Delayed Gastric Emptying


Author

Lin

Seiler

Tran

Seiler

Year

1999

2000

2004

2005

Country

Taiwan

Switzerland

Netherlands
 
Switzerland
   
Operation (PD/PPPD)

15/16

49/37

83/87

66/64

Operation time (minutes)

PD

237

476

200

449

PPPD

215

404

300

382

Estimate blood loss (ml)

PD

687

2096

2000

1500

PPPD

451

1453

2000

1196

DGE

PD (%)

7

45

23

45

PPPD (%)

38

37

22

31

Pancreatic fistula

PD (%)

13

2

14

2

PPPD (%)

0

3

13

3

Mortality

PD (%)

0

5

7

3

PPPD (%)

7

2.7

3

2

Survival

PD

NA

16 ma

14 mb

ND

PPPD
 
24 ma

15 mb
 

NA not available, ND not different

aMedian survival

bMedian disease free survival



In all of the RCTs, it was possible that underpowered trials had overestimated the results due to small scale studies, and it was concluded that large absolute differences in other key outcomes are unlikely; excluding relatively small differences will, however, require larger, stronger methodologies [15].

Diener reported the Cochrane Database systematic review. A total of 465 participants demonstrated vast heterogeneity with regard to the quality of the methodology and outcome parameters. The incidence of DGE showed no significant difference between PD and PPPD. Hospital mortality, morbidity, and overall survival also showed no significant differences. However, the operating time (95% CI −105.70 to −30.83; P value 0.0004) and intraoperative blood loss (95% CI −0.96 to −0.56; P value <0.00001) were significantly reduced in the PPPD group rather than PD group. All significant results are associated with low quality of evidence, and as determined on the basis of this, no evidence suggests relevant differences in mortality, morbidity, or survival between the two operations [16].



31.2 Pylorus-Resecting Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PRPD)


The gastrectomy site might affect the rate of occurrence of DGE and survival of cancer patients; however, there is no data on the gastrectomy site. At what distance is the gastrectomy performed from the pylorus ring? How much stomach is remnant? All of the four RCTs demonstrated that the incidence of DGE in PPPD was similar to that in PD [1113]. If only extended gastrectomy patients were included in those studies, those RCTs might demonstrate other results. Kawai et al. reported the result of an RCT focused on the pylorus ring, PPPD versus pylorus-resecting PD (PRPD), with near total stomach preservation. They gave it the name of pylorus-resecting PD (PRPD) and proposed this as a new procedure [17]. It was determined that the incidence of DGE was 4.5% in PRPD and 17.2% in PPPD, with a significant difference. This RCT is an epoch to determine whether the pylorus ring affects the occurrence of DGE or not, and it revealed that the pylorus ring is the deciding factor in the occurrence of DGE.


31.3 Subtotal Stomach-Preserving Pancreaticoduodenectomy (SSPPD)


Japanese surgeons have previously performed SSPPD, which is PD combined with an intended antrectomy; however, SSPPD does not clearly define the gastrectomy site [18]. A meta-analysis demonstrated that the occurrence of DGE favors SSPPD compared to PPPD (odds ratio 2.75, 95% CI 1.75–4.30, P < 0.00001) [19]. However, PRPD was included in the SSPPD group in this meta-analysis. Distal gastrectomy in PD is associated with gastric emptying via gastroenteric hormones [20], and the RCT (PPPD vs. PRPD) has clarified the importance of the antrum [20]; therefore, the concept of PRPD is different from that of SSPPD.


31.4 Reconstruction Route of PPPD


Reconstruction route was previously thought to be important in the occurrence of DGE. Two reconstruction routes are usually considered for duodenojejunostomy, the antecolic route or the retrocolic route in PPPD. However, Tani et al. paid attention to the reconstruction, and an RCT was conducted to analyze whether or not an antecolic route reduces the incidence of DGE compared to a retrocolic route. DGE occurred in 5% of patients with the antecolic route for duodenojejunostomy versus 50% with the retrocolic route (P = 0.0014). Those with the antecolic route had a significantly shorter duration of postoperative nasogastric tube drainage than did those with the retrocolic route (4.2 days versus 18.9 days, respectively, P = 0.047). This result demonstrated the superiority of the antecolic route in prevention of DGE by interim analysis [21]. Therefore, this RCT investigated a small cohort of patients, although this RCT was statistically planned for 140 patients. Table 31.2 shows the summary of RCTs focused on only PPPD assigned into two groups: antecolic reconstruction and retrocolic reconstruction.


Table 31.2
Summary of four prospective RCTs to compare between antecolic reconstruction and retrocolic reconstruction in PPPD patients











































Author

Tani

Tamandl

Imamura

Eshuis

Year

2006

2014

2014

2014

Country

Japan

Austria

Japan

Netherlands

Operation (ante/retro)

54/57

20/20

36/28

60/60

DGE

Antecolic (%)

5*

17

12

58

Retrocolic (%)

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Jun 26, 2017 | Posted by in ONCOLOGY | Comments Off on Delayed Gastric Emptying

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access