Care of the Elderly Ovarian Cancer Patient: The Surgical Challenge

 

AGO-OVAR [11]

GOG [37]

EORTC 55971

pCRS iCRS

[36]

CHORUS

pCRS iCRS [15]

Suboptimal > 1 cm

29.6 months

35.0 months

26 months 25

22.8–24.5

Gross optimal ≤ 1 cm

36.2 months

42.4 months

32 months 27
 
NGR

99 months

71.9 months

45 months 38
 
Age

58.9

57

62–63

65–66

PS

0 38 %

2 10.4 %

0 41 %

2 8.5 %

0 45 %

2–3 32 %

0 13 %

2–3 20 %

Stage

II 8.9 %

III 74 %

IV 17 %

III 100 %

IIIc 76.5–75.7 %

IV 22.9–24.3 %

III 75 %

IV 25 %



While there does appear to be a significant survival benefit in achieving no gross residual tumor and proceeding with platinum-based chemotherapy, this table is a good reminder of how cross study comparisons can be misleading. If one looks at the patient criteria, we see that both EORTC 55971 and CHORUS had patients whose median age was about a decade older than either the GOG or AGO-OVAR studies, had significantly more patients with performance status 2, and had significantly more patients with stage IV disease.

These studies have provided important guidance as to identifying patients who would be better served with NACT and iCRS versus pCRS, and this group undoubtedly includes some elderly patients; however, we are still faced with uncertainty regarding the best sequence of therapies for those patients felt medically fit enough to undergo pCRS and attempt to maximize survival. A proportion of elderly patients will fall into this category as well.



Outcomes Among Elderly Patients Who Undergo CRS: What Do We Know?


As discussed above, the goal of CRS, whether it be pCRS or iCRS is to achieve NGR. This outcome is achieved in a variable proportion of patients dependent on presenting disease burden and surgeon skill and comes at a significant cost in terms of morbidity and mortality. Many single institution studies have been published exploring this issue in the “elderly patient” with a variety of definitions of elderly and a variety of outcomes – pointing to the dearth of prospective data in the area (Table 4.2).


Table 4.2
Published case series of outcomes and survival with elderly ovary cancer


























































































































































Author

Age

No of pts

PFS (mo)

OS

Postoperative mortality

Postoperative complications

Primary surgery

NACT selected

Marchetti [23]

≥65 years

29

NA

19.2 months

3 (10.3 %)

NA

28 (96.6 %)

1 (3.4 %)

Susini [32]

≥70 years

51

NA

NA

NA

NA

51 (100 %)

Study exclusion

Cloven [10]

≥80 years

18

NA

6 months

2 (11.1 %)

– Cardiac: 7 (39 %)

– Sepsis: 3 (16.7 %)

– Pneumonia: 1 (5.6 %)

16 (88.9 %)

3 (16.7 %)

Bruchim [6]

≥70 years

46

NA

NA

2 (4.3 %)

NA

25 (54.3 %)

13 (43.3 %)

Wright [38]

≥70 years

46

NA

NA

0

– ICU admission: 20 %

– Infection: 8 %

– Delirium: 5 %

– Wound: 3 %

– Ileus: 2 %

– Arrhythmia: 2 %

– VTE: 1 %

46 (100 %)

Study exclusion

Uyar [35]

≥70 years

131

NA

70–79 years: 52 months

≥80 years: 36 months

p = .07

NA

– Overall: 23 %

105 (80 %)

26 (20 %)

Alphs [2]

≥75 years

78

NA

19 months

7 (9 %)

– Wound infection: 13 (16.7 %)

– Ileus: 5 (6.4 %)

78 (100 %)

Study exclusion

Moore [25]

≥80 years

85

NA

1°surgery: 2 years survival 51 %

1°chemo: 2 years survival 27 %

9 (13 %)

– Cardiac: 17 %

– Pulmonary: 26 %

– GI: 22 %

– Heme/infectious: 62 %

– Mental status: 10 %

– Surgical site: 23 %

68 (80 %)

17 (20 %)

Moore [26]

≥80 years

39

NA

NA

NA

NA

39 (100 %)

Study exclusion

McLean [24]

≥80 years

34

NA

24

0

– Ileus: 29.4 %

– Pneumonia: 6.1 %

– Wound infection: 3.1 %

– Sepsis: 3 %

27 (79.4 %)

7 (20.6 %)

Chereau [8]

≥70 years

29

2 years: 35 %

5 years: 23 %

5 years: 55 %

1 (3.4 %)

– Overall: 3 (10 %)

– Infection: 2 (7 %)

– Febrile morbidity: 1 (3 %)

– Pleural effusion: 1 (3 %)

29 (100 %)

Study exclusion

Langstraat [21]

≥65 years

280

NA

NA

12 (4.3 %)

Overall: 32 (11.4 %)

280 (100 %)

Study exclusion

Fanfani [12]

≥65 years

164

65–74 years: 12 months

≥75 years: 21 months

NA

0

Overall:

65–74 years: 11 (11.2 %)

≥75 years: 8 (25 %)

75 (45.7 %)

89 (54.3 %)


No number, PFS progression free survival, OS overall survival, NACT neoadjuvant chemotherapy, NA not applicable, recorded, or extractable from the publication for this specific subset of patients, 1 primary

Because of the retrospective nature of these works and the variety in endpoints studied, it is difficult to summarize outcomes for anything other than postoperative death which seems to increase markedly with age. If we classify elderly as > 65, prevalence of postoperative death is 0–10.3 % (with 0 % in the series with almost 50 % of patients undergoing iCRS) [12, 20, 23]. If we change the cutpoint for elderly to >70, the range is 0–9 % [2, 6, 8, 32, 35, 38]. Finally, if we set the cutpoint at age >80, postoperative death is reported in 0–13 % of series [10, 24, 25].

In order to make the more informed decisions regarding how to care of elderly patients with ovarian cancer and provide them with the most accurate counseling, we need good estimates of the following 4 outcomes: (1) postoperative death, (2) postoperative morbidity, (3) non-traditional discharge, and (4) deviations from or elimination of planned chemotherapy.



Postoperative Death


Among the possible complications following CRS, postoperative death is the most significant. Case series report prevalence of 0–13 % with significant variability in populations. Thrall et al. published a SEER-Medicare evaluation which sought to identify the prevalence of 30-day postoperative mortality among patients undergoing CRS and develop a predictive nomogram for this complication. This study contained only women >65 years and included those undergoing both pCRS and iCRS. They found an overall 30-day postoperative mortality rate of 8.22 %. However, when patients who were admitted and underwent surgery emergently were evaluated separately, the rate of 5.56 % among scheduled and 20.12 % among emergent cases. Age was highly associated with postoperative death in both these groups. When evaluated as a continuous variable among patients admitted for scheduled surgery, each year over age 65 was associated with a 7.5 % increase in the risk of 30-day mortality (95 % CI 1.06–1.10). Among patients admitted and operated on emergently, each year over age 65 was associated with a 2.8 % increase in the risk of 30-day mortality (95 % CI 1.01–1.05).

Among those patients admitted for elective surgery who had a history of NACT, the 30-day mortality was 70 % lower than those who underwent pCRS (1.82 vs. 6.13 %).

When evaluating patients admitted for elective surgery with no history of NACT, the risk of 30-day mortality could be divided into low (<5 %), intermediate (5–10 %), and high (>10 %) risk based on age, stage, and comorbidity score. The highest risk group included patients 75 years of age or older, with stage IV disease or stage III disease plus a comorbidity score of 1 or more. This group comprised 25.7 % of the patients and had a 30-day postoperative mortality of 12.7 % which accounted for 50 % of the deaths in the entire cohort [33].

This risk score has not been validated in prospective trial but is valuable information for evaluating patients and making treatment decisions based on the best information available.


Postoperative Morbidity


Postoperative complications are important to avoid, not only for the obvious reason of eliminating patient discomfort and risk but also because certain complications are associated in a reduction in overall survival. This is not to say that patients die of their complications, which would be postoperative death, but the complication compromises the ability of the patient to survive their cancer. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data found that the most important determinant of decreased survival following surgery for patients with solid tumors with occurrence of a major complication [16]. These data exist in ovary cancer as well where the occurrence of 2 or more complications increased the risk of death from cancer (HR 1.31 95 % CI 1.15–1.49) [40]. Wright et al., evaluating the Nationwide Inpatient Sample registry of patients admitted for ovarian cancer surgery, found that perioperative complications increased with age. This study could not separate patients who underwent pCRS and those who underwent iCRS and so they are presented together. Among the 28,651 patients included, those patients < 50 years of age had a 17.1 % complication rate as compared to 29.7 % in patients aged 70–79 and 31.5 % in patients > 80. These trends held regardless of categorization as a medical, surgical, or infectious complication. Not surprisingly, rates of complications also increased by age and by the number of radical procedures performed at the time of surgery. Patients over 70 who required 2 or more radical procedures (bowel resections, diaphragm resections, etc) at the time of surgery had complications in 33 % of cases. One radical procedure in the age range resulted in 25 % with major complications. Given the commonality of radical procedures during pCRS to achieve NGR, these are useful estimates in counseling patients and determining the best sequence of therapy [39] (Table 4.3).
Feb 12, 2017 | Posted by in ONCOLOGY | Comments Off on Care of the Elderly Ovarian Cancer Patient: The Surgical Challenge

Full access? Get Clinical Tree

Get Clinical Tree app for offline access