Case Examples in MIC Interpretation



Case Examples in MIC Interpretation


Paul Lewis

James W. Myers



Bacterial cultures are tested for minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and given an interpretation of susceptible (S), intermediate (I), or resistant (R) based on the breakpoints established in the previous chapter. Antibiotic reports are often a better source of determining which agents should not be used rather than predicting which agents will be successful.

For mild to moderate infections, the S, I, or R interpretation may be all that is needed in selecting an antimicrobial agent. In general, a serum level of >10 times the MIC usually means the organism is S. Around four times the MIC means the organism is intermediate and less than four often means the organism is resistant.

However, for serious infections, other more stringent criteria must be considered when selecting a drug and a dose. It is important to note that the lowest MIC is not always the drug of choice. The MICs cannot be directly compared without knowing the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drug. Table 53-1 provides many of the important parameters useful in evaluating MIC criteria. Table 53-2 provides recommendations to assist in selecting an antimicrobial regimen. There is often more than one correct choice, and clinical experience should always be considered. The following cases discuss the results susceptibility reports and the rationale in selecting an antimicrobial regimen.


Jun 22, 2016 | Posted by in INFECTIOUS DISEASE | Comments Off on Case Examples in MIC Interpretation

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access