Customized Targeted Therapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma




Although most patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) are cured with primary therapy, patients with primary refractory disease or relapse after initial treatment have poor outcomes and represent an unmet medical need. Recent advances in unraveling the biology of HL have yielded a plethora of novel targeted therapies. This review provides an overview of the data behind the hype generated by these advances and addresses the question of whether or not clinically these targeted therapies offer hope for patients with HL.


Key points








  • Patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) with primary refractory disease or relapse after transplant have poor outcomes and represent an unmet need.



  • Therapies derived from an understanding of HL biology can be broadly classified as targeting the Hodgkin Reed Sternberg cell-surface receptors, tumor microenvironment, cell-mediated immunity, and intracellular signaling pathways.



  • Brentuximab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate targeting CD30 now approved by the Food and Drug Administration, offers substantial hope for improving outcomes in the treatment of HL.



  • Other therapies in development need longer follow-up to realize their potential.





  • Objectives


  • 1.

    Review recent advances in HL biology


  • 2.

    Review development of novel targeted therapies in the context of HL biology


  • 3.

    Review results of clinical trials with targeted therapies





Introduction


Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) represents approximately 10% of all lymphomas diagnosed annually in the developing world. In 2013, approximately 9000 cases of HL were diagnosed in the United States. With a median age of 38 years, and at least 40% of patients younger than 35 years at the time of diagnosis, it is the most common lymphoma affecting young patients. Over the past 30 years, valuable lessons learned about the late effects of therapy, specifically cardiovascular and second cancer risk, have led to treatment modifications of radiation dose and field size as well as alkylator exposure, which have led to significant risk reduction of competing causes of death. As a result of these advances, more than 75% of patients are cured with contemporary frontline therapy.


For patients who relapse after attaining an initial complete remission (CR) or have primary refractory disease, the standard treatment approach is salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), with an approximately 50% cure rate. Several studies show that achieving a CR before ASCT is one of the most important factors in determining a long-term outcome after ASCT. Other pretransplant prognostic factors include duration of initial remission, extent of disease at relapse, and constitutional symptoms. In an international collaborative effort from 5 countries, data on 756 patients with relapsed HL with a minimum of 1-year follow-up after the transplant were pooled. The overall median postprogression survival (PPS) for patients relapsing after ASCT was 1.3 years. Seventy-one percent of relapses occurred within 1 year after ASCT and were roughly equally distributed in the following periods: less than 3 months (22%), more than 3 and less than 6 months (22%), and more than 6 and less than 12 months (27%). The median PPS for these periods were 0.55, 1.6, 1.68, and 2.26 years for the time to relapse after ASCT, respectively ( P <.0001). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) can induce durable remissions in some of these patients; however, its utility is limited by the challenges of finding an available stem cell donor, and achieving adequate disease control before transplantation. Therefore novel treatments to increase the CR rate pre SCT, or significantly prolong remission duration post SCT, have been sought.


The recent approval in 2011 of brentuximab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting CD30, has been the first major advance in the management of HL after several decades and offers considerable hope to patients with refractory disease or relapse after stem cell transplant. Better understanding of the biology of HL has led to the exploration of several other potential targets as therapeutic options. This review provides an overview of HL tumor biology in the context of the development of novel targeted therapies. The authors discuss 4 broad categories of targeted therapies either approved or under investigation: (1) therapies targeting Hodgkin Reed Sternberg (HRS) cell-surface receptors, (2) therapies targeting reactive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment, (3) adoptive immunotherapy, and (4) therapies targeting signaling and intracellular survival pathways ( Tables 1 and 2 ). Although some of the agents discussed later are highly active as single agents, many others demonstrate modest single-agent activity. Moving forward, the challenge will be how to develop rational combinations of these novel agents within the context of current paradigms of care to achieve enhanced efficacy with minimal toxicity.



Table 1

Current results in selected targeted therapies in HL
































































































































































Drug/Phase Main Target Clinical Trial Number Failed ASCT (%) Clinical Results Reference
Receptor Targeted Therapies
SGN-30 (I) CD 30+ HRS cells NCT00051597 83 a No significant response
SGN-30 (II) NCT00337194 68
MDX-060 (1/2) CD 30+ HRS cells NCT00284804 87 a No significant response
BV
BV/(I) CD 30+ HRS cells NCT00947856 73 a PIVOTAL Trial: ORR 75%, CR 34%, median
BV/(I) NCT01100502 68 a PFS 5.6 mo, median DOR 20.5 mo
BV/(II) NCT01060904 100
HCD122 (II) CD40+ HRS cells; Th2/Treg signaling NCT00670592 NR ORR 16% (all PR)
Galiximab (II) CD80+ HRS cells NCT00516217 83 ORR of 6.9%, TTP 1.6 mo
Microenvironment Targeting
Lenalidomide (II) Immunomodulation, antiangiogenesis NCT00540007 76 ORR 19% (N = 32)
Lenalidomide (II) NCT00478959 67 ORR 13% (N = 15)
AFM 13 (I) CD 16/30+ HRS cells NCT01221571 NR 7% PR/50% SD
Rituximab single agent (I pilot) CD20+ peritumoral B lymphocytes
CD20+ HRS cells
82 ORR 22%, median DOR 8.7 mo
Rituximab + gemcitabine (II) 55 ORR 48%, median FFS 2.7 mo
Rituximab + ABVD frontline (I) NCT00504504 0 EFS 83% and OS 96%
Rituximab + ABVD frontline (II) NCT00369681 0 EFS 83% and OS 98%
PLX3397 (II) CSF1R inhibitor NCT01217229 NR ORR 5%
Adoptive Immunotherapy
EBV+ specific cytotoxic T cells EBV+ HRS cells NCT00058617 a 40 83% of 28 patients with EBV+ HL had a clinical response, including 4 CRs sustained >9 mo
Downstream Signaling Pathway
Panobinostat (I) Histone modification NCT00742027 100 ORR 27% including 4% CR, median PFS was 6.1 mo
Vorinostat (I) Histone modification, STAT signaling (pSTAT6) NCT00132028 44 ORR 4%
Mocetinostat (I) Histone modification, STAT signaling NCT00358982 84 ORR 21%
Everolimus (I) PI3K signaling, mTOR, TNFR signaling NCT01022996 84 ORR 47% 8 PR, 1 CR median TTP 7.2 mo, 4 responders remained progression free at 12 mo
SB1518 JAK/STAT pathway NCT01263899 NR No significant clinical activity

Abbreviations: ABVD, Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine; BV, Brentuximab vedotin; DOR, duration of response; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; EFS, event-free survival; FFS, failure-free survival; JAK, Janus kinase; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; NA, not available; NR, not reported; ORR, overall response rate; PFS, progression-free survival; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; STAT, signal transducer and activator of transcription; Th2, T helper 2 cells; TNFR, tumor necrosis factor receptor; Treg, regulatory T cells; TTP, time to progression.

All trials are in relapsed/refractory patients unless otherwise indicated.

a Includes patients with HL and non-HL.



Table 2

Selected ongoing clinical trials of novel agents























































































































Drug Main Target Clinical Trial Number
Receptor Targeted Therapies
BV combinations
Frontline
Phase 3 frontline with AVD vs brentuximab/AVD CD 30+ HRS cells NCT01712490
ECAPP B vs ECADD B (frontline) NCT01569204
Relapsed/Refractory
ABVD→ BV (relapsed) NCT01578967
BV + bendamustine (relapsed) NCT01874054
BV + ipilimumab (relapsed) NCT01896999
BV vs ICE pre ASCT (relapsed) NCT01393717
BV→ ICE (relapsed) NCT01508312
BV + rituximab (relapsed) NCT01900496
Maintenance
BV maintenance after ASCT (ATHERA) (maintenance) NCT01620229
TNX-650 IL-13 NCT00441818
Microenvironment Targeting
Lenalidomide Combinations (relapsed)
AVD Immunomodulation, antiangiogenesis NCT01056679
Bendamustine NCT01412307
Romidepsin NCT01742793
Everolimus NCT01075321
Rituximab Combinations
Frontline
Rituximab ABVD vs ABVD phase 2 CD20+ peritumoral B lymphocytes; CD20+ HRS cells NCT00654732
Rituximab + BEACOPP (HD18) NCT00515554
Relapsed
Rituximab + Bendamustine NCT01900496
Ipilimumab (relapsed) Immunomodulation of tumor microenvironment NCT01896999
Nivolumab a (relapsed) PD-1 expressing peritumoral lymphocytes NCT01592370
CDX1127 (relapsed) Anti-CD27 antibody NCT01460134
Adoptive Immunotherapy
Autologous CAR.CD30 EBV specific-cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (relapsed) EBV+ CD30+ HRS cells; CD30+ HRS cells NCT01192464
Downstream Signaling Pathways
MLN4924 (relapsed) NFκB via inhibition of Ned8 NCT00722488
Everolimus (relapsed)
Everolimus and panobinostat PI3K signaling, mTOR, TNFR signaling NCT00918333
Everolimus and lenalidomide NCT01075321

Abbreviations: ABVD, Adriamycin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine; AVD, Adriamycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine; BEACOPP, bleomycin, etoposide, Adriamycin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone; BV, brentuximab vedotin; CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; DOR, duration of response; EBV, Epstein-Barr virus; ECADD B, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, doxorubicin, dacarbazine, and brentuximab; ECAPP B, brentuximab vedotin in combination with etoposide, cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, procarbazine, prednisone, and brentuximab; ICE, ifosfamide, carboplatinum, and etoposide; IL, interleukin; mTOR, mammalian target of rapamycin; NA, not available; NFκB, nuclear factor kappa B; NR, not reported; ORR, overall response rate; PD-1, programmed death-1; PFS, progression-free survival; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase; PR, partial response; TNFR, tumor necrosis factor receptor; TTP, time to progression.

a Includes patients with HL and non-HL.





Introduction


Classic Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) represents approximately 10% of all lymphomas diagnosed annually in the developing world. In 2013, approximately 9000 cases of HL were diagnosed in the United States. With a median age of 38 years, and at least 40% of patients younger than 35 years at the time of diagnosis, it is the most common lymphoma affecting young patients. Over the past 30 years, valuable lessons learned about the late effects of therapy, specifically cardiovascular and second cancer risk, have led to treatment modifications of radiation dose and field size as well as alkylator exposure, which have led to significant risk reduction of competing causes of death. As a result of these advances, more than 75% of patients are cured with contemporary frontline therapy.


For patients who relapse after attaining an initial complete remission (CR) or have primary refractory disease, the standard treatment approach is salvage chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), with an approximately 50% cure rate. Several studies show that achieving a CR before ASCT is one of the most important factors in determining a long-term outcome after ASCT. Other pretransplant prognostic factors include duration of initial remission, extent of disease at relapse, and constitutional symptoms. In an international collaborative effort from 5 countries, data on 756 patients with relapsed HL with a minimum of 1-year follow-up after the transplant were pooled. The overall median postprogression survival (PPS) for patients relapsing after ASCT was 1.3 years. Seventy-one percent of relapses occurred within 1 year after ASCT and were roughly equally distributed in the following periods: less than 3 months (22%), more than 3 and less than 6 months (22%), and more than 6 and less than 12 months (27%). The median PPS for these periods were 0.55, 1.6, 1.68, and 2.26 years for the time to relapse after ASCT, respectively ( P <.0001). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT) can induce durable remissions in some of these patients; however, its utility is limited by the challenges of finding an available stem cell donor, and achieving adequate disease control before transplantation. Therefore novel treatments to increase the CR rate pre SCT, or significantly prolong remission duration post SCT, have been sought.


The recent approval in 2011 of brentuximab vedotin, an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting CD30, has been the first major advance in the management of HL after several decades and offers considerable hope to patients with refractory disease or relapse after stem cell transplant. Better understanding of the biology of HL has led to the exploration of several other potential targets as therapeutic options. This review provides an overview of HL tumor biology in the context of the development of novel targeted therapies. The authors discuss 4 broad categories of targeted therapies either approved or under investigation: (1) therapies targeting Hodgkin Reed Sternberg (HRS) cell-surface receptors, (2) therapies targeting reactive immune cells in the tumor microenvironment, (3) adoptive immunotherapy, and (4) therapies targeting signaling and intracellular survival pathways ( Tables 1 and 2 ). Although some of the agents discussed later are highly active as single agents, many others demonstrate modest single-agent activity. Moving forward, the challenge will be how to develop rational combinations of these novel agents within the context of current paradigms of care to achieve enhanced efficacy with minimal toxicity.



Table 1

Current results in selected targeted therapies in HL
































































































































































Drug/Phase Main Target Clinical Trial Number Failed ASCT (%) Clinical Results Reference
Receptor Targeted Therapies
SGN-30 (I) CD 30+ HRS cells NCT00051597 83 a No significant response
SGN-30 (II) NCT00337194 68
MDX-060 (1/2) CD 30+ HRS cells NCT00284804 87 a No significant response
BV
BV/(I) CD 30+ HRS cells NCT00947856 73 a PIVOTAL Trial: ORR 75%, CR 34%, median
BV/(I) NCT01100502 68 a PFS 5.6 mo, median DOR 20.5 mo
BV/(II) NCT01060904 100
HCD122 (II) CD40+ HRS cells; Th2/Treg signaling NCT00670592 NR ORR 16% (all PR)
Galiximab (II) CD80+ HRS cells NCT00516217 83 ORR of 6.9%, TTP 1.6 mo
Microenvironment Targeting
Lenalidomide (II) Immunomodulation, antiangiogenesis NCT00540007 76 ORR 19% (N = 32)
Lenalidomide (II) NCT00478959 67 ORR 13% (N = 15)
AFM 13 (I) CD 16/30+ HRS cells NCT01221571 NR 7% PR/50% SD
Rituximab single agent (I pilot) CD20+ peritumoral B lymphocytes
CD20+ HRS cells
82 ORR 22%, median DOR 8.7 mo
Rituximab + gemcitabine (II) 55 ORR 48%, median FFS 2.7 mo
Rituximab + ABVD frontline (I) NCT00504504 0 EFS 83% and OS 96%
Rituximab + ABVD frontline (II) NCT00369681 0 EFS 83% and OS 98%
PLX3397 (II) CSF1R inhibitor NCT01217229 NR ORR 5%
Adoptive Immunotherapy
EBV+ specific cytotoxic T cells EBV+ HRS cells NCT00058617 a 40 83% of 28 patients with EBV+ HL had a clinical response, including 4 CRs sustained >9 mo
Downstream Signaling Pathway
Panobinostat (I) Histone modification NCT00742027 100 ORR 27% including 4% CR, median PFS was 6.1 mo
Vorinostat (I) Histone modification, STAT signaling (pSTAT6) NCT00132028 44 ORR 4%
Mocetinostat (I) Histone modification, STAT signaling NCT00358982 84 ORR 21%
Everolimus (I) PI3K signaling, mTOR, TNFR signaling NCT01022996 84 ORR 47% 8 PR, 1 CR median TTP 7.2 mo, 4 responders remained progression free at 12 mo
SB1518 JAK/STAT pathway NCT01263899 NR No significant clinical activity

Only gold members can continue reading. Log In or Register to continue

Stay updated, free articles. Join our Telegram channel

Sep 16, 2017 | Posted by in HEMATOLOGY | Comments Off on Customized Targeted Therapy in Hodgkin Lymphoma

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access