontal pathology. Parkinsonism (present in Parkinson’s disease dementia or dementia with Lewy bodies) is important to note, as is psychomotor slowing, which may be present in a major depressive disorder.

The Mental State Examination is useful for detecting anxiety, mood and psychotic symptoms. These can be related to independent psychiatric problems that may explain subjective memory concerns in a cognitively intact patient, or indeed these symptoms could be secondary to a neurodegenerative process. Sometimes both explanations may co-exist, an example being clinically significant anxiety. Certain speech phenomena are seen with temporal lobe pathology including semantic and phonemic paraphrasias. Aphasia can also be seen in the rarer frontotemporal subtypes.


6.1.3 Cognitive Screening and Assessment


Clinicians commonly undertake brief cognitive testing which is probably best termed cognitive screening. A complete cognitive assessment usually requires a neuropsychologist, though this assessment is not always required in order to make a diagnosis of dementia. Neuropsychological testing is very important in situations of diagnostic uncertainty, particularly with serial testing being able to clarify progress over time.

Cognitive domains including orientation (to time, place and person), the ability to name common objects, memory (registration, spontaneous and cued recall), attention, visuospatial and language abilities must be assessed. Frequent assessments of cognitive function involve the use of validated tools such as the Mini Mental State Examination [5], the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination III [6] or the Montreal Cognitive Assessment [7]. Clinician preference may vary with experience, local custom or copyright access rights. It is important for clinicians to familiarize themselves with not only the administration and scoring of the instruments, but both the limitations of each and the typical scoring profile one would expect in the commoner dementia subtypes. A sense of what alternate explanations for poor performance on cognitive testing (other than cognitive impairment) is also useful. An example is deficits on cognitive examination during a depressive episode, so-called pseudodementia [8].

It is important to consider whether the instrument being employed offers an assessment of executive function, as this is not always the case. Executive function includes some cognitive aspects that are readily assessable to testing (such as letter fluency, motor sequencing, response inhibition and sequencing tasks) and other abilities that may be best assessed by observation alone. These include social inhibition (tact), personal care and, to some degree, the capacity for empathy.


6.1.4 Investigations


In looking for a reversible cause for the impairment, it is worthwhile checking for anaemia, renal or hepatic impairment, thyroid disease and calcium, magnesium or phosphate abnormalities. Checking for vitamin B12 and folate deficiency may reveal a cause or effect of the problem. Syphilis and HIV serology may also be indicated.

Brain imaging ideally would include an MRI series with FLAIR images to demonstrate white matter pathology as well as coronal views allowing for an estimation of hippocampal volume. Some radiology services provide volumetric analysis of the hippocampi, which is clinically valuable. Lesions including stroke, tumours or those relating to previous trauma may be detected on a brain CT scan, but this information will likely be obtained also from the MRI.

The diagnostic gold standard for dementia remains post-mortem brain tissue analysis.


6.1.5 Diagnosis


Diagnosis of subtype of dementia is necessarily provisional without tissue examination. It is also made difficult by ongoing controversies about classification. To complicate the issue, there known relationships between subtypes—for example, between Alzheimer’s disease and vascular dementia—which share common risk factors [3]. Further, these two pathologies co-exist commonly at autopsy [9]. A recognized clinical picture that reflects this is termed ‘mixed dementia’ [10]. Subtyping dementia is important as it guides therapy; however, it will become much more important should effective disease-modifying agents for Alzheimer’s disease become available. After some years of progression, the subtypes tend to be harder to distinguish from each other.

Common outcomes in assessment of individuals who present with early cognitive impairment include:


  1. 1.


    Mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Thought to affect 10–20% of those over 65 years [11, 12], MCI has been defined as an intermediate state of cognitive function between the changes seen in aging and those fulfilling the criteria for dementia [13]. It presents as concern from a patient or informant about cognitive decline and objective impairment in one or more cognitive domains, including memory, executive function, attention, language or visuospatial skills. The key aspect is that there is no functional impairment [14]. Subtypes have been described, denoting those more likely to go on to Alzheimer’s disease (amnestic MCI) and non-amnestic MCI. Between 12% and 20% of patients with MCI are recorded as converting to dementia annually [12], though other studies report the conversion rate as considerably less [15].

     

  2. 2.


    Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the commonest cause of dementia, accounting for 50–56% cases in a clinical series at autopsy [16]. It is postulated to be caused by accumulated protein abnormalities: beta amyloid plaques and neurofibrillary tangles (abnormally phosphorylated tau proteins). AD is the prototypical cortical dementia, as the cerebral cortex is vulnerable, with temporal lobe (particularly hippocampal) deficits prominent in the early stages. Early symptoms include forgetfulness, repetitive conversation, word finding difficulty and language deficits, such as paraphrasias. The neurological examination may be normal. Cognitive testing may reveal poor orientation, poor object naming and some visuospatial deficits. The characteristic deficit, however, is rapid forgetting. A list of words can be registered well—increasing over a number of trials—and spontaneous recall impaired. However, cues do not assist the patient at delayed recall, suggesting the information was never encoded in the hippocampi. In fact, the individual may confidently suggest the wrong words. When cues do assist retrieval, this suggests processing difficulties (which can be reflected in requiring multiple registration attempts to learn the list of words). Vascular dementia (below) can present in this way, with apparent forgetfulness, without rapid forgetting. Routine pathology can be entirely normal in AD. MRI may be normal, but global atrophy and disproportionate hippocampal atrophy are common—the latter very suggestive of AD. Amyloid imaging using PET (positron emission tomography) is likely to be increasingly used, though availability is limited [17]. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis of beta amyloid levels can be valuable, particularly when the diagnosis is less certain [18].

     

  3. 3.


    Vascular dementia is a broad and controversial concept. Because of a lack of agreement about whether the cause extends from chronic subcortical ischaemic change to large cortical stroke, there are varying epidemiological figures provided in the literature. It is described consistently, however, as the second most common contributing pathology in dementia. A cortical stroke presenting with ‘stepwise’ cognitive decline is the classical description (multi-infarct dementia); however, it is apparent that subcortical vascular pathology accounts for more cases of dementia [19]. In the latter, symptoms accrue slowly with a gradual decline in processing speed, executive skills and sometimes personality change. Language is often preserved. The presentation can resemble a depressive episode, though this may be comorbid. Short-term memory concerns may be prominent but in the ‘purer’ vascular presentations, rapid forgetting is less likely to be present. Examination may show focal neurological signs, restricted affect and psychomotor slowing—so-called vascular Parkinsonism [20]. Brain MRI usually reveals extensive subcortical (or one or more cortical) vascular lesions; however, these are not always associated with dementia. Dementia appears associated specifically with multiple lacunes, strategic infarcts, substantial white matter lesions or a combination of these [21].

     

  4. 4.


    Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB). McKeith et al. [22] proposed a new clinical subtype after 10–15% of patients with dementia at autopsy were demonstrated to have diffuse Lewy body disease. This pathological entity may be best conceptualized along a continuum of synucleinopathies, including idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD) and multiple systems atrophy. On history, patients with DLB will present with cognitive and functional decline with temporally related development of Parkinsonism. The close onset of the two syndromes (technically within 12 months) differentiates DLB from Parkinson’s disease dementia where the cognitive changes occur much later after PD diagnosis. The classic triad is fluctuation in symptoms, Parkinsonism and recurrent visual hallucinations. Supportive features for the diagnosis include REM sleep disorders, antipsychotic sensitivity, falls and autonomic dysfunction.

     

  5. 5.


    Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a clinically and pathologically heterogeneous group of dementias characterized collectively by relatively selective, progressive atrophy involving the frontal or temporal lobes, or both [23]. A disproportionately high number of those who present with a younger onset dementia have FTD. As a result, patients may be well served attending a specialist neuropsychiatry or behavioural neurology clinic for diagnosis and management. Clinical presentation includes those where behavioural changes predominate (such as disinhibition, emotionality or apathy) or where language deficits are prominent (primary progressive aphasia). The picture can mimic other frontal pathology, subcortical vascular pathology, psychiatric disorder or atypical AD. Aetiologies include cellular inclusions (both tau protein abnormalities and TDP-43: transitive response DNA-binding protein43) and significant genetic contributions. This includes both autosomal dominant inheritance and specific gene mutations [24].

     

  6. 6.


    Other dementias. There are multiple rarer causes of dementia. In atypical or younger onset presentations, care should be taken making a diagnosis without neurological opinion. Examples include normal pressure hydrocephalus, Huntington’s disease, Prion disease, alcohol-related dementia, subdural haematoma, Wilson’s disease and limbic encephalitis.

     

  7. 7.


    Non-dementia diagnosis. Examples would include hypothyroidism, B12 deficiency or a psychiatric disorder. Anxiety disorders can cause excessive subjective memory concern, and depressive disorders may mimic executive impairment.

     

  8. 8.


    No diagnosis. This is not uncommon in a memory clinic setting and can occur particularly in relatives of people with dementia, who have become worried about their own memory. This concern may indeed worsen their perception of their cognitive abilities.

    Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

    Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Mar 29, 2020 | Posted by in GERIATRICS | Comments Off on Dementia: Making a Diagnosis and Managing Behavioural and Psychological Symptoms

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access