AGO-OVAR [11]
GOG [37]
EORTC 55971
pCRS iCRS
[36]
CHORUS
pCRS iCRS [15]
Suboptimal > 1 cm
29.6 months
35.0 months
26 months 25
22.8–24.5
Gross optimal ≤ 1 cm
36.2 months
42.4 months
32 months 27
NGR
99 months
71.9 months
45 months 38
Age
58.9
57
62–63
65–66
PS
0 38 %
2 10.4 %
0 41 %
2 8.5 %
0 45 %
2–3 32 %
0 13 %
2–3 20 %
Stage
II 8.9 %
III 74 %
IV 17 %
III 100 %
IIIc 76.5–75.7 %
IV 22.9–24.3 %
III 75 %
IV 25 %
While there does appear to be a significant survival benefit in achieving no gross residual tumor and proceeding with platinum-based chemotherapy, this table is a good reminder of how cross study comparisons can be misleading. If one looks at the patient criteria, we see that both EORTC 55971 and CHORUS had patients whose median age was about a decade older than either the GOG or AGO-OVAR studies, had significantly more patients with performance status 2, and had significantly more patients with stage IV disease.
These studies have provided important guidance as to identifying patients who would be better served with NACT and iCRS versus pCRS, and this group undoubtedly includes some elderly patients; however, we are still faced with uncertainty regarding the best sequence of therapies for those patients felt medically fit enough to undergo pCRS and attempt to maximize survival. A proportion of elderly patients will fall into this category as well.
Outcomes Among Elderly Patients Who Undergo CRS: What Do We Know?
As discussed above, the goal of CRS, whether it be pCRS or iCRS is to achieve NGR. This outcome is achieved in a variable proportion of patients dependent on presenting disease burden and surgeon skill and comes at a significant cost in terms of morbidity and mortality. Many single institution studies have been published exploring this issue in the “elderly patient” with a variety of definitions of elderly and a variety of outcomes – pointing to the dearth of prospective data in the area (Table 4.2).
Table 4.2
Published case series of outcomes and survival with elderly ovary cancer
Author | Age | No of pts | PFS (mo) | OS | Postoperative mortality | Postoperative complications | Primary surgery | NACT selected |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Marchetti [23] | ≥65 years | 29 | NA | 19.2 months | 3 (10.3 %) | NA | 28 (96.6 %) | 1 (3.4 %) |
Susini [32] | ≥70 years | 51 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 51 (100 %) | Study exclusion |
Cloven [10] | ≥80 years | 18 | NA | 6 months | 2 (11.1 %) | – Cardiac: 7 (39 %) – Sepsis: 3 (16.7 %) – Pneumonia: 1 (5.6 %) | 16 (88.9 %) | 3 (16.7 %) |
Bruchim [6] | ≥70 years | 46 | NA | NA | 2 (4.3 %) | NA | 25 (54.3 %) | 13 (43.3 %) |
Wright [38] | ≥70 years | 46 | NA | NA | 0 | – ICU admission: 20 % – Infection: 8 % – Delirium: 5 % – Wound: 3 % – Ileus: 2 % – Arrhythmia: 2 % – VTE: 1 % | 46 (100 %) | Study exclusion |
Uyar [35] | ≥70 years | 131 | NA | 70–79 years: 52 months ≥80 years: 36 months p = .07 | NA | – Overall: 23 % | 105 (80 %) | 26 (20 %) |
Alphs [2] | ≥75 years | 78 | NA | 19 months | 7 (9 %) | – Wound infection: 13 (16.7 %) – Ileus: 5 (6.4 %) | 78 (100 %) | Study exclusion |
Moore [25] | ≥80 years | 85 | NA | 1°surgery: 2 years survival 51 % 1°chemo: 2 years survival 27 % | 9 (13 %) | – Cardiac: 17 % – Pulmonary: 26 % – GI: 22 % – Heme/infectious: 62 % – Mental status: 10 % – Surgical site: 23 % | 68 (80 %) | 17 (20 %) |
Moore [26] | ≥80 years | 39 | NA | NA | NA | NA | 39 (100 %) | Study exclusion |
McLean [24] | ≥80 years | 34 | NA | 24 | 0 | – Ileus: 29.4 % – Pneumonia: 6.1 % – Wound infection: 3.1 % – Sepsis: 3 % | 27 (79.4 %) | 7 (20.6 %) |
Chereau [8] | ≥70 years | 29 | 2 years: 35 % 5 years: 23 % | 5 years: 55 % | 1 (3.4 %) | – Overall: 3 (10 %) – Infection: 2 (7 %) – Febrile morbidity: 1 (3 %) – Pleural effusion: 1 (3 %) | 29 (100 %) | Study exclusion |
Langstraat [21] | ≥65 years | 280 | NA | NA | 12 (4.3 %) | Overall: 32 (11.4 %) | 280 (100 %) | Study exclusion |
Fanfani [12] | ≥65 years | 164 | 65–74 years: 12 months ≥75 years: 21 months | NA | 0 | Overall: 65–74 years: 11 (11.2 %) ≥75 years: 8 (25 %) | 75 (45.7 %) | 89 (54.3 %) |
Because of the retrospective nature of these works and the variety in endpoints studied, it is difficult to summarize outcomes for anything other than postoperative death which seems to increase markedly with age. If we classify elderly as > 65, prevalence of postoperative death is 0–10.3 % (with 0 % in the series with almost 50 % of patients undergoing iCRS) [12, 20, 23]. If we change the cutpoint for elderly to >70, the range is 0–9 % [2, 6, 8, 32, 35, 38]. Finally, if we set the cutpoint at age >80, postoperative death is reported in 0–13 % of series [10, 24, 25].
In order to make the more informed decisions regarding how to care of elderly patients with ovarian cancer and provide them with the most accurate counseling, we need good estimates of the following 4 outcomes: (1) postoperative death, (2) postoperative morbidity, (3) non-traditional discharge, and (4) deviations from or elimination of planned chemotherapy.
Postoperative Death
Among the possible complications following CRS, postoperative death is the most significant. Case series report prevalence of 0–13 % with significant variability in populations. Thrall et al. published a SEER-Medicare evaluation which sought to identify the prevalence of 30-day postoperative mortality among patients undergoing CRS and develop a predictive nomogram for this complication. This study contained only women >65 years and included those undergoing both pCRS and iCRS. They found an overall 30-day postoperative mortality rate of 8.22 %. However, when patients who were admitted and underwent surgery emergently were evaluated separately, the rate of 5.56 % among scheduled and 20.12 % among emergent cases. Age was highly associated with postoperative death in both these groups. When evaluated as a continuous variable among patients admitted for scheduled surgery, each year over age 65 was associated with a 7.5 % increase in the risk of 30-day mortality (95 % CI 1.06–1.10). Among patients admitted and operated on emergently, each year over age 65 was associated with a 2.8 % increase in the risk of 30-day mortality (95 % CI 1.01–1.05).
Among those patients admitted for elective surgery who had a history of NACT, the 30-day mortality was 70 % lower than those who underwent pCRS (1.82 vs. 6.13 %).
When evaluating patients admitted for elective surgery with no history of NACT, the risk of 30-day mortality could be divided into low (<5 %), intermediate (5–10 %), and high (>10 %) risk based on age, stage, and comorbidity score. The highest risk group included patients 75 years of age or older, with stage IV disease or stage III disease plus a comorbidity score of 1 or more. This group comprised 25.7 % of the patients and had a 30-day postoperative mortality of 12.7 % which accounted for 50 % of the deaths in the entire cohort [33].
This risk score has not been validated in prospective trial but is valuable information for evaluating patients and making treatment decisions based on the best information available.
Postoperative Morbidity
Postoperative complications are important to avoid, not only for the obvious reason of eliminating patient discomfort and risk but also because certain complications are associated in a reduction in overall survival. This is not to say that patients die of their complications, which would be postoperative death, but the complication compromises the ability of the patient to survive their cancer. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data found that the most important determinant of decreased survival following surgery for patients with solid tumors with occurrence of a major complication [16]. These data exist in ovary cancer as well where the occurrence of 2 or more complications increased the risk of death from cancer (HR 1.31 95 % CI 1.15–1.49) [40]. Wright et al., evaluating the Nationwide Inpatient Sample registry of patients admitted for ovarian cancer surgery, found that perioperative complications increased with age. This study could not separate patients who underwent pCRS and those who underwent iCRS and so they are presented together. Among the 28,651 patients included, those patients < 50 years of age had a 17.1 % complication rate as compared to 29.7 % in patients aged 70–79 and 31.5 % in patients > 80. These trends held regardless of categorization as a medical, surgical, or infectious complication. Not surprisingly, rates of complications also increased by age and by the number of radical procedures performed at the time of surgery. Patients over 70 who required 2 or more radical procedures (bowel resections, diaphragm resections, etc) at the time of surgery had complications in 33 % of cases. One radical procedure in the age range resulted in 25 % with major complications. Given the commonality of radical procedures during pCRS to achieve NGR, these are useful estimates in counseling patients and determining the best sequence of therapy [39] (Table 4.3).
Table 4.3
Postoperative complications by age and radical procedures [39]